Rot-Proof Apple Developed: Stays Fresh for 4 Months

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Rot-Proof Apple Developed: Stays Fresh for 4 Months stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


Posted: 11-13-09 05:28 PM

What's Your Reaction?

treehugger.com:

Scientists in Australia have developed an apple that won't rot. Or, won't rot for a long, long time.

Read the whole story: treehugger.com

Scientists in Australia have developed an apple that won't rot. Or, won't rot for a long, long time.
Scientists in Australia have developed an apple that won't rot. Or, won't rot for a long, long time.
Filed by Katherine Goldstein  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
26
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I don't care how long it lasts, I will not eat it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 11/17/2009
- treboi I'm a Fan of treboi 38 fans permalink
photo

Gross! Where is all the normal food!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 AM on 11/17/2009

No GMO food!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 11/16/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 158 fans permalink

This isn't a GMO. It's a gene transfer between species that could have been crossbred naturally, but it could have taken 50 years to achieve without biotechnology.

Nature intended for closely-related species, such as two kinds of apples, to be able to propagate their successful genes. This just speeds up the process to achieve human-directed objectives.

GMO is when genes are transferred between substantially different species that could not interbreed in nature, such as inserting the Roundup Ready gene in a variety of commodity crops.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 11/16/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 243 fans permalink

At least it is the same species, but if they use a gene gun, there will be collateral genetic alterations.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 AM on 11/17/2009
- Josie79 I'm a Fan of Josie79 4 fans permalink

How is modifying the apple "green" and eco-friendly?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 11/16/2009
- HBHB I'm a Fan of HBHB 4 fans permalink

Keyword - "developed".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 11/16/2009
- JScott I'm a Fan of JScott 20 fans permalink

Yup the say it tastes good, yeah right if you like mushy cardboard. One can only turn to the flopp-flavr savr gentically altered tomato.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 11/16/2009
- plzchuteme I'm a Fan of plzchuteme 30 fans permalink
photo

If I can't get around to eating the apple within 4 months, I probably wasn't serious about it to begin with.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 11/16/2009
- nakedhand I'm a Fan of nakedhand 3 fans permalink
photo

In short. No thanks, bad idea!

Healthy food goes bad. Ever noticed how your organic vegetables go bad if you keep them around as long as you do conventional?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 AM on 11/16/2009
photo

I will take mine natural, no scientists involved please ... geeez.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 AM on 11/16/2009
photo

apples keep very well if stored correctly. they get a little wrinkly.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 AM on 11/16/2009
- condor101 I'm a Fan of condor101 49 fans permalink

Disgusting.

I can't wait for the Non-GMO labels to be used widely.
I want to know that the products I buy are free from GMO.

In the meantime, I buy mostly at Farmers Markets and CSA's.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

Granny Smiths already are long lasting without any gene modification.
Admittedly they're as sour as can be, so that these new apples may really represent a useful advance.
You can be sure though that the outcry about them being Unnatural will be loud, as it always is with gene modified products. The folks doing all the yelling don't seem to recognize that Mother Nature makes such changes herself, only slower & more haphazardly :)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

Not sure what the big deal is. Apples are already one of the produce items that last the longest under refrigeration. I've had apples in my fridge for longer than that that were still edible.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

But will a RS103-130 a day keep the doctor away?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

haha seriously. I don't think this is what nature intended. Rotting/decomposing is a natural part of the cycle of life and should be respected as such. Notice that Organic produce tends to have a shorter shelf life than it's genetically modified, insecticide and petroleum-laden counterpart. it's not a bad thing. It's still far better for you and the earth, despite how long it may last What is bad is our attachment to everything looking just like in the picture, and our throwing it into a landfill if/when it doesn't. We need to work on better distribution chains so that we waste less, and a state-mandated composting system to utlilize what we don't eat. Korea and Japan may not have it all right, but they recycle 97% of their trash, in large part because of composting. The idea of the U.S. being the leader of the free world is a joke on many levels- One that only people who've never left still believe.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 11/15/2009
- PlayTOE I'm a Fan of PlayTOE 21 fans permalink
photo

An apple that does not go bad really soon is a great idea.
And inserting naturally occurring genetics into a new variety of apple is just fine.

Mother nature has been cross pollinating and transferring genes for a very long time with very good results.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 11/15/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 158 fans permalink

I agree to the extent that genes are transferred between species that could be crossbred (cisgenesis) and not transferred between substantially dissimilar species that could not crossbreed in the natural world (transgenesis).

In my view, there's a significant ecological difference between an accelerated simulation of crossbreeding two species of apple and inserting the Roundup-Ready gene into a variety of different commodity crops.

I also object to the intellectual property framework as it applies to the proprietization of genomic sequences. If they can't prevent genes from propagating through natural crossbreeding, then they can't press charges when "their" gene shows up in "unlicensed" organisms.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 PM on 11/15/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect