More

BofA CEO Search To Be Aided By Lifting Of TARP Pay Restrictions

SARA LEPRO   12/ 3/09 12:41 AM ET   AP

Bank Of America Ceo

NEW YORK — Bank of America Corp. has been having a tough time finding a new CEO willing to accept the restrictions that came as a condition of bailout funds. But recruitment is sure to be easier now that the bank plans to pay back its $45 billion in aid in just a few days to free itself from government oversight and pay restraints.

The bank said in a statement Wednesday it will use available cash and raise $18.8 billion in capital to repay the money, which it received during the height of the credit crisis last year and after its purchase of Merrill Lynch & Co. earlier this year.

Bank of America has been searching for a successor to CEO Ken Lewis since it announced in late September that he planned to retire on Dec. 31. But having accepted the Troubled Asset Relief Program funds, the bank has been under close oversight and had to answer to pay czar Kenneth Feinberg, which hasn't made the job very attractive.

"It removes the stigma that we've had as a company," spokesman Bob Stickler said of the planned repayment. "We become more attractive to a CEO candidate. Whether that means we get somebody external is impossible to say."

The bank has said it was considering candidates from inside and outside the company. Stickler said a decision is expected "in the near future."

"It's great news," said Alan Villalon, senior research analyst at Minneapolis-based First American Funds. "It removes some overhang so hopefully a CEO can come in with a clean slate."

Villalon said the effort to repay TARP might be a signal that the bank is focused on luring an external candidate.

Banking analyst Bert Ely agreed that the restrictions put forth by federal pay czar Kenneth Feinberg have likely been an obstacle to finding the best possible CEO candidate.

"There could be someone saying, 'I'm not going to take this job unless you pay back the money and get out from under the pay czar," Ely said.

The Treasury Department said in a statement it was pleased that Bank of America planned to repay the TARP funds.

The bank has paid $2.54 billion to the government so far in dividends on the TARP money. BofA said it is not yet exercising its right to repurchase warrants that the government received in return for the bailout money. Warrants are financial instruments that allow the holder to buy stock in the future at a fixed price.

Treasury said that the $45 billion repayment will release the bank from pay restrictions even though Treasury still holds Bank of America warrants.

Treasury has spent about $450 billion under the TARP program, including around $290 billion poured into banks. As of Oct. 31, nearly 50 financial companies have returned a total of $72.3 billion in bailout money. Other big banks, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Morgan Stanley, repaid their bailout funds after they were given permission to do so by the government in June.

Treasury also made $6.79 billion in dividends from the TARP money and $2.90 billion selling warrants.

Bank of America received $25 billion as part of the initial round of bailouts when the credit crisis peaked last fall. It then received an additional $20 billion in January shortly after it acquired Merrill Lynch and it was learned that the Wall Street firm had billions of dollars in losses that Bank of America did not anticipate.

The bank said it will issue $18.8 billion in what are called common equivalent securities to help fund the repayment. It currently does not have approval from shareholders to increase the number of its common shares outstanding, but once it obtains that approval, investors holding these securities will be able to swap them for common shares.

Bank of America plans to hold a special meeting with shareholders in the next few months to vote on increasing the share count. The company also said it plans to raise an additional $4 billion from the sale of certain business units in the coming months.

Whoever becomes the new Bank of America CEO will have to deal with the rising losses on loans that all banks are contending with. Consumers unable to keep up with their bills have been defaulting on loans including mortgages and credit cards.

Bank of America lost $2.2 billion in the third quarter. Its losses were offset somewhat by investment banking income from Merrill Lynch.

The bank is also still facing investigations from federal and state regulators into whether it misled shareholders about the Merrill Lynch deal, including the fact that employees were given billions of dollars in bonuses shortly before the acquisition closed Jan. 1. At the time, Bank of America was also seeking the additional $20 billion in bailout money.

____

AP Business Writers Stevenson Jacobs in New York and Martin Crutsinger and Daniel Wagner in Washington contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

NEW YORK — Bank of America Corp. has been having a tough time finding a new CEO willing to accept the restrictions that came as a condition of bailout funds. But recruitment is sure to be easier...
NEW YORK — Bank of America Corp. has been having a tough time finding a new CEO willing to accept the restrictions that came as a condition of bailout funds. But recruitment is sure to be easier...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:53 PM on 12/03/2009
Today Bernanke called for cuts in Social Security, Medicare. This is further proof Bernanke and the financial & technological elite want to destroy the middle class as well as every social program in existence so that the United States becomes a two tied socioeconomic system of creators and serfs.

hat tip to http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com
This assault on humanity must end. l
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
06:33 PM on 12/03/2009
Even then, CEO should not be excessively compensated - for job well done YES

but NOT when get the company into trouble! or loss = go back to the basics...

Excessive amount should be eliminated from corporate America!!!!

We need to be able to compete in global basis...
photo
Kache
Toodlum, wake up, I hear a prowler downstairs
01:06 PM on 12/03/2009
EXcellent! BofA is not using the $45 billion the way we need anyhow by loaning to small businesses. Make that $45 billion available to small banks expresssly for poaching smalll business clients from BofA.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DiogenesOfAlaska
Mitt Romney for president - of the Cayman islands!
12:56 PM on 12/03/2009
Mr. Ely claims:

There could be someone saying, 'I'm not going to take this job unless you pay back the money and get out from under the pay czar'

and this is supposed to be an obstacle to finding the best possible CEO candidate.

Let's just put it like this: for as long as banking analysts can claim and write and say such things and journalists will report it without the appropriate criticism, the system remains broken.

If there is such a thing as 'the best possible CEO candidate' (and there isn't, it's a bunch of horsecrap to even think that the notion makes sense) then it is a certainty that being the best possible CEO candidate is a property which depends very strongly on the stakes of those who you ask.

To act like this is not so is unworthy of a banking analyst and unworthy of financial journalism. The stakes of shareholders are not the same as the stakes of creditors, both are different from the taxpayer and customers and clients have still another set of diverging interests.

It's silly and biased to look for 'the best possible CEO'. To use that term proves that the speaker or writer knows NOTHING and understands NOTHING.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DiogenesOfAlaska
Mitt Romney for president - of the Cayman islands!
01:02 PM on 12/03/2009
It should be obvious to Mr. Ely that he is implicitly denying the rationale for the existence of the pay-czar. But the pay-czar exists for good reasons: moral hazard management.

The notion that the new CEO needs to be bought by a high salary is an exercise in myth-revival.

It amounts to denying all valid argument concerning the financial crisis that has been agreed upon in the past 18 months. It creates the impression that the low pay for Lewis was somehow degrading or a kind of punishment. That's nonsense. The pay cap must be in place to avoid sick risk taking. This has nothing to do with the persona of Lewis and applies to the FUNCTION of the CEO of BoA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StJames
In absentia luci tenebrae vincunt
01:46 PM on 12/03/2009
Lewis earned 1800 times what the average teller at BOA earned the year before he rode the bank to the brink. That B of A will be allowed to hire another such as he, speaks volumes to our inability to get control of this situation.

Your post is an excellent one Alaskan truth seeker.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DiogenesOfAlaska
Mitt Romney for president - of the Cayman islands!
05:02 PM on 12/03/2009
for this argument to be complete, I forgot to mention that for all practical purposes, the question of solvency of behemoths cannot be answered within the error bounds imposed by intransparency and irrational exuberance and overshooting of markets and indeterminacy of our knowledge about optimal regulatory capital levels.

Since this is so, moral hazard is imminent and any compensation of executives that remains unaware of the gamble for resurrection is a transfer of wealth which in the circumstances really does amount to looting.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
12:55 PM on 12/03/2009
I was reading on-line and got one of those will you please answer our survey pop-ups. It turned out to be BOA assessing its public image and testing out a new slogan. Apparently, we're supposed to think that BOA is a good bank. An honest bank. A bank that is out to help small businesses and the little guy.

It's going to take more than a new CEO and a slogan to turn around the image of this bank that helped wreck our economy and throw millions out of work.
12:40 PM on 12/03/2009
BofA;s board of directors need to put limits on ANY pay for someone who does NOTHING but cheat customers and sit on their backside.
11:45 AM on 12/03/2009
B of A is paying back the TARP money -- all $45 billion of it.

Once they've repaid the taxpayers, they can do whatever they want. If they want to pay a new CEO obscene amounts of money, that's their decision. Although I suspect their shareholders won't be too thrilled about shelling out millions for a single guy.
11:53 AM on 12/03/2009
I doubt the money is teh issue. In teh large scheme of things, even the obscene amounts paid to folks like Lewis is small potatos on the bottom line of a bank teh size of BofA. I think the issue was always uncertainty that accompanied TARP. The rules kept changing on a weekly basis for TARP recipients and that has to make teh job impossible. How can you be in charge of long term startegic planning when the rules of teh game keep changing on a whim when the latest senator decides he wants 10 minutes of press attention. It would be like an NFL team trying to hire a new coach but having to find someone who can also coach basketball, hockey, and ladies' freestyle basket weaving because the government might ccompletely change the rules tomorrow. And with SOX, you get the triple wammy that if you're not a qualified and competent Basketball coach because the government decided that your NFL team had to play by NBA rules, then you when those 10-K signings roll around, you can go to jail for not being qualified to sign off on assessments of how good your chances are to win your March Madness bracket.

Getting out from TARP allows BofA to say to teh CEO prospects that tehy are an NFL team, will always be an NFL team and won't suddenly be forced to be an NBA team tomorrow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Seipp
11:41 AM on 12/03/2009
"It removes the stigma that we've had as a company," spokesman Bob Stickler said...

Not really. Most people still think you are greedy, heartless jerks.
12:43 PM on 12/03/2009
better to be greedy than losers.....the banks are paying back the bailout funds.

wish we could say the same to loser ass companies otherwise known as GM and chrysler !!
12:43 PM on 12/03/2009
I think its a little late to worry about the public perception of their bank. :)

Its more likely that they are talking to their peers, who don't feel that they have done anything wrong and could care less what happens to the rest of us.
10:58 AM on 12/03/2009
hmmmm, lets see millions of Americans out of work, including myself, and they can'what they are willing find someone to work for them because of the "restrictions" of what they can pay. Well booooo frackin boooooo.

I have a plan to help poor ol BOA get back on track LOWER your APRS on your cards to 10% and target ALL CREDIT WORTHY people, like myself, and you would have more business then you would know what to do with!!! Stop charging insane fees at your banks and go back to being a BANK that deserves to be called bank of AMERICA!!

OH, and BOA that willl only cost you 100,000 you can wire it to my account . :-)
11:42 AM on 12/03/2009
but the good news is that BofA is paying back the TARP money ......then it can pay whatever to whoever they want.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
littlepuffycloud
I propose a toast to my self control...
10:37 AM on 12/03/2009
Why is ANYONE still banking with BoA??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Seipp
11:42 AM on 12/03/2009
Beats the F out of me.
12:44 PM on 12/03/2009
dont blame me. i bank with Chase !!!
12:42 PM on 12/03/2009
My thoughts exactly. I wouldn't touch them or Chase for anything.

I am glad that they are paying back the 45 billion and I would love to know where that 45 billion ends up.

That being said, I still want Glass–Steagall Act reinstated and "Too Big to Fail" institutions regulated and broken up.

If BoA falls under this, no matter that they pay back our money, I want them broken up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alessandro Machi
www.alexlogic.com
09:54 AM on 12/03/2009
The quote "There could be someone saying, 'I'm not going to take this job unless you pay back the money and get out from under the pay czar," Ely said......Is LAUGHABLE.

I am so tired of hearing how bankers will walk if they don't get a plus million dollar bonus. Walk and do what at the same time? Please enlighten us. Enlighten us and tell us where these brilliant banking minds, the same derivative whores who don't have a clue how to successfully enrich local communities, please tell us where are they are all going to go if they don't get their million dollar bonuses.
11:45 AM on 12/03/2009
probably just keep drinking champagne on their yachts
12:05 AM on 12/04/2009
Anyone who is even close to up for the job of CEO of BofA has no need to work. They will do it if they want to and the reward to commensurate with the hassle. They don't do it because they need a job.