Reid To Push Dem Senators To Fight GOP Obstruction

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Reid To Push Dem Senators To Fight GOP Obstruction stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10-30-09 12:16 PM   |   Updated: 10-30-09 12:46 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Reid

When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took to the Senate floor Thursday to blast Republicans for blocking President Obama's nominees for key agencies, the Capitol Hill press corps, bloggers and reporters took notice.

Reid wants his Democratic colleagues to take note, too. The Nevada Democrat is planning to address a private gathering of his caucus next week to raise the profile of the issue and to rally his members to oppose the GOP stonewalling of nominees, a leadership aide tells HuffPost. Reid has put his thoughts down in a memo that he'll present to the Democratic caucus.

The memo, provided to HuffPost, signals Reid's determination to push through Obama's nominees -- or at least score some political points trying.

The memo highlights what Reid terms "egregious examples" of GOP obstruction:

• In the majority of instances, the Republican holds are completely unrelated to their qualifications. Among the most egregious examples:

o Hold on the Surgeon General while H1N1 is a National Emergency
o Hold on DHS official responsible for Pandemics and Bioterror
o Hold on State Department official responsible for Central America (Honduras)
o Hold on Deputy US Trade Rep. over a tobacco bill in Canadian Parliament
o Hold on GSA Administrator over a federal building in Kansas City

The GOP is facing challenges winning over Latino and women voters and Reid notes in the memo that many of the "Republican holds are on female or Hispanic nominees."

The memo also reveals that Reid is a Ruth Marcus fan by including a piece from the Washington Post columnist titled "Advise and Stall."

On the floor Thursday, Reid mocked the GOP for its obstruction.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Months ago, President Obama picked a trade expert who worked in the Reagan, Bush and Clinton administrations to be this nation's Deputy Trade Representative. But she has yet to officially join the Obama administration. Why? Because a Republican Senator is holding up the nomination over a bill that he thinks would hurt tobacco companies," said Reid. "If that seems like an unrelated, random reason to hold up this qualified nominee, you might be even more outraged to learn that the bill that so angers this Republican Senator is not even before the United States Senate. It's not even in the United States House of Representatives. In fact, it's not even in the United States. The bill is before the Canadian Parliament. It should go without saying that our Administration cannot dictate how the Canadian legislature does it job, any more than the Canadian Parliament can dictate how we do ours. It should go without saying, but unfortunately, we evidently must say it."

Reid went on: "President Obama nominated the former chief of staff of the General Services Administration -- which manages the basic functions of our federal agencies -- to lead that organization. He nominated her in April, on the first full day of the Major League Baseball season. Today, on the second day of the World Series, she still remains unconfirmed for that job. Why? Because a Republican Senator is demanding a federal building is built in his home state."

Watch Reid on the Senate floor:

Read the full memo:

Colleagues -

Republicans have been stalling President Obama's nominees for months on end. This morning, I spoke on the Senate floor about the backlog of good, qualified nominees who are awaiting confirmation.

• Today we have 53 nominees on the Executive Calendar and another 175 pending in Committee

• Historical comparison of confirmed nominees:

o Oct. 31, 1993 (Clinton): 379 nominees confirmed
o Oct. 31, 2001 (Bush): 421 nominees confirmed
o Oct. 31, 2009 (Obama): 366 nominees confirmed

• Historical comparison of Republican holds:

o Oct. 31, 2001 (Bush): 5 nominees on Senate calendar
• 1 reported out of committee in September
• 4 reported out of committee in October
o Oct. 31, 2009 (Obama): 53 nominees on Senate calendar
• 1 reported out of committee in March
• 1 reported out of committee in May
• 5 reported out of committee in June
• 8 reported out of committee in July
• 1 reported out of committee in August
• 4 reported out of committee in September
• 33 reported out of committee in October

• In the majority of instances, the Republican holds are completely unrelated to their qualifications. Among the most egregious examples:

o Hold on the Surgeon General while H1N1 is a National Emergency
o Hold on DHS official responsible for Pandemics and Bioterror
o Hold on State Department official responsible for Central America (Honduras)
o Hold on Deputy US Trade Rep. over a tobacco bill in Canadian Parliament
o Hold on GSA Administrator over a federal building in Kansas City

• Many of Republican holds are on female or Hispanic nominees.

• Below is an article from Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus called "Advise and Stall."

Advise and Stall
Senate Republicans Are Holding Up Key Nominees

By Ruth Marcus
The Washington Post
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Miriam Sapiro was nominated to be deputy U.S. trade representative in April. The Senate Finance Committee voted -- unanimously -- to confirm her in July.

She's still not in the job -- because Sen. Jim Bunning, Republican of Kentucky, is unhappy with the Canadian Parliament.

Seriously.

Bunning is upset about a measure pending before Canadian lawmakers that would restrict tobacco companies from adding candy flavorings to cigars and cigarettes. The measure is aimed at reducing youth smoking, but Kentucky lawmakers claim it would harm tobacco companies there -- and violate trade rules -- because chocolate is used as an additive to moderate the taste of Kentucky-grown burley tobacco.

So Bunning wants U.S. trade authorities to intervene, even though federal law restricts them from promoting tobacco use. And he is holding Sapiro hostage, leaving the trade office without a political appointee overseeing such crucial issues as the North American Free Trade Agreement, the Doha round of trade talks, and the pending trade agreements with Panama and Colombia.

Sapiro isn't alone. For all the bellyaching about the Obama administration's supposed excess of policymaking czars outside the normal appointment process, Senate Republicans have been blocking confirmation of a disturbing number of administration nominees, many for reasons having nothing to do with their suitability for their jobs.

No one has clean hands here. Slow-walking nominations is a bipartisan sport. Democrats also pulled this stunt -- often as a gambit to dislodge documents that they believed the Bush administration was improperly withholding. The Obama administration's quick start on making nominations has slowed to a trickle, lessening the pressure on the Senate to deal with the backlog. And, ultimately, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has the power to force a vote on a pending nomination -- if he wants to take the time to do it.

Nonetheless, that's no excuse for letting advise and consent degenerate into sit around and wait. Until Tuesday, when Tom Perez was confirmed as assistant attorney general for civil rights -- more than six months after being nominated -- five of 11 assistant attorney general positions were unfilled.

Some other examples:

-- Missouri Republican Kit Bond is holding up confirmation of Martha Johnson, the nominee to head the General Services Administration, because the agency has been balking at constructing a $175 million federal building for Kansas City. Johnson's nomination has been languishing on the Senate floor since June.

-- Louisiana Republican David Vitter has a hold on Paul Anastas to be an assistant administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency until the EPA agrees to delay issuing regulations on formaldehyde, which has been classified as a probable human carcinogen. The irony of Vitter's hold is that one of the biggest potential problems with the chemical involves Hurricane Katrina survivors exposed to formaldehyde in FEMA trailers.

-- Meanwhile, Ohio Republican George Voinovich is holding up the nominee for EPA's deputy administrator, Robert Perciasepe, because Voinovich believes the EPA is underestimating the cost to households of climate change legislation. In a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, Voinovich acknowledged that his hold is not "a reflection on Mr. Perciasepe's ability to perform in the role of the deputy administrator."

-- South Carolina Republican Jim DeMint is blocking confirmation of Arturo Valenzuela to be assistant secretary of state for the Western Hemisphere because Valenzuela had the temerity to call the military coup ousting Honduran President Manuel Zelaya a "classic military coup."

-- Eight Republican senators, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, warned Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius that "we will not consent" to Senate floor action on nearly a dozen nominations -- including the U.S. surgeon general -- until the department rescinds what they termed a "gag order" on health insurers.

-- Some nominations can't even get out of committee, with the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee a particular black hole. Two nominees for the National Labor Relations Board have been mired there since April. Patricia Smith, the nominee for solicitor of labor, is about to get a committee vote after having been stuck there since March.

Jackie Berrien was nominated in July to chair the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, but Republicans have refused to act on her nomination until a pick for a Republican vacancy is named. Commissioner Christine Griffin has been confirmed to be deputy director of the Office of Personnel Management but can't leave to take that spot because the EEOC would be left without a quorum.

Being in the minority isn't fun. Gumming up the works with holds is one of the few ways to get attention -- and action. But it's no way to run a government.

When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took to the Senate floor Thursday to blast Republicans for blocking President Obama's nominees for key agencies, the Capitol Hill press corps, bloggers and repor...
When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took to the Senate floor Thursday to blast Republicans for blocking President Obama's nominees for key agencies, the Capitol Hill press corps, bloggers and repor...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
183
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

Thought you'd like to know this: http://www.pressdisplay.com/pressdisplay/showlink.aspx?bookmarkid=CAYDFE0K38L4&preview=article&linkid=4ee4c06c-0306-4d80-b6c6-d1790728d6c8&pdaffid=ZVFwBG5jk4Kvl9OaBJc5%2bg%3d%3d

Can't say I"m surprised though.

Sincerely,
MediaMentions

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 11/07/2009
photo

republican obstruction, that's funny. Last I checked the dems had the numbers to pass this without repubs; they need to look at their own party. the repubs are insignific­ant...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 11/01/2009

Obstruction? If Reid wants to talk about obstruction he needs to look at his own party. Ron Paul's bill to audit the FED for the very first time in history, has been gutted by Democrat Mel Watts of North Carolina. It is no surprise the largest contributors to Watts are the banking industry. Where is the outrage? The Demos must be proud.....­....?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 11/01/2009
- vandegrasse I'm a Fan of vandegrasse 195 fans permalink
photo

As a Progressive and one who voted for change, real change, I am very disappointed in the President's seeming cluelessness. Is it an act. Does he understand leadership and choses not to lead. I don't get it!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 AM on 11/01/2009
- meko I'm a Fan of meko 46 fans permalink
photo

The problem isn't the GOP, it's the "centrist" Democrats who killed the robust public option (that would have cost taxpayers and consumers less). There's no way the wimpy public option that made it past the House (without Obama's help) is going to provide any kind of competitive pressure.

The GOP is behaving as expected. The obstructionist Democrats, along with the President, have squandered a historic opportunity.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 10/31/2009

Reid you have the majority and the pres to sign....th­ere is no gop obstructio­n....you might be afraid that a majority of the public are against it but... hey don't sweat the small stuff!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 10/31/2009
- Querent I'm a Fan of Querent 61 fans permalink
photo

My question: who is allowing the Republican senators to place holds on these nominees? Could it be . . . Satan? Or could it be Harry Reid? If Harry Reid were willing to abandon his religion of Senatorial Privilege, I know of no Senate rule which would require him to honor these holds. He is Majority Leader. He has the power to schedule the Senate's business. He can ignore these holds if he chooses to. Instead, he chooses not to, and chooses instead to whine about it.

Why is Harry Reid Majority Leader? He is totally worthless.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 10/31/2009
- Poboy I'm a Fan of Poboy 21 fans permalink

I agree, Querent.

Just as he didn't honor Chris Dodd's hold, he doesn't have to honor Republican holds.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/12/14/142218/02/931/422135

Unfortunately, he seems more concerned about Republicans than Democrats. I think he's trying to give the impression of change, but I don't think his heart is in it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 10/31/2009
- Querent I'm a Fan of Querent 61 fans permalink
photo

You are so right, Poboy. If Harry Reid wants change, he can make change happen by himself. The first step would be to start acting as though he is competent.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 PM on 10/31/2009
- ariveria I'm a Fan of ariveria 16 fans permalink

about time

where were you 9 months ago

"a lie repeated often enough becomes the truth"
glenn beck
information czar fox news
the view 5/20/09

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 10/31/2009
- Mugzi I'm a Fan of Mugzi 12 fans permalink

I remember earlier on when the repubs stated they want our Pres to fail...yes­, they are the 3 ton elephant in the room...you can't go thru, over or around them...the­y are there doing nothing! How many posts remain unfilled..­.again, preventing progress. How can anybody give the party of "no" a second thought!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 10/31/2009
- Ifticar2 I'm a Fan of Ifticar2 23 fans permalink
photo

What Republican, other than Rush, said that they wanted Obama to fail? One Republican congressman said something about Health Care could be Obama's Waterloo but that happens to be a simple truth.

You have been watching MSNBC too much. Don't forget that MSNBC gets their talking points directly from the White House. Two of their prime time hosts got their talking points in a 2.5 down load at the WH with Obama a couple of weeks ago.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 10/31/2009
- Querent I'm a Fan of Querent 61 fans permalink
photo

While none of it was publicly televised, I have heard numerous Republicans say that they want the President to fail. When everything the President does or says is immediately criticized as wrong by the House and Senate Republican "Leadership", it's pretty obvious that they want him to fail. I presume that your post indicates that you think that if you refuse to notice something, it doesn't exist. Sorry, but that won't wash.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 10/31/2009

Dude, lay off of the the faux news pills for a while.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 10/31/2009
- bascombe I'm a Fan of bascombe 29 fans permalink
photo

mitch mcconnell
jindal
delay
jona goldberg
allan combs
imhofe
u.s.chambe­r of commerce

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 11/01/2009
- bascombe I'm a Fan of bascombe 29 fans permalink
photo

after he totally diluted the so-called "public option".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 AM on 10/31/2009
- StillweRise I'm a Fan of StillweRise 121 fans permalink
photo

can you please relate that comment to the holds that republicans are placing on democratic nominees?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 AM on 10/31/2009
- bascombe I'm a Fan of bascombe 29 fans permalink
photo

not for you. but I will say this: reid has not called the repugs bluff on anything and he has not called out the bluedogs on anything. those are facts. why have we not heard about the republicans Obama keeps nominating for government posts? that is another interesting fact. one appointee gets passed and it's a big deal? I think not. the fact that people are getting from the Obama administration what they voted against - now THAT's news! well, not any more really.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 11/01/2009
- AKJM I'm a Fan of AKJM 18 fans permalink
photo

Good for Reid!

We must do our part and HELP!!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 10/31/2009
- dannyluv I'm a Fan of dannyluv 3 fans permalink

Start with Lieberdousche. Isolate him like a disease and get rid of him. That would be a good place to start

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 PM on 10/30/2009
- Ifticar2 I'm a Fan of Ifticar2 23 fans permalink
photo

Have you looked at Joe's voting record since he joined a Democrat caucus? There have been a number of bills such at the Stimulus bill that would not have passed without Joe's vote.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 10/31/2009

Joe's gotta go.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 10/31/2009
- Kassandra I'm a Fan of Kassandra 97 fans permalink
photo

With the way this bill is shaping up, it may be a good thing if he kills it. I'm sick of the whole thing.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 10/31/2009
- meko I'm a Fan of meko 46 fans permalink
photo

Let's not forget about the real obstructionists - Baucus, Conrad, Wyden, Carper, Tester, Lincoln, Nelson, and Warner.

Oh wait. We call them Democrats. Rahm supported them in their primaries against other candidates who would have supported real health care.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 10/31/2009
- Ifticar2 I'm a Fan of Ifticar2 23 fans permalink
photo

What is it, exactly, that Harry is asking the Democrats to do that they are not doing but can do?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 10/30/2009
- Poboy I'm a Fan of Poboy 21 fans permalink

. . .confirm Obama's nominees.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 10/31/2009
- StillweRise I'm a Fan of StillweRise 121 fans permalink
photo

He's not asking the democrats to do anything. what 'can' democrats do about REPUBLICAN holds...

demand they be released.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 10/31/2009
photo

Hey, psssst. . Harry. . you might want to tackle Blue Dog Democrat obstruction first. . . just a thought. . .

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 10/30/2009
- dezzertguy I'm a Fan of dezzertguy 10 fans permalink
photo

Since most people do not want his bill, he would have to add citizens too. He stands against the GOP and most citizens. Hopefully, he will be removed from office next year.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 PM on 10/30/2009
- myvoice09 I'm a Fan of myvoice09 3 fans permalink

ditto that comment!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 10/30/2009
- Querent I'm a Fan of Querent 61 fans permalink
photo

Could you trolls at least talk about what's being discussed on this thread? Why should anybody take your opinions seriously when you don't even know which thread you are on? DesertGuy? myvoice?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 10/31/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect