Detroit: Banks Responsible For Maintenance Of Foreclosed Homes

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Detroit: Banks Responsible For Maintenance Of Foreclosed Homes stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |  Julian Hattem
First Posted: 10- 6-09 05:03 PM   |   Updated: 10- 6-09 06:10 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Americas Emptiest Neighborhoods

As part of the Huffington Post's efforts to bear witness to the effects of the current economic environment on ordinary Americans, we're rounding up some of the most compelling stories reported by local news organizations around the country.

Banks and real estate agents in suburban Detroit, under pressure from citizens tired of seeing their towns turn into graveyards for abandoned homes, will soon be punished if vacant houses they own are not maintained, reports Candice Williams of the Detroit News.

At least five towns in the area, in an effort to get rid of foreclosed homes overgrown with weeds and cracking at the edges, have adopted initiatives aimed at reducing blight and preventing property values from slipping. The new measures mandate that vacant houses must be registered with the city -- at a cost ranging from $25 a month to $150 a year -- and the banks or management companies that own the houses will be ticketed if necessary repairs are not done or houses are not tended to. Opponents of the measures, however, claim that the ordinances are nothing more than a new tax and additional government interference in private commercial enterprise.

"To actually charge people to file a piece of paper, it seems like a gouge to me," said Allen Morris, owner of property management company North Bloomfield Properties. "It just seems like it's piling on fees."


Paul Mychalowych, a real estate agent for Max Brock Birmingham, said he views the ordinances as more paperwork for agents who sometimes serve as property managers for the banks.

"It's a double-edged sword and I don't like it," he said. "My first knee-jerk reaction was: 'bigger government.' The costs are not that high, but it just creates an extra hassle factor for the Realtor."

Residents, already struggling to stay ahead of a 15-percent unemployment rate, a struggling auto industry, and citywide budget failures that keep bodies stacked up in morgues, are troubled by the increasing ugliness in their neighborhoods, and hope that the new plans will prevent their communities from turning into the decrepit ghost towns they are often made out to be.

Foreclosed homes rarely sell, especially in Detroit, where residents are moving out at a rate of about 40 a day -- 15,000 a year. In their wake, abandoned and foreclosed houses and land are left to decay, bringing the beauty of the town down with them. These properties, if not owned by a bank, are often scooped up by profiteering investors at public auction, hoping to hold onto the properties until they become profitable.

Metro Detroit's rates of vacancy and foreclosure far eclipse other towns. Of the 139 square miles in the city proper, 40 are vacant land, reports the Free Press. That's roughly the size of Boston.

Story continues below


******


John Worthington was an engineering technician before getting laid off in March. Since then, he has applied for numerous jobs to no avail and decided to take advantage of his excess time by exploring his passion for photography, reports Thomas Becnel of Sarasota's Herald Tribune. Worthington enrolled in graduate school at the University of South Florida and started taking pictures, editing his photos with computer imaging software. This accidental entrepreneur, who is also a high school dropout, just earned his bachelor's last year, and has mixed emotions about the opportunity to explore his passions

In the last six months, he has applied for more than 100 jobs. He has accumulated more than $10,000 in student loans. He has questioned himself countless times.


"Even now, it's hard to talk to people," says Worthington, a Florida native. "When people call on the phone, forget it. Gayle gets the phone."

His wife is grateful for the twin distractions of graduate school and photography.

"It keeps his mind sharp," says Gayle Worthington. "If he's feeling down, he can go out and do these pictures. He's too busy to think about what's going on with the job and the house.
"He has power over this. He doesn't have power over the economy and things like that."

Worthington's photos are on display at johnworthingtonphotography.com and are altered with dynamic imaging software into a look that Worthington's wife describes as Urban Impressionism. John and Gayle's son, who graduated from high school last year, is also unable to find a job.

HuffPost readers: Seen a good local story? Heard about a heroic judge, neighbor, or doctor helping people stay in their homes? Tell us about it! Email jmhattem@gmail.com.

As part of the Huffington Post's efforts to bear witness to the effects of the current economic environment on ordinary Americans, we're rounding up some of the most compelling stories reported by loc...
As part of the Huffington Post's efforts to bear witness to the effects of the current economic environment on ordinary Americans, we're rounding up some of the most compelling stories reported by loc...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
47
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- MurCal I'm a Fan of MurCal 9 fans permalink

Wow, banks complaining about being gouged. It just gets curiouser and curiouser...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 10/09/2009
- moutonnoir I'm a Fan of moutonnoir 46 fans permalink
photo

To make creating his images easier, he could ask Adobe to create a filter called 'every filter'.. His portfolio is like a 'photoshop donts' world.

rule 1.. dont emboss...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 AM on 10/09/2009
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 83 fans permalink

The ONLY way to succeed is THIS way !!

A suburb of San Diego is doing this as well, and it is very successful !!

It's no hardship on the bank and it keeps the neighborhood, cities and region from growing blighted.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 AM on 10/09/2009
- NeoconGal I'm a Fan of NeoconGal 10 fans permalink
photo

I'm sure the banks will find a way to slither out of this. How can they be expected to dole out million dollar bonuses while paying for the maintenance on houses they stole?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 PM on 10/08/2009

Everyday, on the new, in the paper, we hear of people who try to re-finance OR buy a home in foreclosure or in a short sale (soon to be foreclosed)..... and story after story, you hear the same thing - BANKS don't respond, don't answer questions! AND we find out that even with all of the TARP money, most banks STILL have not done much of anything with their toxic assets...... the took the government money and then DID NOT rid their balance sheets of under-performing loans..... The banks are just holding on the foreclosed houses WAITING for the housing market to turn around.... the only problem is that in some areas of the country, the housing market WON'T turn around until the toxic loans and the homes that are attached to these toxic loans are dealt with - SO BRAVO - making the banks take "CARE" of their foreclosed homes...... maybe NOW, the banks will realize that it IS better to sell these homes at some deflated price RATHER THAN holding on and hurting everyone else...

Simple fix - if you (individual home owner or BANK) owe a piece of property - you take care of it or to pay a fine..... Simple and will work...... fine enough banks enough money and those foreclosed homes will FLY off their balance sheets....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 10/08/2009
- atexasdem I'm a Fan of atexasdem 17 fans permalink

It seems quite simple to me. If a property is not maintained to certain standards, after notification the city makes the repairs and charges the property owner. If the property owner doesn't pay that bill within a specified period of time the city auctions the home.That's standard procedure almost anywhere. I don't know of anyplace that allows abandoned homes to sit and rot, become drug havens and fire hazards. Just because a bank owns a property it's no different than if an individual owns a property. If a city wants to become very creative they might consider some way of encouraging financing for repairing that home. That's a different discussion however.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 AM on 10/08/2009
- Agent420 I'm a Fan of Agent420 50 fans permalink
photo

When I was on the Durham City Planning Commission, that was exactly how we handled home owners that did not clean up their properties.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 10/08/2009
- pros54 I'm a Fan of pros54 6 fans permalink

The banks should also be made to pay real estate taxes on their property like every other home owner,

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 10/07/2009
- MurCal I'm a Fan of MurCal 9 fans permalink

yes, definitely. They own it. They pay the taxes on it. If they don't want to own it any more, then they sell it to someone for a price they can afford and payments they can make.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 10/09/2009

Seems to me that the real intent here is to get the banks to stop foreclosing and allow people to stay in their homes a while longer. From what I've heard, the Wayne Co. Sherriff has stated he will no longer put folks out of their homes unless banks can prove they're in possession of the bank note and have gone through all possible steps to avoid foreclosing. Banks will think twice before foreclosing if they (God forbid) have to spend some of their own precious filthy ill-gotten lucre!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 10/07/2009
- LHoney I'm a Fan of LHoney 44 fans permalink
photo

I think they should go further. Don't just charge a fee. The city should hire inspectors to check on the properties and if the work is not done within a certain period of time, then hire workmen, landscapers, plumbers, whatever and charge the new owners (banks). In our little town, if you have abandoned cars or other trash in your yard, the town charges you and can even come and tow it away at your expense. Would help with employment as well as maintaining the neighborhoods = win/win!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 10/07/2009
- cef911f1 I'm a Fan of cef911f1 19 fans permalink
photo

Might also encourage the banks to actually work with the homeowners to avoid foreclosure.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 10/08/2009

Everything but the little people have become too big to fail.

Everyday we pay the consequences of Reaganomics and neoconservative economics

good articles; http://iamned1.blogspot.com

80's: Arthur Laffer, MIlton Freidman, Greenspan, Alexander M. Haig, Jr, Donald T. Regan, James A. Baker 3rd,
Later: Robert Rubin, Bernanke, Paulson

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 10/07/2009
- Protea32 I'm a Fan of Protea32 2 fans permalink

I thought this was the rule, rather than the exception. In my state, a bank that owns a property must maintain the property, or be fined. Or, in most cities, if the bank doesn't take care of it, the city will, and then bill the bank, usually costing the bank more than if they just patched the roof themselves. Not to mention my city's plan to keep property values up by mandating cosmetic upgrades and improvements.
So now the banks have a new game, waiting for the owner to leave, and then backing out of the foreclosure, or refusing to file the post-sheriff's sale paperwork, having the foreclosure vacated, or finding 'errors' in their own paperwork, thereby invalidating their own foreclosure. Banks took a page from distressed homeowners, and are claiming to be unable to 'find the note'. Normally, the homeowner has moved, sometimes cross country, and finds out a year later that they're on the hook for a bunch of money, because they legally still own the house.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 AM on 10/07/2009

"Or, in most cities, if the bank doesn't take care of it, the city will,..."

If a city takes a piece of property, they can work with neighborhood groups.Tax abatement which in some cases is less than the cost of a demolition.Make sure Banks actually loan to people for rehab loans etc. Houses can be brought up to code, owner occupied or rent it back to the previous owner for less than their original inflated mort. Communities become more stable, people are less apt to become displaced, and financially stretched Cities won't have to pay the high cost of a wrecking ball.
SWAP's first home sold for a $1. (see below comment) We need to think creatively if we are to save our communities.

Do states mandate properties be insured, if a bank owns it.If that's the case ,laws ought to be written so as to not tempt banks to torch their own foreclosed properties.Banks could conceivably torch their properties and get a cash settlement and the neighborhood still loses...or they could let the property fall victim to what occurs to unoccupied dwellings, by not being up to min. housing codes. I think there are enough creative individuals that could come up with programs that would benefit the neighborhood rather than the bank. We've got nothing to loose and everything to gain. It's time we began to tip the scale in our favor, not the Banking Industry

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 10/07/2009

PS Another option to save our communities is to tap into Federal Green Projects. Form co-ops or use existing comm. groups/non profits that are able to get abandoned homes and rehab them using Green Stimulus monies. Of course one needs to pressure banks to actually work with community groups. Either they resell the refurb'd home or at least rent it back to the previous owner. Neighborhoods become more stable,provide larger tax base, and families will not be displaced as they are now. In these time, we have less social and financial stability in our cities and suburbs. We need to stop hoping the banks that forced us to this point , pull us out of it. And begin to force the banks to work with communities. And by utilizing existing newly created or newly formed progs. After all, this is not just about Wall Street, but Our Street.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 10/07/2009

"To actually charge people to file a piece of paper, it seems like a gouge...."

Banks have devised all sorts of charges to their customers and make millions from processing , maintenance, application fees to late charges and over draft charges. However, when a State requires Banks to pay fees for homes they own, the Banks and management co's. think it's unfair? Banks should be held accountable in terms of housing codes, just as home owners are. There ought not be any difference. Ownership is ownership Period. It should not matter if property is owned by an owner occupant, or a conglomerate, They're both responsible for the property and should be required by law for the upkeep of the property.Housing Laws do not only apply to citizens, but corporations as well. Banks have become the largest segment of slumlords in the country, yet they demand that they're not responsible for those properties?Banking Institutions created this mess and tax payers bailed them out, and Banks still expect to be given a free ride? Such is The Audacity of Greed.....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 AM on 10/07/2009

I think we need to rethink this growing housing problem in a creative way and based on the needs of the communities not the Banking industry.

In the 70's, my Mother conceived of a housing program ( SWAP) which began in Prov. R.I.. It addressed the increased abandoned homes in the area, that were in turn, slated for demolition. Our communities were literally being demolished which created unsafe living environments, and vacant lots. This was all due in part to landlords that owned multiple units and thought it more lucrative to torch their insured homes rather than repair code violations.

S.W.A.P. , Stop Wasting Abandoned Property was incorporated in 1976 as a result. It was so successful, and the program is still running strong today. It ought to be used as a model across the country with some added creative adjustments to address the current housing issues . It is an extremely innovative program that was born out of a grass roots effort to protect , strengthen and stabilize,communities.

http://www.swapinc.org/History.htm
http://www.swapinc.org/Welcome.htm

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 AM on 10/07/2009
- Zonie I'm a Fan of Zonie 21 fans permalink
photo

It is also a public health issue in some places....I wish someone would force the banks here to maintain the pools in the backyards of foreclosed homes here....the mosquitoes have been the worst I've ever witnessed here...and yes, it is October...but for Phoenix the bug problem is still raging....I have several bites and they are driving me crazy.....alot of green pools around....I can see them from my rooftop.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 AM on 10/07/2009
- Peter007 I'm a Fan of Peter007 37 fans permalink
photo

I'm the guy that has to force banks to take care of property. Right now I'm in Denver and I have 3,673 homes to inspect. Send me the address of the empty house with the pool and I'll ask the bank to clean it up.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 10/07/2009
- afgail I'm a Fan of afgail 66 fans permalink

Sacramento has the right answer. The banks that do not maintain the houses they foreclosed on must be forced to maintain them or lose them to the local government to do with them as any intelligent agent of the public would do. Put them to use as homes to be occupied by anyone who can afford to maintain them and pay the property taxes.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 AM on 10/07/2009
- Peter007 I'm a Fan of Peter007 37 fans permalink
photo

Every empty house has an owner that is looking for someone with a good job and a large down payment that wants to move into a home that needs repairs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 10/07/2009
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 38 fans permalink
photo

If bank is taking back the property, YES... bank owns it... they are responsible to maintain...

They are shifting it to agents... some good, some - maybe a few.. just don't care...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 10/07/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect