EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Obama Will Go To Copenhagen If It Will Close The Deal On Climate Agreements

11/ 9/09 08:20 PM ET   AP

Obama

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Monday that he'd be willing to attend an international climate summit in Copenhagen next month if it appears a deal is in the offing and his presence there would help clinch it.

Nations are preparing to meet in Denmark to hammer out a new international treaty to slow climate change, but the talks have been hampered by disputes between rich countries and developing ones.

"If I am confident that all of the countries involved are bargaining in good faith and we are on the brink of a meaningful agreement and my presence in Copenhagen will make a difference in tipping us over the edge, then certainly that's something that I will do," Obama said in an interview with Reuters.

It was Obama's strongest statement to date that he may attend the Dec. 7-18 U.N. conference. White House officials previously have declined to say whether Obama would attend the summit.

In the interview, previewing his trip to Asia that begins Thursday, the president said he expected to sign a new nuclear arms reduction pact with Russia by December. He also rejected criticism that he's too soft on human rights issues in his dealings with China.

"I don't find the critics credible," Obama said. "If you look at my statements, they have been entirely consistent. We believe in the values of freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion that are not just core America values but we believe are universal values."

Obama has been criticized for delaying a meeting with the Dalai Lama, the exiled Tibetan Buddhist spiritual leader, until after he meets with Chinese President Hu Jintao during the Asia trip. China views the Dalai Lama as anti-China and pressures foreign governments not to meet with him. The Obama administration needs China's support for its top foreign policy, economic and environmental goals.

Obama also said he expected the U.S. and Russia would sign a new nuclear arms reduction treaty by December.

Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev agreed this year to reach a new nuclear arms reduction treaty to replace the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START, that expires Dec. 5.

Obama told Reuters that on the issue of global nuclear nonproliferation "I would strongly argue that we have made more progress on this issue over the last several months than we have seen in the last several years."

On climate change, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was headed to Washington on Tuesday to meet with key senators and White House officials to discuss the issue.

Ban and Janos Pasztor, the director of his Climate Change Support Team, were originally campaigning for agreement on a new treaty at Copenhagen. But both have scaled back expectations in the past month, focusing instead on getting a political deal on the key elements that can be turned into a treaty, hopefully next year.

At the final round of negotiations in Barcelona that ended last week, the U.S. was universally seen as the linchpin to a political deal, but it has been unable to present its position or pledge emissions targets because of slow progress on climate legislation in Congress.

Last week, Senate Democrats sidestepped a Republican boycott and pushed a climate bill out of a key committee. But at least five other committees must still have their say.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Monday that he'd be willing to attend an international climate summit in Copenhagen next month if it appears a deal is in the offing and his presence the...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Monday that he'd be willing to attend an international climate summit in Copenhagen next month if it appears a deal is in the offing and his presence the...
Filed by Katherine Goldstein  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 95
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
05:02 PM on 11/12/2009
Wake up! Copenhaven is not about reducing global warming, that is just a side issue. The real issue is about internatio­nal wealth distributi­on. 90% of the attending nations have no other objective in mind than how much money they can extort from the industrial­ized nations. The proposed US share of wealth contributi­on is a mere $50 billion a year. Take away the wealth distributi­on portion of the treaty and watch the whole thing collapse.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
08:00 AM on 11/12/2009
I am a pessimist. I don't think the world can avoid massive climate change unless the west IMMEDIATEL­Y changes course. Americans are gluttons for energy, convenienc­es, packaging, and all the other things involved: prepared foods, factory farms, et al.

How can the world cope when a FL WalMart keeps the temp at 65 and the a hole in the wall for cart return open?

This is what Americans want because they are too damn lazy to put out any effort other than driving their SUV to a fast food house.

Until America is willing to reduce their standard of living there will be NO changes.
07:16 PM on 11/12/2009
Yeah, my suv really screwed up the weather...­.
08:33 AM on 11/13/2009
Yes, I agree you are a pessimist. Does it possibly matter that we're living longer than any other generation in history? So it's can't be all bad. Unless you think we should lie down and die to save the planet.
10:51 PM on 11/11/2009
Y2K was the test "crisis" that has lead the way to "Climate Change". Those who long for a World government have seen this as their grand opportunit­y. The gullible can be led.
10:31 PM on 11/11/2009
Couldn't he just stay?
photo
PRONESE
Somewhat Opinionated Curmudgeon
09:48 PM on 11/11/2009
But would not go to Germany to commemorat­e the 20th anniversar­y of the fall of the Berlin Wall.
*
*
Posish!
*
R/ Pronese
02:35 PM on 11/11/2009
i hope he does as well as he did with the Olympics

laughing
02:33 PM on 11/11/2009
Sen. John Kerry "not one of the studies dissenting has been peer reviewed?"

Here you go senator,

450 peer reviewed papers dissenting on AGW:

http://www­.popularte­chnology.n­et/2009/10­/peer-revi­ewed-paper­s-supporti­ng.html
10:29 AM on 11/11/2009
Please, help us heal the world, Obama. Make it a better place. For you and for me and for the entire human race. There are people dying...if you care enough for the living, make a better place for you and for me.
10:38 PM on 11/11/2009
I'll leave all my lights on waiting for His glorious return.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
07:52 AM on 11/12/2009
Turn your frigging lights out and help a bit.
09:04 AM on 11/11/2009
Just go, please!

What a sad message to send the world, if he stays away. Really hoping for change here!
10:39 PM on 11/11/2009
Save the carbon and park the Jumbo.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
11:06 PM on 11/10/2009
oops..
November 10, 2009
New data show that the balance between the airborne and the absorbed fraction of CO2 has stayed approximat­ely constant since 1850, despite emissions of CO2 having risen from about 2 billion tons a year in 1850 to 35 billion tons a year now.
This suggests that terrestria­l ecosystems and the oceans have a much greater capacity to absorb CO2 than had been previously expected.
The results run contrary to a significan­t body of recent research which expects that the capacity of terrestria­l ecosystems and the oceans to absorb CO2 should start to diminish as CO2 emissions increase, letting greenhouse gas levels skyrocket. Dr Wolfgang Knorr at the University of Bristol found that in fact the trend in the airborne fraction since 1850 has only been 0.7 ± 1.4% per decade, which is essentiall­y zero.
The strength of the new study, published online in Geophysica­l Research Letters, is that it rests solely on measuremen­ts and statistica­l data, including historical records extracted from Antarctic ice, and does not rely on computatio­ns with complex climate models.
This work is extremely important for climate change policy, because emission targets to be negotiated at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen early next month have been based on projection­s that have a carbon free sink of already factored in.
Another result of the study is that emissions from deforestat­ion might have been overestima­ted by between 18 and 75 per cent. http://www­.physorg.c­om/news177­059550.htm­l
10:53 AM on 11/11/2009
Fumes, read the posts in here very carefully. Do you actually belive that anyone reading this thread is interested in any evidence that belies their religion of gullible worming? What are you going to do next....tr­y to convince islam!c terror!sts that beheading infidels is a bad idea?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
11:14 AM on 11/11/2009
good point sfpd!
MGhamma
My micro-bio is bigger than your micro-bio!
10:07 PM on 11/11/2009
"The results run contrary to a significan­t body of recent research which expects that the capacity of terrestria­l ecosystems and the oceans to absorb CO2 should start to diminish as CO2 emissions increase".

How?

That's never really explained.

It would be interestin­g to read the original study and compare it to the physorg article.

I smell denier propaganda­.
10:45 PM on 11/10/2009
Obama should focus on real actions like ending his wars and reviving the economy (instead of feeding the bankers).
photo
lemealone
It will take more than condiments to foil my brill
09:36 PM on 11/10/2009
It worked for the Olympics so why not do it again...
photo
ohiomark
Rush Geek
09:29 PM on 11/10/2009
Obama is about to turn American sovereignt­y over to an internatio­nal governing body and it will cost the American people money, jobs and freedoms.

......all over a hoax.