'Sexting' Targeted In Oklahoma Hearing

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - 'Sexting' Targeted In Oklahoma Hearing stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TIM TALLEY | 10/30/09 11:27 AM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Sexting

OKLAHOMA CITY — Teenagers may think it's harmless, but sending sexually explicit pictures and messages over cell phones can lead to emotional problems and criminal charges that will affect them for the rest of their lives, criminal justice officials said.

Investigators and prosecutors on Thursday warned of the dangers of electronically transmitting racy images and words at a hearing organized by Rep. Anastasia Pittman, D-Oklahoma City, into the practice of "sexting," distributing nude or seminude self-portraits over cell phones.

"Sexting alone just by itself will land a kid in jail," Pittman said. "They are not aware of the implications, the consequences. It's their future that we're trying to save."

Pittman said she hopes to craft a bill for the Legislature to consider next year that will clarify language in existing criminal statutes that could be used to prosecute teens who send or receive naughty images of themselves or others.

"What I'm trying to do is be proactive," Pittman said. Major concerns are the long-term consequences of filing a felony child pornography or indecent exposure charges against a minor and requiring them to register as a sex offender.

"We want to educate our children on the very real effects," Pittman said.

Kim Sardis, juvenile services division director for the Oklahoma Office of Juvenile Affairs, said at least 10 cases have been referred to state juvenile courts since 2005 involving teens accused of distributing or possessing child pornography. Three of the cases involved the distribution of images over a cell phone.

Trent Baggett of the Oklahoma District Attorney's Council said he is not aware of any "sexting" cases prosecuted in adult courts. But the practice has led to child pornography charges against teens in several states.

Story continues below
advertisement

Several states have adopted legislation to define and prohibit "sexting." Pittman said a law went into effect in Colorado this year that adds obscene text messages to the list of acts that can be prosecuted under state child pornography and harassment statutes.

In Vermont, a new law permits prosecutors to send teenage "sexting" cases to juvenile courts to eliminate the stigma of child pornography convictions.

Earlier this year, three Pennsylvania high school girls who sent seminude photos and four male students who received them were all hit with child pornography charges. In Ohio, a 15-year-old high school girl faced similar charges for sending her own racy cell phone photos to classmates.

"Obviously, they should be held accountable," Baggett said of teens who engage in "sexting." But prosecutors need to handle felony cases involving teens appropriately and recognize the long-term consequences of a conviction.

Information distributed by Baggett indicates that nationally, 9 percent of children aged 13 have shared nude photos with cell phones or other electronic means and 24 percent of 17-year-olds have engaged in the practice. A total of 20 percent of all teens acknowledge sharing nude photos.

Jennifer McLaughlin of the Oklahoma Coalition against Domestic Violence said the suicide of an Ohio girl last year was attributed to the bullying and humiliation she experienced after she sent a nude cell phone photograph to her boyfriend at the time, who later forwarded it to several other girls.

Heath Merchen, a former prosecutor who is now legal counsel for the Oklahoma Education Association, urged parents to check their child's cell phone for inappropriate images or texts.

"If you don't, the consequences are severe," Merchen said. "Reputations are destroyed. Kids' lives are destroyed."

OKLAHOMA CITY — Teenagers may think it's harmless, but sending sexually explicit pictures and messages over cell phones can lead to emotional problems and criminal charges that will affect them ...
OKLAHOMA CITY — Teenagers may think it's harmless, but sending sexually explicit pictures and messages over cell phones can lead to emotional problems and criminal charges that will affect them ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
21
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

I live in the Netherlands (lived in Ohio back when I was around High School age), and I seriously don't get what's up with a majority of the US population having such huge issues with sexuality.
A high school student that gets into a serious all-out fight might get suspended for a few days, while someone who sends a "racy photo" to their friends risks being jailed and registered as a sex offender.
I shouldn't think people would have to ask themselves what is wrong with that picture.

I think the main thing here is that more and more, people aren't raising their kids to be responsible adults. They keep them young and ignorant (most often through force), rather than impressing a sense of self-worth and responsibility through a open and understanding dialogue.
Rather than condemning their behavior, it might be worth trying to understand kids and to raise their awareness about consequences. And if one of them does send an image and gets ridiculed by their class when it gets forwarded, I'd say that's a punishment a thousand times more effective than any court of law can apply.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 AM on 11/01/2009

I'm sooo weary of responding to reports on this issue. This, rightfully so, has been in the Press for more than a year, now.

Briefly: there are no identifying info on the photographs, just as there is no id on any other photos. Also, it's worth noting that adults or predators are NOT involved (just children of middle and high school age, acting their sexual ages). NO, this won't show up at a job interview; but, if child pornography charges are sustained against children and they are forever called sex offenders, then it WILL show up (but only because the government makes it show up, not the young people).

I don't know what else to say. Why can't the government (Law Enforcement) PR people just tell the truth on this?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 10/31/2009
- PlayTOE I'm a Fan of PlayTOE 24 fans permalink
photo

So this legislator Rep. Anastasia Pittman thinks the 9% of 13 year old's and 20% of teens who send racy phone messages should be jailed?

WTF ?
Is he running a juvenile prison at a profit?

Time to change our attitudes.
Nudity is just skin. No one needs be all that shocked to see a picture.
*(much different if someone is forcing or paying kids to produce porn)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 10/31/2009
- -swift I'm a Fan of -swift 2 fans permalink

So, you can go to jail for *receiveing* a picture or dirty words? And how exactly are you supposed to prevent that?

We went on a driving trip last summer, and my kids now want to go to every state. I have to now tell them that we can't go to Oklahoma. Someone might call and I'll have to go to prison.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 PM on 10/30/2009
- quiviran I'm a Fan of quiviran 23 fans permalink

What a shame. Oklahoma is the reddest state in the union. Think of not being able to buy cold beer at a liquor store or having a gynecologist Senator who can't tell one orifice from another. Oklahoma abounds in amazing things.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 11/01/2009
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 138 fans permalink
photo

Have to punish the kids, rather than punish those who distributed those kids' photographs without their authorization?

Huh....kid­s need to have the RIAA represent them.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 10/30/2009
- goodog I'm a Fan of goodog 130 fans permalink
photo

OR we could teach everyone that nudity isn't a bad thing instead of telling everyone that being seen nude will ruin your reputation and your life FOREVER.

Get a grip, people.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 10/30/2009
photo

thanks. saved me a post. I agree. Especially since these are folks sending photos of themselves. How do they get caught? Do the recipents comoplain? Are our text messages monitered?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 10/30/2009
- goodog I'm a Fan of goodog 130 fans permalink
photo

"Sexting alone just by itself will land a kid in jail," Pittman said. "They are not aware of the implications, the consequences. It's their future that we're trying to save."

Actually, it's people who land you in jail, not sharing a naked picture of yourself.

You can save their future by changing people's attitudes about nudity, from prudery to normalcy, instead of trying to make it out to be a living nightmare.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 10/30/2009

More evidence that the south is backwards and maybe it should have been allowed to leave the union.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 10/30/2009
- Tiger99 I'm a Fan of Tiger99 18 fans permalink
photo

Oklahoma wasn't ever in the south... Open a history book sometime then try actually reading the article..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 10/30/2009

Because only the Confederacy can be considered part of the South.

Try toning down the hostility next time.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 10/30/2009
- quiviran I'm a Fan of quiviran 23 fans permalink

Try telling that to all the redneck Oklahomans with Confederate flags on their pickups.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 11/01/2009
- miles120 I'm a Fan of miles120 25 fans permalink
photo

So, you want to save kids by prosecuting them as sex offenders? Well, THAT won't ruin their lives.

Also, I understand that electronic networks are not private, but is this worse than teens getting naked at a party? What about being topless on a beach? Or laying out naked in the backyard where a neighbor might spy you from the house next door? All behaviors that are less than prudent, but certainly not sex offenses.

I'm so glad I don't live in Oklahoma.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 10/30/2009
- vinny I'm a Fan of vinny 76 fans permalink
photo

"Sexting alone just by itself will land a kid in jail," Pittman said. "They are not aware of the implications, the consequences. It's their future that we're trying to save."

--------------

m0ronic application of law, m0ronic politician

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 10/30/2009
- ziploked I'm a Fan of ziploked 14 fans permalink
photo

While I don't think kids should be sending naked pictures to each other, prosecuting them under child pornography laws is absolutely ridiculous. Why not just confiscate their cell phones? I can understand if an adult was circulating pictures of naked children--throw them in jail! But kids? No, they need to be taught and corrected, not thrown into the court system.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 10/30/2009
- quiviran I'm a Fan of quiviran 23 fans permalink

The laws will work as well to change behavior as abstinence only sex education works to prevent sexual activity. Or worse, as in "If I can't send a picture, I'll just show it in person."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 10/30/2009
- cheeriogirl I'm a Fan of cheeriogirl 105 fans permalink

A bit O.T., but do you suppose Trent Baggett ( aka T. Baggett) is a Tea Bagger? Just wondering.­...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 10/30/2009

The consequences are only so severe because we have written absurd laws that MAKE THEM SO.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 10/30/2009

I guess I should clarify that I don't mean that child pornography laws are absurd, but that applying the same statutes to minors-sex­ting-minor­s is absurd. It's not like there is some 20-something predator sexting in these cases. Why punish highschoolers for being sexual with eachother in a society that screams TEENAGERS ARE SEXY AND HIGHSCHOOL IS FOR PARTAY in all of our media?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 10/30/2009
photo

And what the media says and does carries more clout than the whole of society?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 10/31/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect