Genesio Oliveira, Gay Brazilian Married To Massachusetts Man, Is Denied Asylum

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Genesio Oliveira, Gay Brazilian Married To Massachusetts Man, Is Denied Asylum stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

RUSSELL CONTRERAS | 10/26/09 07:46 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Tim Coco

BOSTON — A gay Brazilian man has been denied asylum by the Obama administration and won't be reunited with his Massachusetts husband in the U.S., the husband said Monday.

Tim Coco said Attorney General Eric Holder did not act on a Friday deadline in the case of Genesio "Junior" Oliveira, effectively denying the 30-year-old Brazilian man's request for asylum in the U.S. on humanitarian grounds.

"We needed the Attorney General to make a decision on whether Junior could come home," said Coco, 48, of Haverhill. "He didn't take this request seriously."

The Justice Department did not immediately return messages.

In 2002, Oliveira had sought asylum in the U.S. because he said he was raped as a teenager in Brazil. But an immigration judge denied his request, and Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich said in a letter that Oliveira repeatedly remarked at his hearing that he "was never physically harmed" by anyone in Brazil. Coco, however, said Oliveira was referring to street beatings and wasn't clear during his hearing about the harm he faced because of the rape.

The Associated Press does not typically name rape victims, but Oliveira speaks openly about his case and allows his name to be used.

Oliveira returned to Brazil in 2007 after losing an appeal. Before he left, he and Coco married in Massachusetts in 2005 and bought a house together.

According to federal immigration law, immigrants also can apply for residency if they marry U.S. citizens. But the federal government does not recognize gay marriages under the Defense of Marriage Act, and Oliveira's request to remain in the United States based on his relationship with Coco was denied this year.

Story continues below
advertisement

In March, Sen. John Kerry asked Attorney General Eric Holder to grant Oliveira asylum on humanitarian grounds.

Kerry spokeswoman Brigid O'Rourke said Monday that the senator will continue to work toward a solution that would reunite the couple for good.

"The fact is that if Tim and Junior were a heterosexual married couple, they would never have suffered through more than two years of separation," said O'Rourke.

Coco said he thought there was "no way" the Obama Administration would deny Oliveira's asylum request after Kerry made his plea to Holder.

"We are profoundly sad," said Coco. "This is more than any married should have to face."

The case comes as Obama tries to smooth a rocky relationship with gay activists, who want him to end the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays, which he has pledged to do but hasn't given a timeline. Tens of thousands of gay rights supporters marched in Washington earlier this month, demanding Obama keep his promise to end the policy.

Coco said he has spent about $250,000 in legal bills and hasn't seen Oliveira since January, though the two video chat online every night.

Oliveira was denied a visa to return to Massachusetts last year for the funeral of Coco's mother.

Oliveira now lives with his mother, helping her run a boarding house for students.

Coco said the couple plans to launch a legal challenge against the federal Defense of Marriage Act as a violation of immigration laws.

"This is our last shot, if nothing else works," said Coco. "But we think we can pull this off with the right legal counsel."

O'Rourke said Kerry supports the couple's legal challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act, which limits how state, local and federal bodies can recognize partnerships and determine benefits. He also called for a law to extend benefits to domestic partners.

This month, Obama called on Congress to repeal the Defense Of Marriage Act.

While Brazilians are generally more tolerant of homosexual conduct than their neighbors in Latin America, the country remains something of a paradox. Judges have granted foreign partners in gay relationships the right to residency and have authorized civil unions that bestow many of the same benefits of marriage to gay couples, but many segments of society remain openly hostile to homosexuals.

A handful of transgender men and women from Brazil also have been granted asylum in the U.S. based on testimony that they had been victims of violence.

Since 1994, sexual orientation has been grounds for asylum in the United States after a ruling by then-Attorney General Janet Reno. Dozens of asylum seekers from the Middle East, Latin America and Africa have won asylum on that ground, according to Immigration Equality, a New York-based nonprofit group that helps gay clients with immigration cases.

However, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services doesn't keep data on asylum cases won on sexual orientation claims.

BOSTON — A gay Brazilian man has been denied asylum by the Obama administration and won't be reunited with his Massachusetts husband in the U.S., the husband said Monday. Tim Coco said Attorney...
BOSTON — A gay Brazilian man has been denied asylum by the Obama administration and won't be reunited with his Massachusetts husband in the U.S., the husband said Monday. Tim Coco said Attorney...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
208
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

Yes, eventually, UAFA (Uniting American Families Act) or something like it will help Genesio. I live in Toronto now, with my partner of 10 years. We had to leave to stay legal. It was heartbreaking but we are together. You might try migrating up here; I know other Brazilians who've done this. It took us 4 years or so to work it all out (including three international moves!). If you would like a recommendation on the strongest and most effective lawyers I know, contact Michael Battista here in Toronto.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 11/01/2009

I am thrilled that the Huffington Post has covered this story. I, too, am a resident of Massachusetts, and my partner of 4.5 years is not a citizen of the United States, and we face a similar situation to the men in the story. This type of discrimination in our immigration policies needs as much attention as possible. I am disappointed, however, that the article makes no mention of the UNITING AMERICAN FAMILIES ACT (S. 424, H.R. 1024). Yes, the repeal of DOMA would allow MARRIED same-sex couples to have immigration rights, but the majority of states still will not legally recognize such marriages. The Uniting American Families Act would amend immigration law so that partners could be sponsored for immigration on the basis of long-term committed partnership. This avoids the question of marriage completely and allows ALL bi-national same-sex couples to be together, regardless of marital status.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 10/28/2009

The attorney general’s ruling has wide ramifications for all victims of sexual violence – male or female – regardless of age. Today, we have taken steps to brief national immigration and women’s rights groups of this ruthless miscarriage of justice. We seek their support.

While we are deep in despair, we remain profoundly grateful to Senator Kerry and his staff for the efforts they have made and continue to pursue.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 AM on 10/28/2009

SOMETHING IS MISSING IN THIS STORY!
I FOUND IN OLIVEIRA'S WEB THE FULL PRESS RELEASE THEY SENT:
CHECK THAT:

http://www.reunitethisfamily.com/index.htm

Attorney General Holder Claims ‘Forced’ Sex is Not Rape; Married Couple Readies DOMA Challenge

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. betrays the civil rights movement from which he has benefitted.

His office passed up a Friday deadline to retract a July 27, 2009 letter to Senator John F. Kerry. The letter, kept under wraps while both sides continued to negotiate, sets back decades of legal precedent by preposterously ruling “forced” sex is not rape.

Senator Kerry alerted Holder last March that forced sex is, in fact, the definition of rape. At that time, Senator Kerry correctly asserted that the claim is “outrageous” and asked Holder to intervene in the adverse asylum ruling against my spouse, Genesio J. “Junior” Oliveira Jr., made by an illegally appointed immigration judge. All these months later, the attorney general’s woefully delayed and inadequate response overlooks the facts that Junior’s testimony has already been ruled “credible” and his fear of Brazil “genuine.”

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 AM on 10/28/2009
- Destin I'm a Fan of Destin 55 fans permalink
photo

Looks like a clear cut case for sexual and religious discrimination to me. The US Govt should be ashamed of itself for being apartheid while we were throwing stones at South Africa.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 PM on 10/27/2009

Oh well. Brazil isn't so bad these days not like he is being sent to Somalia.

Marriage is between a man and a woman, period.
Hopefully Holder follows the law he is charged to enforce and deports the guy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 10/27/2009

You must have dictated your comment since it's obvious you can't read. Have someone read this back to you.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 10/27/2009
- Suggie I'm a Fan of Suggie 27 fans permalink

Very simple solution for this guy. Sneak across our southern border. Millions have done it and will be rewarded for it in the near future.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

So many people are speaking out against the Obama Administration for not yet repelling Don't Ask Don't Tell, but I would like to point out that there are some issues that affect a larger portion of the population than most, The economy and Health Care for all, just to name a couple. I am all for repelling Don't Ask Don't Tell, I just don't think 1) the President should be addressing that issue yet with the two big issues I just mentioned in front of him, and 2) Don't Ask Don't Tell was a law that the President can't just make go away with the stroke of a pen like most people think, that has to come up for vote in both houses.



The man hasn't been in office a year yet. Give him time to get to your issue and stop being impatient and selfish.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

It's the people who dismiss gay rights as affecting only a small group who are being selfish.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:02 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

I'm certainly not saying that Gay Rights aren't important I'm just saying that there are more pressing matters. I sure you would agree that the US economy is more pressing issue and health care is directly tide to it. Also with health care reform I think that would solve the issue of gay couples not being allows to cover their partners under their plan. I just think that trying to force the Presidents hand on Gay rights at this point it very short sighted.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

Perhaps, with over 500 people in the two houses of congress there is an opportunity for multitasking. Just a thought ...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 10/27/2009
- jeremyfive I'm a Fan of jeremyfive 9 fans permalink

So unfair.

Years ago, I remember a coworker had visited Europe. She married a man there. When she returned, her new husband was allowed to immigrate. The couple had know each other for a few days maybe. . .

Compare that to the unfairness here. Discrimination is in full force in America

Sorry, I just don't condone these very special "rights" for heterosexuals. The pursuit of happiness applies to ALL, not some.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 10/27/2009

Whoa! You can't base all of your opinions on just this one article. Neuromaster is correct. See http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2007/08/27/reunite_this_family/ and http://www.reunitethisfamily.com.

Genesio has been with his partner since 2002. He applied for asylum not just for rape but for a lifetime of abuse. He spent most of his adult life outside of Brazil because of abuse -- legally studying. He was NEVER illegal in the U.S. While he was partnered, Massachusetts same-sex marriage didn't yet exist. When it finally came around, the married in 2002. The asylum was denied until 2007.

One doesn't just apply for citizenship as some have inferred here. Only very limited paths to citizenship are available such as marriage. Asylum has been granted to Brazilians in similar situations. The U.S. State Departments lists Brazil as one of the worst human rights regarding gays.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 10/27/2009

I should have said "was not" denied asylum until 2007. Also, contrary to what is being said here, the Justice Department and AG Holder do have the last word on this matter:

§ 1003.1 8 CFR Ch. V (1–1–06 Edition)



(7) Finality of decision. The decision of

the Board shall be final except in those

cases reviewed by the Attorney General

in accordance with paragraph (h)

of this section. The Board may return a

case to the Service or an immigration

judge for such further action as may be

appropriate, without entering a final

decision on the merits of the case.

Senator Kerry asked Holder to make a humanitarian decision. Holder could have approved asylum just to let this couple be reunited.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

They should have played the game by the rules. The rules are:

1) CHEAT

That, in this case, would have involved getting a female friend to marry him. Everyone, especially the religious right, condones such behavior. It's the unspoken law of the land.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

the he would have been deported anyway...when the INS officer interviewed him about his fake marriage it would have been apparent that he only married a woman to get a green card.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

What would make it apparent?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 10/27/2009
- Deparis I'm a Fan of Deparis 25 fans permalink

Part 1

I hear many saying "shameful administration" and blaming Obama or Holder. Why have we become so collectively stewpid? The decision to deny this guy legal residency wasn't made by the administration, but by the courts. The Asylum process is two fold: when the administrative process (filing/applying for asylum) fails, the second process is to challenge the decision in court. The administrative process is under the jurisdiction of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services of the Department of Homeland Security just so you know, nothing to do with the Department of Justice.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 10/27/2009
- Deparis I'm a Fan of Deparis 25 fans permalink

Part 2

I hear many saying "shameful administration" and blaming Obama or Holder. Why have we become so collectively stewpid? The decision to deny this guy legal residency wasn't made by the administration, but by the courts. The Asylum process is two fold: when the administrative process (filing/applying for asylum) fails, the second process is to challenge the decision in court. The administrative process is under the jurisdiction of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services of the Department of Homeland Security just so you know, nothing to do with the Department of Justice.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 10/27/2009
- Deparis I'm a Fan of Deparis 25 fans permalink

Part 2

More to the point, which people are missing. DOMA is a federal law, whether we like it or not is irrelevant. The decision was probably made under DOMA, so asking Obama or Holder to intervene would be asking the President and AG of the United States to overturn/overrule a court decision (not within their constitutional attribute) or break a federal law (which they are supposed to enforce). If Senator Kerry had such concerns for this couple and other fellow gay New Englanders, he would have introduced a legislation to repeal DOMA by now, that's what Senators do, not the President and certainly not the AG.

Finally, you do not file for asylum for something that happened while you were a child and there's no evidence of that happening on an ongoing base. Case in point: the guy returned to Brazil and is living peacefully with his mother, with the publicity that this case has received since 2002, everybody in his town now knows that he is gay and if anybody in town wanted to harm him because of that fact, he would have swallowed his birth certificate by now.

Bottom line: Work and fight to repeal DOMA. As long as it is federal law, you cannot in your right mind ask the President or the AG to break it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 10/27/2009
- raaf I'm a Fan of raaf 24 fans permalink
photo

Hmm, quite a age difference between the Brazilian and the American guy....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 10/27/2009

OMG!!! I'VE NEVER SEEN MARRIAGES WITH THAT BIG OF A DIFFERENCE IN AGE!!!!

Oh wait... some people who are either married are in relationships with people a lot older or younger than them: Halle Berry, Hugh Jackman, Barbara Hershey, Susan Sarandon, Mira Sorvino, Nick Cannon, Courtney Cox, Ashton Klutcher, and Madonna

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 10/27/2009
- newtom I'm a Fan of newtom 15 fans permalink

And that matters, why?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

not that it marries but he's probably his sugardaddy

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

lol...Not *marries* but I meant *matters*

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 10/27/2009
- JakeAZ I'm a Fan of JakeAZ 7 fans permalink
photo

So effing what?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 10/27/2009
- raaf I'm a Fan of raaf 24 fans permalink
photo

Exactly my thoughts!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 10/27/2009

Conservative say that there is no discrimination against gays concerning marriage, a gay guy can marry a woman just like a straight guy can. But, if a gay guy marries a woman and then applies for residency, they will accuse him of a crime and throw him out of the country. Specifically for marrying a woman and applying for residency. But, if the gay guy legally marries another guy, then they say "that doesn't count".

So, gay guys really do NOT have the same right to even marry a woman as a straight guy does. That is just another lie by the right wing haters.

And by the way, in special cases, exceptions are made, like when senators and other high ranking government officials intervene. But, oddly, not in this case.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 10/27/2009
photo

good point. that really tears down their argument of equal rights.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 10/27/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect