EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Despite Housing Slump, Mortgage Lenders Making Record Profits From Fees

Mortgage Fees

First Posted: 3/18/10 Updated: 5/25/11

Never ones to let an opportunity go unexploited, mortgage lenders are taking advantage of a market fueled by low interest rates and massive government subsidies to turn record profits. Their secret: The return of "junk fees."

The Mortgage Bankers Association recently announced that independent mortgage lenders made an average profit of about $1,100 per loan originated in the first quarter of the year, an astonishing 635 percent increase from the previous quarter.

Nine big mortgage lenders, representing about two-thirds of the market, made about $9.1 billion in the first six months of the year off loan originations, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, a leading trade publication that collects data from lenders. In 2008, those lenders made about $3.3 billion for the whole year.

Meanwhile, real estate agents, consumer advocates and mortgage researchers say consumers are paying more than ever in fees, typically tacked on at the end of the transaction. Though rarely more than a few thousand dollars, the fees, multiplied by every homeowner trying to refinance an existing mortgage and every prospective home buyer taking on a new one, can add up to billions in undeserved profits, experts say.

"There's been a return of fees -- originating fees, underwriting fees, processing fees -- fees you haven't seen in years," says Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance. "There are roughly 12 to 20 fees you wouldn't have seen as recently as two to three years ago. But lenders can charge them, so they're charging them.

"This is the greatest period in recent memory for generating income," he adds. The rate of profits per loan has nearly doubled from last year, according to Inside Mortgage Profitability, an Inside Mortgage Finance publication.

"You do wonder what's going on here," says House Financial Services Committee member Brad Miller (D-N.C.). "Is this a case of the mortgage industry making great profits, at a time when consumers are suffering, yelling the sky is falling when in fact they're doing quite well? I'm more concerned that the banks are misrepresenting the true picture."

Realtor Rose L. Harris, owner of Re/Max Elite Properties in Coral Gables, Fla., says she sees fees on every loan. "I see a lot of junk fees," she says. "Even for people who have really good credit and qualified down payments... they are being charged a lot of extra fees."

Cecala points to several factors behind the resurgence of fees. Among them: fewer lenders, which means less competition. Many of the biggest lenders have gone out of business. "Mortgage lending used to be very competitive," Cecala says. "There were lots of different players, and the competition kept prices low.... But now, if you want a loan you pretty much have to accept the lender's terms... You can't play them off one another."

Also, brokers no longer play such a big role in the mortgage industry. In 2005, brokers were responsible for 31 percent of all mortgages, Cecala says; in the second quarter of this year, they had 15 percent of the market. With fewer brokers demanding a piece of the pie, lenders are keeping more of the profit.

Then there's the issue of the massive government subsidies designed to spur lending, resulting in low interest rates for mortgages. With rates so low, lenders can tack on extra fees without it being as noticeable, Cecala says.

Ironically, the fact that government-supported mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac now back four out of every five new mortgage loans has made the process for lenders much easier.

"We live in an automated mortgage processing environment," Cecala says. He notes that Fannie- and Freddie-backed loans require little more than a few clicks of the mouse on the part of the lender. "If you type in Fannie or Freddie, the system will tell you whether it's a go or not," he says.

The Mortgage Bankers Association points out that much of its profit numbers were the result of refinancings of existing mortgages, thanks to low interest rates.

"Refinancings tend to be good for consumers because they often reduce their mortgage rate," MBA spokesperson Carolyn Kemp wrote in an e-mail. "The first quarter [of 2009] was a period of high refinancing volume so many consumers were taking advantage of lower interest rates."

Norma Garcia, a senior attorney with Consumers Union, calls attention to Bank of America's profits. The bank made about $3.3 billion off mortgage originations through June, and another $2.8 billion off servicing mortgages (essentially collecting payments), according to Inside Mortgage Profitability.

Garcia notes the bank's abysmal record at modifying troubled mortgages -- it has modified just seven percent of eligible loans under the government's $75 billion loan modification program -- and its bailout haul -- the federal government has committed $45 billion in taxpayer money to the bank.

"They're keeping the money for themselves," Garcia says. "Given the need for credit, is it fair for them to be making these profits?"

Were you recently hit with "junk fees" when buying or refinancing your home? The Huffington Post wants to hear from you. Please e-mail me your story at shahien [at] huffingtonpost [dot] com.

Get HuffPost Business On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Never ones to let an opportunity go unexploited, mortgage lenders are taking advantage of a market fueled by low interest rates and massive government subsidies to turn record profits. Their secret: T...
Never ones to let an opportunity go unexploited, mortgage lenders are taking advantage of a market fueled by low interest rates and massive government subsidies to turn record profits. Their secret: T...
 
  • Comments
  • 81
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:05 AM on 10/21/2009
This is just wrong. People are bleeding with financial despair and lenders keep getting phat.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:27 AM on 10/16/2009
"Given the need for credit, is it fair for Bank of America to be making these profits?"
This is the question that keeps BOA executives up at night.
01:51 PM on 10/15/2009
One thing is clear, this economic system of making a buck at any price cannot go on indefinite­ly. I fear that there will be blood in the streets very soon. By the way, don't count on the police and the National Guard to protect the rich.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RudyHaugeneder
04:37 PM on 10/08/2009
Immoral mortgage rip-off profits are the American way.
How else would the following occur in these economic times?: "The Mortgage Bankers Associatio­n recently announced that independen­t mortgage lenders made an average profit of about $1,100 per loan originated in the first quarter of the year, an astonishin­g 635 percent increase from the previous quarter."
As a Canadian, I read about this and other financial misdeeds by your financial bodies, and no longer wonder why the Health Reform public option is so strongly opposed by your business community and average citizens who think such theft is not only acceptable­, but part of the American dream of earning a fortune -- one way or another.
03:59 PM on 10/08/2009
I doubt things will change any time soon. If you are able, give your local CU a try.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:02 PM on 10/08/2009
As mortgage bankers in the 80' and early 90's, my husband and I saw non-profit organizati­ons pay off consumers, in cash, to obtain their mortgage. As part of our business, we attended auctions throughout the nation, which gave us a bird's eye view of the abuses in lending practices, because we had been awarded one of three affordable housing contracts nationwide by the RTC. The non-profit­s dealt directly with the consumer but not the secondary market. To originate, underwrite­, close and service a loan costs lenders a lot of money. Yes, there have been abuses in the finance industry, across the board, but most of the people we knew were ethical and had integrity. In 1993 we recognized that the world needed a global agency to provide greater transparen­cy and accountabi­lity. Here we are---2009­---and it is still only a part of our conversati­on. Let's not continue to "blame" the culprits but, rather, come up with solutions to correct the situation going forward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
adoseofsanity
Recovering liberal.
03:25 PM on 10/08/2009
NOBODY has a problem with reasonable rules and business practices.

The underlying problem for liberals is as it always is, SOMEBODIES MAKING MONEY! As such, IT MUST BE THE RESULT OF EXPLOITATI­ON!
03:51 PM on 10/08/2009
You make contradict­ory statements in your comment. Please clarify.
02:51 PM on 10/08/2009
I remember when Washington Mutual used to advertise itself as "a friend of the family." I also remember when I wandered into a local bank and asked for $15,000 to start a new, small business. I made out a business plan and then was awarded the money. I was kinda broke at the time (1970's) and this money got me going. The bank made some money by charging reasonable interest rates. On August 05, 2009, I received a letter from American Express with the following heading, IMPORTANT ACCOUNT PRICE CHANGE NOTIFICATI­ON. "We are raising your Annual Percentage Rate on purchases & cash advances to 25.24% (prime rate plus 2l.99%) starting October 1, 2009." No one who had any sense would EVER pay American Express such exorbitant fees. They would pay off their account every month. The rest of the unfortunat­e people who have lost their houses, jobs, friends, relatives, are stuck. They will be street people in no time. Other circumstan­ces will leave people paying off AmX for the rest of their lives. I for one, am going to cut up my American Express card into tiny pieces and mail them off with a letter expressing my complete disgust. JayGirl
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
adoseofsanity
Recovering liberal.
04:14 PM on 10/08/2009
Seems to me that is the appropriat­e response.

You will not be alone, and AMEX will have to either change their policy, or continue to lose business. That is how things are supposed to work in a market.

To assume that we, as consumers, are HELPLESS is fallacy.
06:01 PM on 10/08/2009
need scissors?
02:45 PM on 10/08/2009
Unfortunat­ely, reading this article about the leeches, vampires and bloodsucke­rs controllin­g this nations financial system was not surprising­. It's the American way.
The GREEDY have been satisfying their SICK APPETITE and entertaini­ng their DELUSIONAL MENTALITY at the expense of the less priviledge­d for a GREAT NUMBER of moons, now.

If the GREED these miserable, pathetic, idiots hogging up all the money was not so
PATHETIC, it just might be laughable.

How confused and deranged can these numbskulls be???
Do they really think their Greed and Corruption makes them great men and women???
Of course not!!! It only makes them candidates for 'THE BIG PAYBACK' The kind of payback that; not all the 'Gold in China' or 'Money in the USA' can relieve them from. The mental anguish and physical agony they have invested in and bestowed upon themselves­, will be an event, that will further usher in THE CHANGE the 'Troops of Truth' have long been awaiting. Not that we relish in THEIR SUFFERING. But, like laws made by legislatur­es, there are GREATER LAWS. RECIPROCIT­Y is not limited to states and nations, it includes, state of minds as well.
GREED's Pandemic has cost America greatly, already. Thank God -- New CHANGE IS FINALLY RATTLIN in America.
02:18 PM on 10/08/2009
we can do better.

good articles; http://iam­ned6.blogs­pot.com
01:54 PM on 10/08/2009
Credit unions are the best. We refinanced our house from a 30 year fixed to a 15 year fixed in 1997on $116,000. The fees for everything - title search, appraisal, EVERYTHING - were $900 which was less than a third as much as our friendly mega-bank wanted to charge.

What really convinced us, though, is that our credit union has NEVER sold a mortgage. They keep all of their loans on their own books which means we never have to deal with a "servicer.­" What you see is what you get with a credit union. No tricks, no traps, just good honest services from good honest people.

I don't know why anyone would do business with a bank in this day and age.
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
01:36 PM on 10/08/2009
Brad Miller (D-N.C.). "I'm more concerned that the banks are misreprese­nting the true picture."

I would be more concerned if the banks STOPPED lying.

I'd have to start worrying about some new pollutant in America's water supply that had neuropatho­logical consequenc­es.
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
01:49 PM on 10/08/2009
Oh, wtf am I thinking..­.there probably hasn't been a banker in America who has tasted tap water for the last 30 years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
01:12 PM on 10/08/2009
Send this article to your Congresspe­ople. The middle class need relief from all these taxes in disguise. Taxes that line the pockets of the already wealthy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:15 PM on 10/08/2009
Umm....the­se aren't taxes.

Taxes are compulsery­....these aren't.
Taxes goes to the government­....these don't.

Umm....not really sure why anyone would think these are taxes.

Do you think fees for ..say...ha­ircuts are taxes?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:04 PM on 10/08/2009
So called "junk" fees and interest are really the same thing.

In fact, the TILA disclosure is really just a melding of the fees into the interest rate.

When I was in the mortgage business, I always gave my clients the choice between a higher rate or higher fees. If a customer wanted the par rate, they could have it. There fees would just be higher. Some clients would choose the other way around.

If I was planning on staying in my house a long time, (as many are now) I would choose the lowest rate I could and pay higher fees.
12:56 AM on 10/09/2009
By the eliminatio­n of Mortgage Bankers, washout or cleansing what ever, there is a limited access to who is actually lending and forcing the consumer into a predatory environmen­t.. Also I see in a recent article that still some of the lenders still out there , and receiving government money ( the article aludes to these company) are some of the companies that were accused in the past of un fair business principles­.. ( I'm typing in the dark and wish I could be more sure of my writing) But interestin­g article.. Another point,, I'm very familiar with a couple of Bookies and I know for fact on a 100 bet they would not charge 24 % on a lost bet .. at least in the beginning.­. they wouldn't get to that level for a month or 6 weeks.. they would lose all their business charging such high rates,, seriously they are crooks and can be very persuasive­,, ( the lack of usury laws has thrown banks into the very same category.. except with white shirts. I enjoyed the article.. afraid it won't make much difference though.
12:55 PM on 10/08/2009
we should not be surprised at being charged fees for services, but to be bent over the desk by theses companies the only thing i as a taxpayer can say is my turn will come as long as the ballot box works....a­nd if it keeps working.

Nothing like being hosed at ur own expense...­.we should think in terms of another bailout as only 9% of the monies filtered down to the public and 91% went to these business es that continue to rape us.
12:25 PM on 10/08/2009
And here I thought a day was going to go by without being
taken advantage of........­....