The Forgettable And The Overlooked In Lit Prizes

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - The Forgettable And The Overlooked In Lit Prizes stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |  Jessie Kunhardt
First Posted: 10-20-09 07:57 AM   |   Updated: 10-20-09 02:31 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Overlooked

This year is a good one for female writers; most of the major literature prizes have gone to women, though whether this is a fluke, a new trend of heightened equality, or a sign that "literary fiction itself is succumbing to entropy," as Erica Jong muses in her new piece for HuffPost. Just as a shallow film, Shakespeare in Love beat out the film with more staying power, Saving Private Ryan at the Oscars, great writers have been overlooked for prestigious prizes ever since the conception of these prizes. Not just women, either. Even Steve Leveen, a member of the board of directors for the National Book Awards, admitted the preposterous omissions over the years when trying to choose the best novel of the past 60 years.

It's great to recognize less popular literature, and there's nothing wrong with awards going to authors unheard of by the general public, but some of the omissions over the years are too crazy not to take note of. So, in the spirit of celebrating the overlooked greats and gawking over the most forgettable of the winners, we bring you some of the most questionable decisions in literature prizes:


The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald
Despite being required reading for practically every high school student in the country, The Great Gatsby never won a single literature prize. The winner of the Pulitzer in 1925, the year it was published was, instead, So Big by Edna Ferber, which is decidedly not the Great American Novel, though it may be a favorite of young girls.


Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov
Nabokov is widely regarded as one of the greatest writers of the 21st century, and Lolita is far and away his most well-respected novel. It was groundbreaking in terms of its intricate style, its fascinating and unreliable narrator, and its controversial subject matter, but it was shortlisted for the National Book Award in 1959, losing to The Magic Barrel by Bernard Malamud.


William Faulkner
Faulkner never won a literature prize until 20 years or more after his greatest works of fiction were published. Overlooked for the Pulitzer time and again, Faulkner was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1949. He later won the Pulitzer twice for A Fable and The Reivers, both considered minor novels compared to earlier greats like As I Lay Dying and The Sound and the Fury.


Howl and Other Poems, Allen Ginsberg
"Howl" has gone down in history as one of the central works of the Beat Generation. It has become one of the most popular poems of its generation and beyond. And yet, "Howl" never won any literature awards, possibly because of its controversial language, which was originally considered obscene.


The Handmaid's Tale, Margaret Atwood
Though The Handmaid's Tale was awarded a couple of minor literature prizes, it was majorly overlooked when it came to the 1986 Booker Prize. Though nominated, this classic feminist dystopian novel lost to Kingsley Amis's The Old Devils. Does anyone remember that one?



Get HuffPost Books On Facebook and Twitter!

This year is a good one for female writers; most of the major literature prizes have gone to women, though whether this is a fluke, a new trend of heightened equality, or a sign that "literary fiction...
This year is a good one for female writers; most of the major literature prizes have gone to women, though whether this is a fluke, a new trend of heightened equality, or a sign that "literary fiction...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
5
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

I remember "The Old Devils." It's a great book. "The Handmaid's Tale" bored me so much I couldn't finish it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 11/19/2009

I love The Great Gatsby, but This Side of Paradise is a far better work.

And Faulkner ... while the ideas and themes in his works are strong, I'm not a huge fan of his writing style. One sentence which lasts pages and pages is not (in my opinion) indicative of a strong writer.

Kurt Vonnegut should also be added to the list of overlooked authors. He pioneered a new writing style and tone; yet he is often overlooked in canonical literary circles ... perhaps b/c much of what he did could be considered science fiction. It's an unfortunate fact that science fiction is often disregarded as "critical literature­."

But we all have different preferences.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 10/22/2009
- Jessie Kunhardt - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Jessie Kunhardt permalink

Good point; Kurt Vonnegut is somewhat overlooked as well... I don't think he ever won any of the major lit prizes either.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 10/23/2009
- iamjones I'm a Fan of iamjones 7 fans permalink
photo

Lolita has always been one of my favorites and please do not forget The Enchanter, the novella that was the precursor to Lolita.

I keep telling anyone who'll listen that Angle of Repose by Wallace Stegner is one of the very best American novels. Anyone who has read it will tell you. I think Stegner is overlooked in the American canon in general, which I've never understood.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 10/20/2009
- jdrourke I'm a Fan of jdrourke 13 fans permalink

Nice piece. It's good that smaller titles and lesser known authors can still be given their due. It shouldn't be Dan Brown all the time...

http://jdrourke.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/dear-author-dan-brown/

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 10/20/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect