CIA Eavesdropping Suit: Government Agrees To Pay $3 Million

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - CIA Eavesdropping Suit: Government Agrees To Pay $3 Million stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

| 11/ 4/09 09:50 AM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Cia

WASHINGTON — The government has agreed to pay $3 million to a former agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration who sued CIA officers for illegal eavesdropping.

The proposed settlement followed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth in July that CIA officials committed fraud to protect a former covert agent against the eavesdropping allegations.

The lawsuit was brought by former DEA agent Richard Horn, who says his home in Rangoon, Burma, was illegally wiretapped by the CIA in 1993. He says Arthur Brown, the former CIA station chief in Burma, and Franklin Huddle Jr., the chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Burma, were trying to get him transferred because they disagreed with his work with Burmese officials on the country's drug trade.

Horn sued Brown and Huddle in 1994, seeking monetary damages for violating his civil rights. The CIA itself was a defendant in the lawsuit until early this year.

Then-CIA Director George Tenet filed an affidavit asking that the case against Brown be dismissed because he was a covert agent whose identity was a state secret that must not be revealed in open court. Lamberth granted the CIA's request and threw out the case against Brown in 2004.

Lamberth found out last year that Brown's cover had been lifted in 2002, even though the CIA continued to file legal documents saying his status was covert. The judge found that the CIA intentionally misled the court and he reinstated the case against Brown.

The agreement in the case was revealed in court papers filed Tuesday night, and Lamberth will now consider whether to dismiss the suit. Under the proposed settlement, the government makes no admission as to whether the allegations in the lawsuit are true.

WASHINGTON — The government has agreed to pay $3 million to a former agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration who sued CIA officers for illegal eavesdropping. The proposed settlement follow...
WASHINGTON — The government has agreed to pay $3 million to a former agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration who sued CIA officers for illegal eavesdropping. The proposed settlement follow...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
22
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- SamEllison I'm a Fan of SamEllison 16 fans permalink
photo

Somewhere along the line Burma,
Afghanistan and the heroin trade tie in.
Wouldn't you know it, the CIA is there too!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 11/04/2009
photo

Sam, you forgot about the oil and gas.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 11/04/2009

Really....­......... I know now - there is a supreme being !!!!

And we can still believe in a small bit of JUSTICE!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 11/04/2009
- jimfl I'm a Fan of jimfl 13 fans permalink

Why isn't Tenent charged with perjury?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 11/04/2009
- garymc8 I'm a Fan of garymc8 37 fans permalink

Does george bush have to pay the fine since he was all for illegal wiretapping? Wouldn't that be cool if politicians were fiscally punished for their illegal blunders?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 11/04/2009
- ljc I'm a Fan of ljc 110 fans permalink

I am no Bush fan, but this happened in 1993. It sounds more like something started by Poppy Bush than Jr. It was about the d.r.u.g trade.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 11/04/2009
- hmmmmm I'm a Fan of hmmmmm 4 fans permalink

the wiretapping was in 93, but the fraudulant filings were in 02.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 11/04/2009
- rissole I'm a Fan of rissole 10 fans permalink
photo

When Pappy Bush was with the CIA he had a really good drug dealing friend in Panama.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 11/04/2009
photo

I'm sure the govt employees in the new govt run healthcare won't abuse their power the way these govt employees did. It'll be totally different.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 11/04/2009
- Doc0976 I'm a Fan of Doc0976 9 fans permalink

You should know since you've been a Tricare victim for quite some time, huh? How's that Tricare working out for you and the family, by the way?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 11/04/2009
photo

How's that personal attack working out for you when you have nothing substantial to say on the topic at hand?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 11/04/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 121 fans permalink

Will it be SECRET health care?

Maybe they can get a "sneak and peek" warrant for random prostate exams on unnamed Americans.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 11/04/2009
- ljc I'm a Fan of ljc 110 fans permalink

ha..says the person on government run healthcare­....hmmmm are you one of those phoney soldiers ?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 11/04/2009
photo

It's shocking how little you know about me since you feel so comfortable commenting about services I earned through my service.
My service has ended and so has my use of govt healthcare. I pay for the health insurance I have now through my employer because VA hospitals are pathetic.

But by all means makea personal attack against me to cover for the fact that our medical privacy will be a serious issue and that you have no response to that.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 11/04/2009
- cybexg I'm a Fan of cybexg 27 fans permalink

lol...a large percentage of identity theft can be traced to insurance companies or insurance related activities. Sharing of data among insurance companies was common place and still seems to be occuring.

Not saying that the government entities have not abused their access to information. I AM saying that private entities do and will abuse access to information to a greater extent than will a government entity. The reason for this is that the private entity has a means to benefit from the abuse while government entities largely cannot.

Notice, I gave reasoning while RWM only gave empty rhetoric

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 11/04/2009
- roald I'm a Fan of roald 16 fans permalink

Any person can abuse their power. Insurance account reviewers may be paid bonuses for figuring out ways to deny claims.

I fail to see how you can equate the abuse of power of a spy agency covering their asses with what a clerical worker who is simply working for a pay check.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 11/04/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect