Uninsured And Sick, Student Begged For His Life

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Uninsured And Sick, Student Begged For His Life stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10- 2-09 04:13 PM   |   Updated: 10- 2-09 04:26 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Effinger
Freddie Effinger

Freddie Effinger started feeling what he called a "bizarre pain" in his upper thigh during the summer of 2007, just before his third year at the University of Alabama law school. After a scan, his doctors told him it was probably some sort of mass, nothing serious, and that they would remove it surgically in September.

Effinger, then 23, didn't have insurance. His parents' policy dropped him after college, and he had figured he could coast through three years of law school and land a job with benefits before suffering any catastrophic illness or injury. ("Superman Complex," he calls it.) The operation to remove the mass would only cost him about $1,200.

But when they operated, Effinger's doctors discovered something more serious.

"The tumor was the same size as my hand," Effinger told the Huffington Post. "And directly underneath that tumor was another tumor, and further down my leg was another tumor."

The following month, an oncologist told Effinger he had advanced stage lymphoma. The oncologist told him that his chemotherapy could cost tens of thousands of dollars per session, and that he would need 12 sessions. Effinger panicked.

"My mom's a schoolteacher and my dad's a juvenile detention officer," Effinger said. "They're good people, but that's not going to happen."

Effinger scrambled for insurance. He said he was told that the school's health plan for students wouldn't have adequately covered chemotherapy treatment at the nearby University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital. He had no luck on the private insurance market outside the university.

"After making a couple calls explaining the situation, it was pretty much discussions of blackout periods and 'We wouldn't be able to do it,'" he said. "And it was frustrating and frightening."

Story continues below
advertisement

Meanwhile, his leg hurt more and more. He was afraid the cancer would spread.

Staff at the hospital, St. Vincent's East in Birmingham, Ala., came up with a solution. "I spoke to someone at the hospital and they mentioned there's a certain number of patients a year they grant charity to," he said. He was eligible because he had zero income. He was indigent.

"They called me that later that day and told me they would grant me 100 percent charity. I broke down in tears. Somebody told me they were going to let me live. It was an amazing feeling."

Effinger finished up chemo and got married in July 2008. He even managed to finish law school on time and score a job with an employment law firm in Birmingham.

But Effinger is still on the hook for about $9,000 for other parts of his treatment. (That's on top of $100,000 in student loan debt, but, he said, "at least the student loan people are being cool" by comparison; debt collectors harassed him over the medical bills.) His credit is wrecked.

And the warm, fuzzy feeling Effinger got from the kindness at the hospital was tempered by the realization that he had to beg to survive, that he owed his life to charity and had added considerably to his debt all the same. He's become an advocate for health insurance reform, going door to door for Organizing for America.

"I'm a pretty humble guy, but it's really demoralizing to have to beg a hospital for your life, to be to be able to be treated for this thing you just found out that you had," he said. "I don't just have a right to be healthy? I have to beg for it? I have to show that I am poor? It's frustrating. It's embarrassing. It's really unacceptable."

Freddie Effinger started feeling what he called a "bizarre pain" in his upper thigh during the summer of 2007, just before his third year at the University of Alabama law school. After a scan, his doc...
Freddie Effinger started feeling what he called a "bizarre pain" in his upper thigh during the summer of 2007, just before his third year at the University of Alabama law school. After a scan, his doc...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
3229
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (32 pages total)

Hold on -- 100K in student loans, and we're worrying about the 9K in medical bills?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 10/23/2009
photo

JESUS HEALED FORE FREE /// WHY CAN'T WE

JESUS HEALED FOR FREE ///WHY CAN'T WE

EVERYBODY!! : - )

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 AM on 10/10/2009

Complain about the insurance companies all you like, but they are just a sidenote and a distraction from the problem. Contemplate this: why do we need medical insurance at all? We don't need insurance to pay for any other things in life - cars, houses, etc. First we buy them, then we insure against losing them. The only reason we need medical insurance before we afford health care at all, is the incredibly insanely high price of health care. That's the real problem. Nothing we do about the insurance companies, including making them compete against a public option, is going to make this situation better until there are some kind of price controls on health care.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 AM on 10/08/2009
photo

Your right! The price of health care is high, ridiculously high. After treatment I get one, two or three huge bills. I propose that hospitals give the patient an ITEMIZED statement. I want to know how much they are charging me for every aspirin, icepack, meal, cable channel, EVERYTHING. Like a grocery receipt !

OK, OK. True the problem is the cost of health care and not Health Insurance companies as a whole but something else I have noticed is how few people-if any- don't see the following link between employment and health care. I have yet to apply for a job in which I said, "Oh no thank you. I don't need benefits." It's one of the main reasons, other than a wage of course, why people strive for better jobs. Work comes with an opportunity of health insurance for me and my family like many others. Now why should that be? Oh wait a minute, if I have a job the company wants to make sure I'm healthy, right?! Then why don't they pay for it instead of having the premium automatically deducted from my pay check?! not including deductibles and what not. When the fire dept. goes to someones aid and saves their life they don't send them a bill!!! Health should be an actual BENEFIT, not a wish or a hope or begged for.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 10/10/2009
- ufopp I'm a Fan of ufopp 3 fans permalink

To all those who claim there's no constitutional right to healthcare: did you ever try the pursuit of happiness when suffering from piles?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 10/07/2009
- ufopp I'm a Fan of ufopp 3 fans permalink

After reading all the terrible insurance denial cases here and elsewhere, I am wondering how we as a society have come to this stage where one profession has lost its bearings and holds the entire country to fear and ransom like this?

What was that old line about judging a society by how it treats its prisoners. Perhaps we need to update that to how a society treats its sick.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 10/07/2009

I predict there will be no reform or change and Obammi will discourage his followers, hence losing 2012. Dems will also lose a lot of seats in the house in 2010.

good articles; http://iamned2.blogspot.com

Obama= fail

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 10/06/2009
- ufopp I'm a Fan of ufopp 3 fans permalink

I predict you are an epic fail.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 10/07/2009
- JazzyJim I'm a Fan of JazzyJim 73 fans permalink
photo

Your insurance backed comments are well noted. But you are wrong - the party of "do nothing, hate and fear mongering, Frank Luntz media campaign to disenfranchise the voting citizens of the US is over". The republicans will lose more seats and be set back to where they belong - the days of the last world war. Get on board to help America or get off. The RNC is the problem and your "propaganda" has begun to loose it's teeth. Your hate and fear tactics aren't being bought except by you.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 10/09/2009

I live in Delaware. A few years ago, Well Point tried to turn our Blue Cross insurance into "for profit." It was then that I learned that Well Point had been doing this around the country with serious issues over public funds involved. Our opposition won this time. Blue Cross-Blue Shield for Delaware, Maryland, DC and northern Virginia continues to be non-profit. Back in Baltimore, non-profit hospitals were bought out as profit-making ventures. I understand that the California-based corporation that George H.W. Bush was associated with after he left the presidency that makes weaponry has gone into the nursing home business. The top 1% of our population now owns more than the bottom 95%.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 AM on 10/06/2009

It's easy to say something along the lines of "well, he took his chances and lost" when he decided he could make it through law school without a health insurance policy. It's way too easy. Particularly since why he didn't have health insurance isnt' the question.

The question is, why should a citizen's health be on a "list" identified as "optional"? Is our health really just kind of like that overcoat you've been lusting after all these years? The obvious answer, of course, is "no". Society defines its own mores. If there's something called a "government" it's function is to provide those services every single citizen relies on AND ASSUMES IS IN PLACE 24/7. Why? Because since everyone needs whatever it is, it's considered an essentially governmental function.

Which is why you rarely hear citizens fussing about tax-support for such things as firemen. When you call because your house is on fire, you don't want to be asked a whole string of questions determining whether you're entitled to protection. If you live in their jurisdiction, the firemen will come to your house and they will try to put out your fire. The need for fire protection is universal. Your community depends on being protected from your fire. So the fire department will just ask "where?".

The need for health care is universal. Access must be universal.

If you're still a Refusican, you're being played for a chump by pros.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 10/05/2009

I fully agree that access should be universal and we should have a single payer system, but I think "why he didn't have insurance?" is still a legitimate question that should not be overlooked. Because our society has been either grossly apathetic to health care cost and access or our concerns have been grossly misrepresented in the actual law making (most likely a healthy dose of both) we are still stuck under a "pay or risk your life" system of insurance. Just because I fight for universal health care does not mean I can opt of buying insurance in the mean time. Sometimes you have to play by the current rules while you are trying to get them changed, particularly when the game is life and death.
The question is also not about him, but rather about all individuals in society. Why do we ignore health care issues by not supporting and demanding reform and universal access AND not purchase insurance until we are on death's door and bankrupt?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 10/05/2009
- junebug08 I'm a Fan of junebug08 3 fans permalink

This notion that all people should play by the rules and pay for healthcare now, tell me - how do the poor, the minimum wage, the unemployed, and full time students afford this insurance? Afford it now? The cost is completely unreasonable, and out of reach for these groups - through no fault of their own mind you. For those whose fault it may be, it's a very small number in comparison.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 10/05/2009
photo

"Why didn't he have health insurance?" is a great question. In fact it was so relevant for years that hospital admitting lobbies echoed far and wide with this important query as the patient was ushered out. Gradually, 12-15 years ago, people started asking, "hey!...why don't THEY have health insurance?­.......tho­se people who got laid off over there, yeah, those guys". Later, during the Clinton administration, the question rang out: "dang, why are SO MANY PEOPLE not insured?" And now, just this afternoon, I heard a small business owner in line at a clinic, asking quietly "why are we the only advanced country on the planet with millions of uninsured?" Yes, a good question, indeed!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 AM on 10/06/2009

Mr. Effinger and many people I see in the hospital on a regular basis unfortunately are stuck in a system of health care they don't understand. The concept of health insurance is that people not currently sick are paying premiums, that covers those who are sick thus spreading risk and payment over time and population. When the tables are turned, other people will be paying your medical bills. In our current system you can't refuse to pay into the system when you are well and scramble to get your huge medical bills covered when you are sick, just like you can't refuse to pay social security until the month before you retire and then expect full benefits.
This story illustrates at least one key change needed in our system while we fight for single payer.

We need to dramatically upgrade our primary care system. Family doctors, general clinics, and other ways to prevent and screen for early illness are desperately needed. If the general population had access to screening and regular checkups more diseases would be discovered early and that would lower suffering, improve life span, and lower cost. It's much easier, safer, and cheaper to remove precancerous cells surgically than to wait until radiation and $120k rounds of chemo are needed.
While I think single payer is the best way to offer health care to everyone, I wish that while we are fighting for single payer, we take the much less controversial steps to increase primary care access.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 10/05/2009
- Raster I'm a Fan of Raster 22 fans permalink

We USED to have some semblance of a basic Public Health structure until sometime in the 1950s or early 60s. But that's GWTW.Remember the statistic: 47,000 people die EACH YEAR due to lack of health care coverage, because they weren't as fortunate as Mr. Effinger. Some of their plights are appearing on this site; but mostly they die in silence. Does the US qualify as a "First World" country?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 10/05/2009

When it comes to health care the US certainly spends like a first world country, we just get much less for our money than any other first world country because we spend all our money on insurance overhead, advertising, and claims denials.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 10/05/2009
photo

I agree with the earlier post that said that the larger problem is a largely ignorant electorate,
that falls for the jingoism, the faux Christianity covering what is really cutthroat profiteering
(ie, ask for charity if you get sick), and fails to elect representatives who really make a difference.
Why, for instance, isn't Dennis Kucinich playing a bigger role in the health care debates? Why
is Baucus given so much power? Eventually the US will have single-payer, because it is the
ONLY system that will make economic and moral sense. The only question is, how many decades
more will people have to live in terror of going bankrupt if they need health care, how many decades
more will we let people die so that Big Insurance and Big Pharma can keep their insane
profits going? You all know that we're going to have to do single-payer eventually.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 10/05/2009
- Hank10303 I'm a Fan of Hank10303 46 fans permalink

I WANT TO KNOW WHY DOES THE HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY HAVE TO BE "FOR PROFIT". Why can't all health insurance companies be forced by law to be not- for-profit entities. These are our lives people. We are letting business majors determine if we live or die depending on how much we can pay their companies in co-pays and deductibles. THIS HAS TO STOP!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 10/05/2009
photo

One word - Lobbyists

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 AM on 10/10/2009

So relieved it was a happy ending (not perfect - he still has enormous debt). I must say, relatively speaking, I have EXCELLENT health insurance, with a very low co-pay. My husband has a great job. We are financially stable. And, we are all very healthy. BUT, even with a comparatively stable situation, it is a nightmare dealing with my insurance (CIGNA) for anything other than routine. My daughter has complex medical issues since birth. You really have to stay on top of the insurance company to get anything reimbursed. It's a full time job. Shouldn't be this way.

So, for all those opposed to the public option who think insurance is an 'issue' only for immigrants, or unemployed, or uneducated, etc., etc., etc.,...think again! It's a bitch even for those who are financially stable.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 10/05/2009

"I'm a pretty humble guy, but it's really demoralizing to have to beg a hospital for your life, to be to be able to be treated for this thing you just found out that you had," he said. "I don't just have a right to be healthy? I have to beg for it? I have to show that I am poor? It's frustrating. It's embarrassing. It's really unacceptable."



Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/uninsured-and-sick-studen_n_306639.html

Unfortunately, yes, that is exactly what one is to do according to Eric Cantor....show that you are poor and then beg for a charity to step in......

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 10/05/2009
- Anthro I'm a Fan of Anthro 29 fans permalink
photo

Has Cantor ever read any Dickens? Does he want us to put our ten-year-old children to work (where, I wonder would THOSE jobs come from) or should they just "beg" as well?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 10/05/2009
- Levonsky I'm a Fan of Levonsky 14 fans permalink
photo

The raw, ugly truth of capitalism is that everything becomes a commodity to be priced and sold.
Even people's lives.
If that's what you want then that is what you have.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 10/05/2009
- emncaity I'm a Fan of emncaity 34 fans permalink

Truth, Ruth.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 10/05/2009
- Hank10303 I'm a Fan of Hank10303 46 fans permalink

Not only that everything, including our lives, becomes a commodity but we are forced to seek professions and careers that pay well and offer us the means in which to survive in the world of capitalism. Just like this young man, many of us choose jobs that will see to our needs as based on this capitalist society.

The one question I have is WHO DETERMINED THAT THIS IS WHAT WAS BEST FOR OUR COUNTRY - I PRETTY SURE THE PEOPLE DIDN'T.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 10/05/2009
photo

"The raw, ugly truth of capitalism is that everything becomes a commodity to be priced and sold."

This is a popular and reasonable view. I personally feel too much emphasis is placed on capitalism as a fixed, clearly defined law, like gravity. It's often the jumping off point for arguments against "Socialized Medicine"......But capitalism is also a reflection of the culture it serves (though without checks and balances, I think the people serve capitalism). China practices a successful form of capitalism; they're not exactly a democracy.

Health Insurance isn't your average free market product. It only makes money when the carrier DOESN'T pay for service. That may not make it wrong, but some say that's the point at which government has a regulatory role to protect it's citizens.

A well researched work on healthcare around the world by T.R. Reid reveals that Germany's healthcare system is in fact, more capitalistic (or at least less "socialist") than ours. In other words, it might serve us well to find more open and accurate ways of interpreting capitalism. In a Socialist program, the state OWNS the doctors and hospital. Not just managing or guiding them like MediCare and Social Security (programs that serve us well on many levels).....We may have accepted updated definitions of capitalism that are more consumerism or include the CEO worship born of the "Reagan-Era" corporate culture.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 10/05/2009

It's sad that so many in this country judge the quality of their healthcare by whether their copay on their annual physical is $20 or $15. Anyone who hasn't actually had to deal with an insurance company for anything other than routine charges should just stay out of this conversation.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 10/05/2009
- Hank10303 I'm a Fan of Hank10303 46 fans permalink

I WANT TO KNOW WHY DOES THE HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY HAVE TO BE "FOR PROFIT". Why can't all health insurance companies be forced by law to be not- for-profit entities. These are our lives people. We are letting business majors determine if we live or die depending on how much we can pay their companies in co-pays and deductibles. THIS HAS TO STOP!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 10/05/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (32 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect