More

Lamont Running For Governor Rather Than Re-Challenge Lieberman

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:35 PM ET

Lamont

Ned Lamont, the Connecticut Democrat who nearly took out Sen. Joseph Lieberman in the 2006 elections, is planning a run for the state's governor's chair in 2010.

In an interview with the Huffington Post, Lamont said that his background in business and his concern over the state's budgetary crisis had compelled him to take another crack at elective office.

"This is a state that has been falling behind its peers for a long time," he said. "We are a beautiful state with a lot of advantages but we are old and getting older. The recruiters say we are old and cold and jobs are going to places like Georgia... You can't just sit on the sidelines and watch that happen."

Early on Tuesday, Lamont announced that he was setting up an exploratory committee to begin raising funds for a potential run. The decision to launch an official campaign -- confidants say and Lamont admits -- has basically been made.

"The exploratory committee is supposed to be a little bit ambiguous about running for office but I've always been a chief executive," he said. "I've run a company and I think Connecticut is a state that needs a chief executive."

By announcing his attentions for 2010, Lamont catapults himself to the top of a list of Connecticut Democrats who seem poised to run for the seat -- a list that includes Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz and Stamford Mayor Dan Malloy.

It also means that Lamont likely won't be in position to stage a re-match against Lieberman when the now Independent senator is goes for re-election in 2012.

"Senator Lieberman is going to be right where he is for the next year," Lamont said. "Connecticut can't wait."

"I'm sure that Senator Lieberman will have big bold challenger in the next few years," he added. "But I've always been an executive and I've felt that the state is in a position where it needs strong leadership."

Connecticut's current governor, Jodi Rell, a moderate Republican, has not stated her intentions about re-election. Nor has she embarked on any public campaigning or fundraising -- making the traditionally Democratic state a target for party pickup.

"Lamont wants to get something done," said a close confidant. "He's a business guy, wants accomplishments, and isn't interesting in sitting back and waiting on what happens. There is lot of problems in Connecticut... he had lots of people from Connecticut saying we don't want you to wait to re-challenge Lieberman. We want you to run for governor."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 79
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:19 AM on 11/05/2009
Hear that DNC. Pick a progressive candidate that can draw enough enthusiasm to get Lierman out!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kannita
Never be underestimated, marginalized
10:23 AM on 11/05/2009
C'mon Rep Larson, run for Senate. PLEASE!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Proud to be an American
10:22 AM on 11/05/2009
Lamont is one of the most popular Democrats in Connecticut history. He should have no trouble being elected to another office he likes, except for senator.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bpeirce
09:27 AM on 11/05/2009
MEALY MOUTH JOE NEEDS TO GO. I'M SURE UNITED HC OR AETNA ALREADY HAS A LOBBYING SLOT WAITING FOR HIM.........CREEP
08:09 AM on 11/05/2009
It's hard to believe Lieberman will be re-elected since we loathe him here in CT. I was hoping our outstanding Attorney General Richard Blumenthal would run for Governor and LaMont would take another shot at Joe in 2012. The GOP will put up another weak candidate so Lieberman has a better chance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meldah
08:09 AM on 11/05/2009
Somebody has got to run to replace Senator Lieberman for the sake of Connecticut. Normally my thought is ‘it’s no body’s business except the constituents of the State’ , but at this time the whole Country is suffering because of this man.

He doesn’t appear to have loyalties to Anyone, (accept, dare I mention Doug Coe). The Senator’s only loyalties should be to the people of his State, then his Caucus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yodaveg
Ride si sapis
07:59 AM on 11/05/2009
Lamont may have a brand name at this point, but all he has is recognition and $$$. There are better Dem candidates already running. I'm impressed by Rudy Marconi, from Ridgefield.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
09:12 AM on 11/05/2009
I'm to hear that there will be some Democrats willing to take Lieberman on. I didn't know if the Democratic Party would take him on.
02:18 AM on 11/05/2009
a ha! this is the quid pro quo!!!!

Lieberman will support health care and draw no Democratic primary challenger!!!
08:10 AM on 11/05/2009
That is not going to happen. We want him out!
09:30 AM on 11/05/2009
I think you're right. But I have my own Quid pro Quo. Whoever runs against Lieberman, Republican or Democrat I'm donating to their campaign. Because I'd rather have a republican in his seat than a backstaabing lobbying arm of a middle east country. At least I'd know where that republican stood. And I encourage all democrats to support the republican candidate if a democrat doesn't oppose Lieberman.
photo
Bettysdad
The arc of human history is to the left.
02:12 AM on 11/05/2009
Win or lose for governor, he can still run against Joey in 2012.

He'll do more good in the Senate.

Seems like he's setting himself up to run for the Senate from the Governor's office.
12:36 AM on 11/05/2009
We dont have to wait four years to strip his chairmanship.
sarabono
Oldie but Goody
10:27 PM on 11/04/2009
Lieberman would wipe his butt and Lamont doesn't want that humiliation.
10:55 PM on 11/04/2009
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Soreloserman is going out in the rowboat soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamala4
11:00 PM on 11/04/2009
Kool aid!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
10:09 PM on 11/04/2009
No sooner did Lamont win the Democratic primary than he went on vacation.

Really.

If that isn't enough to convince you that this guy is clueless and nobody you should invest a dime in, Lamont took Hillary Clinton's aide, Howard Wolfson, into his campaign, despite the fact that Hillary and Bill were both working behind the scenes to help and fundraise for 'Independent' candidate Joe Lieberman. In spite of Hillary's pledge to throw a fundraiser for Democratic candidate Lamont, it was translated into one fundraiser for ALL of the Democratic candidates in the northeast, and at which Lamont's name was left off at the last minute. Hillary, herself, donated the maximum to Joe Lieberman, but only half that amount to Lamont.

Lamont's only value in politics is as a donor.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
09:39 AM on 11/05/2009
One of the many reasons to further distrust Hillary.

I am so glad she didn't get the Democratic nomination!
10:11 AM on 11/05/2009
Can you provide any concrete proof (e.g. links to REPUTABLE news sources) supporting your claims that President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were supporting "behind the scenes" and contributing max amounts to Lieberman?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
02:21 PM on 11/05/2009
I don't know what is "reputable" to you, but I try to get as close to the source as is feasibly possible before I make claims. I don't come by my opinions lightly or casually. By the time I say that people are we@sels or corrupt or Iiars, they've been caught de@d to rights several ways.

Since you're here at HP, I'll assume you think it's reputable:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/when-hillary-meets-ned_b_27797.html

If that still isn't enough to convince you that Hillary gave the maximum, $10,000, to Joe Lieberman and half that amount ($5,000) to Lamont, I offer opensecrets.org:

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expend.php?cmte=C00363994&cycle=2006

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expend.php?sort=A&cmte=C00363994&cycle=2006&Page=2

The Clintons were actually more than supporting Lieberman just behind-the-scenes (@find Steve Rattner @ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/when-hillary-meets-ned_b_27797.html), but in front of the camera, too. After the primary and before the general election, Bill Clinton went on Larry King.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0609/20/lkl.01.html
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
02:35 PM on 11/05/2009
I don't know what is "reputable" to you, but I try to get as close to the source as is feasibly possible before I make claims. I don't come by my opinions lightly or casually. By the time I say that people are we@sels or corrupt or Iiars, they've been caught de@d to rights several ways.

Since you're here at HP, I'll assume you think it's reputable:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/when-hillary-meets-ned_b_27797.html

If that still isn't enough to convince you that Hillary gave the maximum, $10,000, to Joe Lieberman and half that amount ($5,000) to Lamont, I offer opensecrets.org:

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expend.php?cmte=C00363994&cycle=2006

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expend.php?sort=A&cmte=C00363994&cycle=2006&Page=2

The Clintons were actually more than supporting Lieberman just behind-the-scenes (@find Steve Rattner @ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/when-hillary-meets-ned_b_27797.html), but in front of the camera, too. After the primary & before the general election, Bill Clinton went on Larry King.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0609/20/lkl.01.html
photo
Ponderus
Enriched with lanolin.
09:30 PM on 11/04/2009
The Wingnuts need to put up a candidate to the right of Leiberman (though there's only a sliver of land for it to stand on) and do a Scozzafava on him.
09:15 PM on 11/04/2009
I'm guessing LaMont was thinking he'd need a real challenge. How hard would it be to run against Lieberman, with the prize being that he would be 1 of 100?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:42 PM on 11/04/2009
I'd like to know more about Lamont--I certainly are diasappointed that he lost the senate race against Judas Lieberman.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bpeirce
09:48 AM on 11/05/2009
Karl Rove had his hands in the Liebermans SELection that year.