More

Few CEOs Plan To Hire In Next 6 Months: Survey

CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER and DANIEL WAGNER   12/ 8/09 04:59 PM ET   AP

Economy

WASHINGTON – Few employers plan to ramp up hiring early next year, two surveys show – evidence that the economic recovery isn't likely to create many jobs anytime soon.

That will mean fierce competition for job openings that do exist. Nearly 6.3 unemployed workers, on average, are vying for each opening, government figures released Tuesday show. When the recession began, only 1.7 jobless workers were competing for each opening.

More of America's largest companies will shrink their staffs than will hire in the next six months, according to a quarterly survey from the Business Roundtable, a group of large-company CEOs released Tuesday.

Nineteen percent of the CEOs expect to expand their work forces, while 31 percent predict a decrease in the next six months, the survey found. That's slightly better than the 13 percent who expected to increase hiring three months earlier. At that time, 40 percent forecast cuts.

More chief executives foresee higher sales and capital spending compared with three months ago. But "it still will take some time for these gains to translate into more jobs," said Ivan Seidenberg, CEO of Verizon Communications and chairman of the Roundtable.

Separately, a survey of 28,000 employers by staffing company Manpower Inc. found that hiring may improve in the first quarter of 2010 compared with the current quarter – but any gains will likely be slight.

Manpower said its hiring index rose to 6. It was the first positive reading since the first quarter of 2009. Still, that's far below the 18 the index reached in the fourth quarter of 2007, when the recession began.

Economists say employment at large firms is likely to remain flat through much of 2010. Many companies already have hit their hiring targets for what's expected to be a weak and bumpy recovery.

"We're in very much of a holding pattern for 2010," said Brian Bethune, an economist at IHS Global Insight.

The National Federation of Independent Business said Tuesday that more small businesses plan to reduce employment than increase it. Only 7 percent of small companies expect to hire in the next three months, the group found. Seventeen percent expect to reduce employment.

In Washington on Tuesday, President Barack Obama made small business the focus of multibillion-dollar proposals to spur job growth and stimulate the economy.

Obama proposed a tax cut for small businesses that hire in 2010 and an elimination for one year of the capital gains tax on profits from small-business investments. He also proposed an elimination of fees on loans to small businesses, coupled with federal guarantees of those loans through 2010.

Employers cut only 11,000 jobs in November, the government said last week, down from 111,000 the previous month. And the unemployment rate fell to 10 percent from 10.2 percent.

Yet even as job cuts slow, there's little evidence in government data that hiring is picking up. The Labor Department's report Tuesday on job openings said employers posted 2.5 million jobs on the last day of October, down slightly from 2.6 million in September.

That might sound like a lot of openings. But it's far below the peak of 4.8 million job openings in June 2007. And there are many more unemployed workers hunting for work now. The unemployed population rose to 15.7 million in October, compared with 7.5 million at the start of the recession. That means there are about 6.3 unemployed people, on average, for each job opening. That's up from 6.1 in September.

William Beill, a partner at a law firm in Kansas City, Mo., said his firm is benefiting from the increased competition as it seeks to hire two or three new lawyers.

For the first time in his 17 years as head of recruiting, he's getting resumes from young lawyers who have graduated from Ivy League law schools and worked at prestigious New York firms. And Beill says a rising number of them are unemployed.

"We're seeing overall a much higher caliber of candidate than we've seen in the past," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON – Few employers plan to ramp up hiring early next year, two surveys show – evidence that the economic recovery isn't likely to create many jobs anytime soon. That will mean fie...
WASHINGTON – Few employers plan to ramp up hiring early next year, two surveys show – evidence that the economic recovery isn't likely to create many jobs anytime soon. That will mean fie...
Filed by Claire Schneiderman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:53 PM on 12/11/2009
As evidenced by these survey results, the unemployment crisis isn’t going away anytime soon. For many of the unemployed, this time has presented them with the opportunity to strike out on their own and pursue their passions. I work for Regus, a company with a history of supporting the entrepreneurial spirit and we’re proud to offer business people in Manhattan 2 months of free office space. To learn more and take advantage of this offer call 1-877-REGUS-01. Good luck to anyone striking out on their own! For more information visit www.regus.com/nyc. - Rebecca Tann, Vice President of Marketing for Regus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
11:42 AM on 12/10/2009
SAD YES!

This should be CEOs agree to cut their pays, bonus, perks to ADD jobs...
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
03:29 PM on 12/09/2009
Big businesses are not hunkering down so they can survive; they are getting rid of ‘Expensive’ payroll and operations within the US so they can move it to a Best Cost country.

Until we put some restrictions on the Free Market, US Corporations will not increase headcounts in the US. Why should they? They can get the same level of work, I hate to say it but it is true, while paying 10% in payroll. And they get all kinds of crazy incentives to do this from countries like China and tax breaks here in the states for sending jobs offshore.

Again why would they hire Americans?

But have you noticed how it is only marginally cheaper and this practice will ultimately wreck the consumer base here the US that allowed them to prosper for all these years.

I seem to remember a story that relates to this, something about killing the goose that laid the golden egg.
02:09 PM on 12/09/2009
... and you geniuses thought what ?
12:54 PM on 12/09/2009
When businesses can't predict there future costs with any certainty, they hunker down.

The same for individuals and family's with any amount of savings.

I could really use a new, newer car, but I have decided that it is better for me to park my funds into Tax Exempt High Quality Municipal and Industrial Revenue Bonds. Looking at the current activity in this market, apparently million's of other folks have come to the same conclusion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trevor Seitz
11:29 AM on 12/09/2009
These CEOs know the "market" so why would they hire now?

If you ran a steel mill and you knew you could run fine, maybe a little below your desired level, for the next six months and you knew that the steel price would be lower in six months plus the Gov't may help you buy that steel at that time, why would you buy the steel now???
10:59 AM on 12/09/2009
it;s unfortunate Obama is taking advice from neoconservative, globalist economists like Bernanke, Geithner & Summers instead of being more receptive to Krugman & Volcker.

hat tip to: http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com
10:54 PM on 12/08/2009
The thing is, if a CEO wants to keep all the profits, because its her or his business, then lets assume the CEO is doing all the work. When a business owner decides to hire contractors, employees and 1099 workers, these people are pulling their collective labor together, which makes it possible for business expansion. With expansion comes additional costs, expenses, profits and revenues. Inexperienced conservatives have this idea that only the business owner, or the CEO should benefit from business expansion, which may partly explain why some CEO's make 400 to 600 times what employees earn. What will happen to middle-class families, when CEO's begin making 1,000 to 2,000 times employee earning, or 10,000 times employee earning. Anyone for a "trillion dollar CEO." At some point, old fashioned common sense needs to kick in, CAPICHE!!
09:33 PM on 12/08/2009
Maybe we can all be part of the new Obama EPA Carbon Polluter police force, squeel on everybody who exhales.

Fidel will be his consultant on how to set it up.
12:59 PM on 12/09/2009
Damn it! You just stay away from my high powered Avanti hot rod !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
07:33 PM on 12/08/2009
The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein looks to be an interesting read.....................view pages on Amazon
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JanPoore
07:31 PM on 12/08/2009
CEO's should be more patriotic and do their part by hiring X number of workers depending on the size of their company. If every Fortune 1000 CEO hired 10 people at various levels, that would be 10,000 people with jobs. If smaller company CEO's would hire 1-5 people, that would be more jobs. It's a drop in the bucket but it's a start and a good faith action to help the country that allows them to be successful. It allows them to be part of the solution instead of part of the problem. Business people need to step up just like our military steps up.
08:22 PM on 12/08/2009
Hey Jan.. Maybe get some sort of education about how the economy works. Patriotism is really not in play here. It's called survival. Mom and Dad are not here to send money for the CEO's to cover the extra payroll tax and union wages for new extra employees just so they can be patriotic. First get a job before you make a statement like that... Better yet start a company and hire a few and see how hard it is to make payroll under the current IRS guidelines.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JanPoore
11:14 AM on 12/09/2009
I know how the economy works and you totally missed my point because you're being myopic. Second, at 63, I have had many jobs and have run more than one business. Many companies that have not been in trouble have cut thousands of job just to increase profits for shareholders, while the CEO's make up to $100 million a year. Their workers are doing the jobs of 5 people. This isn't a normal economy and it's up to business - especially large companies to do their part in getting the economy growing again. We are all in this together. But as long as we have selfish greedy people like you who don't have a big picture view, it's a struggle to grow the economy. If people are out of work, they don't have money to buy your goods and services. Supply and demand. And I wasn't talking about small businesses where an owner has 1, 5, 10 or 25 employees. In a company that has hundreds or thousands of employees, hiring 5 or 10 people is a drop in the bucket and there is work that needs to be done.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
03:22 PM on 12/09/2009
There was a time when patriotism did mean something.

But in this day and age big businesses are not hunkering down so they can survive they are getting rid of ‘Expensive’ payroll and operations within the US so they can move it to a Best Cost country. But have you noticed how it is only marginally cheaper and will ultimately wreck the consumer base here the US that allowed them to prosper for all these years.

Something about killing the good that laid the golden egg.
10:35 PM on 12/08/2009
The thing is, many inexperienced conservatives will claim: "THEY DON'T CARE HOW MUCH A CEO TAKES." in compensation. What's forgotten, is that the CEO cares very much what employees make. Executives will use spread sheets to track to the penny, what the payroll costs are for employees. Their payroll concerns diminish substantially, when it comes to doling out large bonuses and salaries for upper management. Some portion of money should be allocated to provide bonuses to company-wide employees, not just executives, its just plain old common sense. Currently, several wavering conservatives, who have never experienced members of their families being subjected to lay offs, let alone being unemployed for more than nine months, are beside themselves. Several former dyed-in-the-wool conservatives have moved into the politically independent camp, and it looks like another one is soon to follow. The thing is, "every man for himself" didn't work very well during the "Wild, Wild West," and it doesn't look like a return to that approach and philosophy would work any better this time around.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JanPoore
11:17 AM on 12/09/2009
Yet they continue to part of the problem, not part of the solution. Comcast is a good example. They are raking in money like nothing I've ever seen. The CEO could set a good example. Same with McDonald's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
07:30 PM on 12/08/2009
Methinks CEO's should go and more people be hired.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GerryS
There they are--
11:27 PM on 12/08/2009
yup,

and then more $ to the stock owners,

if the CEO is any good--------------
06:04 PM on 12/08/2009
BO.......you reap what you sow.
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
05:23 PM on 12/08/2009
Why would they hire? Corporate payrolls are down,profits are up and there is no great demand for increased services or products. It would make no sense to hire more people. In addition, this trend will continue to contribute to a decline in ages, and "good hires" will be cheaper than ever.

Many companies will come out of this is very good shape, employees not so. Welcome to the new world order. Just what the corporatists ordered.

Just remember..............there is no such thing as being over qualified. Under-employed yes, over qualified never. Under-employment is here for years to come.
photo
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
07:17 PM on 12/08/2009
But they still want a tax cut.
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
12:17 PM on 12/09/2009
Of course they do. They needtax breaks to invest in their overseas operations. You know, create jobs.