Lamont Running For Governor Rather Than Re-Challenge Lieberman

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Lamont Running For Governor Rather Than Re-Challenge Lieberman stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11- 4-09 05:40 PM   |   Updated: 11- 4-09 05:54 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Lamont

Ned Lamont, the Connecticut Democrat who nearly took out Sen. Joseph Lieberman in the 2006 elections, is planning a run for the state's governor's chair in 2010.

In an interview with the Huffington Post, Lamont said that his background in business and his concern over the state's budgetary crisis had compelled him to take another crack at elective office.

"This is a state that has been falling behind its peers for a long time," he said. "We are a beautiful state with a lot of advantages but we are old and getting older. The recruiters say we are old and cold and jobs are going to places like Georgia... You can't just sit on the sidelines and watch that happen."

Early on Tuesday, Lamont announced that he was setting up an exploratory committee to begin raising funds for a potential run. The decision to launch an official campaign -- confidants say and Lamont admits -- has basically been made.

"The exploratory committee is supposed to be a little bit ambiguous about running for office but I've always been a chief executive," he said. "I've run a company and I think Connecticut is a state that needs a chief executive."

By announcing his attentions for 2010, Lamont catapults himself to the top of a list of Connecticut Democrats who seem poised to run for the seat -- a list that includes Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz and Stamford Mayor Dan Malloy.

It also means that Lamont likely won't be in position to stage a re-match against Lieberman when the now Independent senator is goes for re-election in 2012.

"Senator Lieberman is going to be right where he is for the next year," Lamont said. "Connecticut can't wait."

"I'm sure that Senator Lieberman will have big bold challenger in the next few years," he added. "But I've always been an executive and I've felt that the state is in a position where it needs strong leadership."

Connecticut's current governor, Jodi Rell, a moderate Republican, has not stated her intentions about re-election. Nor has she embarked on any public campaigning or fundraising -- making the traditionally Democratic state a target for party pickup.

"Lamont wants to get something done," said a close confidant. "He's a business guy, wants accomplishments, and isn't interesting in sitting back and waiting on what happens. There is lot of problems in Connecticut... he had lots of people from Connecticut saying we don't want you to wait to re-challenge Lieberman. We want you to run for governor."

Ned Lamont, the Connecticut Democrat who nearly took out Sen. Joseph Lieberman in the 2006 elections, is planning a run for the state's governor's chair in 2010. In an interview with the Huffington P...
Ned Lamont, the Connecticut Democrat who nearly took out Sen. Joseph Lieberman in the 2006 elections, is planning a run for the state's governor's chair in 2010. In an interview with the Huffington P...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
79
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- dbailey I'm a Fan of dbailey 13 fans permalink

Hear that DNC. Pick a progressive candidate that can draw enough enthusiasm to get Lierman out!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 11/05/2009
- kannita I'm a Fan of kannita 7 fans permalink
photo

C'mon Rep Larson, run for Senate. PLEASE!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 AM on 11/05/2009
- Ramirez I'm a Fan of Ramirez 267 fans permalink
photo

Lamont is one of the most popular Democrats in Connecticut history. He should have no trouble being elected to another office he likes, except for senator.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 11/05/2009
- Bpeirce I'm a Fan of Bpeirce 16 fans permalink

MEALY MOUTH JOE NEEDS TO GO. I'M SURE UNITED HC OR AETNA ALREADY HAS A LOBBYING SLOT WAITING FOR HIM.......­..CREEP

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 11/05/2009
- Opus007 I'm a Fan of Opus007 17 fans permalink

It's hard to believe Lieberman will be re-elected since we loathe him here in CT. I was hoping our outstanding Attorney General Richard Blumenthal would run for Governor and LaMont would take another shot at Joe in 2012. The GOP will put up another weak candidate so Lieberman has a better chance.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 11/05/2009
- meldah I'm a Fan of meldah 32 fans permalink
photo

Somebody has got to run to replace Senator Lieberman for the sake of Connecticut. Normally my thought is ‘it’s no body’s business except the constituents of the State’ , but at this time the whole Country is suffering because of this man.

He doesn’t appear to have loyalties to Anyone, (accept, dare I mention Doug Coe). The Senator’s only loyalties should be to the people of his State, then his Caucus.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 11/05/2009
- yodaveg I'm a Fan of yodaveg 19 fans permalink
photo

Lamont may have a brand name at this point, but all he has is recognition and $$$. There are better Dem candidates already running. I'm impressed by Rudy Marconi, from Ridgefield.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 11/05/2009
- brt929 I'm a Fan of brt929 54 fans permalink
photo

I'm to hear that there will be some Democrats willing to take Lieberman on. I didn't know if the Democratic Party would take him on.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 11/05/2009

a ha! this is the quid pro quo!!!!

Lieberman will support health care and draw no Democratic primary challenger!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 AM on 11/05/2009
- Opus007 I'm a Fan of Opus007 17 fans permalink

That is not going to happen. We want him out!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 11/05/2009
- westreal I'm a Fan of westreal 17 fans permalink

I think you're right. But I have my own Quid pro Quo. Whoever runs against Lieberman, Republican or Democrat I'm donating to their campaign. Because I'd rather have a republican in his seat than a backstaabing lobbying arm of a middle east country. At least I'd know where that republican stood. And I encourage all democrats to support the republican candidate if a democrat doesn't oppose Lieberman.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 11/05/2009
- Bettysdad I'm a Fan of Bettysdad 56 fans permalink
photo

Win or lose for governor, he can still run against Joey in 2012.

He'll do more good in the Senate.

Seems like he's setting himself up to run for the Senate from the Governor's office.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 AM on 11/05/2009
- dancucich I'm a Fan of dancucich 15 fans permalink

We dont have to wait four years to strip his chairmanship.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 AM on 11/05/2009
- sarabono I'm a Fan of sarabono 18 fans permalink

Lieberman would wipe his butt and Lamont doesn't want that humiliation.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 11/04/2009

ZZZZZZZZZZ­ZZZZZZZZZZ

Soreloserman is going out in the rowboat soon.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 11/04/2009
- mamala4 I'm a Fan of mamala4 54 fans permalink
photo

Kool aid!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 11/04/2009
- Bettysdad I'm a Fan of Bettysdad 56 fans permalink
photo

Wiping other people's butts is all Lieberman is good for these days.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 AM on 11/05/2009
- springsm I'm a Fan of springsm 52 fans permalink

That is all he has ever done anyway...o­le "aren't I smart Mom, Joey.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 11/05/2009
photo

No sooner did Lamont win the Democratic primary than he went on vacation.

Really.

If that isn't enough to convince you that this guy is clueless and nobody you should invest a dime in, Lamont took Hillary Clinton's aide, Howard Wolfson, into his campaign, despite the fact that Hillary and Bill were both working behind the scenes to help and fundraise for 'Independent' candidate Joe Lieberman. In spite of Hillary's pledge to throw a fundraiser for Democratic candidate Lamont, it was translated into one fundraiser for ALL of the Democratic candidates in the northeast, and at which Lamont's name was left off at the last minute. Hillary, herself, donated the maximum to Joe Lieberman, but only half that amount to Lamont.

Lamont's only value in politics is as a donor.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 11/04/2009
- brt929 I'm a Fan of brt929 54 fans permalink
photo

One of the many reasons to further distrust Hillary.

I am so glad she didn't get the Democratic nomination!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 11/05/2009
photo

Can you provide any concrete proof (e.g. links to REPUTABLE news sources) supporting your claims that President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were supporting "behind the scenes" and contributing max amounts to Lieberman?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 11/05/2009
photo

I don't know what is "reputable" to you, but I try to get as close to the source as is feasibly possible before I make claims. I don't come by my opinions lightly or casually. By the time I say that people are we@sels or corrupt or Iiars, they've been caught de@d to rights several ways.

Since you're here at HP, I'll assume you think it's reputable:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/when-hillary-meets-ned_b_27797.html

If that still isn't enough to convince you that Hillary gave the maximum, $10,000, to Joe Lieberman and half that amount ($5,000) to Lamont, I offer opensecrets.org:

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expend.php?cmte=C00363994&cycle=2006

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expend.php?sort=A&cmte=C00363994&cycle=2006&Page=2

The Clintons were actually more than supporting Lieberman just behind-the-scenes (@find Steve Rattner @ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/when-hillary-meets-ned_b_27797.html), but in front of the camera, too. After the primary and before the general election, Bill Clinton went on Larry King.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0609/20/lkl.01.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 11/05/2009
photo

I don't know what is "reputable" to you, but I try to get as close to the source as is feasibly possible before I make claims. I don't come by my opinions lightly or casually. By the time I say that people are we@sels or corrupt or Iiars, they've been caught de@d to rights several ways.

Since you're here at HP, I'll assume you think it's reputable:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/when-hillary-meets-ned_b_27797.html

If that still isn't enough to convince you that Hillary gave the maximum, $10,000, to Joe Lieberman and half that amount ($5,000) to Lamont, I offer opensecrets.org:

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expend.php?cmte=C00363994&cycle=2006

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expend.php?sort=A&cmte=C00363994&cycle=2006&Page=2

The Clintons were actually more than supporting Lieberman just behind-the-scenes (@find Steve Rattner @ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/when-hillary-meets-ned_b_27797.html), but in front of the camera, too. After the primary & before the general election, Bill Clinton went on Larry King.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0609/20/lkl.01.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 11/05/2009
photo

Your "concrete proof" is in HP's pending comments.

I'll keep trying to post the links (to OpenSecrets.org, and other sites, including HP articles, which I'll presume since you're here that you find to be "reputable"), or you can do the legwork yourself through Google or here and OpenSecrets.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 11/05/2009

So StopSexismNow, what's the word?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 11/05/2009
- Ponderus I'm a Fan of Ponderus 280 fans permalink
photo

The Wingnuts need to put up a candidate to the right of Leiberman (though there's only a sliver of land for it to stand on) and do a Scozzafava on him.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 11/04/2009
- Yowsers I'm a Fan of Yowsers 3 fans permalink

I'm guessing LaMont was thinking he'd need a real challenge. How hard would it be to run against Lieberman, with the prize being that he would be 1 of 100?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 11/04/2009
- ChelseaC I'm a Fan of ChelseaC 153 fans permalink
photo

I'd like to know more about Lamont--I certainly are diasappointed that he lost the senate race against Judas Lieberman.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 11/04/2009
- Bpeirce I'm a Fan of Bpeirce 16 fans permalink

Karl Rove had his hands in the Liebermans SELection that year.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 11/05/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect