Bush TARP Head: Obama Picking Up Where We Left Off, "Actions Are Very Consistent" (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush TARP Head: Obama Picking Up Where We Left Off, "Actions Are Very Consistent" (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10-20-09 02:54 PM   |   Updated: 10-20-09 04:14 PM

What's Your Reaction?

When it comes to bank bailouts, the Obama administration is continuing right where the Bush administration left off, says the former high-ranking official who used to run the program.

Neel Kashkari, the widely-criticized former Goldman Sachs banker who led the team that administered the Troubled Assets Relief Program, said in an interview Tuesday that while the messaging of the Obama administration is different from the previous administration, the actions are pretty much the same.

"I think the Bush administration or the [potential] McCain administration may talk about things a little differently than the Obama administration. But I think the substance of the actions are very consistent," Kashkari said during an interview on CNBC. (Bonus detail: Kashkari also says that since leaving government, he's been busy chopping wood outside of his home in Lake Tahoe, CA)

"[Treasury Secretary] Tim Geithner's a very smart guy, [National Economic Council Director] Larry Summers is a very smart guy. They know what we need to substantively. I think that the way that a Democratic administration talks about certain issues is probably a little different than the way a Republican administration does, and that's appropriate, and that's to be expected. But the substance of the actions, I think, are very consistent, and that's been important," Kashkari said.

And at least one prominent critic of the bailout agrees with that assertion.

"One thing I'd give [the Obama administration] credit for is that at least they've proposed reform measures, like higher capital requirements for 'too big to fail' banks," said Dean Baker, an economist and co-director of the progressive Center for Economic and Policy Research. "But suppose you didn't know when the election took place, and you looked at what was happening with the bailout month by month, could you have detected a break? I sure can't."

In discussing TARP, Baker added part of the problem is that there was, and continues to be, a lack of meaningful conditions imposed on bailed-out banks. Baker points to Goldman Sachs, for example, who after repaying taxpayers the $10 billion it received last fall, has set aside more than $16 billion this year for employee compensation. The firm continues to have a taxpayer guarantee on some $25 billion in FDIC-backed debt, according to regulatory filings.

President Barack Obama, while campaigning for the presidency last fall, personally lobbied reluctant members of Congress to quickly pass legislation authorizing the eventual $700 billion bank bailout, Baker says. "He personally called progressive members of Congress and lobbied them. There certainly was a lot of support to put conditions on the bailout, but all the conditions that were put in there were a joke," Baker says. "They haven't restricted the banks in any serious way."

Baker adds that he'd take back his criticisms if Congress passes a strong regulatory reform package, but says "it doesn't look like that's gonna happen."

The Treasury Department didn't respond to an immediate request for comment.


Get HuffPost Business On Facebook and Twitter!

When it comes to bank bailouts, the Obama administration is continuing right where the Bush administration left off, says the former high-ranking official who used to run the program. Neel Kashkari...
When it comes to bank bailouts, the Obama administration is continuing right where the Bush administration left off, says the former high-ranking official who used to run the program. Neel Kashkari...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
114
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- Hank007 I'm a Fan of Hank007 74 fans permalink

So which is it? Obama is following Bush, and giving out huge sums of money to his friends with no accounting, or Obama is holding onto the stimulus money, which he is supposed to be putting into the economy? You can't complain in both directions.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 10/22/2009
- RightOn5 I'm a Fan of RightOn5 9 fans permalink

Change....please Change....HRC for 2012

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 AM on 10/22/2009
photo

OK, so let me get this straight:

The guy who gave out $700B in taxpayer funds with absolutely no strings attached now wants to complain that the Obama administration isn't managing TARP well enough.

Remind me again which administration he worked for. Oh yeah Bush.

'nough said.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 10/22/2009
- niblik I'm a Fan of niblik 21 fans permalink

Yeah, this guy isn't exactly showing up with any credentials that I would trust.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 10/22/2009
- olephart I'm a Fan of olephart 104 fans permalink

Obama has kept virtually everything the same. Bailouts, Wars, military spending, crony contracts like Halliburton and Blackwater, tax cuts, no investigations of War crimes or Wall Street frauds, just a smooth transition into more of the same. He’s added a few bucks for the stimulus and has talked about regulation but that’s about it. I’ve got some bad news, this approach won’t work. Not fixing what is horribly broken, sweeping egregious actions under the rug and throwing a few dollars at something will not bring this Nation back to life. The so called recovery looks more like a dead cat bounce than a substantive upswing.

In a few months when the economy is still dragging, jobs are still disappearing and the deficit keeps climbing the Obama team may go into panic mode. If the recent past is a guide then they will once again push the wrong buttons and try to keep a ship full of holes afloat by moving the water from one side of the vessel to the other.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 10/21/2009

For a more perfect unions we must have:

Jobs,job securi.ty, job benefits, universal pre school-K.12, housing, affordable college education affordable health are that doesn't ban.krupt sic.k families

good articles; http://ow.ly/dmzm

a better society is one that creates opportunity

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 10/21/2009

This guy is just creepy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 10/21/2009
- sposton I'm a Fan of sposton 163 fans permalink
photo

What is really creepy is that what he is saying is true.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 10/21/2009
photo

At some point liberals will figure out that Bush destroyed the Republican party, because he himself was a big spending liberal. If you want to know what the results of Obama's administration will be. Take a hard look at the last eight years.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 AM on 10/21/2009
- dc2nm I'm a Fan of dc2nm 18 fans permalink

Keep trying...still not working. Bush is all yours.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 AM on 10/21/2009
photo

Yup, and Obama's continuation of his policies will be all yours.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 10/21/2009
- KIVPossum I'm a Fan of KIVPossum 43 fans permalink
photo

Is this a new tactic? Try to convince people Bush was actually a liberal and the REAL GOP is different? Good luck with that one buddy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 10/21/2009
photo

No it's not a tactic. It's a fact. The Republican party is rediculous. This is why so many conservatives don't identify themselves as republican. Conservatives believe in lower taxes and less government infringement. You certiany can't say that about republicans. They seem to be all for big government if it's some issue they stand for. Republicans don't mind the government telling people who they can marry, gays can't serve in the military, bailing out companies where all their pals hold stocks. These are not conservative stances. They are liberal positions on different issues than the Democrats, but no less liberal.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 10/21/2009

From your comments, you obviously did not live in American for the last 8 years or your head is still stuck in the sand.
NO ONE in their right mind would ever want to live through the last administration again.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 10/21/2009
- Jannsmoor I'm a Fan of Jannsmoor 64 fans permalink

The 'too big to fail' companies need to be broken up and the ratings agencies imprisoned. Anything less is a whitewash.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 10/21/2009
- vlm1948 I'm a Fan of vlm1948 6 fans permalink

Agreed.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 10/21/2009
- Jannsmoor I'm a Fan of Jannsmoor 64 fans permalink

TARP is an acronym for "pretense to make people think you are going to help mortgage holders but in fact push billions at your friends on Wall Street." Thanks Henry Paulson. You are smart enough to swindle the American people, why aren't you moral enough to actually help them?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 10/20/2009
- Jannsmoor I'm a Fan of Jannsmoor 64 fans permalink

I admit it. I am absolutely, completely, 100% incapable of understanding how this guy was trusted with even one dollar of taxpayer money, let alone hundreds of billions.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 10/20/2009
- samaire I'm a Fan of samaire 15 fans permalink
photo

Obama , could you please stand for something? Now?!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 10/20/2009
photo

This is where I differ from Obama. Let them fail.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 10/20/2009
photo

What, exactly, is bush tarp? Underwear?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 10/20/2009
- XzibitX I'm a Fan of XzibitX 124 fans permalink
photo

toxic asset relief program

a bullchit term for covering up skullduggery while fleecing the american people.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 10/20/2009
photo

"Obama is still following the Hoover failure. ..."

It's actually the other way around. Defeating TARP would be following the Hoover plan. Preventing TARP recycling would be following the Hoover plan. Voting to reduce the deficit, at this point in time, would be following the Hoover plan. Stopping Bernanke from expanding the Federal Reserve balance sheet, would be following the Hoover plan.

There are suddenly tons of progressives who are all on board with causing the 2nd Great Depression - just like when the Hoover plan and a defective Federal policy exacerbated the 1st Great Depression.

And on Frontline, the biggest advocate of following the Hoover plan, Bill Moyers, will once agin get the financial crisis all wrong.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 PM on 10/20/2009
- urbangreen I'm a Fan of urbangreen 3 fans permalink

Not so! You've bought the BS that throwing taxpayer money at the banksters was the only way out of this disaster. All that this has done is increase concentration in the financial sector and create a new asset bubble.

Obama could have forced the banks to re-negotiate the mortgages for homeowners in possession in exchange for a single $ of taxpayer money. He could have conditioned the bailout on a requirement that the banks convert the mortgage debt (or some part of it) into an equity stake in the property.

It would work like this: homeowner X owes $300K on the mortgage but can't meet the monthly payments since the adjustable interest rate jumped to 8 or 9%. The bank would have to accept 5% and take a 20% equity stake in the home (equal to the interest foregone). The bank would thereby share in any potential profit -- or loss. When X sells the property (presumably when the market has recovered) the bank takes 20% of the sale price. The bank might make more than it otherwise would have or it might lose if the home is under water (worth less than the debt) at the time of sale.

This would have had the salutary effect of stabilizing home prices, improving the bank balance sheets without creating the excess liquidity that has allowed the banksters to continue gambling with taxpayer money.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 10/20/2009
photo

In the span of two or three weeks, a Presidential candidate could force the banks to renegotiate all troubled mortgages? So you are saying the guy can walk on water?

Have you ever heard of a thing called congress? You should look into it. They have this thing called voting. Really weird, to pass something they have to have sufficient votes. Pretty strange stuff.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 10/20/2009
- Jannsmoor I'm a Fan of Jannsmoor 64 fans permalink

It was my understanding TARP was a Bush program.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 10/20/2009

Goldman Sachs, through its CEO Lloyd Blankein, said that Goldman did not need government assistance and wishes that he never borrowed money under the favorable terms of the FDIC's Term Loan Guarantee Program (TLGP). As mentioned in the article, Goldman currently has approx 22-25 billion out in this facility.

So, is Blankfein a hypocrite?

PS....as has been asked repeatedly at zerohedge, have you paid the bonds off LB and gone out to the capital markets like a big boy and borrowed at market rates? Still waiting for that press release. Until then, the answer to the question above is "yes".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 10/20/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect