iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Uninsured Patients Twice As Likely To Die In The ER: Study

CARLA K. JOHNSON   11/16/09 04:00 PM ET   AP

Patient

CHICAGO — Uninsured patients with traumatic injuries, such as car crashes, falls and gunshot wounds, were almost twice as likely to die in the hospital as similarly injured patients with health insurance, according to a troubling new study.

The findings by Harvard University researchers surprised doctors and health experts who have believed emergency room care was equitable.

"This is another drop in a sea of evidence that the uninsured fare much worse in their health in the United States," said senior author Dr. Atul Gawande, a Harvard surgeon and medical journalist.

The study, appearing in the November issue of Archives of Surgery, comes as Congress is debating the expansion of health insurance coverage to millions more Americans. It could add fodder to that debate.

The researchers couldn't pin down the reasons behind the differences they found. The uninsured might experience more delays being transferred from hospital to hospital. Or they might get different care. Or they could have more trouble communicating with doctors.

The hospitals that treat them also could have fewer resources.

"Those hospitals tend to be financially strapped, not have the same level of staffing, not have the same level of surgeons and testing and equipment," Gawande said. "That also is likely a major contributor."

Gawande favors health care reform and has frequently written about the inequities of the current system.

The researchers took into account the severity of the injuries and the patients' race, gender and age. After those adjustments, they still found the uninsured were 80 percent more likely to die than those with insurance – even low-income patients insured by the government's Medicaid program.

"I'm really surprised," said Dr. Eric Lavonas of the American College of Emergency Physicians and a doctor at Denver Health Medical Center. "It's well known that people without health insurance don't get the same quality of health care in this country, but I would have thought that this group of patients would be the least vulnerable."

Some private hospitals are more likely to transfer an uninsured patient than an insured patient, said Lavonas, who wasn't involved in the new research.

"Sometimes we get patients transferred and we suspect they're being transferred because of payment issues," he said. "The transferring physician says, 'We're not able to handle this.'"

Federal law requires hospital ERs to treat all patients who are medically unstable. But hospitals can transfer patients, or send them away, once they're stabilized. A transfer could worsen a patient's condition by delaying treatment.

The researchers analyzed data on nearly 690,000 U.S. patients from 2002 through 2006. Burn patients were not included, nor were people who were treated and released, or dead on arrival.

In the study, the overall death rate was 4.7 percent, so most emergency room patients survived their injuries. The commercially insured patients had a death rate of 3.3 percent. The uninsured patients' death rate was 5.7 percent. Those rates were before the adjustments for other risk factors.

The findings are based on an analysis of data from the National Trauma Data Bank, which includes more than 900 U.S. hospitals.

"We have to take the findings very seriously," said lead author Dr. Heather Rosen, a surgery resident at Los Angeles County Hospital, who found similar results when she analyzed children's trauma data for an earlier study. "This affects every person, of every age, of every race."

___

On the Net:

Archives: http://www.archsurg.com

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

CHICAGO — Uninsured patients with traumatic injuries, such as car crashes, falls and gunshot wounds, were almost twice as likely to die in the hospital as similarly injured patients with health ...
CHICAGO — Uninsured patients with traumatic injuries, such as car crashes, falls and gunshot wounds, were almost twice as likely to die in the hospital as similarly injured patients with health ...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 197
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:21 AM on 02/06/2010
My partner was hit by a car while riding his bicycle to work. He was severely injured with multiple cranial fractures and a full detachment of his facial bones from his skill, he had both LaFont 2 and a La Font 3 Fractures to his face, his eye socket was ruptured, and his ocular muscles were no longer supporting his eye.

Four hour after being admitted to this private hospital he was sent home with a prescription for morphine and antibiotics, none of his injuries were treated, all the ER did was take a CaT scan and stop the bleeding from his multiple facial lacerations, and they just released him into my care. We stayed home for 5 days like that just feeding him morphine, keeping him comfortable, but he needed emergency surgery. They gave me the phone number of a county hospital to call and make an appointment for him to have surgery. I called, and called, I gave him morphine, and I tried my best to keep him comfortable, but he still needed surgery, had he had insurance he would have had surgery that day instead of being sent home to die. This caused a ripple effect in his care and the neurological damage he suffered was not addressed for over a year and only after multiple behavioral episodes, it has been a long, painful journey to recovery, the journey was exacerbated by the negligent assessment care/release from the ER simply due to his uninsured status.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PatA
~~LONG LIVE JUAN~~
01:52 AM on 11/18/2009
This argument is a pretty good stretch for lots and lots of emergency rooms. I worked in Oklahoma and in no way did having insurance, or not, have anything to do with the quality of care a patient received. The admissions clerk took the information down and then a triage nurse did the medical intake. The chart progressed from there into the hands of a nurse and a doctor......a team of people.
Do you people really believe that a medical team who is working on someone who might possibly bleed out is concerned about their insurance?
07:12 PM on 11/17/2009
"This just in: Americans who aren't rich even more screwed than previously suspected."

So much for my plan to avoid wasting my money on private healthcare.
05:45 PM on 11/17/2009
Take a look and where Medicare is being ripped the worst by unscrupulous health care providers.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/10/health-care-plan-lifestyle-health-obama-health-care-bill_map.html
05:41 PM on 11/17/2009
What do these states have in common besides Obesity? Lots of Rebublicans!

41 Georgia
41 South Carolina
43Missouri
44South Dakota
45Ohio
46Kentucky
47Mississippi
48Oklahoma
49Tennessee
50Alabama
05:33 PM on 11/17/2009
Well there's a chilling thought.
04:01 PM on 11/17/2009
This is why they ask you for your insurance info BEFORE they treat you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justoverit333
make art not war
04:12 PM on 11/17/2009
That's exactly right. Insurance card please ... no insurance,
got sit down over there for about 8 hours. We'll get back
with you. Remember up in NY I think last year or the year
before, the woman in the ER died while she waited.
09:18 AM on 11/18/2009
IT IS AGAINST FEDERAL LAW for ERs to ask for insurance information prior to pt's being triaged/medically screened. the Emergency Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) http://www.insure.com/articles/healthinsurance/emergency-rights.html

If you know where this is occurring, REPORT THEM. They will be fined enormous amounts and can be CLOSED.
10:53 PM on 11/19/2009
While it is true that it is illegal to ask for insurance prior to being seen, this does not prevent emergency room personnel from finding out that you are uninsured once you are in the ER room itself.

I have seen this in action myself and am very appalled at the discrepancy in treatment I've received. Here, the insurance cards are asked for after your initial contact with either the triage nurse or the ER doctor (as is generally the case). As most of us have been in an ER, however, we know the hugely open situation. My treatment was very much accelerated and increased once I flashed an insurance card (from out of the area) that said 'hospital' across the front of it. I was given ultrasounds, x-rays, pain medication and treatments right there in the ER. Imagine my surprise when, a few years later, I am being seen in the ER with the prospects of an x-ray only to be told as I am filling out paperwork for medi-cal coverage for the visit that there's really nothing they can do for me. They did not want to even give me crutches although I had needed to use a wheelchair to get from the parking lot to the ER itself. This was an abrupt change from what they had recommended prior to finding out my previous 'hospital' insurance was no longer valid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pakaal
Pigs, in cages, on antibiotics
02:40 PM on 11/17/2009
Anyone who's tried getting emergency care already knows this. I've been shuffled off to the side because I didn't have insurance, and essentially harassed for the same reason, while folks with insurance went through to see the doctors.

I don't blame doctors or nurses for this, it's admin staff at the reception area who pick who gets seen first, I'm guessing they're the ones who've been told to never take "no insurance" for an answer.
01:07 PM on 11/17/2009
A friend of mine in the fingerlakes Region of NY tried to commit suicide. Another friend of mine and I rushed him to the local hospital. When they found out he was uninsured, they asked one of us to take responsibility for his bills. We said no. They took him into the emergency room, stabilized him and then sent him to another hospital that had a psych ward for the 72 hour observation period at around 11 PM. When that hospital found out that he had no insurance, they called me at 4 am to come and pick him up. When I asked why they were discharging him, I was asked if I was willing to cover his expenses. I said No. I was put on hold and the women came back on the line and stated that they did not consider him a suicide risk and they were discharging him. You didn't need to do a study to know that the uninsured get less help, everyone knows it; including those doctors who feigned shock and disbelief.
02:39 PM on 11/17/2009
For the cost of cable T.V. , a cell phone , and a new car payment people could have med. ins. Its a matter of priorities. My wife and I both make less than $9 per hr and can manage health care. We are living in an age were people want all they concider " nessessary" given to them, and want to spend their $$$ on toys. Take some responcibility for your own self and stop putting it on everybody eles.
03:52 PM on 11/17/2009
I bet you can't afford very good health insurance. Better hope neither one of you ever gets truly ill and finds that out. My husband and I have very good employer provided care. No lifetime limits, for example. I pay around 7K per year for it. It would be more like 15K without the employer contribution. Doesn't sound like you could afford it.

Funny thing is that I am more aware and more empathetic to people in your position than you are.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Repubnomore
04:30 PM on 11/17/2009
Not necessarily true.

Individuals who have lost their jobs and declined COBRA because of its cost only have a few months to obtain "credible coverage". Once this time period has passed, all pre-existing conditions no longer have to be covered by the new insurance company.

While you and your wife may make health insurance a priority, people with pre-existing conditions may never be able to afford coverage once an employer-subsidized plan has ended and the credible coverage period expired.

Not to mention that an individual's monthly unemployment benefits are close to the same amount as the cost of a COBRA plan for their family.

Not everyone can afford coverage. This is why we need reform.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pakaal
Pigs, in cages, on antibiotics
02:41 PM on 11/17/2009
Welcome to the Republican Healthcare Plan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:20 AM on 11/17/2009
Unconscionable. It is not only our right as a citizenry, but our obligation to uphold healthcare as a human right. It is not a consumer product...
10:34 AM on 11/17/2009
And dare i say it: Our Christian duty, for those who are Christians.

Or if not, our Islamic duty. I believe the Koran makes that quite clear.
06:41 PM on 11/17/2009
Show me that in our constitution. And if its a "right" then who are the sorry suckers that have to pay the trillions and trillions it will cost. Oh , I forgot we have a Pres. who just prints up more worthless $$$
07:11 PM on 11/17/2009
From the preamble:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Please note 'promote the general Welfare'.

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_America
07:25 PM on 11/17/2009
Jeffyboy, you just better not get sick. Then you'll learn how little your health insurance pays.
04:34 AM on 11/17/2009
GOT HOPE???
The insurance companies, Big Pharma, and the Banks have plenty of hope...

How about you America? Still think your living in a Democracy???

They couldn't care less about you...

What a effn joke this government is...

So go ahead and vote, yeah, you do that and then the congress will do what they please...

WAKE UP PEOPLE YOUR GOVERNMENT SELLS TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Imzadi
Proud Progressive for decades
06:40 AM on 11/17/2009
Maybe you should go to bed. These early hours make you very cranky.
05:59 PM on 11/17/2009
Here Here!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
03:09 AM on 11/17/2009
GWB: "You can always use the emergency room."
10:40 AM on 11/17/2009
And the Emergency Room will be happy to turn the bill over to a collection agency,garnish your paycheck or put a lien on any property you might still have.

Good luck paying the bill on what most Americans get paid.
11:06 PM on 11/19/2009
Exactly Durango.

While the ER is required to 'treat you' regardless of you ability to pay, the bill collectors have no obligation to you whatsoever and will take everything they can while sending you down the long winding road to healthcare induced bankruptcy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
03:06 AM on 11/17/2009
Good for Harvard: another nail in the current state of affairs.
02:05 AM on 11/17/2009
The article says that they don't know what the link is.....what good is that....

It's crazy to say well lets just give everyone healthcare....because that won't necessarily fix the problem.

The study seems to just group all the hospitals together which makes the study pretty much meaningless. Becuase you're introducing too much of a variable. What if a majority of uninsured people are living in poor areas going to poorly financed hospitals which cannot provide the same quality of care that insured people are going to in major metropolitan/suburban areas. In that case the stats would show the results mentioned above, but if you look at each hospital indivdually the results might differ.

To make a meaningful study they should evaluate it on a hospital by hospital basis. You can't compare results if they're getting different care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
03:07 AM on 11/17/2009
"It's crazy to say well lets just give everyone healthcare­....becaus­e that won't necessarily fix the problem."

Most of the free world would beg to differ. I'm sure you know that. You don't? Have you ever been outside America? Have you ever been inside it?
04:26 AM on 11/17/2009
I don't think you understand the huge error in this study.

It would be incorrect to assume the problem is the lack of insurance. If a majority of uninsured people visit underfunded hospitals that don't have the best equipment...having or not having insurance is a non-issue.

The article even makes this point. They admit there are too many variables.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:15 AM on 11/17/2009
UNLVGOP: "The article says that they don't know what the link is.....what good is that...."

People don't generally fix problems they don't know they have, so identifying a problem is the first step towards fixing it..

UNLVGOP: "What if a majority of uninsured people are living in poor areas going to poorly financed hospitals which cannot provide the same quality of care that insured people are going to in major metropolitan/suburban areas. "

Paragraph 6 of the AP story cited above ("The hospitals that treat them also could have fewer resources.") discusses exactly this point.
04:20 AM on 11/17/2009
But this study doesn't identify a problem. It is an incorrect assumption to say the lack of insurance is the actual problem. Because like the article mentioned, if a majority of the uninsured live in areas w/ poorly funded hospitals, then the lack of insurance is not the problem. The problem is the lack of funding for our hospitals.

The study should have been done on a hospital by hospital basis that way you can compare results. There are way too many variables in this study to really mean anything.
12:35 AM on 11/17/2009
I think there might be another correlation/causation problem here. Uninsured people probably wait a lot longer before going into the ER, same as with most medical care. The study would have to compare similar patients with similar diagnoses.

There might be another explanation for it, but of all the places in the hospital, the ER is the place least likely to look into your insurance status before treating you. So my gut tells me that this is more likely due to a difference in demographics/diagnoses/timing between the insured/uninsured, rather than a difference in treatment.
12:40 AM on 11/17/2009
probably true ......and yet that study will never be done
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
03:08 AM on 11/17/2009
I'm fairly sure that Harvard would have thought of that, don't you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:03 AM on 11/17/2009
The researchers took into account the severity of the injuries and the patients' race, gender and age. After those adjustments, they still found the uninsured were 80 percent more likely to die than those with insurance – even low-income patients insured by the government's Medicaid program
The researchers analyzed data on nearly 690,000 U.S. patients from 2002 through 2006. Burn patients were not included, nor were people who were treated and released, or dead on arrival.

In the study, the overall death rate was 4.7 percent, so most emergency room patients survived their injuries. The commercially insured patients had a death rate of 3.3 percent. The uninsured patients' death rate was 5.7 percent. Those rates were before the adjustments for other risk factors.
=============
Seems interesting to adjust the data for all of those variables. Is that statistically significant or necessary to arrive at the percentage of those dead with or without insurance?