iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Aardonyx celestae: New Dinosaur Species Discovered

CELEAN JACOBSON   11/11/09 08:25 PM ET   AP

New Dinosaur Species

JOHANNESBURG — A newly discovered dinosaur species that roamed the Earth about 200 million years ago may help explain how the creatures evolved into the largest animals on land, scientists in South Africa said Wednesday.

The Aardonyx celestae was a 23-foot- (7-meter-) long small-headed herbivore with a huge barrel of a chest. It walked on its hind legs but also could drop to all fours, and scientists told reporters that could prove to be a missing evolutionary link.

This is a species "that no one has seen before and one that has a very significant position in the family tree of dinosaurs," said Australian paleontologist Adam Yates.

Yates, who is based at the University of the Witwatersrand's Bernard Price Institute for Paleontological Research, led the research with a number of other local and international scientists.

Their findings were published Wednesday in the Proceedings of The Royal Society B, a London-based peer-reviewed journal.

The Aardonyx celestae species dates back to the early Jurassic period. Yates said the creature found in South Africa stood nearly 6 feet (about 1.7 meters) high at the hip and weighed about 1,100 pounds (500 kilograms). It was about 10 years old when it died, and its death may have been caused by drought.

The newly discovered species shares many characteristics with the plant-eating herbivores that walked on two legs, Yates said. But the new species also has similar attributes to dinosaurs known as sauropods, or brontosaurs, that grew to massive sizes and went about on all fours with long necks and whip-like tails.

"The discovery of Aardonyx helps to fill a marked gap in our knowledge of sauropod evolution, showing how a primarily two-legged animal could start to acquire the specific features necessary for a life spent on all-fours," said Paul Barrett, a paleontologist at the British Natural History Museum who assisted on the dig that led to the finding but was not directly involved in the research.

Why and how dinosaurs grew into such massive creatures is a question that scientists have been trying to answer for a long time.

Walking on all fours allowed animals to carry more weight, and size was often their only defense against sharp-toothed carnivores, said one of the report's co-authors, Matthew Bonnan of Western Illinois University, by video conference from the United States.

The discovery of the new species was made by postgraduate student Marc Blackbeard, who was excavating two sites in central South Africa about five years ago.

It was a site that had been largely ignored by scientists who felt the bone fragments found there would prove to be a common dinosaur species found across the country. On the first day of excavation, a bone too large to belong to this ordinary species was found.

"We knew we had something new, something very, very exciting," Yates said.

The scattered bones were collected and cleaned of the heavy cement-like rock that clung to them. Scientists then began the slow process of studying the bones and trying to order them.

They were pleased with how much of the skeleton they could reconstruct and especially that a large part of the skull was found.

Bonnan said he also was thrilled to be part of this discovery: "It has been a childhood dream to discover a new dinosaur," he said.

___

On the Net:

http://web.wits.ac.za/Academic/Science/GeoSciences/BPI

http://www.wiu.edu/earthclaw

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

JOHANNESBURG — A newly discovered dinosaur species that roamed the Earth about 200 million years ago may help explain how the creatures evolved into the largest animals on land, scientists in So...
JOHANNESBURG — A newly discovered dinosaur species that roamed the Earth about 200 million years ago may help explain how the creatures evolved into the largest animals on land, scientists in So...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:20 PM on 11/13/2009
another plant from Satan to throw off the believers!
01:55 PM on 11/13/2009
I LOVE stuff like this!

One of my mother's cousins was a paleontologist and, when I was in my teens, I'd go on an occasional dig with him

While not my chosen career, I still enjoy reading about new discoveries
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hirnlego
08:10 PM on 11/12/2009
Michael Shermer, Genesis Revisited: A Scientific Creation Story

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69EHLSnWKNQ

Hilarious!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scienceme
02:26 AM on 11/12/2009
I really hope Jurassic Park becomes real some day. That'd be so awesome!
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
02:15 AM on 11/12/2009
Thay-uts unpossuhbul. Ain't nuthin in the Bible bout the urth bein' more 'an 6,000 years old.
11:18 PM on 11/11/2009
But the real question about dinosaurs is never answered.
How long did it take them to rise from the primordial soup
to ruling the earth?
09:34 AM on 11/12/2009
The "primordial soup" would start in the Archaean Eon 3.8 billion years ago (aka BYA). That was the era of the archaeans, a single celled life form whose cellular surface has both a protein coat and fats, like plants and animals. During this era bacteria, which have only a protein coat evolved and took over the easy living parts of the environments.

The Proterozoic Eon started 2.5 BYA. That was the development from the archaeans of the fungi and single celled animals and plants. The archaeans were reduced to a few extreme environments such as near boiling geyser pools.

The Phanerozoic Eon started 545 million years ago (MYA). This is the first life that would have been big enough to see without a microscope. We are still in that eon. The first part of the Phanerozoic is the Paleozoic when the fish, land life and amphibians evolved. The Carboniferous and Permian eras in that have been called the Age of Amphibians.

251 MYA in Siberia a volcano poured out lava continuously for millions of years poisoning the environment and killing off masses of speciese. The reptiles had evolved during the Age of Amphibians. With the dominant amphibians suppressed the reptiles came to dominate.

That was the beginning of the Mesozoic era, aka the Age of Reptiles, aka the Dinosaur era.

So primordial soup life = 3.8 BYA. Dinosaurs = 250 MYA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hollyhund
Don't judge all Texans by the ones you see on TV
02:07 PM on 11/12/2009
What chapter of the Kings James Version did you dig up all these strange facts? I love them but no way coukd this be true!!! Not in the Bible....couldn't be true! And further more, The Permian Base is in Texas and known for all its oil wells!! Now who made that oil down in the ground? ROFLMAO!
07:03 PM on 11/11/2009
I'd like to see how many bone fragments were found to come up with such a detailed backstory.
photo
bigmacha
Truth through research.
12:16 PM on 11/11/2009
I thought the world is only 6,000 years old and that man walked the world with the dinosaur. Could I be mislead by the bible?

PS. Could someone also refer me to a passage in the bible referencing dinosaurs. I need it for a Sunday school presentation.
photo
barkrudedog69
Im Kinda Republican and Kinda Liberal
12:28 PM on 11/11/2009
You must be one that feels the bible has been translated in perfect form and meaning.....

The original Hebrew wording, combined with a comparison to other passages of Scripture, has led some to conclude that a considerable time interval is indicated between these two verses. If such an interval is indeed intended, there is no discrepancy between the Bible record and scientific determinations that the earth is up to several billion years old. If, on the other hand, there is no such gap, then the earth itself must be only around 6,000 years old—which most scientists consider an impossibility.

Myself...I hold the views of a Native American....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
COPerez
02:18 PM on 11/11/2009
"Myself...I hold the views of a Native American...."

Something equally as enlightened as the xtians, I'm sure.
photo
bigmacha
Truth through research.
10:14 AM on 11/12/2009
No, actually I believe that the "bible" was written by men, based on their understanding of the world at the time that they wrote. No different then the Greeks who wrote about Zeus and Hera and other representations of a world that they could not explain. If the "bible" were to be written today, again based on the author's understanding of the world, it would reflect a totally different understanding and panorama.

Assuming that an oral tradition, emanating from illiterate desert nomads and a population that thought the world began and ended at their village (or close by) accurately portrays the "universe" is, in my view, absurd.

What we may have is a distorted representation of what life was like at the time it (the bible and other religious texts) was written and then selectively edited by later generations to support their contention(s) as to what has come to pass as "god" or some form of divine being. (See the Book of Mormon or Scientology for a more recent view.)

In its simplest form the bible (as it may have been originally written - pre its many edits) may have been a snapshot of life, but given man's predilection of shaping facts to fit his beliefs, I doubt that is the case now.

You, of course, are entitled to your own view. This is mine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
02:33 PM on 11/11/2009
The earth God made 6,ooo years ago was flat, with a solid sky (firmament) held up by the pillars of heaven. There were only enough species to fill a single boat.

*(clearly this god was an early farmer who build a post and lintel house)
photo
bigmacha
Truth through research.
04:11 PM on 11/16/2009
,,,and actually the ancient Sumerians wrote about the equivalent of "an ark" several hundred years before the bible was written and the belief is that it was - like politics - local. The "deluge" is believed to have been a river flood and in the retelling, like most stories, got bigger and bigger until it was actually written down. As in most oral histories the most recent/current edit is the one that becomes "gospel".
photo
barkrudedog69
Im Kinda Republican and Kinda Liberal
12:10 PM on 11/11/2009
People making the comments it is a Republican of some kind.....I suggest it is a left wing Vegan.

As stated in the article:
Yates says the Aardonyx celestae species shares many characteristics with the plant-eating herbivores that walked on two legs.

We all know Republicans are meat eaters....
11:53 AM on 11/11/2009
Wow people were falling all over each other to get their republican joke in....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
11:47 AM on 11/11/2009
It's called Limbasaurus Rushpublicus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ralph Noyes
I rant therefore I am.
11:35 AM on 11/11/2009
Cool.

I wanted to be the curator of a dinosaur zoo when I was about six years old. Never could understand what had happened to the critters.

Republicans? Nah, if I could put them in a cage, I'd starve them. They aren't dinosaurs, they're RATS.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
fcsakes
11:29 AM on 11/11/2009
Common name: republican.
11:08 AM on 11/11/2009
"But the new species also has similar attributes to later dinosaurs known as sauropods, or brontosaurs, that grew to massive sizes and went about on all fours with long necks and whip-like tails."

Brontosaurs?

That is not a scientific term, the name brontosaur come from a fake fossile, which was the body of an apatosaur and the head from another dinosaur.

Apatosaur was a sauropod of the Diplodocidae family

Brontosaurs only exist in flintstones and 80ies movies plus in creationist museums.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
COPerez
02:20 PM on 11/11/2009
Actually, paleontologists accepted the term brontosaur - I believe in the mid-80s. I'd have to look up the exact essay, but I think I read it in one of Stephen Jay Gould's collections of essays.
03:37 PM on 11/11/2009
Brontosaur is an obsolete abandoned name and term since the 80ies in science, it still lives on in popular culture.

So it really dont belong in an article where they try to present science discoveries.
07:55 AM on 11/12/2009
The essay is the title of the anthology, "Bully for Brontosaurus".

It was found, not that the brontosaur was a fake but that someone had discovered a specimen a few years earlier and named it apatosaurus.

The naming rules prioritize the first naming. But they make an exceptions for a plant or critter that has been widely named otherwise in so many papers and publications. Gould protests that that precedent should have been followed.

Now, Hedera venena is an obsolete and incorrect designation for Toxicodendron radicans. The first name is the original Latin name for poison ivy. Hedera = ivy, venena = poison. But it is not an ivy.

In any case, brontosaur is not incorrect for Diplodocidae apatosaurus. It is a synonym and is just as legitimate as horse, which is "correctly", Equus caballus.
11:05 AM on 11/11/2009
Hmmm... Repukeacauruses.