'Slumdog' Kids' School Skipping Threatens Trust Fund

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - 'Slumdog' Kids' School Skipping Threatens Trust Fund stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ERIKA KINETZ | 10/29/09 05:24 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Slumdog Kids

MUMBAI, India — The slum kid stars of "Slumdog Millionaire" want a lot of things in life – new houses, a car, trips to London and Paris – but they aren't too interested in school.

Ten-year-old Rubina Ali has missed nearly 75 percent of her classes and her co-star hasn't done much better – truancy that filmmakers say will jeopardize their trust funds and monthly stipends if it continues.

Their parents blame the absences on deaths in the family or other misfortunes, including the demolition of Rubina's shanty by city authorities earlier this year, and have promised to do better.

But the filmmakers say the children are being lured away by endorsement deals, television appearances and other opportunities to cash in on their celebrity – at the risk of losing the money set aside for them once they graduate.

"Our love got a little bit tougher today," "Slumdog" producer Christian Colson told The Associated Press Thursday.

"We understand there are opportunities for both kids – and for the parents of both children – to cash in, in the short term, on their celebrity. We don't have a problem with that. But if they want to benefit from the trust, they have to get those attendance rates up."

Beneath the debate about school is a deeper tug-of-war between the impoverished families' urge for as much short-term gain as possible and the filmmakers' desire to endow the children with a secure future.

Rubina and 11-year-old Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail both grew up in one of Mumbai's most wretched slums. They shot to fame after starring in the rags-to-riches blockbuster, which won eight Oscars. Rubina was cast as the young Latika, who grows up to become the hero's love interest, and Azhar plays his brother, Salim.

Story continues below

After filming ended, director Danny Boyle and Colson got the pair placed in a Mumbai school that helps disadvantaged children. But these days, Azhar is showing up to class just 37 percent of the time and Rubina's attendance is only 27 percent, said Noshir Dadrawala, an administrator of the trust.

"It's pathetic," said Dadrawala, adding that a flurry of awards ceremonies, festivals and fashion shows that have taken the kids to Paris, Madras and elsewhere are detracting from their studies.

These have included Rubina's Paris trip to promote a book about her life, "Slumgirl Dreaming: My Journey to the Stars," as well as a tea party at Westminster in London, a dance number on a Hong Kong TV show and, of course, a trip to Los Angeles for the Oscars.

"They are constantly going ... That's fine, but go over the weekend, not at the sacrifice of school," Dadrawala said.

The parents were told Thursday that if the children do not get their attendance above 70 percent they would lose their monthly $120 stipend. And if the kids fail to graduate, they will forfeit the lump sum payment set aside to help them get a start in life, Dadrawala said.

The filmmakers have declined to reveal the amount of the trust for fear of exposing the families to exploitation. In addition, both families are covered by medical insurance, which the trust finalized Thursday.

Azhar's mother, Shameem Ismail, said her son had missed school because he has been inconsolable since his father died in September from tuberculosis.

"He would cry often, so I kept him home from school for a while," she said, promising he would go to class more often.

"As long as I'm alive, I will make sure my son gets an education," she added.

Rubina's father, Rafiq Qureshi, said his daughter's absences were due to the destruction of the family's shanty last May and a cut on her leg that forced her to stay home.

"It will not happen next time," he promised. "I also know education makes people brighter."

In July, Azhar moved out of a sheet metal shack in the slum into a $50,000 one-bedroom apartment the filmmakers bought for his family in Mumbai. His mother said Thursday that though they quite like the apartment, where they live with a half-dozen relatives, Azhar would prefer a room of his own.

Rubina remains in the slum.

The trustees say they've shown Rubina's family a half-dozen apartments, all of which they rejected.

Rubina's father complained the apartments were too small or too far from his daughter's school and said it will cost at least $73,000 to find an appropriate place.

But the filmmakers aren't bargaining. If Rubina's family doesn't take a place by January, the money for the apartment will be given to a charity, Colson said.

"He's continually turned down offers of decent accommodation we've offered in the hope that he can embarrass us into making more money available," Colson said of Rubina's dad.

"We've got a significant sum of money sitting there, which other children could benefit from. That's not the outcome we want. But we need Rafiq to understand we're not here to negotiate."

Colson and Boyle were in Mumbai this week to meet with Indian filmmakers and Bollywood megastars Anil Kapoor and Aamir Khan about several film projects, including a thriller loosely based on Suketu Mehta's book "Maximum City," a journalistic memoir about Mumbai's seamy underworld.

They also hosted a tea party reunion at the JW Marriott hotel in a posh neighborhood at the epicenter of Mumbai's burgeoning film industry that was attended by many of the film's child actors, including Tanvi Ganesh Lonkar, who played Latika as a young teenager.

As Rubina and Azhar swept into the Marriott's marble lobby – Rubina in pink Puma sneakers and Azhar in a flashy silver and red jacket – they were ensnared in a net of popping flash bulbs and aggressive television cameramen. They began to perform for the cameras: Rubina grabbed on to the bulky biceps of a celebrity bodybuilder passing through the lobby as Azhar looked on grinning.

Asked what he wants Rubina to be when she grows up, her father said: "She should be a star."

Dinesh Dubey, a friend of the families who attended the meeting with Boyle and Colson, said he made a special plea.

"I said, 'Danny Boyle, I just have a request to you sir: In the new film just give them one role,'" Dubey said.

Colson said he and Boyle would be happy to cast the kids in a new film, as long as it doesn't interfere with school.

"Everyone can dream," Colson said. "But it doesn't matter if you're Azhar or Rubina or a kid in Milwaukee: It's a precarious dream. My advice is go to college in case it doesn't work out."

___

Associated Press writer Muneeza Naqvi in New Delhi contributed to this report.

MUMBAI, India — The slum kid stars of "Slumdog Millionaire" want a lot of things in life – new houses, a car, trips to London and Paris – but they aren't too interested in school. T...
MUMBAI, India — The slum kid stars of "Slumdog Millionaire" want a lot of things in life – new houses, a car, trips to London and Paris – but they aren't too interested in school. T...
Loading...
 
Report Corrections
 
Comments
67
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- citlali I'm a Fan of citlali 6 fans permalink
photo

While we're on the subject of skipping something ... methinks what needs to be 'skipped' is these kids parents, especially the fathers. There has been history in the press of maltreatment by the fathers, who likely see these children as mini-mints spewing money.

The kids would likely benefit from being legally emancipated from the parents, and having guardians appointed - and monitored - to act in the best interest of the children. The abusive parents can go hang.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 10/30/2009

If you had read they thing you would know one of the fathers died recently. Geez..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 12/31/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 41 fans permalink
photo

Something for nothing, no work involved.

That's what they're looking for; a free ride.

I bet Rubina's Father fails to find the apartment and that money goes to charity. Then he'll put up a big stink trying to blame Boyle again.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 10/30/2009
- medusa11 I'm a Fan of medusa11 2 fans permalink

Give them all their money in one large sum; if they piss it away, they'll have no one to blame but themselves, then hopefully we'll stop hearing about all this sad headache that this kids/families had turn into AND finally this horrible, exploitative, made-for-tv crap of a movie will go away into obscurity!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 10/30/2009

a. I wonder would you be saying that if they were little white kids and b. "if they piss it away..." they are 10 and 11 years old, what else would they do with a lump sum of money. Geez...

It was wrong for the movie makers to make millions and leave those two kids in the slums to begin with.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 12/31/2009
- ywcachieve I'm a Fan of ywcachieve 137 fans permalink

Leave those kids alone. I wonder they are still be stalked by the American and British media.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 10/30/2009
photo

I'm sure these kids and their parents have dreamed about money and fame for years. it is a bit much to ask them to suddenly make realistic choices about those things now. they're trying to ride this thing as fast and as far as it will take them, but that's a reflex that shouldn't be trusted. their kids have an almost foolproof way out of the Mumbai slums if they behave responsibly.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 PM on 10/29/2009
- Betrayed I'm a Fan of Betrayed 56 fans permalink

Too bad the dad can't be put up for adoption.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 PM on 10/29/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 252 fans permalink
photo

Gotta love how capitalists take advantage of even children. This is tatamount to a Hollywood sweat shop. So, what were the kids and their families paid? Trust funds don't count because that's not payment. You know, the producers, the adult actors and director, etc, all get royalty check every month. Which are pretty sizable. What are these kids getting every month?

They've earned at least enough to have an actual built home, and the ability to live in a nice neighborhood and go to decent schools. But why hasn't any of that been talked about that they are being denied?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 10/29/2009
- KIVPossum I'm a Fan of KIVPossum 76 fans permalink
photo

If there wasn't a trust fund the parents would have run through everything by now.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 AM on 10/30/2009

This is horrific what the film producers have done to these kids and their families. They have very large extended families. The children worked very hard in these films and should reap the rewards like Danny Boyle and crew. Instead they don't get paid very much and are put into one bedroom apartments while the rest of the filmmakers and stars became millionaires. Of course Rubina's familiy is being picky they see what the others from the film are getting and where they live. These kids and their families should be put up in a large home with a substantial stipend ($120 mo is laughable) and have private tutors so they can continue to make appearances like their peers and bring in income. They have suffered for being in this film instead of prospered and allowed to be happy. I am furious and would boycott anything Danny Boyle and crew produce. And it took them forever to get their living situation straightened out. Danny Boyle and the producers, film stars etc should be ashamed of themselves and help out more and make sure these kids are safe and financially stable. But instead they threaten to take away their trust fund because of lack of school attendance (which they should be privately schooled). This is so infuriating to me and see that this has taken so long to settle yet could easily be taken from the poverty stricken children and their families.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 10/29/2009
photo

This studio is just continuing in long tradition of the West exploiting India for it's resourses. The studio seems to think that they are doing the children who they exploited a favor by paying them there money. What right does the studio have to set conditions on how and when these children should get the money that they earned? And then to take the position that they know wht is best for these children and there families is very condescending.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 10/29/2009
- leeclayton I'm a Fan of leeclayton 13 fans permalink
photo

They got the money they earned. The trust fund was over and above their contracted pay.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 AM on 10/30/2009

This is the type of shortsightedness that leads to the generational poverty there. Drug abuse, education isn't a priority unless it's forced on them.

They've got plenty of money, and housing was provided - but the families of these poor children demanded more, different housing, and try to use their children for money, rather than focusing on their education.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 10/29/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 252 fans permalink
photo

You forget that "provided" housing was tatamount to a cardboard box with a curtain door.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 10/29/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 41 fans permalink
photo

They've squandered everything that was given to them.

They've failed to follow through on promises and conditions.

There's a reason for those trust funds and a reason they're tied to the children's education.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 10/30/2009
- avshanbh I'm a Fan of avshanbh 40 fans permalink
photo

Maybe the kids were better off if they were sold to parents who made sure these kids went to school. I think the kids parents are taking advantage of these kids for a free ride.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 10/29/2009
photo

Tutors....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 10/29/2009

You are exactly right! It's too much to expect them to attend school and make appearances (bring in add'l income). These kids aren't benefitting like their peers or the film's producers.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 10/29/2009
- philly282 I'm a Fan of philly282 3 fans permalink

just give these slum-dogs a reality show on TLC

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 10/29/2009
- nc44 I'm a Fan of nc44 permalink

Are you just making up numbers to support your arguments. The filmmakers have refused to divulge the amount of the trust fund giving the reasonable (but also highly convenient) reason that crooks of various sorts might target the family. Where do you come up with the 750K figure from? Are you in the employ of the filmmakers or something?

I wasn't aware that Rs 60 was significantly less than $1 when the exchange rate is about 47. Also the minimum wage is Rs 80 since 2007. None of this is to argue that there isn't a lot of poverty in India (coupled with increasing riches at the other end). But this doesn't entitle you to your own facts. There is poverty in India is hardly excuse for the filmmakers to not shell out a reasonable sum. They made their money precisely by exploiting this poverty on film.

This excuse of them still "looking" for a place for the other kids family also rings a bit hollow. Suggests a lack of urgency if they can't find something in Mumbai in what 6 months.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 10/29/2009
- jcwtts1 I'm a Fan of jcwtts1 180 fans permalink
photo

The filmmakers aren't required to shell out anything. Your argument is that because the movie is a hit they should pay... what if the movie was a flop? If I hire you to do a job do I also adopt you? Since when do I owe you more than a salary you contract. The trust fund was a gift not an obligation and he isn't required to tell anyone anything about it. The parents need to do a better job living up to their part of the gift... which is making sure the kids go to the school for which the gift pays.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 10/29/2009
- nc44 I'm a Fan of nc44 permalink

The filmmakers "gift" was a result of the outcry after the outcry after it was realized that they hadn't paid the kids very much at all. A political cover, not something they gave out of the goodness of their heart. And setting up a fund that mas a triggered opt-out provision in the language of the day is not a very generous "gift". It's is awfully paternalistic to decide it is in the best interest of the kids to live in grinding poverty till they are 18 or whatever. Oh and then we might not give you the money anyway. Som gift!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 10/29/2009
photo

Slumdog Millionaire World Gross!

Domestic: $141,319,928 37.4%
+ Foreign: $236,097,365 62.6%
= Worldwide: $377,417,293

A $50,000.00 apt and 120.00 per month? WTF!!!

http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=slumdogmillionaire.htm

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 10/29/2009

This seems relatively consistent with how child actors are paid in the US. From what I understand, parents cannot access amounts paid to children unless the parent is on staff and paid a salary or possibly a small amount for living expenses. The rest of the money is put in a trust fund for the child.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 10/29/2009

I agree WTF! It's so infuriating and yet there's no type of overseer to make sure the children benefit like everyone else associated with the film.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 10/29/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect