'Where The Wild Things Are' Makes Some Kids Cover Eyes, Ears

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - 'Where The Wild Things Are' Makes Some Kids Cover Eyes, Ears stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DAVID GERMAIN | 10/12/09 02:54 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Wild Things

LOS ANGELES — Spike Jonze recalls how Maurice Sendak urged him to make the movie version of "Where the Wild Things Are" as dangerous as the book was when the children's classic came out in 1963.

The question now is whether Jonze made it too dangerous.

The film arrives in theaters Friday, a year later than originally planned by distributor Warner Bros. The studio was queasy over the dark, menacing tinges Jonze brought to the story about a boy who sails off to an island where resident monsters proclaim him their king.

"It wasn't what they were expecting," Jonze said in an interview. "We just ran into the sort of quagmire of like, `That's not what we thought it was going to be.'"

Instead of a cozy children's movie, Jonze crafted a tale about childhood, with a lot of the messy issues adults pay a fortune to exorcise through psychoanalysis. It touches on divorce and feelings of abandonment. It presents a child acting out in ugly, even violent ways, engaging in a shrill shouting match with his mother and running away from home in a red rage. Its monsters resemble the beloved images of Sendak's picture book, but their moodiness and occasional ferocity may prove more unsettling than endearing to viewers.

At a test screening of an early cut, some children found the wild things creepy and scary.

Rather than snatching the $80 million project away from Jonze, Warner decided to give him more time. Jonze reshot some scenes, and he spent the past year applying computer animation to create the facial expressions on his wild things, which were shot live on set using actors inside giant monster suits.

The result certainly is more challenging, and potentially more rewarding, than many family films.

Story continues below
advertisement

In keeping with the sparse few hundred words of Sendak's text, the story is slim, Jonze providing a snapshot of a broken family before sending his young protagonist, Max, to the realm of the wild things.

The film plays out in an impressionistic manner akin to Sendak's book, Max having some wild rumpus adventures among his new friends, whose erratic behavior veers from loving to threatening.

When first published, the book found some harsh critics who thought its images were too frightening for children and that Max's disobedience set a bad example.

Sendak, who told Jonze at the start to make the story his own, said he was pleased with the results and that he and the filmmaker have become close friends.

"As you do these things, you relive them – and that's not always a pleasant experience," Sendak said. "Spike was reliving his business and giving Max his Spikean drama, which is what it was all supposed to be. I was not supposed to sit there and tell them, `Make it this way, make it that way.' If anybody had done that to me while I was making the book, I would have had a fit."

Sendak and Jonze had talked for years about adapting the book to film. Jonze had been reticent, uncertain what he could bring to the story and not wanting to fabricate some contrived plot line to expand it to movie length.

He finally found his way into the story as he mused about not where the wild things are, but who they are.

"The idea that I came up with is if the wild things are wild emotions. As a kid, one of the things that can feel scary or out of control is wild emotions, out-of-control emotions, either in yourself or the people around you," Jonze said. "Having a tantrum, that's scary as a kid, because you just see red. ... Trying to make a movie that feels like what it feels to be 9 years old at times, that was the idea."

With a screenplay co-written by Jonze and author Dave Eggers, the movie is a visual marvel, no surprise from the director who turned identity and perception on its head with his first two films, "Being John Malkovich" and "Adaptation."

And voiced by James Gandolfini, Forest Whitaker, Lauren Ambrose, Chris Cooper, Catherine O'Hara and Paul Dano, Jonze's monsters have true soul, their dialogue punctuated with whoops of joy or authentically weary sighs that make their emotional swings feel very human.

Cast members said the story offers valuable lessons in human behavior for young audiences.

"This is a fantasy environment for kids to be able to address their own fears so they can try to figure out what's going on inside of them, and see an example of themselves," Whitaker said. "You start to understand why he's throwing these tantrums, but then you start to see that maybe those tantrums aren't so healthy, aren't so cool."

Even if the film enlightens, though, it still might intimidate some.

Max Records – the 12-year-old actor who stars as Sendak's Max – said reaction was mixed among students at his school in Portland, Ore., where the film was screened recently.

"There were some kids who absolutely loved it and just thought it was really amazing," Records said. But at certain moments, some younger children "were just like, `I don't want to listen to this.' They just like, covered their ears or their eyes."

Any kid fears about the movie being too intense actually could be parents' fears, said "Being John Malkovich" co-star Catherine Keener, who plays Max's mother.

"I totally think the parents are more afraid. They're projecting a lot of stuff," Keener said. "I really hope that parents can just roll with this."

Warner Bros. certainly is rolling with it, debuting "Where the Wild Things Are" in 3,500 theaters with a big marketing blitz, hoping to score a commercial success before the barrage of holiday-season films begin to arrive in early November.

However audiences respond, Jonze is glad he got to adapt the story his way – and that Sendak approves.

"I knew we'd always make our movie, ultimately. I was never going to compromise. To care about something, to work on something this long, I was never going to let it become something it shouldn't," Jonze said.

"I was worried that when it came down to them marketing it, that they would try and sell it as something it wasn't. Try and sell it as this safe children's movie. But I think they've done a good job at being honest about it. ... They've not only accepted the movie, but they've embraced it in the marketing of it."

___

AP Entertainment Writer Jake Coyle contributed to this story.

LOS ANGELES — Spike Jonze recalls how Maurice Sendak urged him to make the movie version of "Where the Wild Things Are" as dangerous as the book was when the children's classic came out in 1963.
LOS ANGELES — Spike Jonze recalls how Maurice Sendak urged him to make the movie version of "Where the Wild Things Are" as dangerous as the book was when the children's classic came out in 1963.
Report Corrections
 
Comments
101
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

"The Wizard of Oz" made me cover my ears and close my eyes when I was little. Cetain things in "Dumbo" and "Sleeping Beauty" terrified me. Somehow, I managed to survive.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 10/16/2009

Just don't be stupid and take little kids to see this movie. Really it is for adults and OLDER kids.

I get so ticked off when I see parents dragging little kids into movies like this. Our kids are being exposed to violence and "the harsh realities of life" way too soon. Let kids be innocent and carefree for God's sake.

Movie producers continue to push the envelope because EDGY DRAMA SELLS TICKETS. But just because a movie is made does not mean you need to take your little kids to go see it.

THINK FOLKS. THINK about what you are doing.

If you 5 year old has watched all the Shrek movies and plays violent video games.... YOU MIGHT BE A CRAPPY PARENT.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 10/15/2009

Is it therefore irresponsible for me to watch the nightly news when my kids are around or even listen to NPR with them in the car?

The world contains darkness. I'm not saying that I want to scare them, but this story is also about self-discovery and redemption - both of which often require conquering your fears before you receive either.

It comes down to more than just taking them to the movies, buying a lemonade and popcorn and leaving. It, like every event for a small child begs the parent to actively discuss events, not let what they see exist in the vacuum of their own minds.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 10/16/2009
- Lulubelle1 I'm a Fan of Lulubelle1 73 fans permalink

Parental overprotectiveness and viewing of exclusively child-oriented media doesn't prepare kids to experience life with any sense of confidence.

Fiction (literature, visual media, or what have you) is an incredibly valuable way of "trying on" or rehearsing emotional situations, and provide a safe, personally neutral context for discussing the complications of life with kids.

The above goes to your general point; more directly, I just saw the movie with 4 kids and another mom. The kids were ages 8, 8, 10, and 12. All enjoyed it, and the six of us had a really great discussion about what was our favorite part and why, where we felt happy or sad, and why (if we knew). It was wonderful!

No, it was no Shrek, or another one of the ubiquitous CGI/animated comedies. It didn't have any "hasta la vista, baby" moments or other mugging with pop culture references. It was a very emotionally worthwhile film, while being very entertaining.

I was exposed to too much, too early as a child, and wouldn't make that mistake with my own, but I don't want to go completely the other way, either. I've met those kids, and they're very much hampered in their sense of orientation in the world at large.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 10/17/2009
- KataVideo I'm a Fan of KataVideo 46 fans permalink
photo

I'm waiting for Roland Emmereich's adaptation of "Rabbit and Skunk and the Scary Rock"

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 AM on 10/15/2009
- MaybeMilo I'm a Fan of MaybeMilo 38 fans permalink
photo

"Where the Wild Things Are," the Nutshell Library (included "Chicken Soup with Rice"), and "the Wish Tree" were staples for me during my early childhood - can't wait to see this - the teaser footage looks freakishly close to Sendak's masterful illustrations.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 10/14/2009
- Konnie I'm a Fan of Konnie 19 fans permalink

#1 who are you making the movie for? little kids who read the book, big kids who read the book, or grown ups who read the book? There should be a warning - not safe for kids under 10 or something to that effect.

and


#2 volume in movie theaters is so over the top it isn't even enjoyable to go most of the time to any movie!
ITS NOT A ROCK CONCERT!

ten years ago my 2 yr old grandson was traumatized at the noise level at a viewing of the lion king movie. we finally got him ear plugs to wear at the shows for the next few years. every now and then
producers and movie theater operators should actually sit in the theatre and listen to the little kids
crying because their ears hurt and watch them covering their ears with their hands. most parents
don't know they can leave the theatre and demand their money back - and if enough would perhaps
the volume level would be lowered.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 10/14/2009

I truly adored the book as a kid, even though I was a little freaked out by it. I think that was one of my favorite things about it, how strange and emotional it all seemed.

http://speakonit.com/

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 10/14/2009
photo

Well, Sendak not only blessed this movie, but actually pushed Jones to make the film for many years. This is an odd, if not unique genesis of a movie and while it in no way guarantees quality, we know the book was and is very popular with kids and adults. Many of the most popular children's stories are indeed truly "scary". There are loads of theory and opinion about it, but it seems likely to me that an engaging story trying to come to terms with the big questions of love, death and family may "resonate", if done well. The fact that Jones insisted on a "live action" feature, avoiding the option of using CG animation is interesting to me. This speaks to his intent to make Max's (protagonist) imagination and characters that inhabit it as real to us as their were to him. Given that the book is a short story carried by beautiful art, but light on dialog, I'm guessing the success of the movie will depend at least in part on the child actor's ability to convey non-spoken emotion in revealing the heart of this timeless tale.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 10/14/2009
photo

Obviously they don't realize the kind of crazy mess that kids are watching these days. They want to see disturbing, watch enough Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon and Disney? I seriously doubt this is anything too shocking for children to see. I cannot wait and my kids have been driving me nuts to watch. Not even that, the video games are awful, even the ones supposedly for kids are too violent in my book so I doubt this will cause a blip on the scale of violence out there for kids to see.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 10/14/2009

I loved this book as a kid, but I was a seventies kid when we where not coddled....my dad owned a Pinto dammit!! we road in a pickup truck without seat belts. I saw bambi when I was five and I cried but I got over it. Perhaps this movie isn't for today's coddled youth but for kids at heart like me.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 10/14/2009
- kappa08 I'm a Fan of kappa08 77 fans permalink
photo

The book and from what I read is for the serious child...the kid that is a bit more connected and internally wise...There are children out there that have old souls that this work speaks to. That doesn't mean that kids that aren't shouldn't enjoy...however it is nice to have another layer of entertainment for the few if not many that would like to see something that's not dumbed down for the masses...Not everything should be for everybody. There is a reason why Spike Jonze got this or Tim Burton got "Alice in Wonderland". Because these are stories for the "individual". Thus hiring "freaks and geeks" to present the story.
It's ok if your(ed.) child doesn't "get it"...it shouldn't speak to everybody

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 10/14/2009
photo

My daughter was 2 the first time she saw The Wizard of OZ. When I knew the witch was going to appear I waited for her to get scared. It never happened. She's 11 now and we just saw the 70th Anniversary HD edition on the big screen. People need to give kids more credit. Children feed off their parents' fears. I will probably see the movie.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 10/14/2009
- KIVPossum I'm a Fan of KIVPossum 51 fans permalink
photo


My kids loved the book. It scared them. They begged for me to read it again and again.

Does everything today have to be sanitized so someone's precious snowflake doesn't get scared or upset?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 AM on 10/14/2009
photo

I never read the book and never even heard of it until Verizon decided to start using it in their TV commercials many years ago and I wondered where the hell kind of freaky and scary looking monstrosities they were using in the commercials came from, so I can't really appreciate the nostalgic value of the film.

I have no desire to see it, but I will give Spike Jonze extra credit for daring to make a movie that doesn't talk down to children, that gives them a tough piece of real life to grapple with and digest in a surreal and expansive setting that lets them come to their own conclusions about what to do with the information and the feelings that it brings about.

Exposure to some adult problems and mulling them around their heads expand children's ability to process the complex world they will enter into as adults and makes them more mature than their years in a good way.

I know many people want children to stay adorable, cute little bundles of big eyed ignorance but we really are doing them a disservice by not teaching them the world as it is.
They live in it. They need to understand how things work and why so they can process it in non-self destructive ways.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 AM on 10/14/2009
- lilnyc I'm a Fan of lilnyc 9 fans permalink

This book scared me as a kid, but it's one of my faves, and I look forward to the movie.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 10/13/2009
- zannamar I'm a Fan of zannamar 3 fans permalink
photo

So does Bambi, Snow White etc etc Why don't we just tell every kid that nothing bad ever happens and everything is exactly like Disney World theme parks

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 10/13/2009
photo

I loved this book as a kid, I found magic in it. I am surprised this book scared some youngsters. I would like to see the movie, anybody wanna go?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 10/13/2009

heck yea i'll go w/ u i cannot wait to see it!
but...is it okay if my dad and the monkey-lady come too?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 AM on 10/15/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect


svn