iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Administration Helps House Democrat Gut Post-Enron Reforms

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:30 PM ET

Rahm

With the White House's blessing, a House panel voted Tuesday to water down a key post-Enron measure designed to protect investors.

In a voice vote, members of the House Financial Services Committee agreed to permanently exempt from a provision of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act all publicly traded companies with market values less than $75 million -- which amounts to more than half of all public companies.

The provision mandates that firms obtain audits of their internal controls. Companies say it costs too much. Though these firms have received annual deferrals from this requirement since its 2004 enactment -- some think the fiercely anti-regulatory Bush administration had something to do with this -- SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said last month that the deferrals had ended, and that the firms would be expected to comply by 2010.

So Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), John Adler (D-N.J.) and Scott Garrett (R-N.J.) went to work. All three offered amendments to delay or prevent its planned implementation. Adler's amendment from last week went the furthest, proposing to exempt four out of five publicly traded companies.

Schapiro sent committee member Paul Kanjorski, a Pennsylvania Democrat, a letter expressing concern and the anti-investor amendments were beaten back last week after Kanjorski and committee chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) expressed disapproval.

Then the White House got involved.

On Tuesday, Adler offered a new amendment to permanently exempt smaller firms. Though it passed via voice vote, Frank requested a final roll call vote which is scheduled for Wednesday.

Per the Wall Street Journal:

At this morning's session, two committee members mentioned that the Obama administration is on board. "It's odd that I should be defending the White House," said Rep. Scott Garrett (R., N.J.), who introduced the amendment that would make permanent the small-company exemption that's due to expire next year. "The White House understands the importance of going forward" with the amendment, he added.


Rep. John Adler, a New Jersey Democrat who supports the amendment, also chimed in that the White House and Treasury Department back the repeal.


That prompted Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D., Pa.), who said a permanent exemption would be a "bad day for the American investor," to ask Adler to identify the administration folks with whom he had talked.


Adler said he discussed the matter three times with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.

The amendments, which were first disclosed by the Huffington Post, have come under fire from former regulators and finance industry watchdogs.

Former SEC chairman Arthur Levitt said of the amendments:

This has enormous significance to individual investors. This is something the Republicans could never have accomplished, and what a bitter irony it is that the Democrats...are emasculating the best piece of legislation of the past 20 years.


It's the freshman members of Congress, fearful for reelection, that are pandering to interests that want to overturn this legislation. It makes a mockery of what the Democratic Party has always stood for -- individual investors.

Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America, added:

Congressman Adler's statements today appear to remove any question about the Administration's role in this travesty. Just to be perfectly clear, this White House, which has derided the deregulatory policies of the Bush Administration, is pushing an amendment that would gut post-Enron reforms beyond what the Bush SEC was willing to do.


While this issue is small potatoes compared to other issues currently under debate, such as reforming the derivatives markets or overseeing financial institutions that are 'too big to fail,' it tells us a lot about what we can expect. Their message that regulation is just too burdensome and too costly should send a chill down the spine of anyone who still held out hope that this Administration is serious about regulatory reform.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

With the White House's blessing, a House panel voted Tuesday to water down a key post-Enron measure designed to protect investors. In a voice vote, members of the House Financial Services Committee a...
With the White House's blessing, a House panel voted Tuesday to water down a key post-Enron measure designed to protect investors. In a voice vote, members of the House Financial Services Committee a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 473
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
05:08 PM on 11/18/2009
Victoria Duff made excellent recommendations.
HP Readers please act by sending comments to the SEC Government Business Forum on Small Business Capital Formation. The Forum offers an opportunity for representatives of smaller companies to meet with senior government officials and communicate their views on small business capital formation.
Encourage 2009 SEC Forum participants to include Duff’s recommendations in the final report and recommend that the Whitehouse take immediate action on these recommendations.
The President, leaders of Congress and administration decision makers need to understand what must be done to help small business raise capital.
Huffington Post readers please call on President Obama, Speaker Pelosi to hold a small business conference in Northern California during Congress’ Christmas Recess.
President Obama must proactively confront reshaping small business policy. Studies reveal that small business is a net new job creator that will lead the economy out of this downturn. Silicon Valley and Northern California have an eco-system in place to capitalize and support innovative new businesses. The Whitehouse, Congress and administration decision makers can immediately work on small business policies by listening to this eco-system.
Huffington Post readers call on President Obama to hold a small business conference in Northern California and develop it into a model that the Whitehouse can take to other parts of the country. It is critically important to hear directly to make policy changes that will help small business begin raising capital, creating new jobs and growing the economy.
Sincerely,
Brad Smith
Austin, Texas
08:10 PM on 11/17/2009
Here is the problem: Nobody takes the time to clearly define just what a $75-million or even a $700-million in market cap company is these days. That is a company that has 100-million shares outstanding at $7/share. In other words, probably a company that is trading OTC...probably housed in a single office with three people working at two or three jobs within the company - CEO/Marketing Director and COO/CFO and Sales Rep/Investor Relations.

THESE COMPANIES ARE THE SMALL COMPANIES THAT PROVIDE MOST OF THE JOBS IN THIS COUNTRY. They get punished while the big banks, big auto, big Wall St. and big Government get away with killing off our financial system.

There is a major disconnect in this country over words like ‘corporation’ and ‘publicly traded’ and it is because of the likes of Enron and GoldmanSachs etc. The average person is correct in being outraged but the problem is that when they hear $700-million they think we are talking about Goldman Sachs!!!!

WE WILL CONTINUE TO HAVE HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT UNTIL WE STOP SQUEEZING SMALL BUSINESS!

I propose that we - small businesses, consultants, lawyers, accountants, and average citizens who understand this unfortunate misunderstanding - go directly to the White House, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who have all announced that the next project will be job creation.

HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT IS A POLITICAL PROBLEM. The solution is adopting a more realistic attitude to small business.


Victoria Duff
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Screed
Where's my election gift?
07:56 PM on 11/09/2009
GOOD. Sarbanes Oxley is a terrible law. My company is struggling now with the economy, and we have to have auditors on staff, and other expensive compliances. We have to print every e mail and store them. What a waste of paper. Bye bye bad law. Smaller companies shouldn't be involved in this awful legislation.
11:51 AM on 11/05/2009
Due to Obama's inability to create an effective jobs program the only beneficiaries of this recovery is Wall Street- the same it's been since the 80's. FDP knew how to make work, but Obama doesn;t or chooses not to.

good articles; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com
because of this he may lose in 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjtaylor22
05:08 PM on 11/05/2009
REPUGS N CONSERVATIVES PULLED THE SPENDING OUT OF the stimulus.
hey what did bush do as we lost 750 jobs from july 2008 thru dec 2008
he gave a 3 min speech on the white house lawn
01:29 AM on 11/05/2009
Why did Obama campaign for Corizine but not real health care reform?

Answer: Rahm ordered Obama to push for another Goldman Sachs CEO (Corizine) politician to infiltrate the Government

This way everyone can see who is in charge ... the Wall Street Con Artists
photo
JohnnyWalkerBlueLabel
527HP, 12.3@111mph 1/4 mile. 2%er going for 1%
11:53 PM on 11/04/2009
Rahm's visage makes me want to puke.
10:18 PM on 11/04/2009
Sarbanes-Oxley was the best piece of legislation of the last 20 years. Hmm. It seems like I remember some problems involving businesses that were regulated by that law AFTER it went into effect. I'm probably not remembering right.
photo
vandegrasse
Don't Panic
10:01 PM on 11/04/2009
Individuals are not exempt! Why should small companies be?
10:17 PM on 11/04/2009
I'm pretty sure individuals are not required to produce audits of internal controls.
photo
vandegrasse
Don't Panic
01:10 AM on 11/05/2009
We're not exempt from personal audits!
12:29 PM on 11/04/2009
This one of the reasons why West Virginia and New Jersey went to the Republicans. THE DEMOCRATIC BASE STAYED HOME.

DUH!
12:05 PM on 11/04/2009
A friend asked me if things were really hopeless and I said yes. There will be no meaningful change or reform and things will continued suck1ng they way they have since Reagan.

good articles; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

And that was that.
01:19 AM on 11/05/2009
It will change only after all the money is in the hands of the Wall Street Con Artists. Even Chelsea Clinton was given $500K from a hedge fund manager.
11:47 AM on 11/04/2009
Sarbanes-Oxley was a knee-jerk reaction to the Enron fiasco. It is an incredibly expensive to implement and doesn't really prevent corporate fraud. This is the right thing to do.
photo
vandegrasse
Don't Panic
10:01 PM on 11/04/2009
Oh, boo-hoo for the companies, big or small.
10:49 AM on 11/04/2009
He is actually doing the right thing here for once.
09:07 AM on 11/04/2009
I can see there aren't many corporate types here, or you would know that Sarbanes-Oxley is mostly BS that has been a boondoggle for consultants and auditing firms. I don't see this as a big deal. It really has added a lot of overhead (mainly because of the consultants etc) and doesn't do much to improve accountability. There are better ways to make improvements. Lots of pearl-clutching going on here...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
07:53 AM on 11/04/2009
The very same people from Goldman sachs and jp morgan who brought us the deregulation of 1999 under Clinton and the financial meltdown of the Bush crime administration are now heading the Obama smoke and mirror conjob. And Ranm Emmanual is the man behind the curtains. This country has been under the direction of the jp morgans and goldman sachs for at least 40 years. Obama is now the figurehead carrying the water. They are all criminals. We need to get rid of Obama and the dems and get rid of the republicans who created the smoke and mirror scheme back in 1999.
The only thing that makes sense is to elect Micheal Moore to turn things back to the people.
THROW THE BUMS OUT
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
09:52 AM on 11/04/2009
Your talk of throwing the bums out is working. Now we have Independents - who used to be Republicans - electing more Republicans who will most certainly continue the work of the Bush administration. Ugh!
10:23 PM on 11/04/2009
This is why Republicans are right when they think they should purify in order to expand. It has nothing to do with them. The most short-sighted wing of the Democratic party always follows suit. It's about not being part of the establishment or something. Boy we really stuck it to that Carter administration though. That'll teach him to listen to We The People (do you capitalize the The?) Once we're back to being underdogs again, I think we'll all be happier.
07:51 AM on 11/04/2009
This is horrible.

Obama shoves the stiletto a little deeper into the bowels of Main Street while kissing rear ends on Wall Street.

I can not wait until Obama comes around looking for campaign team leaders, money and votes again.
photo
vandegrasse
Don't Panic
10:02 PM on 11/04/2009
I doubt I will vote for him again unless he WAKES UP!