Bush Interrogators Used "Abdominal Slaps" To "Instill Fear And Despair"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush Interrogators Used "Abdominal Slaps" To "Instill Fear And Despair" stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11- 3-09 11:44 AM   |   Updated: 11- 3-09 12:02 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Detainee

The following article was produced by The Raw Story and written by Larisa Alexandrovna.

Recently declassified documents on the Bush administration interrogation program describe several techniques used on detainees in US custody, some of which may have violated the United Nations Convention Against Torture, to which the United States is a signatory.

Included in the large cache of documents is one which describes (pdf) stress positions to be used as interrogation techniques, as well as the use of an abdominal slap as a punishment tool.

The documents were requested by the American Civil Liberties Union via a Freedom of Information Act request in 2004 and were made public on October 30, 2009.

While there is no information on when the stress-position document was written or which government agency authored it, the entire cache of documents was in the possession of the Office of Legal Council at the US Department of Justice according to ACLU attorney, Alex Abdo. "We don't know who wrote it," Abdo said in a Monday interview. "It may have been written by the OLC, the CIA, or the DOD."

Abdo further explained that the document may be part of of another set of documents, which could explain its lack of a date and other contextual information. Abdo pointed out that the Central Intelligence Agency had primary declassification responsibilities.

The other documents in the release are from the Department of Defense, the Department of State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Justice Department, and the Central Intelligence Agency, along with communications between these various agencies and the National Security Council. The general time frame of the entire set of documents is from late 2001 until the filing of the FOIA in 2004.

Stress Positions

Story continues below
advertisement

The document setting forth the use of stress positions and abdominal slapping is short and vague but raises serious questions of human rights abuses. The first part of the document describes the the "purpose" of stress positions without indicating what the desired results are or when the technique should be implemented.

The "purpose" of stress positions is described as follows:

A variety of stress positions are possible. They focus on producing mild physical discomfort from prolonged muscle use, rather than pain associated with contortions or twisting of the body.

There is no further information provided on the length of time stress positions should be used, nor is there any list of prohibitions relating to the overuse of stress positions. The only information provided on the implementation of this technique is under a section called "application":

A). The detainee kneel on the floor and lean back at a 45-degree angle B). The detainee lean against a wall with only their forehead touching the wall and feet as far away as possible from the wall.

There is no mention of how long a detainee is to lean back at a "45-degree angle" or what signs indicate that the"mild physical discomfort" has become severe or acute.

Abdominal Slap

The "purpose" of the abdominal slap technique is far more defined than the purpose of the stress position technique and it is this portion that raises serious questions of legality, as defined by several treaties to which the United States is a signatory.

The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, for example, was adopted by the United Nations in 1984 and ratified by the United States in 1994. It defines torture as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person."

The "purpose" of the abdominal slap is defined in the document as being "to instill fear and despair, to punish selective behavior and to instill humiliation or cause insult."

The document then goes on to describe how a detainee is to be slapped in the abdomen:

The interrogator is positioned directly in front of the detainee. With the interrogator's fingers held tightly together and fully extended, with the palm toward the interrogator's own body and about one foot from the detainee's abdomen, using the wrist as the fixed pivot point, the interrogator slaps the detainee in the detainee's abdomen. The interrogator does not use a fist, nor is the slap delivered either below the navel or above the sternum.

In an email to Raw Story, human rights lawyer and Columbia law professor Scott Horton provided a strongly worded comment in response to the "purpose" of the abdominal slap technique:

In a famous statement, George W. Bush disparaged the international law prohibition on humiliating and degrading treatment saying it was 'vague' and that he 'didn't know what it meant.' But this document demonstrated that the Bush Administration's strenuous efforts to avoid international law were not based on concerns about ambiguity, but rather because they understood precisely what the law meant and they intended to break it. Here, the purpose of one technique is openly described as being 'to instill fear and despair... and to instill humiliation or cause insult.' It's actually one of the milder techniques secretly adopted and used--and clearly forbidden and punished up to the time Bush came to office.

Abdo concurs that this is a serious revelation indicating an intent to violate known human rights laws. "As with all of the enhanced interrogation techniques, it is clear their purpose was to humiliate detainees and instill fear in them them of death and bodily harm and [was] certainly in contradiction to all of the treaties we have signed," Abdo said.

Asked if there are any known cases of death as a result of the abdominal slap technique, Abdo said that there are cases of detainees dying as a result of beatings to the lower regions of the body but he was not aware of any deaths directly related to abdominal slapping.

Larisa Alexandrovna is managing editor of investigative news for Raw Story. Contact: larisa@rawstory.com.

The following article was produced by The Raw Story and written by Larisa Alexandrovna. Recently declassified documents on the Bush administration interrogation program describe several techniques u...
The following article was produced by The Raw Story and written by Larisa Alexandrovna. Recently declassified documents on the Bush administration interrogation program describe several techniques u...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
111
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- Madbunny I'm a Fan of Madbunny 7 fans permalink

Which is it wingnuts, either we had to go to extremes (x-treme!) to get information from the horrible animals that hate our way of life or these silly pooftah techniques are not even worth getting upset over?

Granted, this is an application of a stress position that we're talking about, not like tea time and comfy pillows as others have implied, but I'd like to know why they think that using physical techniques designed to 'instill fear and despair' are acceptable?

So dwhich is it?
Does this stuff work, or did the Bush administration waste our time and the safety of our soldiers coming up with useless 'pseudo-tortures'?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 11/04/2009
- duxguts I'm a Fan of duxguts 22 fans permalink
photo

That's okay. As long as they were not tortured.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 11/03/2009
- belyeu I'm a Fan of belyeu 12 fans permalink
photo

I hope those poor prisoners never got their comfy pillows taken away or missed tea time.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 11/03/2009
- Schnides I'm a Fan of Schnides 16 fans permalink

Anyone wonder why there are only 99 posts on this article? Well, it's because the majority has no problem if prisoners were slapped on their bellies. Remember 9/11? Has it happened to us again? No! Thank you!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 11/03/2009
- sviolette I'm a Fan of sviolette 76 fans permalink
photo

You're right. Some of the American people believe it's perfectly alright for American intelligence agents and soldiers to commit war crimes. That still doesn't make it legal. Some people think that rape is OK but it's still illegal.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 11/03/2009
- Schnides I'm a Fan of Schnides 16 fans permalink

You can't compare rape to this!!! We didn't prey on these people, we caught them after THEY successfully made the largest attack on us since Pearl Harbor. Be lucky it hasn't happened agian because you and your loved ones might have been a victim, and believe me, they would have problem for their war crimes they committed on us. Slapped their bellies???? Please!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 11/04/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 148 fans permalink

Man, use some of these techniques on Bush and the other Bush administration war criminals, including John Yoo and Doug Feith.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 11/03/2009
- Frenbar I'm a Fan of Frenbar 24 fans permalink
photo

We are either a country of laws, or we aren't. Obama promised to restore respect and the rule of law, and he has failed miserably. Everyone involved in torture, from those performing it up to those who ordered it should be tried and imprisoned.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 11/03/2009
- duxguts I'm a Fan of duxguts 22 fans permalink
photo

He misspoke.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 11/03/2009
- Schnides I'm a Fan of Schnides 16 fans permalink

Keep in mind that once 9/11 happened, we HAD to go extreme to save stop this from happening again. Of coure we went extreme!!! I would do worse to a human if they might know where my kidnapped child was! I would do ANYTHING to make suspects talk. Yet, when I believe they know nothing, I would back off, but if they DID know something, it would be the worst scenario that person could experience.

These prisoners were NOT treated that badly, I'm sorry. And has another 9/11 happened again here in the U.S.? Nope!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 11/03/2009
- Poiks I'm a Fan of Poiks 71 fans permalink
photo

You're a fool.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 11/03/2009
- Schnides I'm a Fan of Schnides 16 fans permalink

No, I'm really not. I'm a believer in going after the proximate cause as it is the best way to discontinue it's growth. You sir appear to be soft and have forgotten why this is even a conversation.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 11/03/2009
- grdndoctor I'm a Fan of grdndoctor 4 fans permalink

a fool and a tool of the Rightwing Nutz

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 11/03/2009
- Schnides I'm a Fan of Schnides 16 fans permalink

Rightwing???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, wrong, guess again.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 11/03/2009

9/11 was a one -time sucker punch and the perpetrators died.There was never a possibility of another large scale attack.
Bush/Cheney then used lies and distortions to 'belly slap" fear and despair into enough Americans to support an endless waste of money on the endless war on terror .

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 11/05/2009
- greysells2 I'm a Fan of greysells2 37 fans permalink
photo

It sounds like it meets the definition of torture to me. But this item will be parsed to death by the torturers and friends just like every other allegation is said "not be torture but rather an enhanced interrogation technique."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 11/03/2009
- jennylynn I'm a Fan of jennylynn 49 fans permalink

These guys look very well fed and very healthy. I saw on the news they received the Swine Flu vaccine too. How Horrible they are being treated for trying to k i ll us.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 11/03/2009
- Poiks I'm a Fan of Poiks 71 fans permalink
photo

You, too, are a fool.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 11/03/2009

Why? For being concerned that these dirtabgs get better treatment than our own citizens?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 11/03/2009
- ZenDiagram I'm a Fan of ZenDiagram 40 fans permalink

So slapping the belly is torture now?

What about forcing one to listen to Miley Cyrus? If so, I want my roommate sent to the Hague.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 11/03/2009
- jennylynn I'm a Fan of jennylynn 49 fans permalink

Good One

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 11/03/2009

Well yes...the use of slaps or paddles to elicit confessions or information has long been regarded as abusive treatment and determined as illegal by courts in the USA.

And BTW stress positions that "work muscles" beyond their capacity can cause permanent damage. A short term movement can be accomplished sufficiently by a muscle group - but maintaining an intermediate posture can cause the tendon or ligamentous attachment to fail, creating scar tissue or if the posture is forced a complete destruction of the muscle group and other muscles and tendons that "pick up" the action.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 11/03/2009
- Schnides I'm a Fan of Schnides 16 fans permalink

Crashing planes in to buildings while people burn, explode, and dive out of 80 story buildings to avoid burning to death is torture too.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 11/03/2009
- Schnides I'm a Fan of Schnides 16 fans permalink

Hahahahaha­ha....awes­ome!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 11/03/2009
- kat1944 I'm a Fan of kat1944 14 fans permalink

This torture stuff gets sillier and sillier by the day.
Let it go.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 11/03/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 645 fans permalink
photo

No! These people need to be brought to justice. We cannot operate on strength in foreign policy, if our moral authority is not repaired through justice.....,

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 11/03/2009
- Guitar63 I'm a Fan of Guitar63 11 fans permalink
photo

You would be singing a different tune if it was you or your family. Evil actions should have consequences.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 11/03/2009
- Fred Hood I'm a Fan of Fred Hood 121 fans permalink
photo

either we have laws that have consequences for all that break them.....or lets go lawless your choice

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 11/03/2009
- Fred Hood I'm a Fan of Fred Hood 121 fans permalink
photo

if it were you or your family being water boarded 183 times you would sing a different tune........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-22cbMvP6Q

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 11/03/2009
- Fred Hood I'm a Fan of Fred Hood 121 fans permalink
photo

I want to know why holder has not charged these crooks yet...........

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 11/03/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 645 fans permalink
photo

Me too. He is weak. we need a new AG already......,

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 11/03/2009
- Guitar63 I'm a Fan of Guitar63 11 fans permalink
photo

Do you think it's Holder or Obama?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 11/03/2009
- Chili4me I'm a Fan of Chili4me 32 fans permalink
photo

Followed up with wedgies and wet willies.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 11/03/2009
- jimmygee I'm a Fan of jimmygee 9 fans permalink
photo

Chili

You set exactly the tone of most of these comments. Mindless twaddle.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 11/03/2009

Next we'll find out that these scumb*gs were being tickled: its torture, aaahhhh!!!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 11/03/2009
- TEHelms I'm a Fan of TEHelms 11 fans permalink

Some of these techniques were not prohibited by the UCMJ handbook but here is the problem..they do not work. It has been proven that it is a rare situation where any of these methods produce actionable intelligence.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 11/03/2009
- Guitar63 I'm a Fan of Guitar63 11 fans permalink
photo

For me it matters not what the UCMJ handbook says. Really, it is more a matter of ethics, and I find this to be immoral.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 11/03/2009
- Fred Hood I'm a Fan of Fred Hood 121 fans permalink
photo

and inhumane a person that does this to another human is just sick......if I were still in the military and ordered to do this I would be in the brig I would refuse

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 11/03/2009
photo

So the guards were in fact, slapping bellies with the prisoners.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 11/03/2009
- Guitar63 I'm a Fan of Guitar63 11 fans permalink
photo

WHERE IS OSAMA FATTY!? *Smack*

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 11/03/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect