Jerome O'Hara And George Perez: Ex-Madoff Programmers ARRESTED For Alleged Cover-Up

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Jerome O'Hara And George Perez: Ex-Madoff Programmers ARRESTED For Alleged Cover-Up stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM HAYS | 11/13/09 03:40 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Jerome Ohara George Perez

NEW YORK — Two former employees for Bernard Madoff programmed an old IBM computer to generate false records that concealed the crooked financier's massive Ponzi scheme and were given hush money when they threatened to stop lying, federal prosecutors said Friday.

Madoff gave orders to pay the pair "whatever they wanted to keep them happy," a criminal complaint said.

The complaint relies heavily on inside information provided by Madoff's chief financial officer, Frank DiPascali, who is cooperating after pleading guilty in August.

The computer programmers, Jerome O'Hara, of Malverne, N.Y., and George Perez, of East Brunswick, N.J., were arrested at dawn Friday at their homes on charges including conspiracy and falsifying records.

Both were released on $1 million bond after a brief hearing Friday in federal court in Manhattan. Their attorneys had no comment.

"Without the help of O'Hara and Perez, the Madoff fraud would not have been possible," George S. Canellos, director of the Securities and Exchange Commission's New York Regional Office, said in a statement.

The SEC brought similar charges against the men on Friday in a parallel civil complaint.

O'Hara and Perez were hired by Madoff's firm in the early 1990s to develop and maintain programs using a computer known as "House 17." The programs allowed Madoff to generate account statements for thousands of clients "that purported to confirm the purchases of securities that, in fact, had not been purchased," the complaint said.

Story continues below
advertisement

DiPascali has told investigators that in 2001, Madoff become alarmed by news report that his phony returns were too good to be true. Madoff "attempted to prepare for increased scrutiny" by the SEC by having O'Hara and Perez fabricate a second set of books that would throw regulators off the trail, the complaint said.

In what the SEC called "a crisis of conscience" in 2006, O'Hara and Perez deleted 218 of the 225 special programs from the House 17 computer, and withdrew thousands of dollars from their own accounts with the firm, authorities said.

DiPascali said that at a meeting the pair told Madoff "that they would no longer lie for him." Handwritten notes found later by FBI agents in O'Hara's desk read, "I won't lie any longer. Next time, I say 'ask Frank.'"

DiPascali said Madoff responded by ordering him to buy their silence. They both received $60,000 bonuses and 25 percent pay raises, the complaint said.

"Their subterfuge was designed to conceal the fraud from regulators and others, and when they told Madoff they would no longer lie for him, their continued complicity was bought for a price," Joseph Demarest, head of the FBI's New York office, said in statement.

Madoff, 71, was sentenced in June to 150 years in prison for orchestrating a decades-long Ponzi scheme in which investors are paid with other investors' money rather than actual profits on their investment. The scheme destroyed thousands of people's life savings and wrecked charities.

O'Hara, 46, and Perez, 43, face up to 30 years in prison if convicted on all counts.

NEW YORK — Two former employees for Bernard Madoff programmed an old IBM computer to generate false records that concealed the crooked financier's massive Ponzi scheme and were given hush money when...
NEW YORK — Two former employees for Bernard Madoff programmed an old IBM computer to generate false records that concealed the crooked financier's massive Ponzi scheme and were given hush money when...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
24
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- rissole I'm a Fan of rissole 10 fans permalink
photo

This is just a distraction. The other billionaire criminals are laughing all the way to the White House.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 11/15/2009
- mrjames1 I'm a Fan of mrjames1 3 fans permalink

Wow, i am glad that this entire case is now solved! Who would have thought that a multi-decade $100 billion dollar fraud could be pulled off by bernie, helped by two low level programming guys banging out some php code and database queries. Throw the book at them, and don't worry about the members of bernies family involved.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 AM on 11/15/2009
photo

Yes WE CAN!

But also lets bring in the $TRILLION CR1MINALS in the five Big Banks on Wall Street + A1G!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 11/14/2009
photo

SCHEMES AND SCAMS AND CR1MES: STARTER LIST

PONZI
INSIDER TRADING
MISREPRESENTION DURING SALE OF HIGH RISK PRODUCTS AS FAKE "AAA" PRODUCTS

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 11/14/2009
- raechel I'm a Fan of raechel 21 fans permalink

Anyone, including most 14 year-old kids, could print reports that LOOK legitimate out of Access or Excel. An old IBM computer and a couple of computer programmers weren't required. These guys were bozos, and dishonest obviously, but hardly essential components of the fraud. I can't believe anyone would assume that if it's printed by a computer printer, then it must be true, although obviously some people do. Excuse me while I go mock up a winning lottery ticket ...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 11/14/2009

Perhaps they needed to actually manipulate the data in the computer to evade an auditor or accountant. It may have entailed more than simply producing a mock print-out.­..but an actual algorithm that funnelled the money out of the accounts.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 11/15/2009
- raechel I'm a Fan of raechel 21 fans permalink

I'm an auditor. The story says these guys printed reports for investors that indicated money had been invested when it had not been. They wouldn't have fooled an auditor or an accountant, because neither would rely on an internal report to determine whether an investment was legit.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 11/15/2009

Only really young children living in Fantasyland would believe this kind of "paper-trading" is okay instead of criminal. Book 'em!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 11/14/2009
- jukesgrrl I'm a Fan of jukesgrrl 74 fans permalink
photo

These dopes will probably make license plates for the better part of 30 years. Meanwhile, Madoff's sons are still making dinner reservations at Le Cirque.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 11/14/2009

sooner or later the Boys will be hauled in...if I were them I'd be headed offshore.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 11/15/2009

We, the American people, dug ourselves into this hold for which there is no escape.a

good articles; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 11/14/2009
- Rosewren I'm a Fan of Rosewren 22 fans permalink
photo

You are spamming on too many threads, go away.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 11/14/2009
photo

The fraud would never have been pulled off without the complicity of these idiots. People tend to believe computer-generated reports. That's why it's getting easier to perpetuate scams and steal identities.

I happen to do computer security auditing and fraud detection for a living. I'm proud to report that I've participated in exposing several crimes committed by internal employees and their management. Sometimes it works top-down, but mostly it is discovered bottom-up. Most often, it's petty stuff like skimming off payables or receivables, but occasionally, it exposes bribery or other illegal behavior. One scam resulted in federal contract fraud indictments. More frequently, someone just gets fired.

But it often starts with a computer programmer who thinks he's smart enough to get away with something. What I don't understand is how these particular guys could keep this up for so many years while accepting hush money. But I have a conscience, so I couldn't possibly understand.

Simple business checks and balances are always missing in these cases. You know; one guy writes the check, a different guy signs it. This is what works. Computers only make it happen faster.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 AM on 11/14/2009
photo

now look at this photo?

did all these people not know they were doing nothing but moving numbers around?

What did these people do all day?

Besides screwing a lot of people?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 AM on 11/14/2009
photo

both released on a million bond...pre­tty good!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 AM on 11/14/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 267 fans permalink

good, now when are you going to get Goldman Sachs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 11/13/2009

Yup, the whole financial system collapsed because of massive fraud....

Who do we go after??.. two computer programmers who live in crappy middle class towns..

We can't touch any of the big guys... how about a few executives from the rating agencies where massive fraud was a way of doing business..­. Give me a break. Glad to hear that the rich are spending again...

It just makes me sick and tired.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 PM on 11/13/2009
- retreadite I'm a Fan of retreadite 3 fans permalink

60K and a 25% raise? Is that it?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 11/13/2009

That's the first thing I thought. Madoff was a billionaire and these fools settled for pennies.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 11/14/2009

a soul sold for 60K...chea­p!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

Somebody refresh my memory. Wasn't Madoff a democrat?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 11/13/2009
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 99 fans permalink

HAHAHAHAHA­HAHAHAHAHA­HAHAHAHA..­..........­.......you can't get away with that one :)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 11/13/2009

if he was, he was probably a BLUE DOG!!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 11/13/2009
photo

Nope. But do ask your doctor about Aricept. ;-)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 11/13/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect