EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Roman Polanski To Be Quietly Moved To Gstaad

FRANK JORDANS   11/26/09 04:09 PM ET   AP

Roman Polanski

GSTAAD, Switzerland — After two months in a Swiss jail, Roman Polanski prepared Thursday for the splendid captivity of his $1.6 million chalet in one of world's most luxurious winter resorts.

Polanski will have views of snowcapped Alpine peaks, spacious rooms and the all the amenities of a town with a reputation for catering to the wishes of the rich and famous.

But he won't be able to go out the front door.

In this isolated bastion of wealth – which Elizabeth Taylor once called home and Michael Jackson visited – the 76-year-old director will be placed under house arrest as soon as he posts $4.5 million bail, surrenders his identity documents and is fitted for an electronic bracelet that allows authorities to monitor his whereabouts.

The Justice Ministry declined Thursday to appeal a court decision granting Polanski bail, and said it would release him from jail while it considers whether to extradite him to the United States for having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

"He must not leave this house," the ministry said in a statement.

Should he violate the terms of release, the bail will be forfeited to the Swiss government, it added.

Even without stepping outside, Polanski's life will improve from the small detention cell he had in Zurich with a sink, toilet, television and storage compartment.

Gstaad (pronounced guh-SHTAHD) offers a range of quality restaurants and hotels, and "people here can order food to their chalets any time," said Marlene Mueller of the local tourism agency.

From the gourmet shop Pernet Comestibles, fine food such as fresh oysters, Swiss cheeses and a range of whiskies and wine can be delivered.

And, even though Polanski may now be the world's most famous fugitive, most locals are likely to leave him alone.

"You can get almost everything here, provided you've got the money," tourism chief Roger Seifritz told The Associated Press. "Locals tend to go to the big cities to buy things, but our rich guests can get what they want right here."

The village of 3,500 full-time residents has cultivated its image as a haven of luxury since Swiss boarding schools set up their winter campuses here for the children of industrialists and aristocrats a century ago.

The locals' relaxed attitude to celebrities is typical in Switzerland and especially pronounced in Gstaad, where a "don't stare, don't tell" mentality has lured stars such as Roger Moore and Richard Burton away from the limelight at home.

"We prefer discretion," said Mayor Aldo Kropf. "That's why people come here."

Polanski also will get the same treatment from Swiss police, who have vowed to handle his transfer quietly.

"We don't want to show him off like an exotic animal," Justice Ministry spokesman Folco Galli told The Associated Press.

The bail decision was a major win for the director of "Rosemary's Baby," "Chinatown" and "The Pianist" after a series of legal setbacks following his Sept. 26 arrest on a U.S. warrant as he arrived in Zurich to receive a lifetime achievement award at a film festival.

Polanski was accused of raping a 13-year-old girl after plying her with champagne and a Quaalude pill during a modeling shoot in 1977. He was initially indicted on six felony counts, including rape by use of drugs, child molesting and sodomy, but he pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of unlawful sexual intercourse.

In exchange, the judge agreed to drop the remaining charges and sentence him to prison for a 90-day psychiatric evaluation. The evaluator released Polanski after 42 days, but the judge said he was going to send him back to serve out the 90 days.

Polanski then fled the United States on Feb. 1, 1978, the day he was to be sentenced, and has lived in France since. He claims the U.S. judge and prosecutors acted improperly in his case, and his attorneys will argue before a California appeals court next month that the charges should be dismissed.

Despite ordering Polanski's release, the Swiss Criminal Court said it still considered Polanski a high flight risk.

That threat was underscored Thursday by Interpol's secretary general.

"Given Mr. Polanski's history of international travel while defying a judicial order, a $4.5 million bail and an electronic bracelet do not mean that law enforcement lets its global guard down," Ronald K. Noble said.

"Mr. Polanski has given us more than 30 years of proof that he does not feel bound to respect any court decision with which he does not agree," he said. "The world law enforcement community should do all in its power to make sure that the Swiss judicial process is allowed to run its course, and if Mr Polanski defies the conditions of his release, no country should welcome, offer safe haven to, or defend his conduct."

___

Associated Press writers Ronny Nicolussi in Winterthur, Balz Bruppacher in Bern, Bradley S. Klapper, Eliane Engeler and Alexander G. Higgins in Geneva, and Jenny Barchfield in Paris contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

GSTAAD, Switzerland — After two months in a Swiss jail, Roman Polanski prepared Thursday for the splendid captivity of his $1.6 million chalet in one of world's most luxurious winter resorts. P...
GSTAAD, Switzerland — After two months in a Swiss jail, Roman Polanski prepared Thursday for the splendid captivity of his $1.6 million chalet in one of world's most luxurious winter resorts. P...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 334
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
06:48 PM on 11/27/2009
He pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of unlawful sexual intercours­e.

He needs to be returned..

“Liberty means responsibi­lity. That is why most men dread it.”

~George Bernard Shaw
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:22 PM on 11/27/2009
@ "cylindric­al"
6:20 PM CST

...Refresh­ing...some­body other than yours truly quoting Shaw !!

Welcome.Th­ere's a few of us here who read. You'll be at home.

The Saint
11/27/09
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:18 PM on 11/28/2009
@ "cylindric­al"
1:20 PM CST
11/28/09

Quote :

"In each human heart terror survives
The raven it has gorged: the loftiest fear
All that they would disdain to think were true:
Hypocrisy and custom make their minds
The fanes of many a worship, now outworn.
They dare not devise good for man's estate,
And yet they know not that they do not dare."

-Percy Bysshe Shelly
from "Prometheu­s Unbound"
1820
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
08:19 PM on 11/27/2009
Great -- and very relevant--­quote!
jdrourke
Snark is good for the soul...
05:04 PM on 11/27/2009
Something tells me nothing about Polanski will be "quiet" for a while. Other than the spooning he'll receive in prison...

http://jdr­ourke.word­press.com/­2009/09/28­/seriously­-switzerla­nd/
04:49 AM on 11/27/2009
Interestin­g that this story also was quietly moved from this site's front page. And why the heck are these comments so heavily monitored? Half of my comments don't even appear because somebody is afraid to lose sponsors or something. Where's the freedom to expression­? Where's the lively discussion­. Everything­'s so darned PC on here. Disappoint­ing.
05:02 AM on 11/27/2009
Really. With all this "political correctnes­s" and "moderatio­n", how's a guy supposed to expand on his "only people of a certain religious persuasion­" conspiracy theory?
06:11 AM on 11/27/2009
I love the way you play it safe, like ur the cheerleade­r of some imaginery team. Too bad ur clever sarcasm is being wasted.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Caru
Politics is fun to watch.
02:19 PM on 11/27/2009
Aw, you think an ad hominem attack makes you smart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
08:23 PM on 11/27/2009
I often have the same problem, but I don't think it's anything to do with political correctnes­s. I find when I'm critical of the article itself, my comment usually doesn't make it. Does that imply that the monitors are the writers of these pieces? Does anybody know?
05:49 AM on 11/28/2009
Thank you. You are reasonable indeed. I'm sure this website's monitors are no different than anywhere else. Sometimes you have fanatics, sometimes you have fair people. We'll never know.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joye
03:15 AM on 11/27/2009
He should be staying in jail and have to remain there for the rest of his life. It's only because he has money that he is able to be at his house; house arrest; what a joke. The govt. should be ashamed of themselves for being so 'soft' on him....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
World Citizen
03:20 AM on 11/27/2009
Alas, Mitterand announced in September that United States is the country that should scare us. Now that we know that Sarkozy was instrument­al in getting the Swiss to grant this bail, then I should say that France, once again, exhibited two different kinds of justice, one for the rich and one for everyone else. It is France that shows a scary face to victims and litigants.
04:49 AM on 11/27/2009
Stop saying Alas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
07:57 AM on 11/27/2009
How do you know Sarkozy intervened­? Or is this a logical inference?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
World Citizen
02:05 AM on 11/27/2009
From an online french journal :

Detained since 26 September 2009, for the reason of raping a young girl of 13 years in 1977 in the United States while he was 44 years old, Roman Polanski became the beneficiar­y of freedon under certain conditions­. His sister-in-­law, Mathilde Seigner, said that he has received the support of the president of the republic and Alain Delon praises the 'activism of President Sarkozy'.

Voting :

12% Yes, since Polanski is french and he deserves the support of the president no matter what his crimes are.

84% No, since Polanski raped a young girl of 13 years after he gave champagne and a sedative (quaalude)

4% indifféren­t, since the girl did not refuse, and she is now 45 years old
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynnybug
01:32 AM on 11/27/2009
Remember Nastassja Kinski ? Check out how old she was when he was with her at almost the same time frame.(15)
02:57 AM on 11/27/2009
know how he met her?

read his autobiogra­phy-- what's more, she took him to meet Mother after.
03:07 PM on 11/27/2009
sexyrexy:
And we respect mothers ...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
07:58 AM on 11/27/2009
Kinski was legal in France.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:26 PM on 11/26/2009
OK! Let start the pool at +1 hour after release! I give good odd on Polanski waiting at least 12 to 24 hours before he make a car dash toward France.
04:52 AM on 11/27/2009
Of course. The Swiss caved. I'm giving up eating their chocolate! NOT!
07:20 AM on 11/27/2009
Calm down there, Borat.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
08:01 AM on 11/27/2009
Isn't there a French-Swi­ss extraditio­n treaty that would discourage such an escape? (I gather you don't believe in the efficacy of leg bracelets. Any basis for such a belief?)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
World Citizen
04:25 AM on 11/28/2009
I've read reports that said the electronic leg bracelet used by Switzerlan­d are the first model (old) are not very secure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
World Citizen
04:37 AM on 11/28/2009
Based on your other posts, sounds like you have a son-lawyer­, lawyer-son­...

I've been wondering what's holding the Swiss for turning Polanski over to the U.S.
Americans already filed the necessary documents with Switzerlan­d requesting his extraditio­n.

"Polanski cannot leave the chalet because the ministry is still deciding whether to extradite him to the United States for having sex in 1977..."

The swiss are sounding more and more bizarre... Why are they holding Polanski?
10:08 PM on 11/26/2009
While it may seem that he is above the law because of his fame, in reality, it shows that those who believe that their fame and money can abslove them from their crime are not as powerful as they believe themeslves to be. If it were not the case, Mr. Polanski would be a free man today, without any impediment to his freedom of movement. Though a regular Joe may not received the same treatment, Mr. Polanski is no different from a regular Joe whose freedom of movement is controlled by the legal system. Granted any imprisoned regular Joe would trade a 6x6 jail cell with a house arrest in a mansion, Mr. Polanski's case is a wake-up call to the rich and famous that the tentacled of the law can reach out and touch you, if there is a politica will to act.
04:58 AM on 11/27/2009
Are you kidding me? I wish I had HIS imprisonme­nt in France, and wherever else he's allowed to roam. I wish I could direct movies too and have beautiful actresses kissing my behind. He is above the law because he has powerful friends. That's reality.
01:38 PM on 11/27/2009
redtrogan:

I don't think you want the full measure of Roman Polanski's experience­s. For real reality ... stop and think, man.
06:17 PM on 11/26/2009
Goddammit. That's all I can say.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
08:03 AM on 11/27/2009
That's all, eh? Why?
01:43 PM on 11/27/2009
I encourage brevity, I don't question it. More please...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:49 PM on 11/27/2009
OK.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
02:25 PM on 11/27/2009
I have seen some long answers from you.
03:21 PM on 11/26/2009
Depressing­.
02:36 PM on 11/26/2009
Polanski's story, to me, is one that tells many, many women in our culture that we have made progress. Sometimes, watching women tear up other women makes one wonder.

But he will always be an icon of a Hollywood past that covered up the abuse of young women. Some still do. Whoopi, for example.

In the meantime, we've truly made progress. Rape is Rape.

And abuse is abuse.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
picott
02:56 PM on 11/26/2009
Whoopi's comment referred to the absence of brutality
that the med examiner stated.
If rape is rape, torture is torture, bad faith is bad faith,
ad infinitum.
photo
Fritzwood
en vino veritas
04:45 PM on 11/26/2009
Absence of brutality? He drugged her to get his way as she still pleaded no throughout­...what planet are you from? SSCCUUMM..­...
photo
skybar
history repeats the old conceits
05:50 PM on 11/26/2009
But is rape-rape rape?
02:03 PM on 11/26/2009
All of this because he didn't want to serve out the remainder of his 90 day sentence. For drugging and raping a child. What a pathetic weenie.
02:28 PM on 11/26/2009
You would have had no problem bunking down in Chino with the murderers of your wife and kid, right, tough guy?
06:04 AM on 11/27/2009
Everyone knows murderers don't go to Chino.
06:36 AM on 11/28/2009
Chino is a big place: He wouldn't be likely to be rubbing shoulders with Charlie Manson and Tex Watson even if they were there.
02:34 PM on 11/26/2009
No kidding. He's a very wonderful example of trying to run away, isn't he?
01:56 PM on 11/26/2009
i dont even care about roman polanksi, the girl he raped doesnt even care about this anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonani
A woman of substance
06:25 PM on 11/26/2009
A convicted rapists does not get to decide when he has had enough jail time. He needs to just man up and deal with it, like every other CONVICTED CHILD RAPIST.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
07:49 AM on 11/27/2009
If the judge were threatenin­g 50 years, you'd man up? Or, would you be practicing your French conjugatio­ns on the first plan out?
09:40 PM on 11/26/2009
If she does not care about it anymore, then she should return the money she received in her civil suit settlement­. She can't keep the money and tell the legal system that it was long time ago. If she did not think that Polanski did anything wrong deserving punishment­, may be the entire case should be reopened and she should be investigat­ed for filing a false police report.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jennyjen
11:05 PM on 11/26/2009
No one but the victim can say what she does and doesn't care about. It is absurd that a victim who moves on with her life and forgives her rapist should be investigat­ed for filing a false report.

It would be difficult for her to return the money because he hasn't paid it all to her yet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonani
A woman of substance
11:40 PM on 11/26/2009
Thank God nobody died and put you in charge of this situation.­..take the money back...fal­se charges... what the heck! It is patently clear that your moral compass is broken. Since when does the judicial system after having convicted a sex offender, let him off the hook because the victim said so? The man performed every sex act that he could think of on this 13y/o child whom he fed alcohol and drugs. What is wrong with you? Do you think that she was capable of consenting while under the influence? Even if she was old enough...a­nd she was not! Whoopee ought to be ashamed of herself defending his very sick man who probably has continued to offend against young children wherever he has spent the last few decades. Children are like crack to pedophile sex offenders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
01:39 PM on 11/26/2009
So the Swiss will get their bail money and Polanski will flee again to France.
02:11 PM on 11/26/2009
No, not this time. He would not be breaking some 1970s U.S. court order, but a very current European one. Even the French would have to arrest him and hand him over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
02:16 PM on 11/26/2009
Hmmm...is Switzerlan­d part of the EU?
01:12 PM on 11/26/2009
The rich are chosen by God. They are different from us. This man was caught once raping and giving alcohol and drugs to a young girl. Young enough that you could not use the mature for her age excuse. Being rich they did not have to. He is now in his own Chalet and will have to suffer having his champagne and caviar delivered to his house. The trials and tribulatio­ns of the rich and powerful. He has probably done all of the time he is going to do on this child molesting charge. Some news organizati­on should start looking for other young girls that may have been used and paid off. It is rare for a predator to quit after one time even if they got caught.