Bart Stupak: 'There Will Be Hell To Pay' If My Amendment Is Removed

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bart Stupak: 'There Will Be Hell To Pay' If My Amendment Is Removed stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |  Rachel Weiner
First Posted: 11-12-09 08:32 AM   |   Updated: 11-12-09 10:09 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Stupak

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) is warning fellow Democrats not to mess with his restrictive anti-abortion amendment.

Pro-choice outrage was sparked by the inclusion of a provision in the House health care bill making it harder for private insurers to cover abortion. President Obama himself suggested that the language disrupted the status quo and should be taken out of the final legislation. Abortion rights supporters in Congress requested a meeting with the president next week to discuss the issue.

Now Stupak is saying he won't go easily.

"We won because [the Democrats] need us," Stupak said. "If they are going to summarily dismiss us by taking the pen to that language, there will be hell to pay. I don't say it as a threat, but if they double-cross us, there will be 40 people who won't vote with them the next time they need us -- and that could be the final version of this bill."

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) is warning fellow Democrats not to mess with his restrictive anti-abortion amendment. Pro-choice outrage was sparked by the inclusion of a provision in the House health car...
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) is warning fellow Democrats not to mess with his restrictive anti-abortion amendment. Pro-choice outrage was sparked by the inclusion of a provision in the House health car...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1253
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (26 pages total)
- roninroshi I'm a Fan of roninroshi 16 fans permalink
photo

People like Stupak,Pal­in,Hannity­,Beck Limbaugh and the rest of those "meat heads".prove the need for abortion!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 11/17/2009

OK Stup-f**ker, bring it on.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 AM on 11/15/2009
- artgurrl I'm a Fan of artgurrl 23 fans permalink

If Stupak gets this bill, another bill should revoke coverage for Viagra. And, No Prostate care for the Pious.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 11/14/2009
- lthuedk 1 I'm a Fan of lthuedk 1 47 fans permalink
photo

Stupak can run but cannot hide.

http://www.light-to-dark.com/The_Family.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 11/13/2009
- GAPeach99 I'm a Fan of GAPeach99 6 fans permalink

Okay, so the crusty old men want to take away women's constitutionally guaranteed rights, let's go with this argument as a counter-balance

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/immoderate-proposal-by-digby-i-have.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 11/13/2009

I wonder if Stupak's insurance.....you know, the one that is offered to him by the government, has abortion coverage.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 AM on 11/13/2009
photo

The RNC had it, until it was exposed, now they're removing it. I mean... the RNC?? The REPUBLICAN National Committee??

What will ProLifer's say now?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 11/13/2009

Actually it doesn't. So his dependents do not have abortion coverage. Nor do those who serve in the military or their dependents, people who work for the VA, women in federal prisons, Peace Corps volunteeers, Native Americans receiving care from the Indian Health Service, or women on Medicaid who live in states that do not provide funds for abortions.

Women's reproductive health choices are already shockingly limited for many. This is just another nail in the coffin.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 11/14/2009
- Jazz88105 I'm a Fan of Jazz88105 10 fans permalink

how dare you deny a woman the right to choose what happens to her body. your right there will be hell to pay if your amendment is not removed. i have had an abortion and i want all woman to have the same right and in case you are curious yes i do vote and i will vote against anyone who votes for health care that includes the stupak amendment.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 11/13/2009
- Pero I'm a Fan of Pero 9 fans permalink

He "dares" because he is a Christian Taliban (religious fundamentalist) and belongs to a fascist organization "The Familia". Search on Google for its incredible history and members

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 11/13/2009
- Tahut I'm a Fan of Tahut 7 fans permalink
photo

This health care reform bill is se.crewd up. The repub.licans and blue dog have salt and peppered it with so many political IED's it will be an a.bort.ion if it ever sees the light of day. It needs to be de.feated. If the dem.ocrats really want to pass a bill that has meat on the bone, they need to get their act together on what they want, disregard bipartisan.ship, and give the public want they demand and tell those 40 re.pub.lican senators who represent only 10% of the public where to take a hike. This is one time I'm all for the republican effort to kill the bill but for diametrically opposite reasons

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 11/13/2009
- kevinw I'm a Fan of kevinw 10 fans permalink

You have to understand that he is under orders from the "family" and C street. They have informed him what role he should play in this. Reid will have a hard time competing with the influence of the religious mafia at C street.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 11/13/2009

GONNNNNNEEEE....in a flash...the movement is firing full steam ahead....you're an arrogant old man...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 AM on 11/13/2009
- jimrs6 I'm a Fan of jimrs6 10 fans permalink

Get use to it. The Dems will throw aside whatever they need to in their platform in order to achieve a "victory" for Obama. The Obama people just need to say they did something, even if that something makes the entire situation worse.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 11/13/2009
- Scott3843 I'm a Fan of Scott3843 9 fans permalink

Get useD to it. The GOP will throw whatever they can in any path for progress in order to achieve a "loss" for Obama. The GOP just needs to say they did something to bring a popular president down, even if that something makes the entire situation worse.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 AM on 11/13/2009
- Lulubelle1 I'm a Fan of Lulubelle1 73 fans permalink

And there'll be he1 1 to pay if it's not removed.

There's always he1 1 to pay.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 AM on 11/13/2009

If you really knew what you were talking about you would say that what is being preached in Catholic Churches is the following:

"A consistent Ethic of life from conception to natural death"

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 11/13/2009
- kevinw I'm a Fan of kevinw 10 fans permalink

Yet there is no concern over Iraq that was declared unjust by the previous Pope, or the number of people that die because they do not have access or cannot afford healthcare.

In addittion, the concept of life beginning at conception uis a rather recent argument adhered to by the church. For the first one and a half millenium the church believed that life began at the time the fetus had developed to the point of receiving the spirit. That was at a point called the quickening, when the child begins to kick. The current set of beliefs around when life begins seems to have developed as needed defenses against birth control methods and advanced techniques surrounding abortions. Look at the church liturgy around funerals. If the church had always believed that life begins at conception, would they not have to have services for babies that die before birth. That would mean keeping the remains from a misscarriage for burial in a plot with a Mass and all of the normal solemnity death normally requires. There is no such practice. It is only viewed as life beginning at conception as focused on the abortion fight and contraception (RU486).

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 11/13/2009
- wak84 I'm a Fan of wak84 2 fans permalink

After working for the Catholic church for many years I finally had to tear myself away from the ludicrious activity being encouraged within it and just leave for good. For example, I have actually known of and seen your above mentioned "funeral" for miscarriage remains by a priest in good standing.

Although the church "officially" does not have a set funeral plan for embryos and fetuses, plenty of priests are having these funerals on their own (mostly the young retrograde ones) and in certain pro-life circles, it's expected. I know specifically of one case where the woman saved the "remains" from her very, very early miscarriage and put it in the center of a large flower for the service. CREEPY. The pro-life culture within the Catholic church is not mentally healthy and it keeps getting worse. Whether the few remaining intellectuals within the church will steer it toward health again is open for serious question--the new, young priests (and bishops) are intellectually inferior to their counterparts from Vatican II and also emotionally unhealthy as a whole. Just my opinion from an insider.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 11/13/2009

President Obama himself said that this is a healthcare bill not an abortion bill.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 11/13/2009
- Tahut I'm a Fan of Tahut 7 fans permalink
photo

it is now

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 11/13/2009
- blaharumph I'm a Fan of blaharumph 14 fans permalink
photo

mr. stupak plucks his eyebrows quite fancy-like...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 11/13/2009

You betcha there is going to be Hell-to-pay for everyone.

The Bishiops just want an "Abortion Neutral" health care bill.

Believe me, NO one wants to pay for some woman's abortion.

Let the woman find her own financing not my wallet.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 AM on 11/13/2009

But I should pay for your 4 hour woody.....I think not!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 11/13/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (26 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect