Obama Puts Government On Greenhouse-Gas Diet

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Puts Government On Greenhouse-Gas Diet stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DINA CAPPIELLO | 10/ 5/09 05:41 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is putting the federal government on a greenhouse-gas diet.

In an executive order signed Monday, Obama directed all agencies to set the first-ever targets for reducing climate-altering pollution from government buildings, fleets and federal workers' commutes.

The agencies will have 90 days to tell the White House how much they plan to measure and reduce greenhouse gases from buildings and vehicles by 2020. Targets for employees' commutes and travel will be due June 2010.

"As the largest consumer of energy in the U.S. economy, the federal government can and should lead by example when it comes to creating innovative ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions," Obama said in a statement.

The order also compels agencies to curb petroleum use, conserve water and curtail waste – extending and expanding on an executive order issued by President George W. Bush in January 2007 that became law earlier this year.

Bush's order, unlike Obama's, did not require agencies to set emissions targets.

The government mandate comes as the Obama administration takes steps to require automakers and large industrial facilities to cut greenhouse gas emissions. It is also a way for the White House to show much-needed progress toward reducing greenhouse gases before more than 180 nations meet in Copenhagen, Denmark, in December to hammer out a new international treaty to slow global warming.

The president wants Congress to pass a bill setting mandatory limits, but its passage is unlikely in the Senate before negotiations begin. The Senate bill would require refineries, factories and power plants to reduce greenhouse gases by 20 percent by 2020 and roughly 80 percent by mid-century.

Story continues below

It was unclear how deep the targets would be for the federal government, or how much of a dent it would make in total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.

The government operates nearly 500,000 buildings, more than 600,000 cars and purchases more than $500 billion per year in goods and services.

The White House said Monday that the actions taken would benefit the taxpayer by reducing energy costs.

Dave Hamilton, director of global warming and energy programs for the Sierra Club, called the actions a blueprint for how the private sector can begin reducing greenhouse gases.

"This is about how organizations do business and how to incorporate lower emissions in the way they do business," Hamilton said.

Reviews by the White House budget office show that most federal agencies are well on target to reduce energy use to meet the goals set by Bush for 2015. It is proving more difficult for agencies to reduce their oil use, officials said.

Bush wanted all agencies to reduce petroleum consumption by 2 percent annually, until 2015. Obama's executive order extends that goal to 2020.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is putting the federal government on a greenhouse-gas diet. In an executive order signed Monday, Obama directed all agencies to set the first-ever targets fo...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is putting the federal government on a greenhouse-gas diet. In an executive order signed Monday, Obama directed all agencies to set the first-ever targets fo...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
52
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- RomeoMD25 I'm a Fan of RomeoMD25 54 fans permalink

OK the last 100 years IS NOTHING except inmaterial... try the last million or so years and you'll FIND THE SAME WARMING COOLING trends. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE SUN, except for algore and his buddies it's all about money...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 10/11/2009
- sc300nc I'm a Fan of sc300nc 61 fans permalink

Now if only Obama would put Congress on a spending diet.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 10/07/2009
- ellenst I'm a Fan of ellenst 25 fans permalink

How can he when Congress has some senior two-year-olds saying "No" all the time. They all need a good spanking.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 10/07/2009
- super I'm a Fan of super 13 fans permalink
photo

Bush wanted all agencies to reduce petroleum consumption? Why?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 10/06/2009
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 90 fans permalink

Perhaps the same reason Obama does?
.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 10/08/2009

RWN's should be happy. This is a shrink the government move.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 10/06/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 179 fans permalink
photo

We could be running a lot of the military equipment on Industrial HEMP and cut costs and emissions tremendously..!

Or run it on Obama's hot air I am getting totally sick of...

http://hemp4fuel.com

What a hypocrite..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 10/06/2009
- Heather1 I'm a Fan of Heather1 4 fans permalink
photo

gee, not as simple as turning of a light switch. 9 months compared to a lot of years of waste. Give the guy a break.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 10/06/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 179 fans permalink
photo

Please the ban on growing Industrial Hemp for fuel is regressive draconian and ignorant..!

This is one fuel source that growing it is as simple as turning on a light and as lifting the ban on it and puff you've got Green Jobs, and a new clean cheap energy source...is that too much for him to comprehend...?

Why is Obama against American energy independence and cheap fuel and green jobs at that..?

He's so backwards a stiff without any real vision or imagination...he's old school passing for new school...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 10/06/2009

We spend a lot of time here talking about why coal fired plants are bad...

And yet we use the same to produce electricity to light the skies over America.?

Did a Cloud, Bird or Jet aircraft pilot ever tell you they like the skies lit up?

CLOUDS DON'T TALK AND BIRDS DIE BECAUSE OF THIS LIGHT AND PILOTS..WELL THEY
NEITHER NEED IT OR LIKE IT.

DON'T LIKE CARBON DIOXIDE FROM COAL BURNING?

THEN DON'T LIGHT THE NIGHT SKY UP...

AND PULL YOUR SHADES DOWN AND DON'T LIGHT YOUR ROOM WHEN YOU ARE SLEEPING BECAUSE IF IT'S NOT DARK..

YOUR BODY WON'T PRODUCE ENOUGH MELATONIN THAT FIGHTS CANCER.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 10/06/2009
- jer9848 I'm a Fan of jer9848 14 fans permalink
photo

To make the Wingnuts happy.I think the prez should fly by hot air balloon. :P

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 10/06/2009
- BlueZoo I'm a Fan of BlueZoo 44 fans permalink

LOl! I'm sure Beck & Co. will suggest that next! Hells bells! If the President harnessed all that hot air in Congress these days, he could fly around the world several times!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 10/06/2009
- jer9848 I'm a Fan of jer9848 14 fans permalink
photo

AMEN!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 PM on 10/06/2009
- polidoc I'm a Fan of polidoc 26 fans permalink
photo

Yesterday's NPR California Report californiareport.org/archive/R910050850/aa) looks at how Japan's energy regulatory practices have spurred greater competition and innovation amongst its companies. At first, manufacuturers resisted the aggressive standards, including a 1% increase in efficiency annually. However, now manufacturers embrace the regulations, seizing it as an opportunity to compete.

Viva Innovation and Viva a Government willing to enforce environmental regulations.

To this administration, this is a good start and keep it coming.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 10/06/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Has the federal government even adopted CFLs yet?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 PM on 10/06/2009
- notAMoron I'm a Fan of notAMoron 5 fans permalink

Most commercial buildings have regular fluorescent tubes rather than incandescents already.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 10/06/2009
- royevatom I'm a Fan of royevatom 12 fans permalink

As leaders of the world we can show what needs to be done and how . First you pass all kinds of anti pollution laws, elevate wages and benefits and then allow your companies to move across the border. Labor is cheaper and you don't have to offer benefits to the workers and guess what! There are no environmental laws. That worked out fine now lets take manufacturing to Asia and have all our consumer products made in nations that guess what: have no environmental laws, cheap labor and no benefits.
I suppose the government offices can do a lot to reduce greenhouse gases but the truth is that your tennis shoes were probably produced in a plant with no waste management and no emission restraints what so ever.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 10/06/2009

In addition to that the majority of these overseas factories have no bothersome health and safety regulations for their workers....this is why I hated Clinton....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 10/06/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

The US is leading the world??? In bailouts maybe.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 10/06/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 291 fans permalink

That's why we need Fair Trade, not just Free Trade.

There needs to be pollution tariffs, and workers rights tariffs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 10/06/2009
- gobarackgo I'm a Fan of gobarackgo 40 fans permalink
photo

In related news, Sarah Palin announced that if/when she takes up residence she will erect an oil derrick on the South Lawn of the White House and cull the squirrel herd with a.22LR from the window of the Lincoln bedroom.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 10/06/2009
photo

I am thrilled to see the President walking the talk on this issue. Not only will these measures help save taxpayer dollars in reduced energy costs, it will also help stimulate the economy and job creation by increasing demand for green energy products and services. Way to kill two birds with one stone!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 10/06/2009
- trebor0927 I'm a Fan of trebor0927 13 fans permalink

He talks big but his wife and him flew separate plans to the IOC last week. She took two dozen cars to the farmers market a block away for the White House. Nothing more than do what I say, but I don't have to do it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 10/06/2009
- gobarackgo I'm a Fan of gobarackgo 40 fans permalink
photo

I'm sure he'll carpool next time. I hear John Boehner has a very roomy Prius.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 10/06/2009

Well said!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 10/06/2009
- polidoc I'm a Fan of polidoc 26 fans permalink
photo

I can't imagine how sadly a President's family's life is changed by taking on that office. There's unfortunately always a threat over their heads and a simple walk to the farmer's market may just not be possible.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 10/06/2009
- BlueZoo I'm a Fan of BlueZoo 44 fans permalink

Michelle Obama flew to Denmark three days before the President did! He flew in, spent three hours, and returned to the White House with her. How were they supposed to fly to Denmark together when she was expected there beforehand? This is grossly unfair criticism and unwarranted.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 10/06/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Well put. Obama is not talking the talk and walking the walk. He is just walking the talk.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 10/06/2009
- ellenst I'm a Fan of ellenst 25 fans permalink

How do you know? Can you write a thesis on the subject? If not, get off you cardboard box.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 10/07/2009
- betty22 I'm a Fan of betty22 12 fans permalink

Ha hahahhaaaah.....Is this the same person that takes his plane to go everywhere on a whim photo opts
dates or whatever . hahahaaa you are too funny : )

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 10/06/2009
- texaz3step I'm a Fan of texaz3step 6 fans permalink
photo

Now he had a HIS/HER jet plane.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 10/06/2009
photo

Lame.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 10/06/2009

When there was gasolene shortages nearly 30 years ago, someone brought up how much segregation school busing consumed compared to all the recreational boating business. My sailboat still has diesel in it from the last century. The Feds could sure lay off thousands of workers and close offices.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 10/06/2009
- Guitar63 I'm a Fan of Guitar63 18 fans permalink
photo

The question must be raised, however, if a job is detrimental to our society or the planet in general, is it really a "cost" to get rid of these jobs? As an example: Would we really be losing anything if the insurance industry was strictly government operated? We would remove an industry which exists only to make money without aiding in the betterment of society. In the same way, many players in the energy industry have become detrimental, because they have sunk their teeth too far into the government. Are people going to suffer because of it? Probably. Should we feel bad for them? Yes. Is the solution to just keep the industry around forever for fear of losing jobs? NO! We must be an adapting society where we attempt to fix the mistakes of the last generation - because we are always learning, and changing to fit the needs of society and our planet. I sympathize, but ultimately, I don't mind seeing the meat industry and the oil industry losing some money.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 10/06/2009
- pat8942 I'm a Fan of pat8942 5 fans permalink

LED lighting uses about 1/2 the electricity as a CFL and doesn't produce any toxic waste, why isn't this being explored, oh wait I forgot it's proven technology and doesn't require grants or stimulus money.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 10/06/2009
photo

There is the little problem of how to get as much output with LED's as with CFL's (which I know is being worked on) but the price at the present time is a bit prohibitive.

I know they will probably last for the rest of my life - and I have a few, but replacing all those in my house is a very pricey undertaking.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 10/06/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect