Iran Talks Held In Geneva On Nuclear Program

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Iran Talks Held In Geneva On Nuclear Program stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GEORGE JAHN | 10/ 1/09 07:09 PM | AP

GENTHOD, Switzerland — Iran and six world powers put nuclear talks back on track Thursday at a landmark session that included the highest-level bilateral contact with the U.S. in years and a pledge to meet again this month. President Barack Obama then challenged Tehran to make good on its promises quickly.

Iran also agreed to allow U.N. inspectors into its covertly built enrichment plant during the talks, held at a villa outside Geneva. The discussions appeared to defuse tensions that had been building for weeks.

Speaking in Washington, Obama called the talks "a constructive beginning" and said Iran must match its words with action.

Tehran "must grant unfettered access" to international inspectors within two weeks, he said, warning that if Iran fails to follow through, "then the United States will not continue to negotiate indefinitely and we are prepared to move towards increased pressure."

"Our patience is not unlimited," Obama said. "Going forward, we expect to see swift action."

The tone of Thursday's meeting was considerably more positive than just a week ago, when the U.S. and its allies were threatening Iran with tough new sanctions if it refused to freeze its nuclear activities, which they suspect are aimed at creating an atomic weapon.

Perhaps the most significant development of the day was a 45-minute one-on-one meeting between U.S. Under Secretary of State William Burns and Iran's senior nuclear negotiator, Saaed Jalili. It was the first direct U.S. negotiations with Iran since Washington severed relations in 1980.

The encounter appeared to add to the positive atmosphere that led to agreement by all the parties – Iran, the U.S., Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany – for a follow-up meeting this month.

Story continues below
advertisement

It also appeared to be concrete proof of Obama's commitment to engage Iran directly on nuclear and other issues – a sharp break from policy under the Bush administration.

However, statements made by the two sides reflected the continuing divide between them.

U.S. Deputy State Department spokesman Robert Wood said Burns used the meeting with Jalili "to reiterate the international community's concerns about Iran's nuclear program."

"He addressed the need for Iran to take concrete and practical steps that ... will build international confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of its program," he said.

Wood said both sides also "had a frank exchange on other issues, including human rights." Officials in Washington said Burns urged Tehran to resolve the cases of three Americans detained in Iran since July.

Javier Solana, the European Union's foreign policy chief, told reporters Iran agreed to "cooperate fully" with the International Atomic Energy Agency and to open its newly disclosed nuclear facility to inspectors, probably within "a couple of weeks."

In a statement, the IAEA said agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei had been invited to Iran to discuss nuclear issues. A senior U.S. official said elBaradei would travel to Tehran this weekend. He spoke on condition of anonymity because his information was confidential.

ElBaradei recently said Tehran was "on the wrong side of the law" over its new enrichment plant near the Shiite holy city of Qom. He said Iran should have revealed its plans as soon as it decided to build the facility.

Western officials said Iran also agreed to send some of its enriched uranium to Russia to further process the material for use in a research reactor in Tehran. It was a long-sought compromise because Iran has repeatedly refused to involve an outside country, insisting it has the right to a full domestic enrichment program.

Obama said such a step would help build international confidence.

"We support Iran's right to peaceful nuclear power," Obama said. "Taking the step of transferring its low-enriched uranium to a third country would be a step toward building confidence that Iran's program is in fact peaceful."

Still, questions remained over the way forward.

The six powers remain committed to seeking a full freeze of Tehran's nuclear activities, but Iran could argue that the agreement amounted to an acknowledgment of its right to enrich uranium.

Curbing Iran's ability to enrich uranium is a key international goal, because the process can produce both fuel for nuclear reactors and weapons-grade uranium for warheads.

The differences reflected the likelihood of huge bumps ahead in any future talks.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, speaking in Washington, sounded a pragmatic note. "Today's meeting opened the door, but let's see what happens," she said.

Iran's refusal to freeze its enrichment activities has already prompted three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions.

Iran came to the talks with a proposal that ignored the key demand that it freeze enrichment. Instead it offered to hold "comprehensive, all-encompassing and constructive" discussions on a range of security issues, including global nuclear disarmament.

Reiterating calls by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian offer linked any talks with a discussion of Middle East tensions "to help the people of Palestine achieve all-embracing peace."

It called for "reform" of the U.N. Security Council – shorthand for curbing the authority of the U.S. and the four other permanent council members. The only link to the arms issue was a call for discussion of disarmament by the world's nuclear powers.

Jalili told reporters that while those issues were key, Thursday's discussions were "good talks" compared to the last seven-nation meeting 15 months ago that broke up in failure.

At the United Nations, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki suggested the talks could be expanded to the "summit" level. He said Iran was willing to discuss a variety of security, economic and political issues, although he did not specifically refer to nuclear issues.

__

Associated Press writers Alexander G. Higgins, Bradley S. Klapper and Scheherezade Faramarzi in Geneva, John Heilprin at the United Nations, and Robert Burns in Washington contributed to this report.

GENTHOD, Switzerland — Iran and six world powers put nuclear talks back on track Thursday at a landmark session that included the highest-level bilateral contact with the U.S. in years and a ple...
GENTHOD, Switzerland — Iran and six world powers put nuclear talks back on track Thursday at a landmark session that included the highest-level bilateral contact with the U.S. in years and a ple...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
115
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

Upon reading through the comments I was astounded that someone (starts with a 'P') needs a serious primer on Modern Iranian history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 AM on 10/02/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

The most ironic aspect of this is that as soon as Iran acquires a nuclear weapon, the chances that Israel launches a first strike increase ten fold. Israel is not going to wait until Iran launches their missiles to retaliate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 10/01/2009
- Wozzeck I'm a Fan of Wozzeck 23 fans permalink
photo

Evidently you don't understand MAD, or you would not be making such statements.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 10/01/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

The Israelis do and they are not going to wait. They have 200, Iran only needs one. It has to be done before Iran gets its one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 10/01/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

Mentioning missiles, it would take more years for Iran to have one capable of delivering a nuclear warhead accurately. So, why not wait until then?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 AM on 10/02/2009
- Wozzeck I'm a Fan of Wozzeck 23 fans permalink
photo

Juan Cole's "Top Things you Think You Know about Iran that are not True "

1. "Belief: Iran is aggressive and has threatened to attack Israel, its neighbors or the US

Reality: Iran has not launched an aggressive war modern history (unlike the US or Israel), and its leaders have a doctrine of "no first strike." This is true of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, as well as of Revolutionary Guards commanders."

Read the other nine at:
http://www.juancole.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 10/01/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

The other FACT is: Iran was involved in one of the bloodiest wars in the later 0th century.

And every Iranian was directly affected by that war or has friends and relatives affected in that war.

Unlike, say the USA, the Iraq/Iran war was conducted on Iranian soil.

Iran's leaders, corrupt as they may be, know first hand the consequences of war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 10/01/2009
- Wozzeck I'm a Fan of Wozzeck 23 fans permalink
photo

"Iran's leaders, corrupt as they may be, know first hand the consequences of war"...

unlike the neocon chickenhawks who got the USA to attack Iraq and who now are cheer leading an attack on Iran. The most insidious ones are not even citizens of this country. They look on the USA as a source funds and cannon fodder to wage wars of aggression on their behalf.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 10/01/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

There is some debate over who precipitated that war (but little to who needlessly extended it for many more years at the cost of thousands and thousands of lives). I think it was a little bit of both Saddam and Khomeini.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 AM on 10/02/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

Great stuff. Today's Juan Cole was good too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 AM on 10/02/2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4QPsKYG1aM&feature=fvw
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christine-pelosi/if-we-th-people-cant-agre_b_304877.html

Is this a clarion muddle I’m not sure about this meaning/ Just the opposite/it may be claricle calm in the president’s Process?
where it is. I’m almost practically sure everyone is aware of this & that . I can re-read it agiain & attach on this (to be – thankfull) http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/chile09/images/mountain-in-glow-of-sunrise-Beagle-Channel.jpg



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzyV1hm0c18&NR=1



When you build roads and lay drill pads and pipelines on it’s kind of delicate uderfirm side seals the need in protectioN. What kind of stone structure are you building – just to be inquisitive?
toProtect the public's lands. building desired forces finally sounds cooling; keep up the good work!


The Red Rock Wilderness Act: Our Chance to Be Present at the Creation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=it1NaXrIN9I

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 10/01/2009
- postman66 I'm a Fan of postman66 360 fans permalink
photo

Could you start your own blog?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 10/01/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

Put down the pipe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 AM on 10/02/2009
- Hirnlego I'm a Fan of Hirnlego 115 fans permalink
photo

Apart from the verfiabale lies told to the world on Iraq's supposed WMD's were still being lied to.

Here's an example:
Bolton wanted Iran to kick out Arms Inspectors, he tells AIPAC (audio track as well as text)

"...they have not done anything more dramatic, such as withdrawing from the nonproliferation treaty, or throwing out inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which I actually hoped they would do – that that kind of reaction would produce a counter-reaction that actually would be more beneficial to us."

A clear example on how "diplomacy" is supposed to FAIL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 10/01/2009
- sc300nc I'm a Fan of sc300nc 56 fans permalink

Iran said, yes, lets have more talks, we need at least 6 months worth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 10/01/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

Like Winston Churchill once said: "To jaw, jaw, jaw is always better than war, war, war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 10/01/2009
- PlanoBlue I'm a Fan of PlanoBlue 62 fans permalink
photo

Hmm, the Iranian representatives look like reasonable people, maybe they are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 10/01/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

I have long wondered if many of the problems between Iran and the West could be solved by simply showing Iran respect.

After all, they are one of the oldest cultures on earth. And we really don't have that many points of conflict. Certainly nothing that could not be negotiated.

Countries, like people can suffer inferiority complexes. (see: Adolph Hitler and Germany). Maybe if we treated Iran with respect our hostility will vanish.

As for Ahmedinijad and the government; That is a problem the Iranian people have to take care of. All the West can do is mess things up.

The trick is to offer respect to the country and people of Iran. But not to their government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 10/01/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

There is no reason to respect a "nation" that sponsors terrorism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 10/01/2009
- Hirnlego I'm a Fan of Hirnlego 115 fans permalink
photo

Which would include USA. .. a group called MEK..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 10/01/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

Oh ye of diminished reading skills, read that last line again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 AM on 10/02/2009

There is only one problem in this world if that is solved then there will be no problem left. That problem is the desire of Israel to be the lone super power of Mid-East. If these problem of Israel's desire is nipped in the bud then there will be no problem in not only Mid_East but thoughout the world.

Israel weeps I front of the world community and begs sympathy for Holocaust and faints crying anti-Semitic with active support of all world Nations, but it was with utter surprise and a stunning shock the world witnessed the true ugly face of the demon when it went on a rampage massacring innocent civilian men, women infant on mother's lap, and children.

The world is left with no more sympathy for a demon which continuously feasts on lively human blood and flesh and committing unabated crime against humanity that tantamount to genocide. An Ex-Hon' Judge of south Africa of Jewish origin heading an international inquiry found glaring example of Israel government the descendants of holocaust victims willfully and systematically carried out a brutal massacre that resembled HOLOCAUST is just inconceivable.

With this background when nuclear armaments and establishments is in the hand of a dangerous nation like Israel, all eminent political analysts raised the question as to why nuclear issue is being discussed with Iran and not Israel.

It is more important that Israel too should be asked to disarm itself of all nuclear armament simultaneously .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 10/01/2009
- fbr79 I'm a Fan of fbr79 12 fans permalink
photo

They are getting what they want: attention.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 10/01/2009
- postman66 I'm a Fan of postman66 360 fans permalink
photo

We haven't talked to them in 30 years. We're getting what we want, inspections.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 10/01/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

And how does it hurt us in the least to give it too them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 10/01/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

This government held US Embassy personnel hostage for over a year. They deserve nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 10/01/2009
- Ken Maddox I'm a Fan of Ken Maddox 88 fans permalink
photo

It has been generally recognized through out the world that no nation can deny another the right to pursue nuclear power for peaceful purposes. The world has however stated that any nation that pursues nuclear energy must abide by certain guidelines, restrictions, and inspections. The world stands united against proliferation of nuclear weapons and the delivery systems needed to support their use. So long as Iran does not attempt to produce a nuclear weapon, allows inspections, and adheres to international standards and limits, it will be allowed to continue its pursuit.
When Iran sets off missiles, reveals the existence of secret facilities, and makes threats to use nuclear weapons against its neighbors then the world has the right and the duty to insure they can not produce these weapons.
Iran's participation in joint talks, if done seriously, are a positive step in the control of nuclear weapons in the region.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 10/01/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

This is the Japanese negotiating with the US right before Pearl Harbor.

And if they seriously wanted nuclear power, they can buy the reactor from GE, Arreva, Toshiba...
And it would be cheaper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 10/01/2009
- Ken Maddox I'm a Fan of Ken Maddox 88 fans permalink
photo

What you say is true, but I implied that the wrath of world should be upon Iran if they are not serious. Iran must conform to the wishes of the world (for nuclear energy whether for peaceful purposes or evil) is a threat to our globe. If they will not comply, then their ability to produce nuclear energy technology for any reason must be denied. There is no debate on that point.
The main point here is first try to get compliance, second introduce serious sanctions, and then as a last resort take military action. The time table between each step should be well understood and short enough to create a sense of urgency to comply.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 10/01/2009
- postman66 I'm a Fan of postman66 360 fans permalink
photo

Japan had already attacked China. Who and when has Iran attacked anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 10/01/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

You are misunderstanding what Iran is doing.

The nuclear program is a point of national pride. Amongst all demographics. Buying the reactors from GE would just underline their reliance on the West. Or Moscow. Or China.

They want to prove that they are a nation to be reckoned with. That their scientists are as good as any.

Same thing with India and Pakistan and the Nukes.

Except Iran is pursuing peaceful nuclear development.

We hope.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 10/01/2009
- LMPE I'm a Fan of LMPE 72 fans permalink

See how much easier it is when we behave like adults?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 10/01/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

Isn't that the truth!

No more Frat Boy nonsense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 10/01/2009
- sposton I'm a Fan of sposton 200 fans permalink
photo

An alternative view by Paul Craig Roberts:

http://vdare.com/roberts/090925_another_war.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 10/01/2009
- Ken Maddox I'm a Fan of Ken Maddox 88 fans permalink
photo

The article is basically untrue, and the small tidbits of truth are distorted.
Mr. Obama was speaking to the Iranians in clear terms, and in response to the revelations (made public by Iran) that they had a secret facility ready to come on line that would be capable of producing weapons grade Uranium.
The presidents response and statements where in no way similar to Pres. Bush's lies and distortions about Iraq. To say that language addressing known truths is the same as propaganda supporting a known lie is not comparing Apples to Apples.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 10/01/2009
- hardrain77 I'm a Fan of hardrain77 18 fans permalink
photo

Thanks.

Paul Craig Roberts' writing would do everyone some good if they took the time to read them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 10/01/2009
- Hirnlego I'm a Fan of Hirnlego 115 fans permalink
photo

Well, in one article it seemed that he couldn't praise Reagan enough..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 10/01/2009
- postman66 I'm a Fan of postman66 360 fans permalink
photo

Who is that, some guy blogging in his mom's basement?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 10/01/2009
- Hirnlego I'm a Fan of Hirnlego 115 fans permalink
photo

United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under Reagan 1981 – 1982

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 10/01/2009

Nothing is going to curtail IRAN'S pursuit of nuclear weapons. Nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 10/01/2009
- hardrain77 I'm a Fan of hardrain77 18 fans permalink
photo

Um, except for the fact that the professionals at the IAEA confirm there is no advanced weapons programs. But you go ahead and panic about that 'smoking gun being a mushroom cloud' thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 10/01/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

I gotta bridge in Brooklyn I wanna sell you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 10/01/2009
- Mollabaji I'm a Fan of Mollabaji 17 fans permalink

AIPAC and Israeli agents are holding an emergency overnight meeting to plot sabotage plans of the talks between 6 and Iran. Wait and we will be hearing about it soon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 10/01/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect