Rot-Proof Apple Developed: Stays Fresh for 4 Months

treehugger.com:

Scientists in Australia have developed an apple that won't rot. Or, won't rot for a long, long time.

Read the whole story: treehugger.com

Comments

[willitell]

05:42 PM on 11/17/2009

I don't care how long it lasts, I will not eat it.

[treboi]

02:53 AM on 11/17/2009

Gross! Where is all the normal food!

[BannedNBoston]

03:05 PM on 11/16/2009

No GMO food!!!

[jsarets]

03:49 PM on 11/16/2009

This isn't a GMO. It's a gene transfer between species that could have been crossbred naturally, but it could have taken 50 years to achieve without biotechnology.

Nature intended for closely-related species, such as two kinds of apples, to be able to propagate their successful genes. This just speeds up the process to achieve human-directed objectives.

GMO is when genes are transferred between substantially different species that could not interbreed in nature, such as inserting the Roundup Ready gene in a variety of commodity crops.

[research]

01:02 AM on 11/17/2009

At least it is the same species, but if they use a gene gun, there will be collateral genetic alterations.

[Josie79]

03:03 PM on 11/16/2009

How is modifying the apple "green" and eco-friendly?

[HBHB]

01:46 PM on 11/16/2009

Keyword - "developed".

[JScott]

11:34 AM on 11/16/2009

Yup the say it tastes good, yeah right if you like mushy cardboard. One can only turn to the flopp-flavr savr gentically altered tomato.

[plzchuteme]

10:35 AM on 11/16/2009

If I can't get around to eating the apple within 4 months, I probably wasn't serious about it to begin with.

[nakedhand]

10:16 AM on 11/16/2009

In short. No thanks, bad idea!

Healthy food goes bad. Ever noticed how your organic vegetables go bad if you keep them around as long as you do conventional?

[Patty Farnsley]

08:31 AM on 11/16/2009

I will take mine natural, no scientists involved please ... geeez.

[sabelmouse]

07:33 AM on 11/16/2009

apples keep very well if stored correctly. they get a little wrinkly.

[condor101]

11:05 PM on 11/15/2009

Disgusting.

I can't wait for the Non-GMO labels to be used widely.
I want to know that the products I buy are free from GMO.

In the meantime, I buy mostly at Farmers Markets and CSA's.

[IncredulousGeezer]

08:56 PM on 11/15/2009

Granny Smiths already are long lasting without any gene modification.
Admittedly they're as sour as can be, so that these new apples may really represent a useful advance.
You can be sure though that the outcry about them being Unnatural will be loud, as it always is with gene modified products. The folks doing all the yelling don't seem to recognize that Mother Nature makes such changes herself, only slower & more haphazardly :)

[MagicalPossibilities]

08:35 PM on 11/15/2009

Not sure what the big deal is. Apples are already one of the produce items that last the longest under refrigeration. I've had apples in my fridge for longer than that that were still edible.

[TheGNN]

08:17 PM on 11/15/2009

But will a RS103-130 a day keep the doctor away?

[Patrick McCarthy]

09:58 PM on 11/15/2009

haha seriously. I don't think this is what nature intended. Rotting/decomposing is a natural part of the cycle of life and should be respected as such. Notice that Organic produce tends to have a shorter shelf life than it's genetically modified, insecticide and petroleum-laden counterpart. it's not a bad thing. It's still far better for you and the earth, despite how long it may last What is bad is our attachment to everything looking just like in the picture, and our throwing it into a landfill if/when it doesn't. We need to work on better distribution chains so that we waste less, and a state-mandated composting system to utlilize what we don't eat. Korea and Japan may not have it all right, but they recycle 97% of their trash, in large part because of composting. The idea of the U.S. being the leader of the free world is a joke on many levels- One that only people who've never left still believe.

[PlayTOE]

04:16 PM on 11/15/2009

An apple that does not go bad really soon is a great idea.
And inserting naturally occurring genetics into a new variety of apple is just fine.

Mother nature has been cross pollinating and transferring genes for a very long time with very good results.

[jsarets]

08:03 PM on 11/15/2009

I agree to the extent that genes are transferred between species that could be crossbred (cisgenesis) and not transferred between substantially dissimilar species that could not crossbreed in the natural world (transgenesis).

In my view, there's a significant ecological difference between an accelerated simulation of crossbreeding two species of apple and inserting the Roundup-Ready gene into a variety of different commodity crops.

I also object to the intellectual property framework as it applies to the proprietization of genomic sequences. If they can't prevent genes from propagating through natural crossbreeding, then they can't press charges when "their" gene shows up in "unlicensed" organisms.