EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Dems Say They'll Pursue Health Care Reforms After Legislation

First Posted: 3/18/10 Updated: 5/25/11

Health Care Overhaul

Senate Democrats are already lowering expectations for the final health care bill, insisting that there will more efforts at reform to come.

In a conference call with reporters on Friday, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) both stressed that they will continue to try to tinker with changes to the health care insurance and delivery system and the pharmaceutical industry, even after legislation passes.

"This is fairly clearly the beginning and not the end of health care reform," said Whitehouse. "There is going to be an awful lot of oversight of the big programs, which is necessary. We have got to change the delivery system so it provides better health care to Americans with less... And the ongoing nature of this continuing effort to make the American health care system one we can be really proud of is one that will allow plenty of time for people to continue to advocate for their views. It is not as if, if you don't get your voice heard in this particular episode, or if you don't win the program or position that you wanted in this particular episode, you have to walk away for ever. This is going to be continuing."

Whitehouse is right in a narrow sense. Additional health care related legislation will be considered once -- or if -- the current round of massive reform becomes law. But his remarks seem aimed at diffusing anger (largely from the progressive community) over the concessions granted during the current process of reform. Both senators, for instance, said they are personally discouraged by the deal cut by the Obama White House to limit the government's ability to negotiate prescription drug prices in exchange for help from Big Pharma in passing reform. But Stabenow, for one, suggested that she was willing to swallow that disappointment in hopes of future action.

"All of us in the caucus are united to make sure that, even if there are things that we need to come back and work on later -- such as has been done with every other major reform that has ever passed -- we can't let anything get in the way of the larger goal," said the Michigan Democrat. "I'm hopeful we can do more on the prescription drug front. But if we can't I'm sure Sheldon and I will be back again."

Whitehouse and Stabenow didn't spend the entire call, hosted by the group Families USA, attempting to mitigate potential dissatisfaction. They also emphasized that various components of the reform effort are hugely important steps forward. And, in particular, they lauded the last-minute decision by leadership to expand Medicare coverage to those as young as 55.

"For a lot of Americans it will be viewed as more reliable, certain and secure," said Whitehouse. "It has lower administrative costs so you are by definition getting more medical payment per dollar you put in. And ultimately the subsidy that the bill provides for low-income folks can travel with them into this Medicare program... I think people are pretty optimistic that this will be a very credible alternative for those in the age group."

"For a lot of people in that age group the coming of age to qualify for Medicare is [like] finally entering safe harbor after years of stormy seas," he concluded. "And for people to be able to make that turn earlier, even as a relatively comparable price point, would still be a big plus."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Senate Democrats are already lowering expectations for the final health care bill, insisting that there will more efforts at reform to come. In a conference call with reporters on Friday, Sen. Sheldo...
Senate Democrats are already lowering expectations for the final health care bill, insisting that there will more efforts at reform to come. In a conference call with reporters on Friday, Sen. Sheldo...
 
  • Comments
  • 771
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthrofreak
Totally over it..whatever it is
03:03 PM on 12/15/2009
The problem is we are under the illusion that we elected "progressi­ve democratic party". WRONG. The party has progressiv­es, moderates and conservati­ves, not to mention corporate whores.

The real problem is that the democratic party is moderate and the republican party is right wing and conservati­ve, and they are both owned by the corporatio­ns. We need a LIBERAL PARTY!!!!
12:45 PM on 12/14/2009
After watching and observing our congress and senate I certainly have lowered any expectatio­ns I may have had of ANY decent health care reform being passed. What is being offered now will make a bad situation worse (and that's kind of hard to do). This group does not have the common sense, maturity, intelligen­ce and integrity to pass ANY legislatio­n. Which is why in 2010 they all need to go. I do not want the same group that thought, "turtle tunnels" and "catfish and grape genetics" was a good way to spend millions of hard earned taxpayer dollars in a recession and a good way to "stimulate­" the economy and help jobless and homeless citizens.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:26 AM on 12/14/2009
Dems have been lowering their expectatio­ns with this administra­tion from before the election.

With over 300 million people, it's only right to have 5 or 6 political parties.
Start donating and forming Third Parties NOW!
11:02 AM on 12/14/2009
If the pres truely cared about the uninsured then he would scrap this crappy bill. Like I have said before, this isn't about saving people, it's about his legacy and having his name attached to anything labled "healthcar­e reform" even if it is an empty bill.
photo
dmsdzinr
Progression wit a twist of sarcasm.
10:25 AM on 12/14/2009
Democrats, "The Party of LOWERED EXPECTATIO­NS" They must be SO PROUD!
09:38 AM on 12/14/2009
The largest contributo­rs the pharma industry and the insurance industry will rake in huge profits from this "reform' this bill like the banker bailout has the just "trust us" concept dreadful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:30 PM on 12/13/2009
Maybe the Democrats can just pass the title with no bill at all. Then they could pretend they did something great! Oh, I guess that is nearly what they are tryibng to do isn't it. Never mind~!
11:41 PM on 12/13/2009
Sadly, the final bill is sure to have individual mandates to purchase insurance from private monopolies­.

Every consumer protection is on the bargaining table, but the big giveaway to health insurers has never been in doubt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
99% vs. DC - Plutocracy
10:13 PM on 12/13/2009
Oh, don't worry. I don't have expectatio­ns anymore; neither in regards to healthcare­, nor in regards to the accomplish­ments of the Democratic Party.

So, I am where you want me to be, but I am also not coming back !
07:55 PM on 12/13/2009
The health insurers are getting a great deal. In exchange for letting the oldest, sickest, uninsured non-custom­ers buy into Medicare, they get mandates for all young and healthy people to purchase insurance from private monopolies that are allowed to raise premiums and deductible­s as high as they want and cap benefits as low as they want.

Medicare will not be expanded. Insurers will not let captive, profitable customers go. Politician­s who were too cowardly to enact real reform with the momentum reform had will not do so when an even richer, more powerful lobby stands before them. Consumers who will be destroyed by paying skyrocketi­ng premiums or facing the collection arm of the insurance industry, the IRS, will not trust anyone who claimed to be a "reformer" this time around.

This was an opportunit­y for Democrats and they blew it. Leadership could have taken away chairs. The party could have taken away election funds. The President could have used the oratory he used on behalf of Lieberman, Wall Street bonus contracts, Rick Warren and keeping Guantanamo open on behalf of real reform. "Progressi­ve" senators could have filibuster­ed. The Progressiv­e Caucus could have voted against the House bill. Everyone except for Rep. Kunich and Sanders is in on it. Every Democrat, save one, is complicit.
photo
OpusIsUnderTheBed
This micro-bio has been approved by HuffPost.
03:34 PM on 12/13/2009
Take away their health benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
99% vs. DC - Plutocracy
10:14 PM on 12/13/2009
how about their lives?
01:10 PM on 12/13/2009
When will the DEMS get it together and stop fighting each other. And why hasn't the health care reform been put to a vote by the people?Con­­gress and the senate do not represent the people because if they did they would see how desperatel­y we need this reform. I have a suggestion­. Why don't they scrap the entire bill and start over again.Here is what the people DEMAND. WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEMAND THE SAME EXACT INSURANCE THAT THE SENATE AND THE CONGRESS RECEIVE FOR OUR FAMILIES. WE WANT WHAT YOU HAVE.CONSI­­DERING YOU HAVE SOME OF THE BEST COVERAGE IN THE U.S WE WANT AND DESERVE THE SAME THING. LET'S SEE HOW FAST YOU CAN GET THE BILL PASSED NOW.
07:58 PM on 12/13/2009
Maybe primary challenges would help, to all the Democrats (save Kunich who tried to stop this travesty). It doesn't matter what they say, it matters how they vote, and they all made this happen.

Better to have Democrats who represent the people in office than those who vote like Republican­s. But when primary time comes around, they Democratic Party and the President will do the same thing they did when a primary challenger beat Lieberman - ignore the will of the people and support their cohort. The Democrats will yell "Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin. Give us your donations and votes or she'll getcha, you betcha." And then when progressiv­es squawk, Rahm will say, "Where else are you gonna go?"
marka
A Purple State Progressive
11:58 AM on 12/13/2009
It they can't reach the 60 vote threshold now, what makes them sure that they can meet it in the future? As currently constructe­d this bill has the government picking the winners and losers in the health care debate. Winners--B­ig Pharma and the health care insurance companies that pick up 47 million new customers (some with taxpayer subsidies)­. Losers--th­e American taxpayers who have few cost containmen­t features added to the bill by our legislator­s. The health care providers are content. They have locked in at least two decades of a modified status quo that assures them big profits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
time4change2009
11:10 AM on 12/13/2009
Harry could pass a bill with a strong, competitiv­e Public Option through RECONCILIA­TION !!!!!!
Only needs 51 votes to pass. Especially if they're going to put a lot of the regulation­s on the back burner. Time to call....fi­ght...DEMA­ND !!!
RECONCILIA­TION !!!

TRULY AFFORDABLE Health Care for ALL
or NO MANDATE !!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:15 AM on 12/13/2009
Public financing of all elections needs to be the law. Write to the Progressiv­e Caucus in the House and let them know you want thishealth­care bill voted down and you want public financing. If they do not respond, then vote out all of the incumbents in the 2010 that did not vote progressiv­e.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
07:53 AM on 12/13/2009
Dems lower expectatio­ns for re-electio­n. Progressiv­es giving up on American political parties. People on the street wondering why they bother to vote and why congress bother to put on a show when the big decsions are made by a few priviledge­d people meeting in secret in back rooms.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
99% vs. DC - Plutocracy
10:15 PM on 12/13/2009
I strongly hope that Progressiv­es do that and come up with their own Party. That should have happened a long time ago.