More

HuffPost, TPM In White House Pool: Newspaper Reporters Gripe

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:50 PM ET

Press Pool

Hey, kids! According to Michael Calderone of Politico, a "debate" has been "sparked" over the "new [White House] pool rotation." This debate is raging, I'm sure, among the handful of people who are deeply invested in White House pool reporting, a subset of humanity that excludes the millions of Americans who are living their lives, happily ignorant of what "White House pool reporting" even is.

For the benefit of those millions of Americans, a brief explainer. There is this thing called the "White House Press Corps" and its members are more or less embedded at, duh, the White House. And they regularly question White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs in briefings, and are responsible for providing their news organizations with detailed reports about the president's actions and meetings and pronouncements.

This work also necessitates keeping account of the picayune details of the president's daily activities. But it's not economical to make every single reporter in the corps cover this minutiae, and God knows it would only take time away from their ongoing efforts to nail the Salahi party-crash story, among other pressing stories.

So, on a daily basis, one member of the print press corps has to shadow the president and compile a report about what time Air Force One took off and landed, when the president played golf and where the president ate a hamburger and what condiments he used. It can look like thankless work -- and crucially, it's mostly unnoticed work -- but it's an important part of press politesse, in that nominal competitors work as a team for the betterment of all. It's also the sort of work that lots of people would consider themselves lucky to get to do.

But, now, concerns have been raised about new pool assignments. And, yes, this is about to get somewhat meta. Per Politico:

...White House reporters have privately discussed and debated the recent addition of sites like Talking Points Memo and Huffington Post into the White House in-town press pool. It's not that reporters are criticizing the work of either Christina Bellantoni or Sam Stein, but some have expressed concerns about pool reports coming from left or right-leaning news organizations that will then be used by the rest of the press corps.

Let's note: When Christina Bellantoni does pool reporting for the right-leaning Washington Times, no one bats an eyelash. But when Christina Bellantoni does pool reporting for leftward Talking Points Memo... OH LORDY BE, MY GARTERS, THEY BE POPPIN'!

Stepping forward to lay out "concerns" is Peter Baker of the New York Times:

Baker said he has no problem with outlets like Huffington Post, which he described "an important part of the marketplace of ideas." But the site, he said, has a mission "to produce pieces with strongly argued points of view" and that puts the Times--or other non-partisan news organizations--"in a position of relying on overtly ideological or opinionated organizations as our surrogate news gatherers."

But no one in the debate has made clear exactly how "overtly ideological or opinionated organizations" might fail in the task of reliably recording the details that get written up in the pool report.

Calderone raises some concerns of his own:

But still, some White House reporters question that if TPM and HuffPost join, who might be next? Already this year, the pool has grown with the addition of Politics Daily, Salon and Ebony. (POLITICO joined in 2007, the same year of its launch). And there's likely to be more additions in the near future, including news organizations that may not even exist yet.

Who knows what these imaginary reporters will do, to the JOURNALISM, once they finally get around to existing? THE DEBATE RAGES.

But if you're out there still wondering what sort of shady shenanigans go on with White House pool reporting, I have some interesting examples which nobody (outside of the reporters who strive to take this work seriously) ever seems to be concerned about:

The press likes to engage in self-indulgent bitchcraft about the way they are treated!

August 27, 2009: "Pool Report 6," by Elizabeth Williamson, Wall Street Journal (excerpted):

The verdant entry to the entry road to the entrance of the Vineyard Golf Club is as close as we get to potus right now, colleagues. Given the deteriorating state of our bus toilet, a number of us have chosen to stand outside. So we are holding (it) for 18 holes and watching a very social woman from the club screen members as they drive in. She just told a woman dressed in pink and green that she needs to strip search her. She is joking--but what happens in the Vineyard stays in the Vineyard. Tourists/residents keep walking/biking up to watch and ask questions. But the secret service--and likely the bus miasma--is driving them off.

The press likes to pointlessly snark each other out (for freedom!):

May 13, 2009: "Pool Report 1," by Jonathan Weisman, Wall Street Journal (excerpted):

The one near-casualty of the departure was the Politico's Jonathan Martin, who, after a leisurely last-minute jaunt to McDonald's and a cool stroll to the press charter, left his one change-of-shirt on the Andrews Air Force Base bus. It was rescued and brought on to Air Force One by CNN producer Erika Dimmler for a tearful reunion in Tempe, no doubt. No word on his change of underwear.

To think that Sam Stein and Christina Bellantoni might upset the delicate balance of this super-serious journalism!

Finally, here's a curiosity worth noting! On July 4, 2009, pool report duties fell to a gentleman named Paul West, of the Baltimore Sun. He reported on the White House's Fourth of July party, from the vantage of a separated press pen. Here's what he filed:

Faces spotted at random in the crowd included AG Eric Holder, White House adviser Valerie Jarrett, press secretary Robert Gibbs (gamboling with his son on the big West Wing play set), social secretary Desiree Rogers, Obama chums Martin Nesbitt and Dr. Eric Whitaker, and Mike Allen of Politico.

Mike Allen, who is also a member of the White House Press Corps, did what reporters do with pool reports: repurpose them for their own reporting. But when Allen pasted West's report into his "Playbook" column, look at what he did (via Gawker):

File that away, Politico, if you're concerned about people using the pool report to be manipulative!

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

Hey, kids! According to Michael Calderone of Politico, a "debate" has been "sparked" over the "new [White House] pool rotation." This debate is raging, I'm sure, among the handful of people who are d...
Hey, kids! According to Michael Calderone of Politico, a "debate" has been "sparked" over the "new [White House] pool rotation." This debate is raging, I'm sure, among the handful of people who are d...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littleolwinemakerme
Put A Cork In It!
02:10 PM on 12/05/2009
No Sam Stein but Major Garrett is welcome?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jay Lewis
05:31 AM on 12/05/2009
A major problem is that the process of attrition to become clouty enough to take part as a journalist in direct White House coverage is that one must prove themselves "politically correct" in terms of real news coverage--to have proven themselves to be unconditionally compliant through tacit agreement to have many things agreed upon to be, for one thing, overlooked.

Who would consider, for instance, Amy Goodman as a candidate for direct White House coverage? Even Chris Matthews--a sold-out inside player who over-growls too often to simulate real investigative journalism, but in the end retreats to kissing, always, up--treats her like dirt on purpose. And she has one of the best shovels in this manure business.

"Politically correct" is a phenomenon of corporate America--political correctness is born directly from corporate mentality . . . it is, in fact, pure and simple, corporate-speak--so it is ultimately intrinsically a shaper of basic perception to fit into and seek the approval of corporate mentality, perception constrained to gain corporate approval.

Start with the universities. How do they teach "journalism" these days? Do they have a big pic of Ben Bradley on their walls, much like revolutionaries everywhere have a pic of Che?

While embracing the need to not become outright muckraking and engage in other salacious slants to gain personal footlights, they should be honed to be boldly feral, always looking for the best meat, going after the news much like hyenas tossing about a corpse.
08:56 PM on 12/04/2009
As The Stomach Churns.

Goodness, based on your report alone, I imagine these select pool reporter divas getting along famously with my 12yo whiny, drama queen daughter. Back when she was 12; today, she's in college and doesn't easily suffer fools or manufactured melodrama. Much like her mom.

That said, it is true that reporters are innately competitive, mostly for all understandable reasons. But occasionally that competitiveness turns into troublesome hypocrisy and paranoia. Some kinda crazy.

Guess this is one of those times.
08:37 PM on 12/04/2009
Heavens forbid, they are taken seriously. To prove it, that awful Anita women go Dunn in for going after them.
06:55 PM on 12/04/2009
Oh yuck, bus bathroom stinks info...We're holding it all day? Wow. All the while following the President? The cesspool is never-ending in Washington...even on the bus it stinks to high heaven.
Helluva job, who wouldn't be proud of their child, sent to the school of Journalism at great financial sacrifice and deep hopes, to read the sterling accounts of their "graduate" now in this high-honorable job at the White House?
That must be what raising a generation of entitled children bought us, we wuz robbed.
Thanks Matt, that was a good write-up. I'll bet you could write till the end of time the examples of slip-shod-slanted supposed non-ideological news releases.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Winning09
04:45 PM on 12/04/2009
I've read these pool reports. They are terrible. They can't get any worse.

And Politico is a right-wing rag.
03:48 PM on 12/04/2009
Hold up! Wait a minute! Politico of all the organizations is worried about ideology tainting the darn press pool reporting? Politico with its albeit unspoken acknowledgement that it leans right? Talk about the pot and the kettle. Politico needs to shut up and actually do some investigative journalism instead of just reprinting others stories.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
greysells2
grey cells matter
03:29 PM on 12/04/2009
To the newspapers reporters: Stop whining and start working.......working like the devil for your jobs. Some, possibly a lot of them will disappear in the not too distant future. Do some personal planning as to what you will do with your skills when your job is gone - foreever. Do some investigative work instead of parroting party talking points, interviewing flacks, writing on backround leads, reporting on each other, etc. The gravy train has left the station.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
01:46 PM on 12/04/2009
And there was a time when "telephones" were considered new thechnology!
The Internet news sources are dwarfing the traditional media. In the near future, there won't be any question about this. Rather, the question will be, "should the old technologies like newspapers, be included in the briefing? No one reads them anymore. Why should we bother?
12:44 AM on 12/04/2009
Good one, Jason. Loved that last bit.
11:22 PM on 12/03/2009
Original reporting is a step in the right direction for the Huffington Post. The Drudge Report should do the same. Anyone can link to someone else's work product or express opinions about events reported by others. It takes work to do original reporting, and do it successfully.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyTurn2020
mybigblackblog.com
11:07 PM on 12/03/2009
Is there anyone who really, I mean REALLY believes that there are any un-biased "journalists" in the White House pool, network, print, online, or local affiliate stations. Journalism has taken a major turn dating back to the tabloid shows of the 1980's (e.g. Current Affair, Inside Edition, etc.). The internet has just created additional competition but the issues are still present. The web-based reporters are a good edition.
11:37 PM on 12/03/2009
The web based reporters are legitimate, the other wannabes are imitators and should be shown the back door.
12:15 AM on 12/04/2009
The key is original reporting. There is little of it on HuffPost, or the Drudge Report, for that matter.
10:33 PM on 12/03/2009
What next? Hugh Grant on behalf of 'Horse and Hound' Magazine? Then again, why not?
HP is now mainstream in my opinion, so there's no reason not to include them. Best of luck, though, getting any WH staffer to say anything that is actually newsworthy.
10:07 PM on 12/03/2009
Lord forbid! Prediction..... Olbermann is next to be added to the pool. That will be the ultimate proof that lunatics have indeed taken over the asylum.
11:16 PM on 12/03/2009
Still smarting because FUAX SPEWS isn't taken seriously by the WH?
photo
goodog
Honk if you believe in a public editor.
09:39 PM on 12/03/2009
"OH LORDY BE, MY GARTERS, THEY BE POPPIN'!"

just what dialect are we getting at here?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimboy17
11:35 PM on 12/05/2009
Somewhere east of Vaudeville, and west of Albequerque.