iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

D.C. Sniper John Muhammed Executed

DENA POTTER   11/10/09 11:58 PM ET   AP

Dc Sniper

JARRATT, Va. — John Allen Muhammad, the mastermind behind the sniper attacks that left 10 dead, was executed Tuesday as relatives of the victims watched, reliving the killing spree that terrorized the Washington, D.C., area for three weeks in October 2002.

The 48-year-old Muhammad looked calm and stoic, but was twitching and blinking, tapping his left foot as the injections began, defiant to the end, refusing to utter any final words. Victims' families sat behind glass while watching, separated from the rest of the 27 witnesses, who were quiet, looking straight forward, intent on what was happening.

"He died very peacefully, much more than most of his victims," said Prince William County prosecutor Paul Ebert, who witnessed Muhammad die by injection at 9:11 p.m. at Greensville Correctional Center, south of Richmond.

Muhammad was executed for killing Dean Harold Meyers, who was shot in the head at a Manassas gas station during the three-week spree across Maryland, Virginia and Washington, D.C.

Nelson Rivera, whose wife, Lori Ann Lewis-Rivera, was gunned down as she vacuumed her van at a Maryland gas station, said that when he watched Muhammad's chest moving for the last time, he was glad.

"I feel better. I think I can breathe better and I'm happy he's gone because he's not going to hurt anyone else," he said.

Muhammad never testified or explained why he directed the shootings, and his secrets died with him.

Meyers' brother, Bob Meyers, said watching the execution was sobering and "surreal."

"I would have liked him at some point in the process to take responsibility, to show remorse," Meyers said. "We didn't get any of that tonight."

J. Wyndal Gordon, one of Muhammad's attorneys, described his client in his final hours as fearless and still insisting he was innocent.

"He will die with dignity – dignity to the point of defiance," Gordon said.

Victim after victim was shot down while doing everyday chores: shopping, pumping gas, mowing the lawn. One child was shot while walking into his middle school.

The terror ended on Oct. 24, 2002, when police captured Muhammad and his teenage accomplice, Lee Boyd Malvo, while they slept at a Maryland rest stop in a car they had outfitted for a shooter to perch in its trunk without being detected.

Malvo, who was 17 when carrying out the attacks, was sentenced to life in prison without parole for killing Linda Franklin, a 47-year-old FBI analyst who was shot as she and her husband loaded supplies at a Home Depot in Falls Church, Va.

The men also were suspected of fatal shootings in other states, including Louisiana, Alabama and Arizona.

The U.S. Supreme Court turned down Muhammad's final appeal Monday, and Gov. Timothy M. Kaine denied clemency Tuesday.

Muhammad's attorneys had asked Kaine to commute his sentence to life in prison because they said Muhammad had brain damage and neurological problems, as well as psychotic and delusional behavior, exacerbated by the Gulf War Syndrome he suffered as a sergeant in the first Iraq war.

"I think crimes that are this horrible, you just can't understand them, you can't explain them," said Kaine, a Democrat known for carefully considering death penalty cases. "They completely dwarf your ability to look into the life of a person who would do something like this and understand why."

A small group of death penalty opponents gathered on a grassy area near the prison and had a sign reading, "We remember the victims, but not with more killing."

Muhammad was born John Allen Williams and changed his name after converting to Islam. He had been in and out of the military since he graduated from high school in Louisiana and entered the National Guard. He joined the Army in 1985. He did not take special sniper training but earned an expert rating in the M-16 rifle – the military cousin of the .223-caliber Bushmaster rifle used in the D.C. shootings.

The motive for the attacks remains murky. Malvo said Muhammad wanted to extort $10 million from the government to set up a camp in Canada where homeless children would be trained as terrorists. Muhammad's ex-wife said she believes they were a smoke screen for his plan to kill her and regain custody of their three children.

Sonia Hollingsworth-Wills, the mother of Conrad Johnson, the last man slain that October, sat in the back seat of a car outside the prison before the execution, which she chose not to witness. But she said she wanted to be there and was counting the minutes until Muhammad's death.

"It was the most horrifying day of my life," she said. "I'll never get complete closure but at least I can put this behind me."

___

Associated Press writers Steve Szkotak in Jarratt, and Bob Lewis in Richmond, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

JARRATT, Va. — John Allen Muhammad, the mastermind behind the sniper attacks that left 10 dead, was executed Tuesday as relatives of the victims watched, reliving the killing spree that terroriz...
JARRATT, Va. — John Allen Muhammad, the mastermind behind the sniper attacks that left 10 dead, was executed Tuesday as relatives of the victims watched, reliving the killing spree that terroriz...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 872
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Imhotep40
He who comes in peace
04:07 PM on 11/13/2009
Will the moderator please publish my response to a thread on this board? There are NO abusive, off-topic, use excessive foul language, or include ad hominem attacks within my response.

thank you
04:36 PM on 11/11/2009
Im as liberal as they come and I think that this man deserved to die. Im from Richmond, VA and was terrified thinking that the next person who would be shot could be me, or my mom or dad, or sisters...Couldnt go outside to check the mail without worrying about getting shot at.

Some of you who are critical of the death penalty in this case need to put yourself in our shoes. We didnt ask to be shot at--we didnt ask to have our loved ones used for target practice. He had his chance in society and he blew it big time.

Muhammed would have killed more and more people--He knew what he was doing was wrong, why do you think he taunted the police with his letters? He didnt deserve the life that he was living, even while imprisoned--why should he get 3 meals a day and a roof over his head when he committed such a cowardly and disgusting act. They even say that he could be linked to more murders OUTSIDE of the ones that they already commited in DC, MD and VA.

I say he deserved what he got in this case.
photo
piul05
Are you looking at my ears?! (Mo-om!!!)
05:29 PM on 11/11/2009
No, the death penalty is barbaric.

The Germans have just convicted that bloke who stabbed that poor woman to death. No theater; no ritualized and technologically-assisted revenge pretending to be "justice", no gruesome details to feed the public's macabre voyeurism and lust for blood.

Life imprisonment, and justice has been served. That's how a civilized society deals with its criminals - it does not emulate them.
04:03 PM on 11/11/2009
We can't say that the death penalty should be allowed in this case, but not this case, for this crime, but not for this crime, because it doesn't work that way. Some of the very worst criminals will serve life, or twenty years or make a deal and leave. And some may be executed. People who have committed "lesser" crimes may get death, while a truly horrifying criminal gets life.

We can attempt to rationalize and decide what type of crimes should be punished with the death penalty, but that is largely futile because there is no real rational and methodical application of the death penalty. Many times it's based on, or influenced by, individual prosecutors, the location of the crime, the class, race, and gender of the accused, jury, etc.

If we acknowledge these flaws, can we stand behind the system? John Muhammed may have deserved to die in many people's eyes, and we may be certain of his guilt, and his horrible crimes may be the type of crime that people want to punish with the death penalty, but does that justify the death penalty as a whole?
04:56 PM on 11/11/2009
Then let just use it for the crime you commit this crime and you are executed sounds pretty simple and fair to me.
12:05 AM on 11/12/2009
Just this crime? Something tells me that won't quite satisfy your appetite for revenge.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dwillisno1
Learning to Butt Heads Without Being Buttheads
03:53 PM on 11/11/2009
One of the surest ways to go to he!! is to be happy about some one else going to he!! It is God's will that none should perish, it is God's will that Christians not take pleasure in the suffering of others, it is God's will that we all understand that if we all get what we deserve, then we are all doomed. God's willingness to not give us what we deserve, is the key to Christianity and the key to a better society and a better world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Newthron
Never give up, never surrender.
03:55 PM on 11/11/2009
Then we need to go back to inquisition time and erase their countless bad did, in the name of....a God. Not sure which one they have been praying for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Newthron
Never give up, never surrender.
03:56 PM on 11/11/2009
"Bad deed." of course. Not bad did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Newthron
Never give up, never surrender.
03:21 PM on 11/11/2009
And I will ad that, this crime deterrent, hasn't prevent, frighten or deterred people to commit the despicable. Crime is thriving like a rolling stone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Newthron
Never give up, never surrender.
03:24 PM on 11/11/2009
Can't multi task. I meant; " deterred people from committing the despicable."
03:16 PM on 11/11/2009
I used to live in DC in 2002 when these guys were terrorizing the DC area. You couldn't even fill up your car without being paranoid. They were killing people indiscriminately: men,women,kids,old people, blacks, whites,Hispanics,...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Newthron
Never give up, never surrender.
03:15 PM on 11/11/2009
Test one m.u.r.d.e.r.is wrong. Test one
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Newthron
Never give up, never surrender.
03:11 PM on 11/11/2009
Even if this monumental c.o.w.a.r.d. deserved his faith, ten thousand per minute, A civilized society shouldn't kiII in the name of vengeance or retribution.

An evolved society, can't teach its citizen that murdering is wrong by kiIIing murderers . It hasn't worked.

What would I do if my girlfriend was murdered? Hum....I have thought of this emotional dilemma, countless time. I would certainly refuse the state to do, what I would feel to be in title to. "Revenge."
Nevertheless, I feel a lifetime of imprisonment, is the right way to go, with "hard labor." Also, any compensation he received should go straight to my bank account.

But, the biggest moral question of them all is: What happen when the state murder an innocent man? And a lot of innocent men have been wrongfully murdered.
Who will come forward to be prosecuted, as the kiIIer of an innocent life? Who?
05:06 PM on 11/11/2009
A civilized society would remove the cancerous person from society so they do not hurt anyone else in society.
As for an innocent make sure you do not convict one that is simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greenmonk
The Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself
03:04 PM on 11/11/2009
Violence begets violence.

Less gun control. No ban on assault rifles.

+
society's endorsement of murder (thru allowing capital punishment)

seeds the acceptance of a violent society.
03:00 PM on 11/11/2009
A ticking clock is watched by many.

http://www.ronnierayjenkins.com/topics/education/Its_Eight_O_Clock_in_the_Eas/
02:54 PM on 11/11/2009
Capital punishment and abortion are two separate issues. One is an individual choice permitted by the State (for the time being); the other is a (typically) collective decision institutionalized, enforced and enacted by the State.
photo
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
03:04 PM on 11/11/2009
Right and the mass murder of people is who's choice?
03:19 PM on 11/11/2009
I'm sorry, but your question is not rhetorically or gramatically coherent to me. Would you mind rephrasing the question?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
proudliberal4truth
old southern white liberal - an endangered species
03:05 PM on 11/11/2009
Jonathan, Why do you continue to see individuals as somehow removed from the "state"? We elect our representatives and we should have a huge impact on the policies our elected representatives follow. Mur der by the state is still mur der in our name and is still abhorrent to me.
03:42 PM on 11/11/2009
I believe that participatory democracy as it is practiced in America is designed to create the illusion that we have influence, and are vested, in outcomes. Our government is no longer human-scale, and I feel no more important to the whole than a skin cell is to the body. The only ways an individual cell can affect the whole body is to work with other cells or become cancerous. While I choose the former, it doesn't mean I am responsible for the actions of the body.

Sorry for the incomplete--and maybe incoherent--answer. My time is limited right now.
photo
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
02:32 PM on 11/11/2009
I find it funny that the majority of you who are against the death penalty are pro @bortion. It's ok to end a b@bie's life but not a murder?

Weird....
02:37 PM on 11/11/2009
its as small as a grain of sand, no fingers or toes yet so not quite a baby
photo
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
02:38 PM on 11/11/2009
but still a life with a heartbeat.....
03:16 PM on 11/11/2009
Keep telling yourself that. I saw my 12 week pregnant daughter's sonogram last week as they were doing the sonogram. The baby had legs, arms, a spine, a heart you could see beating and little hands that appeared to be waiving. I believe she would have to go about 3 more months before it would even be called a late term abortion. Support it if you want to, but a grain of sand it ain't.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
helenwheels
SEDAGIVE?!?
02:44 PM on 11/11/2009
It's not a baby 'til it's out of the womb, sorry. And no one is "FOR" ab0rtion. We're for the choice to have one and keeping the procedure safe for those who choose it or have to have one. Big difference.
02:47 PM on 11/11/2009
It's called a baby when she wants it and a fetus when she doesn't. Been to a "Fetus Shower" lately?
photo
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
02:54 PM on 11/11/2009
I know it's a big difference. One is an innocent life the other is a murderer...

but, im not arguing a womens right to choose, im comparing the ideals
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beautyontheinside
I've never dropped anyone I believed in. Marilyn
02:29 PM on 11/11/2009
GOOD! This guy deserved nothing less....my hometown was on lockdown practically...people ducking when they gassed their cars. It was surreal.
I remember they were on the lookout for a white delivery truck...after that I had never seen so many delivery trucks in my life....was each one a potential sniper?
TO have happened one year after 9/11 was devastating.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SusanStoHelit
02:09 PM on 11/11/2009
I don't like the DP - UNLESS - we have no doubts it is the right person, AND they are the worst of the worst even among murderers. This one qualifies.

Death means he won't hurt anyone again. We allow people to hurt others, and pay with some time in jail, but there comes a point where someone has hurt so many, that they must not be allowed to ever hurt anyone again - not by words from prison, not by escaping, not even by fears he could someday escape. That's what the death penalty is for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mabila
I am not exhausted defending this President!
02:17 PM on 11/11/2009
Maximum security prison, life long imprisonment with no possibility of parole, no rights whatsoever is good enough for me!

Killing someone just because he killed others is more evil. We are insane for killing others just because they also killed.
photo
piul05
Are you looking at my ears?! (Mo-om!!!)
02:58 PM on 11/11/2009
I agree. It's barbarian.
04:50 PM on 11/11/2009
...and without any possibility of escape so that they may not continue to kill...... Is that possible to guarantee unless the murderer is actually killed, himself?.....just remembering previous mass murderers.
02:07 PM on 11/11/2009
Where is Mike Farrell when you need him
03:11 PM on 11/11/2009
John Allen Muhammad wasn't a political icon, so he didn't get the benefit of celeb support.