Carrie Prejean Sex Tape Shot When She Was 20, She Lies: Ex Boyfriend

tmz.com:

Carrie Prejean's ex-boyfriend -- the guy to whom she sent the XXX solo video -- tells TMZ Carrie and company called him last week and tried getting him to "lie" and say she was 17 when she shot the video.

During an audio interview with TMZ, the man -- who asked us not to reveal his identity -- says Carrie sent him the video when they were involved with each other in 2007. He says Carrie sent him numerous explicit videos and insists the one in question was shot when she was 20.

Read the whole story: tmz.com

Comments

[Pinoy Tutorial]

One of the mystery still unsolved is "where the heck did the lawyers obtained the tape". Prejean herself isn't that dumb to hand it over to them..=) Apparently, The Donald got the last laugh of this story. Money once again wins!...

http://bit.ly/Carrie-Prejean-story

and oh, there was Prejean + 8!

[MaryBob]

Am I the only one who is over these "famous because they're famous" people? The people from The Hills, Levi Johnston, and Carrie Prejean? Who REALLY cares about this stuff? Are we shocked she's a fake? Why is this news, come on folks...

[RHSimard]

Would someone please step up to the plate and tell me why a woman who first praises America as a place where same-sex marriage can be a choice--nobody in these comment areas ever seems to remember that--but thinks it should be heterosexual, whose words are nearly identical to Barack Obama's except that Obama explicitly cited Christianity in his, whose statement also matches Hillary Clinton's, who never said Thing One about enforcing restrictions on same-sex marriage beyond those already extant, who is excoriated over lies when the only one she was bound by was signing the contract, and that only because of a hypocritical morals clause which happens to be enforceable, and the violation of which does not harm the pageant in any way, whose privacy is horribly violated by a boyfriend who never seems to get any flak around here, who has long lived as she professes--the tapes predate this by a great deal--is, well, all those things I don't need to list here?

[HollywoodHillsCookie]

If you can do others the courtesy of attempting to unpack that horrendously long run-on sentence, perhaps they will enlighten you. But from what I can make out, you do not know that:

1.) Our "country" does not offer the choice of same-sex or "opposite" marriage. A very few STATES do, but that has nothing to do with national government or its benefits. And that choice is only for the people who live in those particular states.

2.) There is no "boyfriend" in this sex tape(s) story. The man she sent them to was an Internet pickup she met face-to-face just once in a hotel room.

[RHSimard]

Hey, has it not occurred to you that when someone asks a question they have no right to ask, neither do they have the right to a truthful answer? A falsehood in response to an illegitimate question is as honest as any other, and may be an alternative to a confrontation.

Nobody has any business knowing how old she was because nobody as any business even knowing about it, much less seeing it. IF the unproven claim is true that she was 20 and she asked the bastard to lie to prevent its publication, it would be honorable as anything else.

The only real falsehood is signing the hypocritical "morals clause" in the contract, and someone somewhere said that the photos, which were arranged by Keith Lewis anyway, were not sexually explicit and thus not in violation. Either way, they're no scandal. And, whether or not by the letter of the law, the video is her own damn business. The villain is the guy who leaked it.

Carrie's problem is not that she told lies. It's that she didn't do a very good job of it. Maybe she doesn't do enough lying to get much practice at it.

(And that histrionic resignation by Shanna Moakler: I wonder if she was bailing because, having been part of making such a stink claiming Carrie's very mild semi-nudity was horrible, she might have had trouble explaining why her own Playboy spread and her sex scenes in Seeing Other People were not?)

[Epiphany2b]

One has, as another option to an outright lie, the right to tell the questioner that the answer is none of his business. A lie told because the question should not have been asked has the same life as a lie told for any other reason. It comes back to bite you when you least want it to. Someone in the habit of telling the truth does not resort to lies; the truth seems to pop out automatically. Someone in the habit of telling lies does the same thing . . . lies when the truth would be the wiser course. If she'd told the truth from the get-go this whole thing would have been over with a long time ago, right after her 15 minutes were up.

[AABrownA]

Say it ain't so Carrie, say it ain't so... I personal think she is pulling a Paris, who knew Paris Hilton before her sex tape? She want to role with Paris, Spears, and the like so this whole sex tape story just another way for her to sell that book report she wrote. I just wonder what would Mary do?

[RHSimard]

I should think that if she, deep down, is so craven as to want this tape to surface, she'd clearly snap up a million-dollar offer from a house that wants to distribute it. It's hard to imagine that she would decline that kind of money on moral principle and at the same time be guilty of such an underhanded trick.

[LorenzK]

I need to see this tape TMZ please hurry UP.

[RHSimard]

That will almost certainly never happen. I don't know what went into passing the video to Vivid, but it may well be that TMZ is no longer able to do anything with it. If that is true, and Vivid, showing the most honor anywhere so far, is giving Carrie the option to allow or disallow its publication (even if the law could allow them to anyway), and compensate her very well, it would then be entirely up to her, and if so, it will never see the light of day. Funny how a woman accused here and elsewhere of being so lacking in honest principles is declining a full million dollars rather than compromise them.

[LorenzK]

HUH Reese's Peas's Yum Yum.

[notb observer]

Back in the old days, when the American Dream was still alive and well, people actually had a decent chance of rising through the social ladder and earning a better life for themselves and their families if they worked hard and ha a little luck. A few decades ago, we became a nation of victims, obsessed with litigating our way to fortune, and the latest get rich quick scheme is to do something outrageous and cash in on the faux celebrity that inevitably ensues.
The MSM is complicit in this pathetic ritual, by essentially acting as the "advertising agency" for these unworthy characters as if they were soon to be released Hollywood blockbusters. Whether it's Mz. (Affront to the christian faith) Prejean, Mz. (Also affront to the christian faith) Palin or Mr. (Faux celebrity by association) Levi Johnston, this is the new American Dream, for those willing to flash their crotch or sell their to the media.
I sometimes feel very sad for the surviving vets of WW II... I wonder how they can still manage to justify their sacrifices and those of their friends and fellow soldiers, when they see how their country has deteriorated to its very core over the past half century.

[sandyra]

As a professed Christian, Ms. Prejean seems to be oblivious to a particular commandment. The one which states: "Thou shalt Not bear false witness". Honey, that means no lying! And trying to get an old boyfriend to lie about your age when you made those tapes (20 years old Not 17) makes your actions even worse.
You've been caught in numerous lies (oops! windy boat blew open my vest, I was only 17 when I did this, did that, did those other tapes, those other 30 photos, etc., I've never posed for anything morally offensive and will willingly sign a morals clause for the pageant stating this as true, need more??) How can we believe anything you say after having been caught in lie after lie? Fool me once...

[RHSimard]

That's not quite true. Strictly, the commandment means "against thy neighbor." A lie not against another may be wrong as well, but not by that particular commandment.

She has been caught in one legitimate lie only: the contract's "morality clause," which is a misnomer if I ever heard one. Any other falsehood was in response to a question the questioner had no right to ask, and thus, had no right to a truthful answer. The law may say the contract entitles the pageant to know and act upon something like this video, but if so, then the law is an ass. It not only intrudes on the contestant's life; it intrudes on her past. I don't think they stuck their nose into my life much more than that when I got my Secret security clearance.

It is not the letter of the law that has people so riled up. And they are ignoring the spirit.

What amazes me is how nobody seems to find fault with the bastard that leaked the tape. He had no right to do that. It's just one more piece of hard evidence that the anger against Carrie is not motivated by what is claimed by her hypocritical bashers.

[HollywoodHillsCookie]

Duckling, he was a ONE NIGHT STAND. Why would he owe her anything? And maybe he was just as sickened by her holier-than-thou act as practically everyone else is.

[Epiphany2b]

No one would care to find fault with her if she'd get on with her life instead of giving interviews projecting herself as the wounded victim and a highly moral person. It's the hypocrisy that people see and are offended at. I certainly don't care that she made a sex tape and sent it to someone, that's her business. I agree that the morals clause is stupid in this day and age when most people's lives don't fit into what they consider good morals. But when you are going to do that sort of thing, you need to own it, not lie about it. Lies bite.

[hasheville]

Whatever. And as long as she keeps getting invited for interviews she will promote herself.
Fake hair, fake boobs, fake beliefs.

[WakingLife]

Wait, she's not a real blonde? Who'd of thunk it?

[MrJM]

Carrie Prejean is so talented -- she can settle a lawsuit with one hand behind her back!

-- MrJM
http://twitter.com/misterjayem

[Schneb]

Yeah, as long as she's 'charged' with 'batteries'?

[Erik Kartmann]

She can do a lot with one hand for sure!

[RightWingBaby]

I think she's being really inappropriate.

[Pinoy Tutorial]

Newest Update: It seems Carrie Prejean is hiding not one, but 7 SEX TAPES! OMG

OMG. her book should be entitled "MY 7 CAPITAL SINS". This is getting ridiculous everyday. Maybe next week she has 365 and 1/4 tapes to share to the world?

detailed review (Nov 13 updates) : http://bit.ly/carrie-prejean-worst-alibis-for-her-bf

Still Standing ei?

[alexunlv]

That was pretty funny. I love it because this bigot is in a bind.

1. If she was indeed 17 when she made these tapes, she was lying to the pageant regarding her prior indiscretions which means she lied to America during all those interviews denying prior indiscretions. So she is a liar, unless these tapes were made after the pageant.

2. If she claims the videos were made after she was 18 and after the pageant.....she can claim safety from being called a liar but the videos are game for dissemination.

She has no way out! Tee Hee!

[Fernando]

Well, she is a a self-righteous Christian conservative! What, were you expecting integrity between what they preach, how they judge the rest of us mortals and how they themselves act? : )

I'm generalizing but it never ceases to amaze me how the most slef-righteous usually have the most to hide.

[RHSimard]

You sound like the kind who has bundled the claims of self-righteousness, judgment, and the rest together with conservative Christian in a simple-minded, one-size-fits-all package that covers everything.

What and where has she said that fits and validates your description? And how has her saying whatever it is caused the least harm to you?

[RHSimard]

She signed the contract, so yes, she lied there. If you view this as a strictly legal matter, you are confining your position to the realms of lawyers and courts. Your gleeful conclusion negates that, so you are viewing it as a failure of morals and character that she signed the contract.

In that case, regardless of the legality and enforceability of the clause, you must consider both the moral legitimacy of the clause and the behavior of the ass who leaked the tape.

The leaking of something so intimate and private, produced for his pleasure trusting that he would respect her and it, greatly overshadows the fact that she lied about something innocuous to the interests of the pageant itself. The behavior of the pageant in exploiting it to harm her in a very public way for reasons unrelated to the contract, instead of working together to reconcile knowing her deception, though real, was not malicious, is immoral.

That clause in the contract may be enforceable, but it is also utterly intrusive, not only the the girl's life, but her past. Something truly shameful would be one thing. A tape like this, made within a personal, private relationship, is not, at least, in human terms.

By the letter of law, she may be in the worst position. By any standard that means anything outside the courts and the contracts--meaning, among other things, here in your post--she is the least culpable.