More

Bank Pay: Fed Proposes Guidelines On Compensation For The First Time

JEANNINE AVERSA   10/22/09 06:11 PM ET   AP

Bank Pay

WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve would police banks' pay policies to ensure they don't encourage employees to take reckless gambles like those that contributed to the financial crisis, according to a proposal unveiled Thursday.

Unlike a Treasury plan to slash pay at certain companies that were bailed out with large sums of taxpayer money, the Fed proposal would cover thousands of banks, including many that never received a bailout.

The Fed would not actually set compensation. Instead, the central bank would review – and could veto – pay policies that could cause too much risk-taking by executives, traders or loan officers.

It's the Fed's latest response to criticism that it failed to crack down on lax lending, irresponsible risk taking and other practices that many blame for contributing to the worst financial crisis since the 1930s.

The Fed's goal is to make sure banks' pay policies don't encourage top managers or other employees to take gambles that could endanger the company, the broader financial system or the economy.

"Compensation practices at some banking organizations have led to misaligned incentives and excessive risk-taking, contributing to bank losses and financial instability," said Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. "The Federal Reserve is working to ensure that compensation packages appropriately tie rewards to longer-term performance and do not create undue risk for the firm or the financial system."

Under the proposal, the 28 biggest banks would develop their own plans to make sure compensation doesn't spur undue risk taking. If the Fed approves, the plan would be adopted and bank supervisors would monitor compliance.

To get a broad picture of industry pay, the Fed also will internally compare and contrast results across the big banks. It is not anticipated that the central bank will make public the results of this so-called "horizontal review," Fed officials said.

The Fed refused to identify the 28 banks that will have to submit plans. But Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. are usually included among the largest banks.

Compensation arrangements for senior executives at big banks are likely to be better balanced if they involve deferral of a "substantial portion" of compensation over a multiyear period in a way that reduces the amount received due to poor performance, the Fed suggested.

At smaller banks – where compensation is typically less – Fed supervisors will conduct reviews. Those banks don't have to submit plans.

All told, nearly 6,000 banks regulated by the Fed would be covered.

Because of differences between large and small banks and the various ways compensation can be structured, the Fed said it decided against a "one size fits all" approach.

The Fed did suggest that banks, among other things, carefully review "golden parachutes," which typically provide senior executives with large payments without regard to outcomes, to ensure they don't encourage undue risk-taking.

Banks too often rewarded employees for increasing the firm's short-term revenue or profit, without adequate recognition of the risks posed for the company, one of the many factors feeding into the financial crisis, the Fed said.

"Aligning the interests of shareholders and employees ... is not always sufficient to protect the safety and soundness of a banking organization," according to the Fed proposal.

The public, industry and other interested parties will have an opportunity to weigh in on the Fed's proposal.

After a 30-day comment period, the proposal could be revised before a final plan is adopted. Fed officials said they want to move quickly but wouldn't commit to a final plan being adopted this year.

Still, the Fed said it expects banks to immediately review their compensation arrangements and implement "corrective programs where needed."

The Fed also may ban certain practices if "further experience" reveals a problem. The central bank said it will ask the public, industry and others to provide feedback on this point.

The findings from the Fed's compensation reviews will be included when supervisors rate a bank for financial soundness. Bank ratings are usually kept confidential.

The Fed also will put together a report – sometime after next year – on trends and developments in compensation practices at banks.

Although Fed officials said they were confident that supervisors would have the necessary expertise to assess compensation practices, outside experts thought the Fed might have to hire additional people to do so.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve would police banks' pay policies to ensure they don't encourage employees to take reckless gambles like those that contributed to the financial crisis, according...
WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve would police banks' pay policies to ensure they don't encourage employees to take reckless gambles like those that contributed to the financial crisis, according...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 107
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinns17
TEAMSTER
11:44 AM on 10/23/2009
http://www.banksterusa.org/blog
photo
JackRusselTerrier
sniff out the truth and chew on facts
10:23 AM on 10/23/2009
Funny how the Fed wants to review the banks, but does not want to be audited themselves. This reeks of a scam in the making.
photo
humanbeing-rick
Born in the USA 1947
08:20 AM on 10/23/2009
American society has become immoral and godless, dominated by spoiled, greedy, white collar businessmen. Ever since childhood, I have always admired the hard working men and women of the world, you know, the ones that actually work and produce items of value.
I was proud to work side by side with hard workers, and took pride in what our hard work accomplished. I took great pride and learning the skills and wisdom that they passed down to the next generation.
Now we are dominated by fat, old, white businessmen who thinks they are superior to everyone else.
I despise these Wall Street gamblers and leacherous bankers. I despise these coddled and spoiled CEO's and rich executives who took our jobs and money away.
What is wrong with America?
Stop glorifying these white collar sleaze bags, and bring the glory and dignity back to the hard working men and women of America, at least the few who are left.
Down with the white collar executives! They have no virtue, but are criminals of the lowest degree.

Put bankers on the minimum wage, and see how they like it.
The bankers need to pay back all the money they stole from us, and shut up.
The bankers disgust me, and most Americans feel the same way.
09:40 AM on 10/23/2009
Who do you think pays the workers?
09:44 AM on 10/23/2009
Pretty well all the large banks have already paid back their TARP funds -- so no money stolen from you there.

Now what about your taxes that went towards non-bank bailouts -- the three auto companies.

Do you want that money back right away? Or do you want it to stay invested in these companies a little while longer, so that the workers whom you admire so much can keep their jobs?

Notice that the money has been invested in the auto companies -- not given to them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
08:04 AM on 10/23/2009
While they are at it they need to rein in the CEOs of Healthcare Industry, their salaries put the Wall Street Gang to shame! But I believe it when I see it. Obama will have to shelf this idea as well.
Our congress needs to be fired, anyone still has doubts?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joebhed
Greenback Revolutionist
07:54 AM on 10/23/2009
peepeedickin' .
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
07:24 AM on 10/23/2009
THIS IS TOTALLY ASSININE...think about it, all they have to do is run SQL queries on the IRS data for the tax ids, sort it by income and voila..... Of course the Feds want to play the STALL GAME...for their friends in high (high, I do not mean MJ) places.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
06:44 AM on 10/23/2009
G0LDMAN HAS ONLY PAID 15.26% of the MONEY IT RECEIVED FROM AMERICANS

http://www.businessinsider.com/dylan-ratigan-how-goldman-sachs-made-3-billion-a-year-after-we-bailed-their-lucky-asses-out-2009-10

G0LDMAN got the Following:

1. $10 Billion from TARP
2. $11 Billion from FED
3. $30 Billion from FDIC
4. $13 Billion from A1G pass through

Total = $64 Billion

They have paid back only the $10 Billion in TARP money or 15.26%! When and where is the other $54 Billion!

Time to LIMIT their INCOMES just like CIT and BofA!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
06:47 AM on 10/23/2009
Skimming of Profits TICKS-OFF US INVESTORS!

Aside: All transactions that DO NOT ADD VALUE TO THE REAL ECONOMY SHOULD BE OUTLAWED!
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
07:25 AM on 10/23/2009
But you know WARREN BABY got his Billion dollars in interest from Goldman sux....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
06:43 AM on 10/23/2009
We AMERICANS Must stop the THEFT of BANK PROFITS by Executive Employees!

They expect Americans to clean up the Resulting SHELL of the Corporation/BANK!

Why the Stakeholders ALLOW this Skimming THEFT is unfathomable!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
06:39 AM on 10/23/2009
Republicans, Conservatives, Liberals, Progressives, and Democrats have a MUTUAL ENEMY in the FED!

We must unlink (DELINK) the Bank Ownership of the FED Reserve and make the FED Reserve a "TRUE" agency of the Federal Government, by REMOVING BANK OWNERSHIP which has resulted in the repeated "Bubble Boom-Bust Harvesting of American Wealth for the Benefit and WEALTH of the EL1TISTS BANKSTERS!"
photo
constitutional 1
No ad hominem
05:38 AM on 10/23/2009
"including many that never received a bailout." this is very dangerous path.They will not stop with the banks
03:10 AM on 10/23/2009
Put bankers on the official minimum wage until they return what they stole.
08:51 AM on 10/23/2009
They didn't steal it, they were given it by the government. Don't forget "they were too big to fail." This is the Government pulling a sleight of hand.
08:53 AM on 10/23/2009
Besides, if the government DOES get it back, do you think the taxpayers will ever see that money? Of course not, it'll go to fund other govt. programs. Hell I'm doubtful that it was taxpayer money, I'm willing to bet that TARP funds were the result of selling our Treasuries to China.
12:01 AM on 10/23/2009
Yes, after championing the biggest financial disaster since the Great Depression the Fed is proposing guidelines the day after the President's recommendation. What a complete joke. A little late. And who would believe that the Fed would be unbiased in their review.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:34 PM on 10/22/2009
Does any Republican here know how many banks Reagan nationalized or what he did with the managers of the bank or banks that he nationalized??? Any Republican here know anything that happened before Obama became president???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:59 AM on 10/23/2009
Still waiting for an answer from any Republican on the first two questions. I really don't expect any Republican to answer the third question. A correct answer to the first two questions will establish the answer to the last question.
08:59 AM on 10/23/2009
I'm not a republican but I consider myself more conservative than liberal, at least when it comes to economics. I believe that we shouldn't be giving the government control of private sector paychecks. I don't really know to much about what happened during the Reagan years or how it applies to Obama. I do know that 2 of the major reasons many people hated Bush (understandably) was because of the Iraq War and the Patriot Act and under Obama's presidency nothing has been done regarding them, and nothing is being said about it.
09:54 AM on 10/23/2009
I'm not a Republican but I believe it was over 1,000 thrifts and $500B in the S&L crisis brought on primarily by deregulation and the ensuing unfettered lending in Real Estate. The problems that existed then, are 10 times worse in today's crisis. The toxic assets are still on the books and when confidence once again falls in the banks or someone initiates a run on an institution, we are likely to be back in the the same boat again.
11:02 PM on 10/22/2009
Yesterday's big news was the "leaked" report that Obama was "thinking about" mandating a $200,000 limit on salaries for those large companies who took bailout funds. Today, not a mention. I wonder if this is a clever ploy to make it seem like something was done to cap excessive compensation. We'll all remember the initial headline and breathless report. But will we remember to keep watching to see if it actually happens?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
09:18 PM on 10/22/2009
We can all relax now, the Fed is on the job.
11:32 PM on 10/22/2009
Not really. They just proposed to the banks. I suppose now the banks are considering it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:57 AM on 10/23/2009
The FED is merely the intermediary between the taxpayers dollars and their ultimate destination the banks. They tell the government how much the banks need and then make the argument to get that amount for the banks.
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
07:27 AM on 10/23/2009
they 'proposed', isn't that sweet?