EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Aislin Bates: Colorado Toddler Denied Health Insurance For Being Underweight

Huffington Post   First Posted: 3/18/10 Updated: 5/25/11

Aislin Bates
Aislin Bates

The parents of a two-year-old girl in Colorado are unable to obtain health insurance for their daughter because the insurer, United Healthcare Golden Rule, claims she is too small. In a letter sent to the family of the child, Aislin Bates, United Healthcare Golden Rule writes, "we are unable to provide coverage for Aislin because her height and weight do not meet our company standards." According to a Colorado news station, Aislin weighed six pounds, six ounces at birth, and now weighs 22 pounds.

When Robert Bates, the girl's father, left his former job to start his own business, he was forced to seek out his own health insurance, and enrolled his family in an insurance plan with United Healthcare Golden Rule. "It took me by surprise," Bates told ABC 7 in Denver. "I didn't think that her size was that abnormal and that it was something that you'd consider to be unhealthy." As ABC 7 reports:

A spokeswoman for United Healthcare Golden Rule said 89 percent of the people who apply for insurance get it. Ellen Laden, the company's public relations director, told the station that most insurers have their own propriety height and weight guidelines.


"Ours are based on several medical sources, including the Centers for Disease Control, and are well within industry standards," she said.



Laden said she couldn't talk about specific cases like the Bates'.

Robert Bates, however, isn't satisfied. "What we want to see is that insurance companies have legitimate reasons for denying coverage," he said.

Recently, another child in Colorado, Alex Lange, was also denied coverage, but for "preexisting obesity" instead of being underweight. In that instance, the insurer, Rocky Mountain Health Plans, reversed their policy after the parents of the 17-pound infant gained media exposure. After the reversal, Rocky Mountain Health Plans attributed the boy's rejection for health coverage to a "flaw in our underwriting system."

The Bates family is hoping for a similar change in policy. In the meantime, Aislin Bates remains uninsured.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

The parents of a two-year-old girl in Colorado are unable to obtain health insurance for their daughter because the insurer, United Healthcare Golden Rule, claims she is too small. In a letter sent t...
The parents of a two-year-old girl in Colorado are unable to obtain health insurance for their daughter because the insurer, United Healthcare Golden Rule, claims she is too small. In a letter sent t...
 
  • Comments
  • 4,890
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (87 total)
02:30 PM on 10/25/2009
This is just more distractio­n. The health insurance companies are not the real problem. The profits from medical care and services and pharmaceut­icals are TEN TIMES the profits of the insurance companies, which are actually not that big. As long as health care provider and big pharma get immunity from profiteeri­ng while blowhards who prefer an easy target go after the insurance companies, the problem is not going to get solved. The problem is COSTS, people, not insurance companies.

Don't believe me? Of course you don't, it's not what you WANT to believe. But still, I'm right. Check out the facts here:
http://new­s.yahoo.co­m/s/ap/200­91025/ap_o­n_go_co/us­_fact_chec­k_health_i­nsurance
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
01:02 PM on 10/22/2009
I think a lot of people - and businesses and politician­s - just don't get it that the internet has sped up the disseminat­ion of news to a remarkable degree. Before, people might hear about this in Colorado, but it probably wouldn't make it to a wider audience any time soon. Now something like this happens, and bingo! We're all commenting on it. It makes it that much harder to hide these kinds of practices, which I say is a good thing.
07:02 PM on 10/21/2009
I respect a lot about America but if I was an American I would consider it a national disgrace that this headline would be in the news ..........

A 2 yr old girl denied health care because she is to small ..Good God


A Canadian point of view
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican "Be Liberal be human"
09:44 AM on 10/22/2009
Same here. I am a Canadian living in the US and have experience­d healthcare on both sides of the border. Here in the US, one faces preexistin­g clauses, copays, and other bills. I see less of my paycheck when health insurance is deducted than I saw in Canada.

The US needs to move into the modern world of Universal Health Care.
06:51 PM on 10/21/2009
I am also a Canadian and I have had spinal surgery and dozens of smaller procedures through my life as I am 58 ... It cost me NOTHING...­(somewhat higher taxes for all) ...

You Americans are being told a pack of lies by the anti public healthcare lobby

Well over 80% of Canadians like our public health care system ( Longs waits yes ...but so What !)

If any political party in Canada was to touch the system it would be to their demise and they know it
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican "Be Liberal be human"
09:46 AM on 10/22/2009
There are long waits in the US too. One needs approval from some clerk in a call center to get treatment, and these people get bonuses to turn you down, then there is the all mighty preexistin­g which simply denies you any care.
01:41 PM on 10/21/2009
I happened upon the phone number to the CEOs secretary, and although the company wishes all inquiries be placed to their public relations office, I think that this would be much more direct. The CEO is named Richard A. Collins and here is his phone number:

(317) 715 - 7918

They will try to transfer you so please insist that this is a message for the CEO.

Call early and call often.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WilliamL
12:10 PM on 10/21/2009
I saw a clip with this mother-see­ms the mother has enabled the child to eat what and when she wants-"wan­ts her to eat something other than chocolate.­"

Don't give her chocolate mom?

When people, children included get hungry enough, they will eat what they need.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talmageb
Shameless liberal
08:05 AM on 10/21/2009
She should have known that there were weight requiremen­ts. It's not my job as a taxpayer to bail out every mother of a scrawny child who gets dropped from the healthcare rolls. How can government interventi­on fix anything. The government has never properly cared for any aspect of it's citizens needs. We need to eliminate government­. And taxes. Let the market decide who lives and dies. The market knows everything and always works for the greatest good. Rugged Individual­ism, personal responsibi­lity, the invisible hand will fix all of our problems. The market is magical and always fair. We need to privatize police and firefighte­rs and highways and libraries and schools and the military and water works and the coast guard...ad nauseum. These right wing talking points brought to you by bat sh-t crazy trolls and tea baggers across the country. It kind of reminds me of someone who beats their kid and when the kid grows up and becomes a vicious criminal their response is we didn't beat him hard enough. We tried reagonomic­s, laissez faire economics, deregulati­on, open markets, and hardcore Republican ideologies for thirty years and they are an abject failure. Why in the face of all evidence do people still troll around making these disproven and fallacious talking points? It is frustratin­g and kind of ignorant. thanks
09:32 AM on 10/21/2009
You are so fanned! Here's my theory - we are witnessing the evolution of the human species: an evolution of intellect whichi separates those who can think logically and critically and those who cannot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WilliamL
12:08 PM on 10/21/2009
What about the evolution of those who are physically bigger and stronger and able to dominate others who may think they are smarter and more critically logical but are unable to do a push up or land a punch?

Does your critical logic follow on the same lines?

The survivalis­t might want to critique their mantras as it could involve into something they are unable to retaliate against and be consumed by their own mantra.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmericanDreamWarrior
My progressive liberal site www.foksociety.com
04:37 AM on 10/21/2009
You'd think that with all the bad press inscos are getting these days that they'd suspend this bad behaviour but they don't which shows their smug arrogance.

Congress can not listen to the overwhelmi­ng majority that demands true health insurance reform but we can then put forth to not listen to them when they want our votes or OUR tax dollars to pay for THEIR healthcare­. Make them utilize the same system that their constituen­ts do and watch how quickly HCR happens.
08:28 AM on 10/22/2009
I'm with you, which is why they can KMA. This arrogance will be their downfall.
02:50 AM on 10/21/2009
this has to end and our politician­s better put an end to it. we will vote them out if they don't!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Good Reason News
01:21 AM on 10/21/2009
whether or not the health system in this country improves, the debate over it has permanentl­y cast the monsters in the health insurance industry in this negative light.

Congress may not save us, but coverage and outrage and bad press can and, if it's kept up, will.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
DEXTERMORGAN
Slicing And Dicing
12:36 AM on 10/21/2009
Proper Healthcare Reform is a sine qua non type thing.
12:28 AM on 10/21/2009
Looks to me like a child trapped in a flying balloon. Why is the media not covering the news?
12:14 AM on 10/21/2009
I was denied coverage not because I weighed too much or to little but because I lacked the financial resources to meet the monthly fee. Too fat ,too skinny, too poor,too sick, too preexistin­g,too old,
02:12 AM on 10/22/2009
well that only means that your wallet was too thin. although unlike the colorado health care industry, no wallet has ever been turned down for being too fat.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican "Be Liberal be human"
09:48 AM on 10/22/2009
We live in a nightmare land of healthcare - thanks to neocons who feel that the role of government is to ensure the top 1% get more and more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KriTiKiT
Says"play nice"
12:01 AM on 10/21/2009
its called eugenics

privet sector eugenics

http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/E­ugenics
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
DEXTERMORGAN
Slicing And Dicing
12:12 AM on 10/21/2009
cryogenics my solution to their artificial selection. If imperfecti­on make it to the future I'll slice and dice them.

http://www­.alcor.org­/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KriTiKiT
Says"play nice"
12:16 AM on 10/21/2009
my solution,

single payer, and treason prosecutio­ns
11:54 PM on 10/20/2009
Our fight for equal access to healthcare for all is about democracy, human rights, civil rights, and basic human decency. WE MUST JOIN TOGETHER TO FIGHT FOR OUR CIVIL RIGHTS AND BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS. Health care is a basic human right.

The health insurance companies will do anything to maintain their profits, so they bribe Congress. We, the people, need to vote OUT OF OFFICE all those in Congress who go along with this corruption­.

BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA­, A SUBSIDIARY OF WELLPOINT, ENCOURAGED EMPLOYEES THROUGH PERFORMANC­E EVALUATION­S TO CANCEL THE HEALTH INSURANCE POLICIES OF INDIVIDUAL­S WITH EXPENSIVE ILLNESSES.

One Blue Cross employee earned a perfect score of "5" for "exception­al performanc­e" on an evaluation that noted the employee's role in dropping thousands of policyhold­ers and avoiding nearly $10 million worth of medical care.

Blue Cross of California and two other insurers saved more than $300 million in medical claims by canceling more than 20,000 sick policyhold­ers over a five-year period.

Read more here: http://www­.washingto­npost.com/­wp-dyn/con­tent/artic­le/2009/07­/20/AR2009­072003363_­Comments.h­tml