Stanford Vs USC: Cardinal Shock Trojans In 55-21 Blowout

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Stanford Vs USC: Cardinal Shock Trojans In 55-21 Blowout stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GREG BEACHAM | 11/14/09 08:41 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Stanford Vs Usc

LOS ANGELES — While Toby Gerhart rampaged through the Southern California defense in an awfully quiet Coliseum, the star tailback and his Cardinal teammates flattened a bunch of recent college football certainties as well.

USC's streaks of seven straight BCS bowls, 11-win seasons and top-four AP poll finishes? Those are all finished.

The Trojans' Pac-10 dominance over the past seven years? It's all but over after Stanford paved the way for a new West Coast champion.

Gerhart took time on the Coliseum field to savor the moment after rushing for 178 yards and three touchdowns in No. 25 Stanford's 55-21 victory Saturday over the 11th-ranked Trojans, who allowed the most points in school history.

"To do that against a storied program, a perennial power, it's the greatest feeling in the world," said the Pac-10 rushing leader, whose Heisman Trophy hopes are gaining momentum. "It was just will. The offensive line just moved people. We got after them and got downhill, and it was just a good offensive day."

How good? The loss was the Trojans' worst since a 51-0 defeat at home against Notre Dame in 1966. Coach Pete Carroll lost in November for the first time at USC after 28 straight victories. And for the second time in three weekends, Carroll endured the worst loss of his nine seasons.

"I'm not sure I have the right words to describe being humbled like this," Carroll said. "I don't really know where to put it. ... We have fallen apart and given our opponents the opportunity to do whatever they want, but you have to give Stanford a lot of credit."

Andrew Luck threw two touchdown passes and ran for another score for the Cardinal (7-3, 6-2 Pac-10), who followed up their surprising rout of Oregon last week with a strong start and a big finish at the Coliseum. The Trojans (7-3, 4-3) haven't lost to any other opponent at home since 2001, going 47-2.

Story continues below
advertisement

Richard Sherman returned an interception 42 yards for a score with 11:41 to play, part of a 27-point fourth quarter for the Cardinal. After the postgame handshsake, the Cardinal raised their helmets and raced to their cheering section for their second celebration at the Coliseum in three years.

Stanford's 24-23 victory as a 41-point underdog in 2007 was a major shocker, yet this win barely even qualified as an upset. That might be the most incredible thing of all about the Trojans' downward slide, which will end with a minor bowl berth – and with more than two losses – for the first time since 2001.

"We came out there, and there was something wrong," USC safety Taylor Mays said. "It is very disappointing. It's almost sickening. To be a senior and leave a legacy like this, it's sickening."

Luck soundly outplayed fellow freshman quarterback Matt Barkley, while Gerhart steamrolled the once-vaunted USC defense. Stanford piled it on late, scoring four touchdowns in the fourth quarter after leading 28-21.

And the Cardinal did it on USC's homecoming, no less, in front of 90,071 somnolent fans.

"We were just consistent," Luck said. "Starting fast in both halves really helped us. Once we got rolling, we kept doing good things. "

Two weeks after USC's 47-20 loss at Oregon, the Trojans' defense was again embarrassed, giving up 469 yards.

Barkley went 21 of 31 for 196 yards with three interceptions in his third straight unimpressive game for the Trojans. Carroll has stuck with the freshman all season, but Barkley made turnovers on USC's first two drives to put the Trojans in an early 14-0 hole.

When Sherman jumped on Barkley's short pass and returned it down the USC sideline to put the Cardinal up 42-21, Coliseum fans headed for the exits with unfamiliar emotions.

"This isn't what we grew up watching," Barkley said. "I'm not used to this. ... I don't know what to think right now."

Joe McKnight rushed for 142 yards and a score for the Trojans, who fell behind 21-7 at halftime without top receiver Damian Williams, who has a sprained ankle. Brice Butler caught a scoring pass among his six catches for 96 yards, but USC's offense rarely found a rhythm after its first drive ended in a fumble by Barkley deep in Stanford territory.

Although USC kept it close through three quarters, the fourth was a long celebration for the Stanford band, a small cheering section and the players who already are bowl-eligible for the first time since 2001. After Gerhart's third touchdown, Stanford coach Jim Harbaugh even attempted a 2-point conversion, but USC stopped the try at the goal line.

Harbaugh's explanation for trying to pile on a couple more points: "I just honestly thought there was an opportunity coming off the ball, the way our backs were running and the way we were playing."

Said Carroll: "I don't know what they were thinking with that, but in that situation, they get to do whatever they want."

Few of the Cardinal's key players remain from their 2007 upset. Tavita Pritchard, the backup quarterback who led that 2007 victory, watched most of this game wearing a headset before playing the final minutes of the blowout.

The 2007 Cardinal couldn't even manage a winning season, but these Cardinal still have a shot at the Rose Bowl. Stanford finishes its Pac-10 season against California next weekend and would need some help to take the title.

"It's just an overwhelming feeling now," Luck said.

LOS ANGELES — While Toby Gerhart rampaged through the Southern California defense in an awfully quiet Coliseum, the star tailback and his Cardinal teammates flattened a bunch of recent college f...
LOS ANGELES — While Toby Gerhart rampaged through the Southern California defense in an awfully quiet Coliseum, the star tailback and his Cardinal teammates flattened a bunch of recent college f...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
22
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Forester I'm a Fan of Forester 95 fans permalink
photo

So coach Harbaugh, what's your deal?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 11/15/2009
- novowel4me I'm a Fan of novowel4me 2 fans permalink

In 1966 Notre Dame beat USC 51 - 0 afterward coach John McKay walked into the locker room looked around took a puff on his cigar and said "there are six hundred million chinese who never knew this game was played".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

USC will be back but will Stanford?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 11/15/2009
- local21 I'm a Fan of local21 9 fans permalink

That's one way to shut the USC band up.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 11/15/2009

Great job, Stanford. So nice to see these elite programs go down every once in a while.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 11/15/2009
- seroquel I'm a Fan of seroquel 12 fans permalink
photo

I live in L.A., and personally don't watch college football anymore. Having a computer basically decide who plays for a "championship" has ruined it for me.

That being said, and risking to be called a "hater", I can't stand USC. Not because they are a good team, but they display a measure of arrogance I think is unwarranted. Why? Nobody has actually played for a championship since the BCS started deciding who plays and who doesn't. Bowls mean nothing now, and there's so many of them that they're boring(yes, there have been exceptions-Boise State)

Can anyone honestly say that the BCS "Championship" actually goes to the two best teams? Until a playoff system is installed, we'll never truly know who is the best team in college football.

I will say it here: The SEC would probably win a majority of titles in a playoff system. But, we'll never know, will we?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 11/15/2009
- Buffington I'm a Fan of Buffington 3 fans permalink

Nope. Never will. I do believe, however, that the Pac 10 could stand up nicely against the SEC. But I guess we'll never know.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 11/15/2009
- WCwill I'm a Fan of WCwill 4 fans permalink

Mythical national championships mean nothing. Some teams who are vastly improved by the end of the year will never get a chance to play in the championship game because of an early loss or two.
Imagine if at the end of the NCAA basketball season, the champion is decided by the votes of writers, coaches and computer formulas.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

Ha! Forget 2012. THIS is a sign of the apocalypse.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 AM on 11/15/2009
- WCwill I'm a Fan of WCwill 4 fans permalink

It's not a "shock" win for Stanford over USC. Stanfort is a good team and USC isn't. The USC defense hardley exists anymore and Stanford has one of the nations best running backs in Toby Gerhart.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 AM on 11/15/2009
- mginla I'm a Fan of mginla 4 fans permalink

Wow. Trojans got a little taste of their own medicine. Stanford just destroyed them - a program on the rise for sure. Fun to see.

And I'm not an SC fan (can't stand the trojan sense of entitlement) but to call them overrated over the past few years is absurd - they've produced a ton of NFL guys and absolutely killed their non-Pac 10 competition.

The pac 10 was undefeated in bowls last year btw...its a vastly underrated conference.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 AM on 11/15/2009

USC got waxed. Losing their offensive and defensive coordinators to Washington was huge. Can't win em all. SC should be a lot better next year.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 AM on 11/15/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 152 fans permalink
photo

It's about time the rest of the Pac-10 started catching up. USC has got to be the most overrated college football team since Texas in the last 20 years. Both USC and Texas are legendary for their creampuff schedules. Put either of them in the SEC or Big-10 and it would take them 2-3 years to win their first game.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 11/15/2009

WHAT? USC had 1 of the toughest schedules in college football this year. USC doesn't play division 2 teams(unlike the SEC). The big 10? What? How many times in a row has USC beat Ohio State. USC beat Penn St. last year in the Rose Bowl remember. Please for the love of god respond. It will be like taking candy from a baby.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 AM on 11/15/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 152 fans permalink
photo

Who has USC played other than Ohio State? Sure, USC has lost to Stanford and Oregon. But then, Oregon was beaten by "lowly" Boise State who never gets any credit? Why because Boise has to take the leftovers, meaning Oregon was the only top 25 team on their schedule.

Look at the Georgia Bulldogs. Of the 10 games they've played so far, 8 of them were against top 25 teams, 3 of which were top 5 teams, including a number 1 ranked team. Georgia didn't play a non-Div 1 team until the 9th game of the season, and that was supposed to be a break after the most grueling part of their season coming off the Florida game. And guess what? Their final game is against 7th ranked Georgia Tech who made be the 4th top 5 team that Georgia has played this season if they keep winning and surprising Nevada knocks off Boise State.

I see USC as being like Florida of the last 3 seasons. Sure, they are good, but they aren't great by any means. The reason they are winning is because of a great coach. I guess that's why the vast majority of their players don't amount to anything in the NFL.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 11/15/2009
- iBlog4Fun I'm a Fan of iBlog4Fun 6 fans permalink
photo

palemoon
clearly, you know nothing about college football.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 AM on 11/15/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 152 fans permalink
photo

I'm sure I don't, lol, but I am a fan regardless of the fact that I've never played that kind of football. The other fact remains though, many women do like it and enjoy watching it. And they can even get very passionate about it, lol.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 11/15/2009
photo

OUCH.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 11/14/2009
- jde I'm a Fan of jde 47 fans permalink
photo

Time to break up Stanford.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 11/14/2009

I wonder if Pete Carroll thinks that Toby Gerhart is fast enough now after he ran for 178 yards ?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 11/15/2009
- Philclock I'm a Fan of Philclock 36 fans permalink
photo

Let this rare moment linger, for another week at least.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 11/15/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect