Khalid Sheikh Mohammed To Face New York Trial (VIDEOS)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Khalid Sheikh Mohammed To Face New York Trial (VIDEOS) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11-13-09 07:48 AM   |   Updated: 11-14-09 09:10 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Guantanamo

WASHINGTON — Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will be brought to trial in a civilian federal courthouse in New York, blocks from site of the devastating 2001 terror attacks. Prosecutors expect to seek the death penalty.

At a news conference Friday, Attorney General Eric Holder also announced that five other suspects, including a major suspect in the bombing of the USS Cole, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, will be tried before a military commission.

Holder said the defendants should be tried where their crimes occurred. The New York courthouse is hard by the site where the World Trade Centers were brought down by two hijacked jetliners. Nearly 3,000 people died there and in another hijacked jet that hit the Pentagon and a fourth hijacked plane crashed in western Pennsylvania.

Holder called the events of Sept. 11 "the deadliest terrorist attacks our nation has ever seen" and said that in the years since, "our nation has had no higher priority than bringing those who planned and plotted the attacks to justice."

Bringing such notorious suspects to U.S. soil to face trial is a key step in President Barack Obama's plan to close the terror suspect detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Obama initially planned to close the detention center by Jan. 22, but the administration is no longer expected to meet that deadline.

"For over 200 years our nation has relied upon a faithful adherence to the rule of law," Holder told a news conference at the Justice Department. "Once again, we will ask our legal system in two venues to answer that call."

The plan that Holder outlined Friday is a major legal and political test of Obama's overall approach to terrorism. If the case suffers legal setbacks, the administration will face second-guessing from those who never wanted it in a civilian courtroom. And if lawmakers get upset about terrorists being brought to their home regions, they may fight back against other parts of Obama's agenda.

Republican Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona called bringing Mohammed to New York "an unnecessary risk" that could result in the disclosure of classified information. Kyl maintained the trial of Omar Abdel Rahman, the so-called "blind sheik" who was tried for a plot against some two-dozen New York City landmarks, caused "valuable information about U.S. intelligence sources and methods" to be revealed to the al-Qaida terrorist network.

Story continues below
advertisement

Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said the federal courts are capable of trying high-profile terrorism.

"By trying them in our federal courts, we demonstrate to the world that the most powerful nation on earth also trusts its judicial system a system respected around the world," Leahy said.

The decision outraged family members of some Sept. 11 victims.

"We have a president who doesn't know we're at war," said Debra Burlingame, whose brother, Charles Burlingame, was pilot of the hijacked plane that crashed into the Pentagon. She said she was sickened by "the prospect of these barbarians being turned into victims by their attorneys," if the trial winds up focusing on allegations that the suspects were tortured after their capture.

"I don't think these people should get the benefit of being subjected to our system of jurisprudence," said Bruce De Cell, whose son-in-law, Mark Petrocelli, was killed at the World Trade Center. "They are terrorists. I don't think they should be tried in a civilian court."

The New York case may force the court system to confront a host of difficult legal issues surrounding counterterrorism programs begun after the 2001 attacks, including the harsh interrogation techniques once used on some of the suspects while in CIA custody. The most severe method -- waterboarding, or simulated drowning -- was used on Mohammed 183 times in 2003, before the practice was banned.

The five suspects are headed to New York together because they are all accused of conspiring in the 2001 attacks. The five headed to military commissions face a variety of charges but many of them include attacks specifically against the U.S. military.

It was unclear where commission-bound detainees like al-Nashiri might be sent, but a brig in South Carolina has been high on the list of sites under consideration.

The actual transfer of the detainees from Guantanamo to New York isn't expected to happen for many more weeks because formal charges have not been filed against most of them.

The attorney general has decided the case of the five Sept. 11 suspects should be handled by prosecutors working in the Southern District of New York, which has held a number of major terrorism trials in recent decades at the courthouse in lower Manhattan.

Holder had been considering other possible trial locations, including Virginia, Washington, D.C., and a different courthouse in New York City. Those districts could end up conducting trials of other Guantanamo detainees sent to federal court later on.

The attorney general's decision in these cases comes just before a Monday deadline for the government to decide how to proceed against 10 detainees facing military commissions.

In the military system, the five Sept. 11 suspects had faced the death penalty, but the official would not say if the Justice Department would also seek capital punishment against the men once they are in the federal system.

The administration has already sent one Guantanamo detainee, Ahmed Ghailani, to New York to face trial, but chose not to seek death because other conspirators involved in his case did not face capital punishment for similar offenses.

At the last major trial of al-Qaida suspects held at that courthouse in 2001, prosecutors did seek death for some of the defendants.

Mohammed already has an outstanding terror indictment against him in New York, for an unsuccessful plot called "Bojinka" to simultaneously take down multiple airliners over the Pacific Ocean in the 1990s.

Some members of Congress have fought any effort to bring Guantanamo Bay detainees to trial in the United States; they have argued it would be too dangerous for nearby civilians. The Obama administration has defended the planned trials and pointed out that many terrorists have been safely tried, convicted, and imprisoned in the United States, including the 1993 World Trade Center bomber, Ramzi Yousef.

Mohammed and the four others -- Waleed bin Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi and Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali -- are accused of orchestrating the attacks that killed over 2,970 people on Sept. 11.

Navy Cmdr. Suzanne Lachelier, the military lawyer appointed to represent Ramzi Binalshibh, said Sept. 11 attorneys had not been notified of the administration's decision but welcomed the apparent move to civilian court.

The four other detainees headed to military commissions in the United States are: Omar Khadr, Ahmed Mohammed al Darbi, Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud al Qosi, and Noor Uthman Muhammed. Their cases are not specifically connected but two of them are accused of plotting against or attacking U.S. military personnel.

Barry Coburn, a lawyer for Khadr, said he was deeply disappointed in the decision.

"The fact that the Department of Justice has not seen fit to make these fundamental protections available to Omar Khadr, who was fifteen years old when he was detained in Afghanistan as a child soldier and has been locked away in Guantanamo ever since, is, quite frankly, devastating and shocking to me personally. I had thought this administration was better than that."


WATCH:



WASHINGTON — Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will be brought to trial in a civilian federal courthouse in New York, blocks from...
WASHINGTON — Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will be brought to trial in a civilian federal courthouse in New York, blocks from...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
2251
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (27 pages total)
photo

Try him and fry him. I know the people of NYC know how to deal with this detritus.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 11/18/2009
- FGDinVA I'm a Fan of FGDinVA 103 fans permalink
photo

"We have a president who doesn't know we're at war," said Debra Burlingame, whose brother, Charles Burlingame, was pilot of the hijacked plane that crashed into the Pentagon. She said she was sickened by "the prospect of these barbarians being turned into victims by their attorneys," if the trial winds up focusing on allegations that the suspects were tortured after their capture."

With my sincere respect and condolances to Ms. Burlingame, if the trial winds up exposing the fact that detainees were tortured while in US custody, then that is hardly the fault of the detainees, is it? That is like saying, "They are unworthy of a criminal trial because we tortured them and things will get messy."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 11/17/2009
- battlez I'm a Fan of battlez 8 fans permalink
photo

Obama breaks silence on KSM New York case...............

http://iowntheworld.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Obama_Hiding.jpg

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 11/16/2009
- OgreDaddy I'm a Fan of OgreDaddy 39 fans permalink
photo

I have a gut feeling we're in for a roller coaster ride.

Addington and Yoo attempted to bend the laws, but their assumptions
were wrong.

What a mess

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 AM on 11/16/2009
- rissole I'm a Fan of rissole 10 fans permalink
photo

Does this mean saturation coverage on CNN and endless hours of so called legal experts like they had on the O.J. Simpson trial?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 11/16/2009
- RightOn5 I'm a Fan of RightOn5 10 fans permalink
    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 PM on 11/15/2009
- lemondade I'm a Fan of lemondade 13 fans permalink

i am so sick of that terrorist's face, same hairy photo, displayed everyday somewhere. try him and get his face out of the media. i want to puke.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 PM on 11/15/2009
- Trueheart I'm a Fan of Trueheart 47 fans permalink
photo

I say bring them to a Himalayan mountain top and let a tribunal of Tibetan monks, led by the Dalai Lama determine guilt and sentencing.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 11/15/2009
- jasev01 I'm a Fan of jasev01 17 fans permalink

As a lawyer I to believe this i a bad idea and a bad precedent. The most important reason is because we are exercising extra territorial jurisdiction. These men in general were captured on a battler field in another country the proper jurisdiction and venue is either a military court or an international forum, like the Nuremberg. The state of New York's jurisdiction is questionable and the manner of which these men were arrested and detained is questionable. In addition they should be entitled to a change of venue because there is not way they can receive a fair trial that close to the WTC. In addition they will not be getting a jury of their peers as is required by law. Its not that I believe they should be freed but the precedent will extend to our soldiers and our people. Next time one of our CIA or military people are captured or taken or extradited from a country we don't want them tried in a court in Tehran or Pyongyang or Mogadishu. If that happened we would cry out that it is unfair and injustice. These men should be given a trial in the proper venue which is a military court or an international forum just as we would want our people.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was not captured on a battlefield. He was pulled out of his rat hole in Pakistan by US and Pakistani agents and arrested.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 11/15/2009
- jasev01 I'm a Fan of jasev01 17 fans permalink

Then he should be tried in Pakitan not the US.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 11/15/2009
- Trueheart I'm a Fan of Trueheart 47 fans permalink
photo

Jihad is a declaration of war against Infidels. (Godless ones.)

In the United States, we don't go to war over religious issues, but on 9/11 we were attacked as Infidels by Moslems who were following the Jihaddic declarations of their holy men.

Therefore, I am not sure if we (the United States of America) are equipped philosophically or politically to define "Justice" in this situation.

It doesn't seem to me to be an issue which the "Founding Fathers" of our country could ever have anticipated. It was an act of war which was directed against more than the USA. It was directed against multi-national corporatism, in which we have participated. The Twin Towers were a symbol of something much greater than US economic entities.

If you agree with that, then you have to admit that we are truly moving in unchartered waters.

That's why I think that the Guatanamo prisoners who have admitted to direct involvement in the World Trade Center bombings should be tried in an international court.

I also do not believe that the people of NYC should be put at risk, which they will most assuredly be.

Therefore, I reluctantly do not support President Obama on this matter.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

Looking at that guys picture and knowing they water boarded him 183 times is fantastic! There's hope for this country yet!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 11/15/2009
- Trueheart I'm a Fan of Trueheart 47 fans permalink
photo

Huh?

Seems like a person who has been waterboarded 183 times and did not break physically or mentally has a belief system which gives him phenomenal strength which has to be (begrudgingly0 acknowledged.

We didn't break him. What are you so proud of?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 11/15/2009
- Philclock I'm a Fan of Philclock 42 fans permalink
photo

Holder is begging for the death penalty; adoption's the only other alternative.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 11/15/2009
- Periwinkle I'm a Fan of Periwinkle 54 fans permalink

The Bush years turned this country into the United States of Paranoia. Republicans need to get a grip. I imagine after these people are found guilty and executed they'll complain about American taxpayers having to foot the bill for the electricity.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 11/15/2009
- gopirate I'm a Fan of gopirate 4 fans permalink

Rope is free. Just sayin'.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 11/15/2009

I did not like bush but this can be blamed on him this was Obamas decision only

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 AM on 11/19/2009
- mergina I'm a Fan of mergina 93 fans permalink
photo

This is a huge mistake, just as closing Gitmo is a huge mistake. But if NY does not want them, SEND THEM HERE TO CHICAGO where we will try them without fanfare, prosecute them, and execute their sentences DAH CHICAHGO WAY!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 11/15/2009
- norkas I'm a Fan of norkas 28 fans permalink

You can have him in Chicago this will be brutal for NYC and very dangerous. I voted and supported Barak Obama and i live in NYC and communicate with many Muslims . Over 98% say they no longer pray at a mosque because of what they consider violent teaching in NYC and New Jersey. I am shocked that the the advice that Brak Obama has accepted as correct was even thoughful and furthermore whomever advised is clueless regardless of how educated.

I will make a petition and know many Dems and Republicans will line up to oppose this dangerous idea.

Mr.Barak Obama you placing our city in harms way simply because of the Imams teaching here can very well provoke another attack. I have no doubt about the chances of something happening are high.

Please Barak Obama reconsider this idea now we all make mistakes but it takes a really big man or women to admit to one especially any Pres. Please step forward and change your mind just let all of us know that anyone can error and change there mind.

I hope all of you blog here and support what i am saying , i know not everyone agrees with me and others but i am hopeful perhaps you may change your minds.

NYC will be closed down and security will be in the 100,s of millions for this dangerous freak show.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 11/15/2009
- mergina I'm a Fan of mergina 93 fans permalink
photo

It is highly irresponsible indeed. Holder cannot be trusted. Gitmo should not be closed, it should be changed to the rule of law. Put the bastards on trial in the surroundings they are in NOW.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 11/15/2009
- Eris23 I'm a Fan of Eris23 48 fans permalink

It's not irresponsible to try people in our Constitutionally created criminal courts. It's the exact opposite actually. It is our responsibility to do just that. There is no "danger" to NYC from this at all, unless despite your paranoia surrounding this, you believe that NYC has just been off the radar for terrorists up until it had been announced that some would be put on trial there. Give me a break.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 AM on 11/16/2009
- dct1999 I'm a Fan of dct1999 363 fans permalink
photo

Crying, screaming, and whining about holding trials in NYC is just another way to use fear as a weapon.

I've never seen so much hysteria. And the NYers who are engaging in it should know better.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 AM on 11/15/2009

well its obvius you have never been in the military and were not personally affected by 9/11. For people in NY they have to live in fear now because of the president. You probably live in California.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 AM on 11/19/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (27 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect