Huffpost Books

One Term President? New York Review Blog By Garry Wills

Posted: Updated:

Garry Wills
The New York Review of Books Blog

I am told by people I respect that Barack Obama cannot pull out of both Iraq and Afghanistan without becoming a one-term president. I think that may be true. The charges from various quarters would be toxic--that he was weak, unpatriotic, sacrificing the sacrifices that have been made, betraying our dead, throwing away all former investments in lives and treasure. All that would indeed be brought against him, and he could have little defense in the quarters where such charges would originate.

These are the arguments that have kept us in losing efforts before. They are the ones that made presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon pass on to their successors in the presidency the draining and self-lacerating Vietnam War. They are the arguments that made President George W. Bush pass on two wars to his successor.

One of the strongest arguments for continued firing up of these wars is that none of these presidents wanted to serve only one term (even Lyndon Johnson, who chose not to run for a second full term). But what justification is there for buying a second presidential term with the lives of hundreds or thousands of young American men and women in the military?

Read More at the New York Review blog

Around the Web

Organizing for America |


Obama: Shutter failing schools and bring down the teacher 'firewall'

Election results show Obama's political coalition unraveling

Reid: Senate not bound by Obama's health deadline

Video: Obama's brother writes a book, talks about abusive father