iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bean Amendment Beaten Back (For Now), A Blow To Wall Street

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:25 PM ET

Bean

In a major defeat for Wall Street banks, Rep. Melissa Bean (D-Ill.) has decided to withdraw an amendment that divided Democrats as they seek to impose stricter regulations on the financial industry.

A keystone Democratic reform would create a federal Consumer Financial Protection Agency, but would allow states to pass more aggressive regulations. Wall Street banks have been fighting to include "federal preemption" in the legislation, meaning that state regulations could be no tougher than the federal guidelines. Consumer advocates said they'd rather have no bill than one with preemption because the banks could either capture the federal regulator or a new administration could strip its teeth out.

"That was the biggest dispute among the Democrats within the committee," Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.) told HuffPost. Miller is a champion of the CFPA within the House Financial Services Committee.

Heather Booth, director of the pro-financial-regulation coalition Americans for Financial Reform, told HuffPost that Bean's amendment was considered the biggest threat to the CFPA.

The Washington Post reported on Monday that Bean planned to introduce her amendment at the committee hearing Tuesday, then withdraw it and engage in a public back and forth with chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) about the need to work toward a compromise.

That scenario is in serious doubt, however, because Bean's family has been stricken with what is apparently swine flu and she may be too contagious to travel to Washington. A Frank spokeswoman referred HuffPost to Bean and a spokesman for Bean declined to comment, but the Chicago Sun Times reported Monday that she canceled an event due to her family's sickness.

"The congresswoman and director were scheduled to speak with students about how to stay healthy this flu season and prevent the spread of the new H1N1 and seasonal flu viruses," he spokesman Jonathan Lipman told the paper.

"Ironically, the congresswoman was forced to cancel the event after her daughter was diagnosed late Saturday night with Type A Influenza, which means she likely has H1N1, also known as swine flu. Her husband has been sick for several days with similar symptoms but has not yet been diagnosed."

Whether Bean makes the trip to Congress Tuesday, the issue has been put to rest for now. "Melissa was going to withdraw the amendment," said Miller. "She was not going to push for it in the committee and that would make it possible for us to get [the CFPA bill] out of the committee."

It's a stark turnaround for Wall Street. Earlier this summer, Frank postponed a vote on the bill until the fall because he lacked the votes for passage after strenuous bank lobbying. Democrats have sought to divide Wall Street banks from smaller, community banks, each of which has enormous clout with the member of Congress who represents them.

An amendment by Miller and a more bank-friendly Democrat, Dennis Moore of Kansas, exempted community banks from some of the CFPA requirement, which helped soften some of their opposition.

The preemption fight is not over, however. "I think that it will continue to be an issue. And it's not that some Republicans will support it. Every Republican would support it," said Miller.

If Bean or an ally introduced it as an amendment on the House floor, it would need about 40 votes from Democrats to pass. "I think enough members whose point of view is more sympathetic to the industry would understand what a problem [preemption] is that they would not support it. And they do understand that it's a deal-breaker for consumer advocates and for progressives on the committee and in Congress," said Miller.

Still, it's far too early to celebrate, Miller said. "If I held a mirror under the nose of that issue, I'd see some fog, because it's still got to go to the floor and then it goes to the Senate," he said. "And God only knows what happens in the Senate."

UPDATE: Bean spokesman Lipman says Bean's unlikely to make it to the hearing. "At this point, we do not believe Congresswoman Bean will be in Washington tomorrow," he said in an e-mail. "Congresswoman Bean and the New Dems have promoted strong regulatory reforms that institute tough new consumer and investor protection rules, credit card reforms, higher capital requirements, and executive pay reforms, all of which put mandates on financial institutions that they don't like. Bean and New Dems have been focused on increasing transparency, reducing systemic risk, and preserving the ability for end user businesses to hedge their risk."

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

In a major defeat for Wall Street banks, Rep. Melissa Bean (D-Ill.) has decided to withdraw an amendment that divided Democrats as they seek to impose stricter regulations on the financial industry. ...
In a major defeat for Wall Street banks, Rep. Melissa Bean (D-Ill.) has decided to withdraw an amendment that divided Democrats as they seek to impose stricter regulations on the financial industry. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 311
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
07:21 PM on 10/20/2009
Here's a good disappearing act to watch:

After tonight's Fundraiser with the Wall Street Bankers, watch how fast FINANCIAL REGULATORY REFORM DISAPPEARS!!!!
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
06:46 PM on 10/20/2009
I think this is an act of GOD. JESUS doesn't want this ludicrous legislation.
She'd better not introduce it again, or who knows what might happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
03:47 PM on 10/20/2009
We need to DEFEAT BEAN with a PROGRESSIVE DEM. Who's running agin her next time????
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
06:48 PM on 10/20/2009
ABSOLUTELY! These Democrats who stand up AGAINST consumers and public interest are like a glass of Democratic water with a drop of Republican ink: polluted.
01:37 PM on 10/20/2009
Melissa Bean needs to go. Illinois can do better. In this climate, how can she even say the de-regulation.
photo
Grannysue
Been around for awhile!
12:38 PM on 10/20/2009
CARMA
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
06:50 PM on 10/20/2009
Gas
12:18 PM on 10/20/2009
she's a swine
12:12 PM on 10/20/2009
There are a few references to "New Dems" in the article.

What is this, another version of "blue dogs", or is this something else?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Americanium
Hillary 2016
08:14 AM on 10/20/2009
Is the flu Divine intervention??
photo
RRoadrunner
Living in a 'Pro-ignorant culture'
07:52 AM on 10/20/2009
Smoke and Mirrors - BF is on the side of Wall Street.
05:20 AM on 10/20/2009
I really don't understand what is going on. The repubs and centralist are all for regulation and the progressives are against it? Sounds like bill is protect companies from more laws. God knows companies shouldn't have to follow laws, not in a free market.

Then this "I think that it will continue to be an issue. And it's not that some Republicans will support it. Every Republican would support it,' said Miller." now I know the people are getting screwed. The banks and wall street are like to wild west no law, not that there isn't it's just that the laws are so weak or there are so few regulators that it is easily side-steped.
01:26 PM on 10/20/2009
Repubs and centrists are for as bill that can not be toughened by the states thus the amendment to remove language from the bill that would allow states to pass their own regulations that might be tougher then the feds. Progressives don't want the amendment added that strips out the ability for states to pass tougher regulation. Conservatives want the bill to be totally fed so they can go after a single bill in the future and try to water it down or remove it.
04:51 AM on 10/20/2009
The American people have had enough of toothless regulation......time to clamp down on this crap and it's starting
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fourex
01:02 AM on 10/20/2009
"Centrist Dem's Anti-Regulation Amendment Beaten Back"

Since most Democrats who voted for Obama wanted the market regulated, Bean's proposal is clearly to the right, and therefore she is not a 'Centrist'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treetracker
01:18 AM on 10/20/2009
She should not be considered a "Dem" either.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JeanRR
08:01 AM on 10/20/2009
Agreed. I did not vote for her in the last election. I doubt I will ever again vote for her.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
01:47 AM on 10/20/2009
Both parties are for regulation. They just say different things. Also the GOP is beholden to different industries than the Dems. But the results are the same...working Americans get screwed and the rich get richer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ajax2
12:26 AM on 10/24/2009
"Both parties are for regulation."

This is false, read anything from Greenspan, Friedman, Chicago school, Rubin, or Summers. Or just watch Frontline's 'Warning' where the right fought regulation to the last derivative collapse.
CarmanK
democrat, retired tax acct
12:54 AM on 10/20/2009
I hope her husband and daughter get well soon. But the timing could'nt be better for the rest of the nation. I would say that this is one for the middle class!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hollyhund
Don't judge all Texans by the ones you see on TV
01:02 AM on 10/20/2009
Can we call this Karma? Banking has more of Congress in their pockets than Insurance Companies. I hope Bean's family get well without complications.
12:31 AM on 10/20/2009
This "federal preemption" is much like the Republican idea that insurance companies should be allowed to sell across state lines; both are a way to destroy the ability of states to regulate big business.

We should never prevent states from establishing a higher standard.
12:08 AM on 10/20/2009
Why this idiocy of calling right wing Dems "centrist" when they are to the right of many Republicans? It is NOT centrist to block banking regulation, it is prostitution.