McCain Battles Google, Twitter, eBay Coalition Over Net Neutrality

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - McCain Battles Google, Twitter, eBay Coalition Over Net Neutrality stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

AP/Huffington Post
First Posted: 10-22-09 03:04 PM   |   Updated: 10-22-09 04:13 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Mccain

WASHINGTON -- Federal regulators took an important step Thursday toward prohibiting broadband providers from favoring or discriminating against certain kinds of Internet traffic.

Despite the concerns of telecommunications companies and the agency's two Republicans, the Federal Communications Commission voted to begin writing so-called "network neutrality" regulations. Proponents say the rules would prevent phone and cable companies from abusing their control over the market for broadband access.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said regulations are needed to ensure that broadband subscribers can access all legal Web sites and services, including Internet calling applications and video sites that compete with the broadband companies' core businesses.

"Internet users should always have the final say about their online service, whether it's the software, applications or services they choose, or the networks and hardware they use to the connect to the Internet," Genachowski said.

The FCC's two other Democrats voted to support his plan. The agency's two Republican commissioners voted merely to start the formal rule-making process, but said they are opposed to the substance of Genachowski's proposal.

Republican Commissioner Robert McDowell said he remains unconvinced that broadband providers are engaging in widespread anticompetitive behavior that requires government intervention.

"I do not share the majority's view that the Internet is showing breaks and cracks, nor do I believe that the government is the best tool to fix it," he said.

In addition, Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) introduced legislation --The Internet Freedom Act of 2009--that would block the FCC from enacting net neutrality rules.

Story continues below
advertisement

"This government takeover of the Internet will stifle innovation, in turn slowing our economic turnaround and further depressing an already anemic job market. Outside of health care, the technology industry is the nation's fastest growing job market," a press release from McCain's office said, according to The Hill.

Next up for the FCC is to actually craft the rules, with a vote on whether to adopt them expected to come by next summer.

That would culminate a five-year debate in Washington that has pitted Internet companies such as Google Inc. against some of the biggest phone and cable companies - including AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Comcast Corp.

The broadband providers insist they need flexibility, free from government intervention, to keep their networks running smoothly. They want to ensure that high-bandwidth applications such as YouTube videos don't hog too much capacity and impede other traffic, like e-mail and online searches. They also say that net neutrality regulations would discourage them from expanding and upgrading their networks.

"We continue to hope that any rules adopted by the commission will not harm the investment and innovation that has made the Internet what it is today and that will make it even greater tomorrow," Comcast Executive Vice President David L. Cohen said in a statement.

But companies such as Google, Amazon.com Inc., eBay Inc.'s Skype and Facebook Inc. argue that without such rules, the broadband companies will become online gatekeepers that can prioritize their own online services or those of their business partners - and potentially put others at a disadvantage.

Markham Erickson, executive director of the Open Internet Coalition, called Thursday's vote "the first step toward ... creating a framework that promotes innovation and consumer choice on the Internet."

The Open Internet Coalition represents public interest groups and big Internet companies, including Google, Amazon and eBay.

Verizon Wireless, however, broke ranks with other telecommunications companies when its CEO Lowell McAdam and Google CEO Eric Schmidt issued a joint statement expressing their support for the idea "that the Internet remains an unrestricted and open platform" and pledging to work together, according to BusinessWeek.

Genachowski's plan calls for the agency to formally adopt four broadband principles that have guided the FCC's enforcement of communications laws on a case-by-case basis. Those principles state that network operators must allow subscribers to access all online content, applications, services and devices as long as they are legal.

The FCC relied on those guidelines last year when it ordered Comcast to stop blocking subscribers from using an online file-sharing service called BitTorrent, which is used to transfer big files such as online video. Comcast is challenging the FCC ruling in court.

Genachowski also wants the FCC to adopt two additional principles that would bar broadband providers from discriminating against particular content or applications and require them to disclose network management practices.

And he is seeking to apply all six rules across all types of broadband networks, including wireless systems, which have been largely unregulated.

"The time is now to move forward with consideration of fair and reasonable rules of the road," Genachowski said Thursday. "It would be a serious failure of responsibility not to consider such rules, for that would be gambling with the most important technological innovation of our time."


WASHINGTON -- Federal regulators took an important step Thursday toward prohibiting broadband providers from favoring or discriminating against certain kinds of Internet traffic. Despite the concerns...
WASHINGTON -- Federal regulators took an important step Thursday toward prohibiting broadband providers from favoring or discriminating against certain kinds of Internet traffic. Despite the concerns...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
226
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

The LAST thing we need is McCain ditherin' about the internest tubes and whining about the tweeting googles being full of stuff that only a wise corporate gatekeeper should control

. . . maybe Johhnie JumpJet should see if Japan or Europe would like to trade THEIR access and innovation for our AT&T style of "free market competition and pricing" . . . .

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 10/24/2009
photo

Internet Freedom Act? If I hear the word "Freedom" attached to one more batch of Republican Orwellian double speak I think I am going to lose my lunch.
This is a money grab pure and simple.Terror,Freedom,Terror,Go U.S.A.!!!!!
Does anybody remember the Clear Skies Act?
They think we are idiots.It seems many of us are.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 AM on 10/24/2009
- ObamAtomic I'm a Fan of ObamAtomic 162 fans permalink
photo

McCain get out of my Internet.
Go, get Sara do it another run,show Meg how to Tweet and be cover up.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 AM on 10/24/2009
- joeyfoto I'm a Fan of joeyfoto 57 fans permalink
photo

John McCain has abdicated the right to call himself a "maverick." Now, it is clear that he's a steer with the telecom corporate logo branded on his rear-end. Actually, given his vote against Senator Franken's rape amendment - defending corporations right to silence female employees who have been raped - he's just a creep.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 AM on 10/24/2009
- PaulLev I'm a Fan of PaulLev 176 fans permalink

net neutrality is a laudable goal; having the FCC enforce it in contradiction of the First Amendment is not http://paullevinson.blogspot.com/2009/10/john-mccains-internet-freedom-act-is.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 10/24/2009
- joeyfoto I'm a Fan of joeyfoto 57 fans permalink
photo

The infringement on free speech is from the side of those who oppose net neutrality. Like the laws on campaign contributions that give us the best representation that money can buy. you confuse money with speech. There is an ancient Japanese proverb: " People who believe everything they read, shouldn't read."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 AM on 10/24/2009
- ObamAtomic I'm a Fan of ObamAtomic 162 fans permalink
photo

Internet Freedom Act is a joke,if this bill pass,the big corporation will dictate,how ,
when and what about the internet,
After they spied on Americans, they can not be trusted.
Almost a generation ago ATT was dismantled ,they are back and bigger.
No to McCain freedom act bill.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 10/24/2009
- dhinds I'm a Fan of dhinds 27 fans permalink

The innovation isn't generated by the ISPs (internet service providers) but rather, the content providers. Limiting access to any legal internet based content provider or service is unauthorized regulation and deserves to be made illegal.

When you pay for a certain bandwidth, the use you give to it is your own choice.

How can McCain fail to recognize this? (But that's like asking, how could McCain have chose Sarah P. as his running mate).

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 10/23/2009
- KarateKid I'm a Fan of KarateKid 384 fans permalink
photo

My tweet to John McCain:

@johnmccain try internet 4 dummies

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 10/23/2009

Well we appear to be behind most of the other developed countries on internet speed, access, and cost with out the government rules, just like health care. Sounds like the free market isn't stepping up "again" so the government takeover BS rings hollow with me. I just want a fat fiber optic cable run into my house by a company that provides no media services at all (public co-op ideally). Separate the infrastructure from the content. Then you could select from an unlimited number of service providers to get what ever you wanted and some real competition for a change. But as Churchill said we will do the right thing in the end only after we have exhausted every other possible option.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 10/23/2009
- NevadaLib I'm a Fan of NevadaLib 12 fans permalink
photo

John McCain has the internet now?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 10/23/2009
- KarateKid I'm a Fan of KarateKid 384 fans permalink
photo

Evidently he decided to join everyone in the 21st century. I don't know if he knows how to turn a computer on, but Meghan must have taught him how to Tweet an appropriate forum for a twit.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 10/23/2009
- ObamAtomic I'm a Fan of ObamAtomic 162 fans permalink
photo

Get off my lawn! ,LOL

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 AM on 10/24/2009
- emily00011 I'm a Fan of emily00011 35 fans permalink

John McCain, what are you go ing to do when one of your fans can¨t access fox news because their ISP is throttling internet access to them?

Private companies have no business deciding what is lawful, that IS the job of the government, du.m.@$.$.

$216,938 from AT&T for his 2010 campaign committee says he won't stop this nonsense.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 10/23/2009
- GuyRC I'm a Fan of GuyRC 7 fans permalink
photo

The Internet Freedom Act! The republicans still think the majority of Americans are stupid enough to believe their labeling games.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 10/23/2009
photo

Does this mean that McCain is back in bed with Vicki Iseman, the telecom lobbyist?

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_02/013167.php

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 10/23/2009
photo

The Corporation plays our politicians like a violin because we, the "stewards of democracy," have abdicated our responsibilities as citizens. Many vote without any understanding of the issues. Half don't bother voting at all. Is it any wonder our legislators publicly and openly represent the Corporation?

The individual pays seven times more taxes than the Corporation, and yet has little control over our legislators. We can begin by calling lobbying what it is called in any other country -- bribery.

Stop lobbying. Reform campaign financing. Wean out legislators from the Corporate teat.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 10/23/2009
- Cryostatic I'm a Fan of Cryostatic 23 fans permalink

Instead of this pointless garbage, how about some of you Washington fools start doing good by people instead of corporations, and get the DMCA repealed?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 10/23/2009
photo

The DMCA is a debacle. Our copyright system is a morass.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 10/23/2009
- vesaversa1 I'm a Fan of vesaversa1 14 fans permalink
photo

Why is senator McCain participating in this legislation when he doesn't understand base computer language or how to operate a computer.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 10/23/2009
- Cryostatic I'm a Fan of Cryostatic 23 fans permalink

I don't think one necessarily has to know a lot about a specific technological industry to be able to understand legislation and freedoms. That being said, It doesn't look like he's particularly knowledgeable about that, either.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 10/23/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect