House Dems To Sic Watchdog On Fannie, Freddie

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - House Dems To Sic Watchdog On Fannie, Freddie stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11-16-09 03:37 PM   |   Updated: 11-16-09 05:17 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Fannie

House Democrats are working on a rapid legislative fix that would finally put an independent watchdog in place at the agency with authority over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks - which collectively hold or guarantee more than $6 trillion in mortgages.

More than six months ago, officials from the Federal Housing Finance Agency challenged the authority of acting inspector general Ed Kelley to continue to serve in that role. According to memos first reported by the Huffington Post, the officials claimed that Congress hadn't intended for there to be an inspector general overseeing the agency until President Obama nominated one. The Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel concurred and Kelley was stripped of his power.

In the meantime, Fannie and Freddie have lost money at staggering rates and continue to ask for and receive billions in taxpayer infusions. The size of the government-backed companies' losses, in fact, are in the same league as the amount of money that Congress would spend on the fiercely debated health care reform proposal year-to-year.

Congressional Democrats said Monday that they didn't intend for those trillions of dollars to go unwatched by independent eyes. "It was never our intention to leave oversight functions unattended," Steve Adamske, spokesman for Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), told HuffPost. "We're going to address this."

Rep. Dennis Moore (D-Kan.), chair of the panel's Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, intends to introduce legislation in short order that would remove any confusion as to whether Congress wants an acting IG, Adamske said. Brandon Naylor, a spokesman for Moore, said that the congressman was working closely with the Office of the Legislative Counsel to figure out the smoothest way to fix the situation.

That fix could move through committee quickly, as Moore's investigations subcommittee has only 15 members -- compared to, say, the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises, which has 50 members, many of them first- and second-termers, put there to fill their campaign coffers with industry money.

With GOP support, the bill could even move through the full House on "suspension" -- a parliamentary process which allows bills to be expedited -- after the Thanksgiving recess.

There is already Republican backing for such a move. Rep. Darrell Issa, the top Republican on the House oversight committee, was the first member of Congress to respond to the HuffPost story -- by calling for quick placement of an IG and an investigation into his earlier removal.

Story continues below
advertisement

On Monday, Issa posted letters to Ed Kelley; Alfred M. Pollard, general counsel at FHFA; Daniel L. Koffsky, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; and Gregory B. Craig, the outgoing counsel to the President.

Issa had different questions for each. He asked Kelley what investigations he was involved in when the agency came after his authority.

He told Pollard that it was "even more troubling... to learn that your office petitioned the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) to wriggle away from the oversight authority." He told Craig he was writing "to inquire about why the President is dragging his feet in appointing a permanent inspector general" and called on him to immediately appoint one.

On Monday of last week, HuffPost spoke to Kelley, who said that the decision by his agency had deprived him of his ability to investigate with any independence. When people approach with anonymous reports of agency wrongdoing, Kelley said, he often turns them away, as he would be unable to guarantee their anonymity because he works directly under the head of the agency.

"If someone approaches me now, with an allegation, I explain to them that we're not an IG's office," said Kelley, who is still with the agency but serves as an "internal auditor."

"Theoretically, the agency head could request me to reveal information that as an IG I would never reveal. So at this point it doesn't work well in terms of those people who want to come forward and make anonymous allegations," Kelley said. "It's just not the environment for that."

A week later, a HuffPost reporter trying to reach Kelley was instead redirected to the FHFA's public relations department.

It's not the job of an agency's PR shop to answer questions intended for its auditor, even one stripped of his independence. Perhaps appropriately, the PR shop didn't return a call.

House Democrats are working on a rapid legislative fix that would finally put an independent watchdog in place at the agency with authority over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks...
House Democrats are working on a rapid legislative fix that would finally put an independent watchdog in place at the agency with authority over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
57
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

Only six years too late.

NY Times, September 11, 2003:

"The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government­-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry."

Barney Frank, quoted in the same article, 2003:

''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee.

Chris Dodd on Fannie and Freddie, June 2008:

"These are viable, strong institutions," Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said at a Capitol Hill press conference.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 11/17/2009

watchdog begin!!!..­..the following is totally hear say....but all the same- i have to share this, because i was disgusted.
i am an acquaintance of a recruiter for Freddie Mac- according to this person...t­hings have never been better, this person was just promoted with a large salary increase- they are hiring & expanding.­....as the story goes, this person was never once, for one minute ever worried about getting laid off or downsizing­....accord­ing to this employee- all of hub-bub about them having trouble was just the news spin, for the papers- things were always ok in their neck of the woods, which is the HR dept?
i thought to myself really- your company has contributed to the crippling of our nation & things are just peachy....­.they just got a raise, a bigger home...how lovely to work for Freddie Mac- so anyone out there that needs a job.....ap­parently they're hiring, don't forget to check your soul at reception.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 AM on 11/17/2009

One more time, for who missed it the first time:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 11/16/2009
- lastep I'm a Fan of lastep 18 fans permalink

seems those so called "trolls" have more facts here

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 11/16/2009
- lastep I'm a Fan of lastep 18 fans permalink

Barney went for this? Oh yeah they are going to watch them now. The past is off limits.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 11/16/2009
- 31BlueDog I'm a Fan of 31BlueDog 46 fans permalink
photo

A Couple Years TOO LATE!!!!

But whatever ...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 11/16/2009
- liamd1 I'm a Fan of liamd1 11 fans permalink
photo

"In the meantime, Fannie and Freddie have lost money at staggering rates and continue to ask for and receive billions in taxpayer infusions.­"

nice, huh?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 11/16/2009
- Poboy I'm a Fan of Poboy 21 fans permalink

They, Freddie and Fannie, were Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs). That's when they were for profit entities where the profits were going to private investors. Now that they are government enterprises, the losses are going to the taxpayers.

When are Americans going to wise up? If the taxpayers can get the losses, why not get the profits? Or are you too afraid to be called a "socialist" to ask the question?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 11/16/2009
photo

Not only were the profits privatized and the losses socialized, but what is even more sickening is the current claim by the 'Big Government Solves Everything' crowd that more government would have prevented the toxic bundles from becoming the foundation of a derivatives bomb... Big Government was essential to the creation of the phony mortgage bubble. The government backstopped the mortgages through FM and FM- that was the insurance that gave the green light for the con artists of Wall Street to market all that garbage debt as a securities.

If the mortgage bundlers didn't have the government seal of approval on their garbage, the racket would have never produced the eventual systemic crisis, because the market naturally rejects weak paper assets. Government backing is what made them appear strong.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 11/17/2009
- Poboy I'm a Fan of Poboy 21 fans permalink

I generally agree.

Where I would add is but for the rating agencies that rated all that junk AAA this scheme by those con artists would have fallen apart.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 11/17/2009
- xtry51 I'm a Fan of xtry51 2 fans permalink

How about prosecuting them as the monopolies they are and dissolving them before they do any more damage to our economy. There is no reason these two should still be around....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 11/16/2009

Can't we get a different democrat from this district? Barney is too Barney for me, and I live in Burlington, MA.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 11/16/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 203 fans permalink
photo

Let the DeBushification of the US Government begin!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 11/16/2009
- billhodges I'm a Fan of billhodges 209 fans permalink
photo

-April 2001 the Bush Administration warned of red flags regarding Fannie And Freddie

-2002 Budget request warned that the size of Fannie and Freddie is a potential problem

-2003 the white house warning was upgraded to a systemic risk that could extend beyond the housing market

- Fall 2003 the Bush administration pushed congress hard for an agency that would regulate and supervise Fannie and Freddie

- Then ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, Barney Frank, pushed back, stating-“we are not in a crisis”.. and…“the federal government should be doing more to get low income families into houses”…and…“too many people had a sky is falling mentality"

-In 2005, Alan Greenspan stated: “Enabling these institutions to increase in size-and they will once the crisis in their judgment passes-we are placing the total financial system of the future at substantial risk”

-NY Senator Charles Schumer stated: “I think Fannie and Freddie over the years have done a incredibly good job and are an intrinsic part of making America the best-housed people in the world…if you look over the last 20 or whatever years, they’ve done a very, very, good job”

-In 2006 Senator McCain co-sponsored legislation for more regulation, on the floor of the Senate he stated: "For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac...and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market"

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 11/16/2009

Bill, you are correct, however back a few years, everyone in Washington was behind the deregulation that lead to the housing bubble. I do believe that Bush was early in warning about the trouble, but he was in favor at the start.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 11/16/2009
- Zeus9000 I'm a Fan of Zeus9000 32 fans permalink
photo

Darn, you beat me to the punch

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 11/16/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 203 fans permalink
photo

Conservative ideology- "Don't Do Anything..­. Just Talk About It!"

All that stuff you quoted... and yet conservatives STILL brought America into a Second Great Depression!

But of course that's going to happen- they've been following a radical, unprecedented, fraudulent, and now failed, ideology for decades.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 11/17/2009
photo

That must have all happened while they were aggressively investigating steroid use in major league baseball.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 11/17/2009
- Eidolas I'm a Fan of Eidolas 5 fans permalink

Oh great, now Frank wants oversight. Too bad he didn't feel that way a few years ago when the issue was first raised.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 11/16/2009

Why does he still have a job?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 11/16/2009
- deanfv I'm a Fan of deanfv 13 fans permalink

The state of Mass loves g a y people? Either that or they really really love incompetence.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 11/16/2009
- oldguydude I'm a Fan of oldguydude 17 fans permalink

Bawney is the single worst Committee Chairman in office today. Evidently Fancy Nancy still likes Bawney and approves of his performance.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 11/17/2009

As a fan of free markets how can we regulate Fannie and Freddie now? Last I heard not every American has the $500,000 house that they deserve.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 11/16/2009
- QueenMaedb I'm a Fan of QueenMaedb 2 fans permalink

"In the meantime, Fannie and Freddie have lost money at staggering rates and continue to ask for and receive billions in taxpayer infusions. "

Not true. Freddie has not asked for any $$ since the initial bailout.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 11/16/2009

Oh, that makes it better then.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 11/16/2009

I think they announced that they lost like $5B last quarter. They probably have enough cash from the original bailout to cover.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 11/16/2009
photo

they're only 20 years too late

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 11/16/2009
- billhodges I'm a Fan of billhodges 209 fans permalink
photo

Quite true!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 11/16/2009
- jayman54 I'm a Fan of jayman54 2 fans permalink

RIght. They are going to get to the bottom of this! LOL! Careful you don't stumble Barney Frank or Sen Dod.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 11/16/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect