John McCain Was For Actual Internet Freedom Before He Was For Fake "Internet Freedom"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - John McCain Was For Actual Internet Freedom Before He Was For Fake "Internet Freedom" stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10-30-09 06:33 PM   |   Updated: 10-31-09 01:56 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Mccain Face The

So, John McCain wants the internet to be a terrifying user experience for everybody, and is pimping the ironically named, net neutrality-killing "Internet Freedom Act" as a means of satisfying the telecoms that have so devotedly lobbied him for favor. The thing is, if it seems like not too long ago, McCain was singing an entirely different tune on the issue, well, there's a reason for that: not too long ago, McCain was singing an entirely different tune on the issue. Don't believe me? Well, here's what McCain economic advisor Douglas Holtz-Eakin had to say on the matter when he was interviewed on C-SPAN by Amy Schatz, telecommunications reporter from the Wall Street Journal:

SCHATZ: Let's switch to everyone's favorite telecom topic: net neutrality. Can you explain to us what Senator McCain's position is on net neutrality?


HOLTZ-EAKIN: His position is that aggressive and prescriptive legislation on net neutrality is not desirable at this time. It's premature. There is yet no demonstrable damage from a practice that a net neutrality legislation would solve. His preferred way of addressing issues like this is let the marketplace develop, watch for and be aggressive about monitoring for abuse of practices, for monopoly power, for unfair representation to consumers, and if you find such behavior, apply a remedy and get damages. But that's an approach that doesn't pretend to know in advance what's the business model of tomorrow, what's the product line of tomorrow, and who will be providing that product.

Now of course, McCain has telecom lobbyists telling him that about the damage that a piece of net neutrality legislation could wreak on their ability to accrue wealth, so his tune has changed. But there's another interesting quirk, here: McCain's strange new take on "internet freedom" doesn't square, at all, with another telecommunications issue he's spoken out about -- a la carte cable television packages. In the case of cable television, McCain supports the open-source, pro-consumer model of content packaging that he now wants to destroy on the internet. And again, his position on this matter was made abundantly clear in Holtz-Eakin's conversations with Schatz:

SCHATZ: I think one of the things that Senator McCain has been very active on in the last few years on telecom policy is cable and a la carte pricing. He's been very vocal in the thought that Americans spend way too much to pay for cable and he's talking a lot about Congress passing laws to require cable companies to offer channels individually, or a la carte. Does he still share that view? And in a McCain administration, what would he do about that.


HOLTZ-EAKIN: I believe that's a classic example of John McCain's view of the appropriate use of government, which is to look out into the landscape and if you see concentrations of power, find ways to ameliorate the exercise of that power. In his view, cable companies have had far too much authority and monopoly power in many marketplaces, there was no ability to ameliorate that, other than by directly demanding that they be responsive to some consumers' desires to get specific channels and not be forced to get others. He pursued that, and he would continue, as a general matter, to look at these issues in that way. You don't want markets that show unusual concentrations of power in any on any side of the equation.

And it's important to point out that McCain has advocated this position himself, long before the presidential campaign. As Ars Technica reported back in February of 2006:

Senator John McCain (R-AZ), a critic of the cable industry's pricing practices and a backer of the à la carte approach, recently announced his intention to introduce legislation that would require the development of à la carte options from the cable industry. Noting that the FCC believes that à la carte pricing could reduce consumer bills by as much as 13 percent, McCain said that choice should reign supreme, and that consumers should not be "forced to buy a host of channels they don't even watch."

"It is regrettable that the cable companies continue to balk at offering channels on an 'a la carte' basis and instead continue to raise the price of their bundled offering. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that consumers can expect to rate increases of as much as six percent during 2006. Therefore, I will soon be introducing legislation that would entice all providers of television services to offer an 'a la carte' option in addition to a package of channels in return for regulatory relief. I hope that the cable industry will appreciate the ability to choose despite their failure to provide meaningful choices to their customers," said McCain through a statement.

With the Internet Freedom Act, McCain now wants an aggressive prescription that would concentrate monopoly power and which would also dictate what "the business model of tomorrow" is. Air America's Ana Marie Cox has a video that juxtaposes the two segments on C-SPAN and makes the obvious observation that his bill would declaw the FCC, which would be the agency primarily tasked with "ameliorating" the "unusual concentrations of power" that the telecoms are seeking by getting rid of net neutrality. Watch for yourself, and, under the circumstances, I'd recommend you especially heed the video's final instruction!

[WATCH]

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

So, John McCain wants the internet to be a terrifying user experience for everybody, and is pimping the ironically named, net neutrality-killing "Internet Freedom Act" as a means of satisfying the tel...
So, John McCain wants the internet to be a terrifying user experience for everybody, and is pimping the ironically named, net neutrality-killing "Internet Freedom Act" as a means of satisfying the tel...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
58
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- gnomic I'm a Fan of gnomic 11 fans permalink

McCain sold to highest bidder.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 11/04/2009
- KindOne I'm a Fan of KindOne 15 fans permalink

That sounds like his position on torture, he was against it until he voted for it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 11/02/2009
- Free2Speak I'm a Fan of Free2Speak 7 fans permalink
photo


This is the same tactic to scare the public about government.Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee introduced the Real Stimulus Act of 2009 Friday to beat back any action the FCC may take regarding the net neutrality.Liberal bloggers need to get together and nip this in the bud.They need to remember that conservative bloggers and all the mainstream media is against net neutrality­.ABC,CBS,N­BC and Fox,Corporate America,Wallstreet dont want the average Joe to have the equal access to the internet.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 11/02/2009

Don't ever let an old person says what's best for the internet because probably over 2/3 don't know how to even turn the computer on.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 11/02/2009
- Rog49Thomas I'm a Fan of Rog49Thomas 192 fans permalink

How sad that you distort the unblemished record for honesty of Senator McCrayz.

The Republicans have definitely got a plan as they do for everything.

It you can't afford it, you don't get it.

What could give you more freedom than that?

You've got the freedom to choose from non viable options. It's like health care.

Do you really want some pointy headed bureaucrat on a death panel in Washington terminating people as they post on the Internet or read their email?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 11/02/2009
- Layman23 I'm a Fan of Layman23 14 fans permalink

The guy who cant even read an e-mail is dictating our internet policy? Great !

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 11/01/2009
- mrmikes I'm a Fan of mrmikes 15 fans permalink

This bill should be called the "Freedom (to plunder powerless users of the) Internet" bill.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 11/01/2009
- Mugzi I'm a Fan of Mugzi 12 fans permalink

First we have to deal with winky courtesy of john, now a bill that clearly puts the internet in hands of companies who wish to control the flow of data, which can be of paramount concern during elections.­..censorsh­ip???? It's time johnny be let out to pasture!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 AM on 11/01/2009
- Whinger I'm a Fan of Whinger 46 fans permalink
photo

Rumor has it that John is being awarded the Nobel Flip Flop award next year!

Freedom is an PSYOPS technique, a mere illusion used by authority to keep us all happy!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 AM on 11/01/2009
- Chip W I'm a Fan of Chip W 18 fans permalink

The Internet Freedom Act would be as the name implies.
No regulation = free market = people do what they want = the power players set the rules.
That's Free Market. The market needs regulation to have Fair Market.
The Free Market worshipers I think don't quite get this. The power players do.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 AM on 11/01/2009
photo

The core of the matter is about access, rather than markets. Power players are trying to flip this, but markets are secondary and only tributary filters in the grander scheme.

And to your point, it is about fairness and access for all, not control and limits set by a few dominant players. Imagine the internet moving to a cable TV model (I shiver to think about it). Picture your access to information around the world from and by anybody and everybody being controlled by say a fictitious FOX INET CORP.
FOX INET CORP would suddenly control your access to all content and they select what you get and not get to access, limiting the rest or charging extra fees (BTW they neither own nor created this content). All of this content today is already accessible for you directly and free (or fees only from the actual content sites themselves) without any added FOX INET CORP filters, controls, or added premium content fees etc.

Why would we ever allow such a world to happen? McCain used to loath such a world, but has now been paid off by big carriers that want to take over access to the internet and control and charge you for what you already have access to today without controls.

McCain, now is confused saying "the internet is not broken." I agree, so why would you want to break it grandpa?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 11/01/2009
- Chip W I'm a Fan of Chip W 18 fans permalink

FOX INET CORP makes me shiver.
It's about markets because that's where the game is being played. If it weren't for money, no one would be playing. Access is an element in the money game.
I don't know what you mean by "but markets are secondary and only tributary filters in the grander scheme."
I'm not familiar with McCain's legislation, but my take is that he wants to keep government out of internet regulation. "The internet is not broken," but I think it's getting to where it'll break itself, or at least have access controlled by the power players, unless there's an imposition of fairness through legislation.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 AM on 11/02/2009
- StillAmused I'm a Fan of StillAmused 256 fans permalink

For more details, the Senator can be reached on his walkie-T.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 AM on 11/01/2009

It's nice that McCain now has the google to let him know what's what.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 11/01/2009
- MyGuyO I'm a Fan of MyGuyO 41 fans permalink
photo

That's our Senator McCain.

Aside...The AZ Republic is reporting that unlike Senator McCain, Senator Kyl, McCain's buddy, will NOT run for president in 2012. Boy, that is a relief.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2009/11/01/20091101nowicki1101.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 11/01/2009
- ssfahrer I'm a Fan of ssfahrer 5 fans permalink

"Freedom is never 'free'", folks! In a Capitalist economy (remember, America is supposed to be one), everything has its price... Even INFORMATION! Thus the concept of "net neutrality" is anti-Capitalist, anti-American and just plain wrong....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 10/31/2009
- johnmorgan I'm a Fan of johnmorgan 15 fans permalink

Actually, freedom is free.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 11/01/2009
- RSKaz I'm a Fan of RSKaz 31 fans permalink
photo

Panama John's idea of texting is Morse Code.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 10/31/2009
photo

Texting pretty much is Morse code. You just don't have to de-code it yourself. Welcome to 19th century technology.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 10/31/2009
- RSKaz I'm a Fan of RSKaz 31 fans permalink
photo

You are semaphore or less correct.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 11/01/2009
- hulagirrrl I'm a Fan of hulagirrrl 40 fans permalink
photo

His opinion is for the highest bidder. What else is new?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 10/31/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect