Kraft, Cadbury Deal: Cadbury Rejects Kraft Bid

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Kraft, Cadbury Deal: Cadbury Rejects Kraft Bid stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JANE WARDELL | 11/ 9/09 11:02 AM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Britain Cadbury Kraft

LONDON — British candy maker Cadbury PLC rejected a renewed 9.8 billion pound ($16.4 billion) hostile bid from Kraft Foods Inc. on Monday after the U.S. company refused to sweeten a previous offer.

Kraft's decision to keep the terms of its previously rebuffed cash-and-stock approach effectively means a lower offer for investors in London-based Cadbury because of a shift in the share prices of both companies.

The prospect of a tie-up has caused some consternation in Britain, where the 195-year-old Cadbury is a much-loved brand – its Dairy Milk is the country's top-selling chocolate bar.

Kraft, the maker of Oreo cookies, Nabisco crackers and its namesake cheese, argued that the proposed deal – though lower than the 10.2 billion pound offer on the table in September – "represents a substantial premium to the unaffected share price of Cadbury."

Analysts had said that Kraft, based in Northfield, Illinois, needed to improve that offer to have any chance of success in winning Cadbury, which also makes Green & Black's chocolate brand, Halls lozenges and Trident and Dentyne gum.

But Kraft instead retained its offer of 300 pence in cash and 0.2589 new Kraft shares. While that translated to a deal worth 745 pence per Cadbury share in September, a surge in Cadbury's share price since then leaves the value of the deal now languishing at 717 pence.

Cadbury's shares were trading far above that level on Monday, up 0.3 percent at 760 pence in afternoon trade. The stock initially dropped as much as 2 percent after Kraft's announcement, but soon began to inch up again, suggesting that the market believes that the U.S. company's move is only an opening gambit.

Kraft, which also makes Kenco and Maxwell House coffee and Toblerone chocolate, made its move with just three hours to go before a so-called "put up or shut up" deadline under British takeover law that required Kraft to make a formal offer or walk away for six months.

Story continues below
advertisement

"We believe that our proposal offers the best immediate and long-term value for Cadbury's shareholders and for the company itself compared with any other option currently available, including Cadbury remaining independent," said Kraft Foods Chief Executive Irene Rosenfeld.

But Cadbury Chairman Roger Carr said that the British company was "an exceptional standalone business" with "strong iconic brands, a sharp category focus and an enviable geographic scope."

"Kraft's offer does not come remotely close to reflecting the true value of our company," he said.

A combination of the two would create a company that generates at least $50 billion in total revenue. Kraft is the largest food company in the U.S. and No. 2 worldwide to Nestle, which would keep its No. 1 position even if Kraft adds Cadbury.

Despite speculation of a bidding war when Kraft's initial approach was revealed in September, rival interest from the likes of U.S. candymaker Hershey Co. has yet to emerge and consumer goods group Unilever NV publicly ruled itself out last week.

Billionaire Warren Buffett, whose investment firm Berkshire Hathaway is the biggest shareholder in Kraft, had said the previous Cadbury offer was "pretty full."

Carr added that a tie-up involved "the unattractive prospect of the absorption of Cadbury into a low growth conglomerate business model."

Kraft reported a lower quarterly profit last week because of a big one-time gain a year ago and a 6 percent decline in revenue but still lifted its yearly earnings outlook.

Analysts have pointed out the advantage for Kraft of gaining Cadbury's strong foothold in emerging markets. The British company last month reported higher-than expected sales for the third quarter and also lifted its revenue forecast for this year to "around the middle" of its previous guidance of 4-6 percent growth.

Along with opposition from the Cadbury board, Kraft faces a band of vocal supporters of the British company's long-held independence.

Felicity Loudon, the granddaughter of former Cadbury Brothers managing director Egbert Cadbury, has also been an outspoken critic of any deal, saying she was "particularly saddened by the possibility of one of the last remaining British icons disappearing into an American plastic cheese company."

In an attempt to appease unions, Kraft has pledged to save some 500 jobs at Cadbury's Somerdale chocolate factory in Bristol, central England, reversing a decision by the British company's board to transfer production of chocolate at the plant to Poland.

But unions say they have not been given a detailed proposal on Kraft's commitment to chocolate making in Britain and point to the U.S. company's decision to shut its Terry's Chocolate Orange factory in York, northern England, four years ago, transferring production to eastern Europe.

LONDON — British candy maker Cadbury PLC rejected a renewed 9.8 billion pound ($16.4 billion) hostile bid from Kraft Foods Inc. on Monday after the U.S. company refused to sweeten a previous off...
LONDON — British candy maker Cadbury PLC rejected a renewed 9.8 billion pound ($16.4 billion) hostile bid from Kraft Foods Inc. on Monday after the U.S. company refused to sweeten a previous off...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
8
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Yay Cadbury!
I love Cadbury's chocolate.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 11/10/2009

I would encourage you to visit and join this Facebook Group I started called:

"Oi! Kraft. Keep your filthy hands off of our Cadburys Chocolate"

I think this link will get you there:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=205749918031&ref=nf

I am doing it for a laugh and to raise awareness amongst those who don't pay attention to the business news or don't realise the implications.

There is no financial gain or notoriety involved though we'll have to see if it gets big enough to attract the attention of the Kraft lawyers:) Hope so!!

I am a Brit living in NJ who cares about the UK and cares about jobs there and who has worked for Cadbury as a consultant in the past and don't want to see a British institution fall into US hands.

We shall overcome!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 11/09/2009
- hulagirrrl I'm a Fan of hulagirrrl 40 fans permalink
photo

Cadbury makes good chocolates, not as good as Lindt or Ritter Sport, but they are easier to find in supermarkets. Especially the ones with Raisins and Almonds, mhhhh..

Should Kraft scoop them up that would mean I have to just order my Lindt online because I would not buy it. They use milk powder from China in their production, and I just do not trust the quality.

Just like I would not buy a chocolate or any other product made by Hersheys since they closed their US plant and laid off all the people to move to Mexico to increase profits.
The only way to vote for a product as consumers is with the pocket book. Don't just support blindly.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 11/09/2009
- efmo I'm a Fan of efmo 8 fans permalink

Cadbury chocolate actually tastes like chocolate. If Kraft gets them, they will definitely become tasteless, fake chocolate candy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 PM on 11/09/2009
- yemaya I'm a Fan of yemaya 53 fans permalink

Good for Cadbury. I think they are a UK company.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 11/09/2009
photo

I'm boycotting Kraft because of their support of Fox.

Good for Cadbury.

The U.S. food supply is almost 100% controlled by three companies. Why do you think prices have skyrocketed, packages have shrunk, so prices have doubled over ten years? The excuse for awhile was fuel prices but when they went back down, did the ice cream go back to being 1/2 gallon and did the price go back to $4? Nope. Price collusion by food giants ought to be illegal under anti-trust laws.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 11/09/2009
- hulagirrrl I'm a Fan of hulagirrrl 40 fans permalink
photo

They are too big to fail......­....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 11/09/2009

No more bailouts. No more too big to fail. more effort needs to be done to make work. Instead, unemployment keeps climbing as well as the deficit. Tax cuts and toehr stupid gimmicks aren't the answer.

hat tip to http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 11/09/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect