Rachel Maddow Takes On Pete Hoekstra's 'Epic Grandstanding'

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Rachel Maddow Takes On Pete Hoekstra's 'Epic Grandstanding' stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11-11-09 10:35 AM   |   Updated: 11-11-09 12:25 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Childrens Rights

On last night's edition of the Rachel Maddow Show, the host dug into the curious case of Representative Pete Hoekstra, who's been courting cameras lately in the wake of the Fort Hood massacre, telling tales out of school. Chief among them are his account of the email habits of alleged Fort Hood murderer Nidal Hasan to a Yemen-based "radical cleric." Maddow asks the obvious question:

MADDOW: Why is it Pete Hoekstra who's taking it upon himself to tell the press that this radical cleric is having his email read by U.S. intelligence agencies? The FBI had not said publicly that this cleric had been emailing Hasan. The CIA, the NSA, the White House... nobody else had reported this cleric was e-mailing Hasan. This is just Pete Hoekstra letting us know -- and letting the radical cleric that is under surveillance know -- that he's under surveillance.

The Rachel Maddow Show attempted to find out why this was happening, and got the run-around from Hoekstra's office, and bad guesswork from the Republican side of the House Intelligence Committee. What they did find out is that Hoekstra "complained all weekend" that he was not being briefed on Fort Hood to his liking, then missed the briefing that was held because he left town of his own accord.

So, what's up with Hoekstra? The Nation's Christopher Hayes bottom-lined it thusly: "His reputation is of an epic grand-stander."

HAYES: There's been a lot of reporting on this over the years. Various intelligence issues that have come before the committee. This is a guy who, in 2006, called a press conference to great fanfare to announce the weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq. This is the same person who has accused the CIA of lying to him many times and turned around when Nancy Pelosi said the CIA hadn't told the truth about torture and interrogation techniques, said it was obviously absurd the CIA lied would ever lie to Congress. And now, he's turning around and saying the executive was withholding information. So, this is what he does, from his perch on the Intelligence Committee.

If you recall, Hoekstra is also the the guy who breached the security of a Congressional delegation's trip to Iraq by broadcasting its whereabouts and itinerary on Twitter. At the time, Congressional Quarterly remarked, "Nobody expected, though, that a lawmaker with such an extensive national security background would be the first to break the silence. And in such a big way." People should recalibrate their expectations!

WATCH:

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

On last night's edition of the Rachel Maddow Show, the host dug into the curious case of Representative Pete Hoekstra, who's been courting cameras lately in the wake of the Fort Hood massacre, telling...
On last night's edition of the Rachel Maddow Show, the host dug into the curious case of Representative Pete Hoekstra, who's been courting cameras lately in the wake of the Fort Hood massacre, telling...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
412
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
- johnmorgan I'm a Fan of johnmorgan 15 fans permalink


Love that Rachel Maddow!

Love the way she infuriates the right-wing nutjobs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 AM on 11/14/2009
- expired I'm a Fan of expired 25 fans permalink

Dear MoveOn member,

Saturday night was bittersweet. The House passed sweeping health care reform—but included a severe anti-choice provision in the bill.

23 Democrats voted wrong on both counts, first voting to restrict a woman's right to choose, then siding with Big Insurance to vote against a health care bill they had just succeeded in weakening.1

On the other hand, there were principled Democrats in tough re-election fights who have been under fire from Republicans and the insurance industry for months. They faced intense pressure—first to vote to limit women's access to reproductive choice and then to vote down health care altogether.

But they didn't give in—they courageously stood up for women and for all Americans who can't afford to wait for health care.

And now they're facing even harsher attacks for their votes. Mary Jo Kilroy and other health care heroes are about to see some of the nastiest attacks against them yet and they need our support. Together we can show that when Democrats stand up and fight, people will stand up with them.

We need to raise $150,000 for Kilroy and other health care heroes in the next 48 hours. That'll take 4 donations from folks in Naperville. Can you chip in $20? Click here:

https://pol.moveon.org/give/healthcare_heroes.html?id=17914-9193653-erx6Max&t=3

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 11/12/2009
- pbkritek I'm a Fan of pbkritek 3 fans permalink

Once more Rachel Maddow provides a lesson to her less enterprising elders in the MSM on what responsible investigative reporting looks like.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 11/12/2009
- beachrose I'm a Fan of beachrose 2 fans permalink

Rachel's expertise in "investigative reporting" is usually much ado about nothing. Nothing of importance unless your're trying to manipulate a few facts, or lack thereof, into something that - will maybe plant a few seeds here and there and hopefully will GROW. An interesting tactic she uses to create a controversy or scandal where NONE really exists - and you believe it because you want to.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 11/13/2009
- johnmorgan I'm a Fan of johnmorgan 15 fans permalink

You believe it because she uses FACTS.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 11/14/2009
- Bozwellian I'm a Fan of Bozwellian 30 fans permalink

....am taking the comment as a bit of sessembling on your part to skew the "take" on what RM does indeed accomplish using FACTS to discredit the bltherings that attempt to manipulate and skew facts with a partisan fervor that identifies those doing as FAR from true patriots who put the country first and but those with a partisan bent with their noses out of joint as they get further exposed for the frauds that they are repeatedly and repeatedly denied by their core groupies who have a difficult time handling truthmaticals and prefer delusional spinnings perped by the group that lost the reins of power ...Just can't get over it that they lost and the reins are now more ably plaed in other hands , many of which are proving to be more than JUST capable but true wonkers of the best interests of this nation and its citizenry !!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 11/14/2009
- HLL I'm a Fan of HLL 76 fans permalink

Rachel would accompany Daniel into the lion's den. You go, girl.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 11/12/2009
- Greg Petty I'm a Fan of Greg Petty 10 fans permalink
photo

see comments

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 11/12/2009
photo

Seems to me that hoekstra has committed several acts of treason....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 11/12/2009
- aj88 I'm a Fan of aj88 6 fans permalink

Sorry Rachel, www.jihadwatch.org and creepingsh­aria.wordp­ress.com had the e-mails on their websites within hours of the Fort Hood massacre.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 AM on 11/12/2009
- beckpod1 I'm a Fan of beckpod1 34 fans permalink

I'm sure Joe LIEberman told Pete to leak this....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 AM on 11/12/2009

Peter's defense is that he is just plain dumb and so are the people from his district who elected him. Here's a man who needs to be censured.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 AM on 11/12/2009
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 136 fans permalink

Saw Rachel's show, and it was a wonderful bit of reporting.
This guy's fellow Republicans should be all over him, putting him to shame. Despicable behaviour by an elected official.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 AM on 11/12/2009
- lobear00 I'm a Fan of lobear00 25 fans permalink

It should be made clear to the select few that get briefed by the intelligence agencies, that a record is kept with the agency on who attended, what was discussed, all present confirm same. That anyone leaks the intel will be charged at once with "Treason", no if's and's or but's.

The Intelligence agency's should never be misused by any administration as was done with the last one for the last eight years.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 AM on 11/12/2009
- beachrose I'm a Fan of beachrose 2 fans permalink

Didn't the White House (under Obama) de-classify & release "classified information" against the CIA's advice - that it would jeopardize the safety of our soldiers - and they did it anyway ?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 AM on 11/13/2009
- GeoLee I'm a Fan of GeoLee 62 fans permalink

Tonight's scorching was even better . Go Rachel...this guy just gave out the kind of secret up that made Osama bin Laden's x cell phone trail to go silent.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 11/12/2009

I can remember when real reporters used to like inside sources speaking out.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 11/11/2009
- kmich718 I'm a Fan of kmich718 26 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, yeah. Espeically when the inside source would then put the three year survelience program in jeopardy or downright shutting it down altogether! And as the kicker, the inside source isn't inside at all, it's a Congressman on the Intelligence Committee.

Oh, puhleeze.... the weakest argument award!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 11/12/2009
- demrepub I'm a Fan of demrepub 34 fans permalink
photo

Poll?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 PM on 11/11/2009
photo

Kudos to Ms. Maddow. I've always thought this grandstanding mouthpiece's connection with intelligence rather oxymoronic.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 11/11/2009
- kobrock1 I'm a Fan of kobrock1 12 fans permalink

No more so than the phrase ; "liberals' concern for national security security;" provided that the country whose security being referenced is The United States. Obviously, it makes perfect sense if the referenced country were Cuba, China, North Korea, Iran, or Venezuela, to name a few.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 AM on 11/12/2009
- johnmorgan I'm a Fan of johnmorgan 15 fans permalink

You've drunk the kool-aid. Go back to Faux News and see what Limbaugh tells you to believe tonight.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 AM on 11/14/2009

Sounds like the type of man who cheats on his wife and rushes home to tell her!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 11/11/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect