• Home
  • Politics
  • Media
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  •  Comedy
  • Business
  • Living
  • Style
  • Green

Polanski Makes Bail, But Is Still In Jail

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Polanski Makes Bail, But Is Still In Jail stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BRADLEY S. KLAPPER | 11/25/09 11:15 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Roman Polanksi Bail

GENEVA — Roman Polanski has been granted $4.5 million bail, clearing the way for the fugitive director to move within days from a Swiss jail to house arrest and electronic monitoring at his Alpine resort chalet.

The justice minister said Wednesday she saw no reason to appeal the surprise decision by the Swiss Criminal Court. Polanski would have to remain in Switzerland as authorities assess whether to extradite him to the U.S. for having sex in Los Angeles in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

Ministry spokesman Folco Galli said the final decision on transferring Polanski to his chalet in the Swiss resort of Gstaad would be made "quickly."

"The 76-year-old appellant is married and the father of two minors," the court said as it considered Polanski's offer of a cash bail secured by his apartment in Paris. "It can be assumed that as a responsible father he will, especially in view of his advanced age, attach greater importance to the financial security of his family than a younger person."

The court said Polanski would be subjected to "constant electronic surveillance" at his chalet and an alarm would be activated if he leaves the premises or takes off the bracelet, adding that the filmmaker was still viewed as a high flight risk.

Polanski's lawyers Lorenz Erni in Zurich, Herve Temime in Paris and Chad Hummel in Los Angeles declined to comment. The Los Angeles County district attorney's office also had no reaction, spokeswoman Shiara Davila-Morales said.

The decision came as a surprise after a series of setbacks for the director of "Rosemary's Baby," "Chinatown" and "The Pianist."

The Justice Ministry ordered Polanski arrested Sept. 26 as he arrived in Zurich to receive a lifetime achievement award at a film festival.

Story continues below

Swiss legal experts had said earlier that Polanski's chances of bail were slim, and even U.S. authorities expressed confidence that a Swiss court wouldn't grant his release.

The court last month rejected Polanski's first bail offer of his Gstaad chalet as collateral, which the director claimed made up more than half of his personal wealth and would definitely guard against his flight because he has two children he must support through school.

The court demanded cash instead, and this time looked favorably on Polanski's offer of a bank guarantee and the threat of sacrificing his family's home if he fled justice.

"Cash is king," said Peter Cosandey, a former Zurich prosecutor. Still, he said he could "hardly remember a case where bail is granted to someone who isn't even a full-time Swiss resident."

A decision on extraditing Polanski to Los Angeles is still pending, and would also be subject to appeals.

For the duration of the procedures, it appears Polanski will be confined to his $1.6 million chalet surrounded by snowcapped peaks on the outskirts of Gstaad, one of the most exclusive winter resorts in the world. Celebrities such as Elizabeth Taylor and Roger Moore have called the town home, and it remains popular with celebrities and royalty.

Polanski was accused of raping the 13-year-old girl after plying her with champagne and a Quaalude pill during a modeling shoot in 1977. He was initially indicted on six felony counts, including rape by use of drugs, child molesting and sodomy.

Polanski pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of unlawful sexual intercourse. In exchange, the judge agreed to drop the remaining charges and sentence him to prison for a 90-day psychiatric evaluation. The evaluator released Polanski after 42 days, but the judge said he was going to send him back to serve out the 90 days.

Polanski then fled the country on Feb. 1, 1978, the day he was to be sentenced and has lived in France since.

Polanski claims the judge and prosecutors acted improperly. A California appeals court will listen to oral arguments from his attorneys next month. They will be urging the court to order a lower court to decide whether to dismiss charges against the fugitive director, whether he is present or not.

___

AP writers Alexander G. Higgins, Frank Jordans and Eliane Engeler in Geneva, and Balz Bruppacher in Bern, Switzerland, contributed to this report.

GENEVA — Roman Polanski has been granted $4.5 million bail, clearing the way for the fugitive director to move within days from a Swiss jail to house arrest and electronic monitoring at his Alpi...
GENEVA — Roman Polanski has been granted $4.5 million bail, clearing the way for the fugitive director to move within days from a Swiss jail to house arrest and electronic monitoring at his Alpi...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
300
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 pages total)
- HappyMarsden I'm a Fan of HappyMarsden 29 fans permalink
photo

This is a sad day for defenders of justice everywhere. But on a lighter note, a happy day for child molesters!

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 11/27/2009
- Harrier I'm a Fan of Harrier 13 fans permalink

The LA DA needs to let this go and go after real cases out city needs. This is a complete waste of tax payer dollars and time. When the victim is not supposing the DA decision,what is the purpose?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 11/26/2009
- DreamerWeaver I'm a Fan of DreamerWeaver 40 fans permalink
photo

I think the LA DA needs to be investigated. It is the largest department in the nation and there have been serious problems for decades. Someone please do a book -- or at least an in-depth jounalistic report. We saw the irregularities right on TV with the OJ trial. Prior to that, the biggest case was the Manson murder trial of Sharon Tate and others. There too, irregularities of glaring proportion. The same people involved in the Manson murder trial were also part of the Polanski case ....

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 11/27/2009
- picott I'm a Fan of picott 8 fans permalink

Happy Thanksgiving to y'all
from here in Singapore.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 11/26/2009
- James Ballard I'm a Fan of James Ballard 20 fans permalink
photo

2:00 PM CST

...Thanksgiving in Singapore. It's almost Kafkaesque !

Hey Picott, don't think we should waste much time on this one. Wait til the fallout; dust will settle everywhere !

J.B.
11/26/09

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 11/26/2009
- World Citizen I'm a Fan of World Citizen 34 fans permalink
photo

He was granted bail but is still in jail since the Swiss court is still waiting for the 4.5 million swiss francs.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 11/26/2009
- World Citizen I'm a Fan of World Citizen 34 fans permalink
photo

From Le Figaro : The article's headline is that Swiss gives green light to Polanski's freedom

It also says : The actress Mathilde Seigner, sister in law of Roman Polanski, was in turn praising the support of Nicolas Sarkozy: "He was great. And he is very supportive. The President has been very effective. "

I hope the U.S. court is listening. This is a disgrace.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 11/26/2009
- leeclayton I'm a Fan of leeclayton 13 fans permalink
photo

I guess it's back to "freedom fries".

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 11/26/2009
- picott I'm a Fan of picott 8 fans permalink

I'm interested in what else you find a disgrace.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 11/26/2009
- jackbutler5555 I'm a Fan of jackbutler5555 31 fans permalink

If Sarkozy was involved, the last thing he'd want is to have the involvement publicized. I suspect he was initially involved, saw that was politically cancerous, and backed off.

The sister-in-law's statement is hard to believe, but anything is possible. It may have involved his initial stance.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 11/27/2009
- Paulofer I'm a Fan of Paulofer permalink

Money is a factor if you are a famous rapist. in a couple of hours he will be free in France...

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 AM on 11/26/2009
- ramblingjohnny I'm a Fan of ramblingjohnny 10 fans permalink
photo

How close is that "Alpine resort chalet" from the French border?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 AM on 11/26/2009
- ramblingjohnny I'm a Fan of ramblingjohnny 10 fans permalink
photo

Just found out his chalet is situated 50km from the border with France! Unless they keep a really close watch he gone in 45 minutes top if he can do it by car. Maybe a one day hike if he have to walk.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 AM on 11/26/2009
- World Citizen I'm a Fan of World Citizen 34 fans permalink
photo

Yep, the french part of Geneve is not far from Gstaad. This swiss judge that granted the bail is a joke.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 AM on 11/26/2009
- World Citizen I'm a Fan of World Citizen 34 fans permalink
photo

What is going on, on the side of the U.S.? I don't understand the process of extradition but this delay seems a bit strange. Does this have anything to do with Polanski's hiring of a U.S. lawyer who is friends with Eric Holder?

The Swiss Ministry of Justice should appeal this bail decision. 4.5 million is NOTHING. Think of how much peoplein show business get paid and how much money they pour into one movie. This is NOTHING.

What kind of b.s. is this? "It can be assumed that as a responsible father he will, especially in view of his advanced age, attach greater importance to the financial security of his family than a younger person."

You bet he's attached greater importance to his family, this is why he has 'mortgaged' his engagement for another movie to get the funds for this bailout so he will once again skip town. He will be in France in no time to pay the people that have 'funded' this 4.5 million bail.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 AM on 11/26/2009
- jackbutler5555 I'm a Fan of jackbutler5555 31 fans permalink

Do you know what his net worth is?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 11/27/2009
- Furby2 I'm a Fan of Furby2 15 fans permalink
photo

Tragic. We're more than happy to throw stones at a famous pedophile, but where's all this indignation when there's a pedophile in our midst, an uncle, a father. Everybody clams up.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 AM on 11/26/2009
- World Citizen I'm a Fan of World Citizen 34 fans permalink
photo

Polanski is not a pedophile. Pedophiles actually engage in sexual acts with girls of 9 - 13 years of age.
He likes very young girls and although technically cannot be considered a pedophile, having sex with a girl that's 13 years of age when he was 43 years old, is illegal.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 AM on 11/26/2009
- Furby2 I'm a Fan of Furby2 15 fans permalink
photo

If pedophiles engage in sex with girls 9 to 13, and Polanski drugged, raped and sodomized a 13 year old girl, wouldn't that make him a pedophile? I'm just running with what you said. But you still missed my point which is that we let the pedophiles in our midst operate unchecked and we rain hate on the famous ones.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 11/27/2009
- tkondaks I'm a Fan of tkondaks 26 fans permalink

One aspect of the case that does not get enough attention: Polanski claimed to the victim and her mother that he was on assignment for Vogue Magazine and that was why he was photographing the girl. Well, Vogue at the time stated quite emphatically that this was the first THEY had ever heard about it and Polanski never had an assignment from them. Indeed, if Vogue had hired him, can you imagine how much Geimer, the victim, could have sued them for?

Polanski used the Vogue Shoot as a ruse to drug, rape and sodomize the victim. Indeed, he suggests that he did it with premeditation if he went to all that trouble to concoct a lie, contrary to what he claims that it was a spur of the moment thing. No, he planned it...obviously!

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 11/25/2009
- sexyrexy I'm a Fan of sexyrexy 22 fans permalink

Vogue Hommes have indeed used Polanski for shoots-- & one of his more f amous ones have been the photo spread of Nastassia Kinski before he used her for TESS..


also, fact was the mother was the one who introduced her daughter to Polanski.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 11/25/2009
- tkondaks I'm a Fan of tkondaks 26 fans permalink

Not for this one, though.

And what does the fact that the mother introduced her daughter to Polanski have to do with anything? Is that a license to rape and sodomize a child? Why bring up such a horrible thing?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 11/26/2009
- DreamerWeaver I'm a Fan of DreamerWeaver 40 fans permalink
photo

Fact was Polanski was looking for young models. That is fact #1.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 AM on 11/27/2009
- jackbutler5555 I'm a Fan of jackbutler5555 31 fans permalink

"Indeed, if Vogue had hired him, can you imagine how much Geimer, the victim, could have sued them for?"

Wouldn't that be a motivation not to admit they had an oral agreement with Polanski?

Polanksi had done major work with the magazine, without, he says, a written agreement.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 11/27/2009
- DreamerWeaver I'm a Fan of DreamerWeaver 40 fans permalink
photo

Jb5555

Questions about this go unanswered. A professional publication has records. Even without written agreements.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 11/27/2009

Hmmmm....the mother dropped her daughter off for a modeling gig, and somehow gets blamed for having a grown man take advantage of a 13 year old...how sad. For some not to see that he is in fact a rapist, and a pedophile is beyond me. He is what he is, no matter what kind of spin some want to put on it.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 11/25/2009
- MalloMel I'm a Fan of MalloMel 107 fans permalink
photo

The victim has forgiven him. It's not up to me, but in that case, I forgive him, also.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 11/25/2009
- tkondaks I'm a Fan of tkondaks 26 fans permalink

I forgive him, too.

Now, lock him up and throw away the keys!

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 11/25/2009
- MalloMel I'm a Fan of MalloMel 107 fans permalink
photo

That's funny :)

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 11/25/2009
- hypnotoad72 I'm a Fan of hypnotoad72 130 fans permalink
photo

Seconded. A society contains individuals, but while she can forgive, I don't want him free. While not likely, the thought of him being free to go hamper someone else's childhood and future live is the penultimate vulgarity.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 11/25/2009
- washlib I'm a Fan of washlib 49 fans permalink
photo

i guarantee Polansky will jump bail to his other house in....Paraguay!

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 11/25/2009
- ashisu I'm a Fan of ashisu permalink

Agreed. He's already done it once. Why wouldn't he do it again?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 11/25/2009
- jackbutler5555 I'm a Fan of jackbutler5555 31 fans permalink

Your 33 fans and I are expecting that escape to take place because you said so. Will he do it right away or wait until the Swiss guard is down?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 PM on 11/27/2009
- Albert Amato I'm a Fan of Albert Amato 27 fans permalink
photo

Saw a documentary where they interviewed Polanski's prosecutor in Santa Monica......He said he would have left the country as well because the judge had a plea deal and reversed himself to give Polanski more jail time than he had already served......and it would have been a death sentence for the way they handle child molesters in Chino. Also the mother of the 15 year-old girl gave him permission to be photographed in the nude to promote his career.....bad move on her part......I am not forgiving him just sayin that there .....
.......is always more to the story.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 11/25/2009
- DreamerWeaver I'm a Fan of DreamerWeaver 40 fans permalink
photo

There is more to the story but you're lying about the mother. That's cruel and cheap.
If you want to stick up for someone don't drag someone else down in order to do so.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 11/25/2009
- sexyrexy I'm a Fan of sexyrexy 22 fans permalink

why not?? she was the cataLYST..

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 PM on 11/25/2009
- Albert Amato I'm a Fan of Albert Amato 27 fans permalink
photo

Lying would assume that I made the documentary rather than reporting what they stated.
How well do you get on in life?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 11/26/2009
- jackbutler5555 I'm a Fan of jackbutler5555 31 fans permalink

Couldn't you have just said you're mistaken about the mother? Of course, then you wouldn't have been able to call him cruel and cheap. Not your natural style, anyway.

How do you know, by the way, what the mother gave Polanski permission to do? By what she said?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 11/27/2009
- tkondaks I'm a Fan of tkondaks 26 fans permalink

You really need to read thesmokinggun.com.

Read in particular the Grand Jury testimony of Samantha Geimer, the victim, and the transcript of Polanski's plea deal...then get back to us.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 11/25/2009
- jackbutler5555 I'm a Fan of jackbutler5555 31 fans permalink

Oh, and while one is at smokinggun.com, one should read more than just the articles that support a particular view point, right? Read the link to the only third party, objective report of the investigation -- the probation officers report.

And "then get back to us."

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 11/27/2009
- tkondaks I'm a Fan of tkondaks 26 fans permalink

As Jeffrey Toobin pointed out in his recent New Yorker article, the probation report may be the most outrageous part of this whole sordid affair.

The star-struck probation officer in effect PRAISED Polanski because he showed such sympathy for his victim. How? Why, upon learning that she was not taking contraception, Polanski withdrew from her v*gina and, instead, penetrated her an*lly!

I kid you not.

This is what the probation officer, Irwin Gold, wrote in his report:

"...the defendant who was, additionally, solicitous regarding the possibility of pregnancy."

Please, James Ballard, refrain from giving us your exalted legal opinion on these matters; you embarrass yourself.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 12/29/2009
- hypnotoad72 I'm a Fan of hypnotoad72 130 fans permalink
photo

Maybe she "gave permission" under duress. Neither of us was there, but if there's more to the story, then there's more than what you included. But we agree, we both want everyone to find the whole set of events. Not cherrypicked for convenience.

And a pity he didn't get that other sentence. He deserves it. Like I alluded to in my other post, because of what happened to me as a kid, I have ZERO tolerance for this sort of thing. And, no, I won't forgive. Most of these sorts of offenders are inclined to repeat it. I'd be no better and might even feel complicit to forgive or let such a creep out early because he'd be likely to do it again. I don't want that on MY conscience.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 11/25/2009
- jackbutler5555 I'm a Fan of jackbutler5555 31 fans permalink

The mother said she didn't give permission. So, if she gave permission "under duress," she would be changing her story

I'm glad you don't want to "cherry pick." But what do you call it's "a pity he didn't get that other sentence?" You skipped the 'cherry-picking" and go on to he's guilty and deserves a longer sentence. I'd call that presumption of guilt.

I don't mean to be insensitive to your childhood experiences, but it seems to be interfering your ability to discuss this objectively.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 11/27/2009
- clloy I'm a Fan of clloy permalink

The girl was not 15, she was 13. And even IF her mother had been willing to pimp her out to pedophiles (which, from my understanding of the story, she was not) it would not in any way serve as a defense for the man who drugged, raped, and sodomized a child. The only reason there is "controversy" about this case is that Roman Polanski is famous. Our culture seems to have difficulty processing the fact that talented, attractive people can also be bad people. The law applies to everyone, as it should.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 11/25/2009

Are you serious?

Yeah, there is more to the story.

He likes/d having sex with underage barely teenage girls.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 11/26/2009
- janedoe31 I'm a Fan of janedoe31 4 fans permalink

1. I'm pretty sure that , re: 4.5 million dollar bail ... he will pay only 10% = $450,000.00
2. Because of his colour , race and $$$$$$$$$ = bail.....anyone else would be locked up tightly

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 11/25/2009
- MalloMel I'm a Fan of MalloMel 107 fans permalink
photo

We're talking about Switzerland here. Not the U.S.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 11/25/2009
- jackbutler5555 I'm a Fan of jackbutler5555 31 fans permalink

How do you know he's paying 10 percent. I realize that that's one a bailbondsman in the United States normally charges. But I'm surprised it would only be ten percent in this instance. Can you refer me to your source? I was under the impression (perhaps false) that all of this was his money and other assets.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 11/27/2009
- DreamerWeaver I'm a Fan of DreamerWeaver 40 fans permalink
photo

jb5555:

To reply to two of your posts below:

The DA reported that he was willing to strike a plea bargain because he had compassion for SG and did not want her to go through the trauma of a trial. Polanski agreed th plea to the lesser charge and a deal was made with the judge that the judge would be the final arbiter. I think with that, Polanski gave up his right for a trial when he chose to go along with the judge's decision.

Did the DA speak of his "compassion" after the fact with total honesty?
Can the Court vacate the former judge's ruling because of judicial misconduct?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 11/27/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with