More

Administration Plans Big Pay Cuts At Bailout Firms

Bama

MARTIN CRUTSINGER   10/21/09 11:47 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration will order companies that received huge government bailouts last year to slash the base salaries of their top executives by an average of 90 percent and cut their total compensation in half, a person familiar with the decision said Wednesday.

The cuts apply to the 25 highest paid executives at the seven companies that received the most assistance, said the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the decision has not been announced. Smaller companies and those that have repaid the bailout money, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., are not affected.

The Treasury is expected to announce the cuts within the next few days.

Kenneth Feinberg, the special master at Treasury appointed to handle compensation issues as part of the government's $700 billion financial bailout package, is making the pay decisions.

The seven companies are Bank of America Corp., American International Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., General Motors, GMAC, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial.

It was unclear exactly how much the executives would be allowed to make, or how that would be determined. Each case is being handled individually, and no details were available on how the calculations were being made.

In the AIG trading division, the arm of the company whose risky trades caused its downfall, no top executive will receive more than $200,000 in total compensation, the person familiar with Feinberg's plan said. The giant insurance company has received taxpayer assistance valued at more than $180 billion.

In an August filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, AIG disclosed that new CEO Robert Benmosche would be paid $7 million a year, with the potential to make millions more in performance-based incentives. According to reports from the time, the package included $3 million initially with $4 million in stock to be held for five years as well as performance bonuses.

As CEO, Benmosche's pay would be considered outside of the $200,000 average compensation for AIG's trading unit. But, according to reports at the time, Feinberg saw splitting the salary and future stock bonuses as a model because it tied compensation to the company's long-range performance.

The administration will warn AIG that it must significantly reduce the $198 million in bonuses promised to employees in its financial services division, the person familiar with Feinberg's decisions said.

The pay restrictions for all seven companies will require any executive seeking more than $25,000 in special benefits – things such as country club memberships, private planes and company cars – to get permission for those perks from the government.

Until now, these companies were only required to provide guidelines for the use of such luxuries. The inspector general at Treasury who oversees the bailout program found a range of standards. GM, for instance, generally prohibits employees from flying in private jets for business travel. Bank of America, on the other hand, encourages senior management to use corporate aircraft "for safety and efficiency purposes."

Feinberg's decisions come days after administration officials voiced sharp criticism of plans by some firms, particularly those on Wall Street, to pay huge bonuses even as the country continues to struggle with rising unemployment and the effects of the recession.

Goldman Sachs, which has paid back its bailout money, has said it earmarked $16.7 billion for compensation so far this year, more than $500,000 per employee. Citigroup is paying $5.3 billion in bonuses to its employees and Bank of America $3.3 billion.

Elsewhere, Freddie Mac is giving its chief financial officer compensation worth as much as $5.5 million, including a $2 million signing bonus. The government-controlled mortgage finance company doesn't have to follow the executive compensation rules because it is being paid outside the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

Congress passed legislation in February requiring Treasury to oversee pay at companies that took bailout money. Treasury created the pay czar's office in June as one means of implementing that law.

Treasury's rules require the special master to review pay for the 25 top earners at companies that received "exceptional assistance," examining overall pay structures and recapturing payouts that go against taxpayers' interests.

Feinberg on Tuesday told a Washington audience that negotiating with the companies was a study in contradictions.

"Perfect metrics, competitive pay, no excessive risk, loyalty to the company," he said. "What I have to do under the law – and everyone's waiting" is to create compensation packages "reflecting those often conflicting principals."

Feinberg has until Oct. 30 to design pay packages for top earners.

Tom Wilkinson, a GM spokesman, said Wednesday that the auto company was "currently in discussions with Mr. Feinberg's office regarding executive compensation. We will have further information once those discussions have concluded."

Gina Proia, a spokeswoman for GMAC, said the finance company has "been working on a proposal that aims at embodying the principles set forth for compensation along with balancing the need to retain critical talent necessary to execute our turnaround. Until we receive notification about that plan, we have no further comment."

Chrysler Group issued a similar statement.

Representatives for Chrysler Financial, Bank of America, Citigroup and AIG declined to comment.

But company officials and lobbyists earlier this month said Bank of America, Citigroup, GMAC Financial Services and others were reworking their pay plans to ensure compensation reflects executive performance. They're giving executives more of their compensation in stock and stock options, and spreading pay over a longer period. They are also adopting plans to recapture some pay when bets go bad.

The changes are not limited to those on Feinberg's list. JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. also are compensating senior employees with more stock and less cash.

Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas, a Republican member of the congressional panel that oversees the $700 billion fund, said the only way taxpayers end up "subsidizing offensive executive salaries is when the government bails out the executives and the companies they run in the first place."

Hensarling called again Wednesday for terminating the bailout program at the end of this year.

____

Associated Press Writers Ken Thomas, Jim Kuhnhenn and Marcy Gordon contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration will order companies that received huge government bailouts last year to slash the base salaries of their top executives by an average of 90 percent and cut...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration will order companies that received huge government bailouts last year to slash the base salaries of their top executives by an average of 90 percent and cut...
Filed by Arthur Delaney  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:06 AM on 10/24/2009
One huge problem with all this redistribution of wealth thing people. If you cut execs. pay by 90%, you cut the taxes they pay by 90%. That's millions of dollars taken from tax payments. Who ends up picking up that tax bill? Answer: All the middle class workers, that's who. Quit hating and think about what's going on here!!! Do you want to make up the difference? I don't!!!
08:35 AM on 10/23/2009
the people who ran the company into the ground are gone. You now want to cut the pay of the people brought in to fix the problem. If another company knows these are good people and will pay them more do you think they will stay? No. No one will. You end up with inferior people doing the job. Just as in the baseball analogy. What part of that don't you understand? I want these companies to succeed so I can get the money back I and everyone else invested in it. I want the best person for the job. To get the best you need to pay for it.
photo
DaveyDavey
Micro-biohazard
05:50 PM on 10/22/2009
Excellent!

Listen up, Mr. Big Shot CEO: if I want to put MY money in YOUR pocket, I'll by a car (or stock, or whatever).
You don't get to take public funds and award your sorry performance with it.
08:49 AM on 10/23/2009
What part of the ones who caused the failure are gone, don't you understand? Now you want to make sure it continues to fail by only keeping inferior workers. Anyone who starts to turn it around and shows any worth will be hired away by other companies paying more money. Stop letting people manipulate you like a puppet by using class envy. Have a stronger mind.
If you work for $200,000.00 and another employer offered you $500,000.00 and bonuses wouldn't you take it? Of course you would.
The only way to get the peoples money back is to have someone who knows what they are doing and you have to pay for that.
10:43 AM on 10/22/2009
Dumbest thing gov't can do. They are guaranteeing we will not get they're money back. The good people will go to other companies.
example. cap the salaries of the Yankees at $200,000.00 and see how competetive they are against the teams without this cap.
quit being a hater.
photo
lisaman
vote for your best interests or shut up
12:58 PM on 10/22/2009
These companies were paying huge bonuses to CEO's and still failed! So what good did it do them? Your post makes no sense, it is just another capitalistic response to justify their greed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dspencer3491
09:44 AM on 10/22/2009
Why didn't we do this during the bailout?
Grunty1
Micro-bio this
10:14 AM on 10/22/2009
President Veto Crayon.
08:19 AM on 10/22/2009
Minimum wgae = $7.25 per hour
Maximum Wage = $725.00 per hour
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
08:41 AM on 10/22/2009
Good reign these banksters in...no bonuses for failure...you not only killed your banks, you bankrupted the country. you all should be in jail...where you could receive a fitting bonus like pack of cigarettes.
08:17 AM on 10/22/2009
Send in the "Tax Man"
You gotta' pay iffn' you wanna' play!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
05:37 AM on 10/22/2009
Limited to 25 execs at 7 companies. BFD. How 'bout including the thousands who got big checks written on our tax $?
09:25 AM on 10/24/2009
One huge problem with all this redistribution of wealth thing people. If you cut execs. pay by 90%, you cut the taxes they pay by 90%. That's millions of dollars taken from tax payments. Who ends up picking up that tax bill? Answer: All the middle class workers, that's who. Quit hating and think about what's going on here!!! Do you want to make up the difference? I don't!!!



Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/administration-plans-big_n_329302.html#postComment
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
03:00 PM on 10/24/2009
I doubt middle class workers would mind paying their take rate on a pay raise. You give me 100$, I'll pay 40$ any day of the week.
04:24 AM on 10/22/2009
Yeah, well they are TALKING about it. We shall see WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS, which is always a huge series of ?????'s with this do next to nothing but give speeches president.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:51 AM on 10/22/2009
Why is Obama involved in their pay--that should not be the role of government. Leave them be to sink or swim. These companies should have NEVER been bailed out to begin with either as that should not be a role of gov either--bailing out these big companies--NO!
I am not comfortable with this whole thing--yet another disappointment.
04:25 AM on 10/22/2009
It is a performance piece. Do you have ANY IDEA how much Obama and the rest of Washington is into these guys for? Can ANYONE believe politicians receive BILLIONS in contributions and do not have to pay these guys back for their KA KA KA CHINGING?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Solja
08:11 AM on 10/22/2009
That's right (Republican tr0//), take up for the corporate greed. It's only appropriate coming from a Republican.
01:05 AM on 10/22/2009
You ran your company into the ground, you had to be bailed out by the American people who have had their own lives severely impacted by your choices, you don't get that astronomical paycheck and bonus. Cause and effect. Simple.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:52 AM on 10/22/2009
they should have never been bailed out.
04:29 AM on 10/22/2009
There is something you have to understand about the so called collapse. It too was fabricated. It was designed to be just what it was, the largest GRAND THEFT LARCENY in the history of this nation. Nothing has changed. All who received BILLIONS are doing business as usual. No regulation. No knowledge of where it is being spent and how. Execs receiving billions in compensation. The housing market a shambles. No lending going on. And the volume beginning to increase on yes, ANOTHER STIMULUS, that will be more of the same... No regulation. No knowledge of where it is being spent and how. Execs receiving billions in compensation. The housing market a shambles. No lending going on.
12:58 AM on 10/22/2009
Good luck finding someone to oversee our $180 Billion investment for $200 gurr a year. Brilliant move!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
08:43 AM on 10/22/2009
We could not do worse then what these guys did...we need a fresh perspective.
12:23 AM on 10/22/2009
Buy Ford!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
10:47 PM on 10/21/2009
Sweet music to my ears. What are these CEOs gonna do, find another job? There aren't any.
10:54 PM on 10/21/2009
They have made so much money by now that these cuts is a drop in the bucket.
10:19 PM on 10/21/2009
This is such garbage. Goldman Sachs and Chase are exempt? Really? This seems more like a PR move by the white house than an actual stand against Wall Street. The idea that since they paid back their bailout money, they're exempt from these salary caps is a joke. Those companies used taxpayer money to achieve huge profits, interest free!