Power Company Trying To Switch Off Cancer Patient's Oxygen Machine

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Power Company Trying To Switch Off Cancer Patient's Oxygen Machine stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |  Julian Hattem
First Posted: 10-16-09 05:24 PM   |   Updated: 10-16-09 07:04 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Mable Randon

As part of its Bearing Witness 2.0 project, the Huffington Post is rounding up a few of the best local stories of the day.

Mable Randon is suffering from the late stages of cancer. She's bound by a wheel chair and only breathing with the help of an electrically-powered oxygen machine. Rucks Russell of KHOU in Houston reports that the local power company sent her a disconnection notice because of late bills. She applied to the Critical Customer Program, a payment plan seemingly tailor-made for people in Randon's condition who depend on electric life support -- but she was denied.

Her provider, Freedom Power, already had the most complaints of any energy company in Texas. The Texas Public Utilities Commission launched an investigation into Randon's case on Wednesday, which will keep the power on for the time being. Texas-based Amegy Bank has set up a charity fund to help her keep her lights on.

KHOU also has a video.


******

Darla Tolliver and her husband, Jim, are just $28,000 away from owning their home after making payments since 2001, reports Claire Galofaro of the Bristol Herald Courier in Virginia. But now, after Jim lost his job, they are three months behind on their mortgage, and fearing foreclosure. "It's like you're in quicksand, and the more you struggle and try to get out, the more you sink" remarked Darla. "My life is in that house...the thought of losing it is unbearable."


******

Bessie Mae Berger, 97, is homeless. She lives with her two sons in a Chevrolet Suburban, reports Bob Pool of the Los Angeles Times. Her sons, Larry and Charlie Wilkerson, are both unemployed and get by on disability checks and food stamps. A damaged nerve and degenerative arthritis, respectively, forced them out of work years ago. They now panhandle for extra change -- Berger holds a sign reading "I am 97 years old. Homeless. Broke. Need Help Please." Because they insist on living together, they have been repeatedly denied government-subsidized housing, and are running into brick walls navigating government aid programs. "There's a million empty homes here in California, but they can't seem to find one we can live in," said Larry. The Times also has an affecting audio slideshow, showing how the family lives in their own words.

Story continues below
advertisement


******

In New Haven, Conn., Baobao Zhang reports in the Yale Daily News that funding for homeless shelters is dwindling just as their demand is increasing in the foreclosure crisis and the colder weather. The crippled economy has increased demand for family shelter by 30 percent, according to a report from New Haven Home Recovery. The non-profit, which has a $200,000 budget gap, is depending on private donations to help operate its two shelters so that it doesn't have to turn homeless people out into the freezing cold. Even under normal budget circumstances the shelters often fill far beyond capacity.


******

Seymore Frankel, 79, has been showing his dedication to others by volunteering with a food distribution program in Springfield, Mass., for fifteen years, reports local TV station WWLP. As part of Rachel's Table, Frankel has consistently traveled around and collecting donated food from restaurants and grocery stores for churches and homeless organizations. "For many years the community was good to me and after I retired I figured it was about time I try to hep them," he said.

HuffPost readers: Seen a good local story? Heard about a heroic judge, neighbor, or doctor helping people stay in their homes? Tell us about it! Email jmhattem@gmail.com.

As part of its Bearing Witness 2.0 project, the Huffington Post is rounding up a few of the best local stories of the day. Mable Randon is suffering from the late stages of cancer. She's bound by a ...
As part of its Bearing Witness 2.0 project, the Huffington Post is rounding up a few of the best local stories of the day. Mable Randon is suffering from the late stages of cancer. She's bound by a ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
4528
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (58 pages total)
- Cambridge9 I'm a Fan of Cambridge9 79 fans permalink
photo

And how many Mabels are there in Texas while Perry says that stimulus funds are not wanted?

These stories are heart wrenching and immoral, in this, the richest country in the world - while these execs walk away with their golden parachutes. Each one of these execs should be mandated to care for at least one of these people. Maybe some humanity might just emerge.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 10/17/2009
- eweqo I'm a Fan of eweqo 21 fans permalink

As usual, huffpo proves that we don't need government making our lives worse.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 AM on 10/17/2009
- elfish I'm a Fan of elfish 194 fans permalink
photo

The regulations that were put in place after the depression clearly stopped the cycle of "Boom and Bust" that had dominated the economy since the founding of the country:

Before the era of regulation, we had Major Depressions, Crashes, and Financial Panics on average every 16.5 years:

1818, 1825, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1893, 1907, 1929

After the Crash 1929, we regulated the Wall Street, the Financial Industry, and the Banks. From 1938 to 1988, there were no Depressions, Crashes or Panics. If the old system had been in place, you'd have expected at least three such financial crisis during that time period. (50/16.5 = 3)

Starting in the 1980's Carter, Reagan and mostly republicans and some democrats began removing depression-era rules and regulations. For example, in 1982, Reagan began the process of deregulating the As regulations were removed, we began to wing back the era of Financial Panics, Crashes and Depressions.

1986 - Savings and Loan Crisis.
1987 - The Crash of 1987
2000 - The Dot-Com Crash
2008 - The Real Estate Crash

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 AM on 10/17/2009
- cavegal I'm a Fan of cavegal 216 fans permalink
photo

Later fellow politicos!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

It's okay. I'll just assume that your inability to address my questions and your quick departure is a strange coincidence.

Take care.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 AM on 10/17/2009
- cavegal I'm a Fan of cavegal 216 fans permalink
photo

Already addressed.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 AM on 10/17/2009
- elfish I'm a Fan of elfish 194 fans permalink
photo

> The market was highly regulated. Why didn't it prevent
> this crisis?

The market wasn't highly regulated. The regulations had been systematically removed. Starting with Carter in the "Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980." This was followed by "Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act" under Reagan. At the urging of Phill Gramm, "Glass-Steagall" and the "Bank Holding Company Act of 1956" were over turned by "Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act," and signed into law.

Had These regulations been in place, it would have prevented the Sub-Prime, Derivatives and Credit Default collapses.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

I can see that you don't understand what any of those "regulatio­ns/deregul­ations" actually did.

The government deregulated sectors of the financial markets to ENCOURAGE sub-prime lending and derivative trading.

It's okay. It's pretty convoluted.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 AM on 10/17/2009
- elfish I'm a Fan of elfish 194 fans permalink
photo

It's too convoluted for your theory to be explainable or correct.

Good theories can be explained. My guess is that you don't know what any of those regulation did and how their removal caused the sub-prime crisis

Maybe money magazine can explain it for you:

http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/deregulation-financial-crisis/

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

cavegal

Lack of enforcement.

=======

What regulations weren't enforced, specifically? I've only seen examples of vicarious regulations being placed upon the market without authority to do so.

In other words, I've only seen regulation gone amuck.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

*amok

D'oh!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 AM on 10/17/2009
- cavegal I'm a Fan of cavegal 216 fans permalink
photo

"... tapes obtained by Rolling Stone of recent meetings held by the compliance officers for big Prime Brokers like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Deutsche Bank. Compliance officers are supposed to make sure that traders at their firms follow the rules — but in the tapes, they talk about how they routinely greenlight transactions they know are dicey.

In a conference held at the JW Marriott Desert Ridge Resort in Phoenix in May 2008 — just over a month after Bear collapsed — a compliance officer for Goldman Sachs named Jonathan Breckenridge talks with his colleagues about how the firm's customers use an automated program to report where they borrowed their stock from. The problem, he says, is the system allows short-sellers to enter anything they want in the text field, no matter how nonsensical — or even leave the field blank. "You can enter ABC, you can enter Go, you can enter Locate Goldman, you can enter whatever you want," he says. "Three dots — I've actually seen that."

The room erupts with laughter.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/30481512/wall_streets_naked_swindle/6

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

Did you understand a word of that article?

My dad has worked on a few high-profile cases like this. This was a pretty rudimentary explanation of the situation.

Anyways, you didn't name a regulation that wasn't enforced.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 AM on 10/17/2009
- cavegal I'm a Fan of cavegal 216 fans permalink
photo

The discussion on this thread regarding capitalism vs socialism made me think of a book I have yet to read called Megatrends 2010: The Rise Of Conscious Capitalism. The premise being that the generations coming up behind the Baby Boomers are more aware of their purchasing power.

Examples of companies that were and are forerunners of Conscious Capitalism would be Apple and Toms Shoes. Apple has been one of the most socially conscious companies towards it's employees of fortune 500 companies. In their California site they had onsite child care which was subsidized by the company. Parents paid a nominal fee. The corporate culture nurtured great ideas because parents had little to no worries regarding their child care. The program was instituted when female senior engineers would have children and were reluctant to return to work.

Tom's is the company that gives a brand new pair of shoes to a child in need whenever a single pair is purchased. The shoes are of renewable and recyclable material. I believe they are all canvas. They won't be slaying the fashion industry anytime soon but they are attracting a large and loyal clientele because of their mission to provide children with shoes. His business plan was developed based on his experience working with children in impoverished areas while working in the Peace Corps.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 AM on 10/17/2009
- shivasquest I'm a Fan of shivasquest 135 fans permalink

The younger generation are great ,too bad the world we leave them is sheet.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

Imagine all of the companies that would do the same if there wasn't foreign aid. (Or a safety net.)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

Ask Ben and Jerry. They have seen your future and it does not work.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 AM on 10/17/2009
- cavegal I'm a Fan of cavegal 216 fans permalink
photo

Those two ex hippies did pretty well for themselves when they sold out to the Dutch conglomerate. They were awarded the Small Business Persons of the Year Award by none other than Saint Ronnie in 1988.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

Disuberence2

At the beginning of the GD, bank runs were very common. The FDIC helped reassure the public. (While at the same time giving d-bag bankers a carte blanche to play around with other things).

========

You bring up a good point. The government is capable of sometimes providing short time solutions for problems that present themselves. However, they will usually warrant more "government solutions" down the road to offset the unforeseen longterm effects and were, more likely than not, a response to an unforeseen mishap of Government Solutions' Past.

Anyways, few folks sit down and take a look at the commonalities of the banks that failed which prompted the creation of the FDIC. A disproportionate share of banks that failed were located in states that had laws preventing a bank from owning or operating more than one bank location. This, of course, increases risk. Let's say the bank happens to be located in a community that produces primarily, oh, I don't know...American automobiles. All of the sudden, American muscle bites the dust. Kind of makes you pine for a more diversified risk portfolio.

State politicians, in their endless crusades, directly heightened banks' risks.

Listen, maybe it made pragmatic sense to enact a temporary FDIC or something, but let's not kid ourselves. FDR was about creating new institutions first and finding the most effective solutions second.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

I think it's a double-edged sword, and something that I am woefully unqualified to even wax philosophical on. On one hand, there is the fact that these gigantic banks essentially have a stranglehold on our economy. On the other hand, government has a history of preventing things from happening after they've already happened. Which does... nothing, but come up with redundant bureaucracy.

I guess you pick your poison. What do you want more? A government that can't predict the future, or the alternative of a few financial institutions taking down the whole economy.

I would prefer breaking them up, and making it easier for people to get into the financial market without being connected to Goldman Sachs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

We're trying to solve two different acts of the same problem, I think. I'll take prevention, you take response.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 AM on 10/17/2009
- MadHeart I'm a Fan of MadHeart 126 fans permalink

Capitalism = death panels. Most of us get a few crumbs from Wall St.'s table; the rest get dust from the crumbs, no matter how straight their lives are lived. Every life has value--it is only devalued by the greed of those thieves you don't see in plain sight. Intelligence not used for the common good is intelligence wasted, IMHO, and contributes to the criminality we see today . Petty "morality" will never fix this system.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

Ah, people seem to be confusing Capitalism with greed a lot these days. Capitalism is simply a system of exchanging goods in which the means of production, the wealth, and the capital is privately-owned.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 10/17/2009
- Shadow08 I'm a Fan of Shadow08 235 fans permalink
photo

tsk tsk...you left out profit...the mother of greed...I'm sure it was just an oversight.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 AM on 10/17/2009

So then capitalism can have it's place in society and so can socialism, we can choose our profit centers and our general welfare centers?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 AM on 10/17/2009
- MadHeart I'm a Fan of MadHeart 126 fans permalink

And where does that "capital" come from? It is NEVER earned outright and honestly. The surplus value wrung from workers is the classic model. In today's capitalism, it comes not just from that source, but also from the outright theft of Other People's Money in the form of speculation, computer trading, insider trading, and every other device thought up by the criminal minds of Wall St.

Show me a prominent company today that reinvests its profits in itself, for the common good of all employees, and strives to make or sell a non-harmful product for its customers at a reasonable price and grows slowly and steadily. Now, we have too many that are simply in business for the sake of profit itself. A company like WalMart, for instance, could double the wages of its lower level employees (instead of depending on govt largesse to assist them), insist on American made goods, and still make its 5 "owners" enough money to live very comfortably, if not obscenely, as millionaires, not billionaires. I mean, how much is enough and how much do you have to rob your employees and the public to get it?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 AM on 10/17/2009
- Dreamers101 I'm a Fan of Dreamers101 191 fans permalink
photo

Cassandra Syndrome I'm a Fan of Cassandra Syndrome I'm a fan of this user 45 fans permalink

"She was delighted and happy (and wet and shiny)".
__________­Â­_________­_­________­__­_______­___­______­__

I'm leveling a charge, now defend it!

So here is the thing, you lost all credibility when you said "I take the baby picture for a client of mine and they let me have right's to use it".

But I bet they never knew your sick0 mind would come up with a use for this precious child in this manner, maybe they thought you would us it in a cutesy babe mag or something but you used it here and you want to soap box us about how bad we are....

Your horns of h.ypocrisy and d.ogma are truly showing...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 AM on 10/17/2009
- citizenkain I'm a Fan of citizenkain 101 fans permalink
photo

The knowledge that seeking the favor of another Means the m_u_r_d_e_r_of self. This is the resolution The end of all progress The d_e_a_t_h_ of evolution It b_l_e_e_d_s_all life away. Silence speeds the path to the streams of solace that run so few and narrow. Brooks that babble the sounds of t_o_r_t_u_r_e. You will one day rise To flood the banks of the chosen. This is the art of ruin. This is the resolution The end of all progress The d_e_a_t_h of evolution It b_l_e_e_d_s_ all life away. I will teach you all that I have mastered Fear. Pain. H8tred. Power. This is the art of ruin.
**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­*
P.S.......­...Republi­can Party.....

You can save this one keyboringc­ommodo....­.....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

special brought up the other emotion. Fear.

If we had a free market, where the ultimate regulator, failure, was re instated, employees would rat out their bosses for the fraud that the too greedy employers were trying to get away with.

The guy that was appointed to the sec today was an intelligence expert....:? in finance.

anyone see a problem with that title besides me?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

I don't think we will ever have a free-market system. The knee-jerk reaction to any failure of the market is the blame deregulation, and that meme isn't going anywhere.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

no, you are probobly right. Its a shame. falilure is a great regulator. regulation just provides hurdles and lawyers, I wish this guy below my post could understand that.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

Is to blame*.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 AM on 10/17/2009

we don't have free markets because the playing field will never be level, we are a competitor in the world and it's just not vanilla.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 AM on 10/17/2009

We apparently need to regulate responsible behavior, I for one, as a person of no debt, resent seeing my property values and my wealth decrease because of the irresponsibilty of others.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 AM on 10/17/2009

0_0

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

V_V

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

(_!_)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

What many on the left see is only the wealth and not what drives people to get that wealth.

It is greed and power. The founding fathers new this and gave an outlet to those in a free society made up on the principles of individualism, capitalism. The regulator for this use to be failure, unfortunately we now have regulations, crony corporatism, and courts withing the executive branch, that keep those who fail with wealth and power.

without greed there would be no wealth.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

Yessir.

Only difference is whether you earn your wealth or seize it.

Typically, the folks who advocate heightened regulations and decry the profits of capitalism are the same folks who would rather seize wealth.

I'm not surprised that they don't quite understand the value of money, given that they haven't exerted the energy that is typically required to amass it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

no system is perfect, never will be, but what we use to have was the best the world ever saw.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 AM on 10/17/2009
- Agent86 I'm a Fan of Agent86 548 fans permalink
photo

Jungle law.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 AM on 10/17/2009
- cavegal I'm a Fan of cavegal 216 fans permalink
photo

Like Wall Street did when the banks were too big to fail? Enforcing the regulations in place would be a good start and reinstating Glass-Steagall would go along way to sustaining the rugged individualism that defines our system of capitalism. Even Adam Smith believed the markets have to be regulated to control the dark side of man's nature.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 AM on 10/17/2009
- austin4 I'm a Fan of austin4 242 fans permalink

You mean , Ste al money

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 AM on 10/17/2009

You are misinformed.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

You know, when the founding fathers founded our country, it wasn't very capitalist. It was a weird hybrid between feudalism and mercantilism.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 AM on 10/17/2009
- shivasquest I'm a Fan of shivasquest 135 fans permalink

And many just sat back while the slaves made their wealth.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

The Founding Fathers have endorsing everything from collectivism to anarcho-capitalism, depending on who is using their image to serve whatever purpose.

Poor guys. I wish they were around to clear some of the confusion.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

*endorsed

Ahh I'm getting sloppy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 AM on 10/17/2009
- shivasquest I'm a Fan of shivasquest 135 fans permalink

Gee your too smart for me...mr geko...
Hows that workin for ya?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 AM on 10/17/2009

It's not necessarily greed and power, sometimes it's fear. I have yet to see where it says in the Constitution that capitalism is mentioned, i do see the bit about where we promote the general welfare, but a capitalistic society, where exactly is that?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 AM on 10/17/2009
photo

New main, btw.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 10/17/2009
- Dreamers101 I'm a Fan of Dreamers101 191 fans permalink
photo

Where the he// is my wealth (oh chit they got it)!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 10/17/2009
- PepeLepew I'm a Fan of PepeLepew 297 fans permalink
photo

... more Wall Street.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 10/17/2009
- EconPadawan I'm a Fan of EconPadawan 280 fans permalink
photo

Who gives a pfuck? (i'm not really insulting you, just my personality! =)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 AM on 10/17/2009
- Beachchick I'm a Fan of Beachchick 333 fans permalink
photo

I am off for the night. Thanks for the music, EP.

Night Pepe, Citizen, Agent, and my other critical thinking progressive friends.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 AM on 10/17/2009
- Beachchick I'm a Fan of Beachchick 333 fans permalink
photo

What is the topic? Goldman Sachs owns the U.S. but might sell.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 AM on 10/17/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (58 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect


svn