iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Senate Passes $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill

JIM ABRAMS   12/13/09 08:41 PM ET   AP

Health Care Overhaul

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Sunday passed a $1.1 trillion spending bill with increased budgets for vast areas of the federal government, including health, education, law enforcement and veterans' programs.

The more-than-1,000-page package, one of the last essential chores of Congress this year, passed 57-35 and now goes to President Barack Obama for his signature.

The weekend action underlined the legislative crush faced by Congress as it tries to wind up the year. After the vote, the Senate immediately returned to the debate on health care legislation that has consumed its time and energy for weeks. Senate Democrats hope to reach a consensus in the coming days on Obama's chief domestic priority.

The spending bill combines six of the 12 annual appropriation bills for the 2010 budget year that began Oct. 1. Obama has signed into law five others.

The final one, a $626 billion defense bill, will be used as the base bill for another catch-all package of measures that Congress must deal with in the coming days. Those include action to raise the $12.1 trillion debt ceiling and proposals to stimulate the job market.

The spending bill passed Sunday includes $447 billion for departments' operating budgets and about $650 billion in mandatory payments for federal benefit programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Those programs under immediate control of Congress would see increases of about 10 percent.

The FBI gets $7.9 billion, a $680 million increase over 2009; the Veterans Health Administration budget goes from $41 billion to $45.1 billion; and the National Institutes of Health receives $31 billion, a $692 million increase.

All but three Democrats voted for the bill, while all but three Republicans opposed it. Democrats said the spending was critical to meet the needs of a recession-battered economy. "Every bill that is passed, every project that is funded and every job that is created helps America take another step forward on the road of economic recovery," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said after the vote.

Republicans decried what they called out-of control spending and pointed to an estimated $3.9 billion in the bill for more than 5,000 local projects sought by individual lawmakers from both parties.

The Citizens Against Government Waste said those projects included construction of a county farmer's market in Kentucky, renovation of a historic theater in New York and restoration of a mill in Rhode Island.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a longtime critic of such projects, said it was "shameful" that so many had found their way into the legislation. Most Americans, he said, were watching football and not the Senate debate, adding, "If they knew what we are about to pass ...."

The legislation also contains numerous items not directly related to spending. It provides help for auto dealers facing closure, ends a ban on funding by the District of Columbia government for abortions and allows the district to permit medical marijuana, lets Amtrak passengers carry unloaded handguns in their checked baggage and permits detainees held at Guantanamo Bay to be transferred to the United States to stand trial, but not to be released.

The bill also approves a 2 percent pay increase for federal workers.

With the Senate concentrating on health care, attention on the upcoming jobs plan shifts to the House.

The defense bill that will be the basis for the package normally enjoys wide bipartisan support, but Republicans, and some fiscally conservative Democrats, are unhappy with the prospect of another jolt of deficit-swelling spending.

Congress must soon raise the debt ceiling, now at $12.1 trillion, so the Treasury can continue to borrow, and Democratic leaders are eyeing a new figure close to $14 trillion, pushing the issue past next November's election.

But a bipartisan group in the Senate says a higher ceiling should be tied to creation of a task force on deficit reduction, and House Democratic moderates say their votes could depend on winning a "pay-as-you-go" law requiring that new tax cuts or spending programs don't add to the deficit.

Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., on CNN's "State of the Union," favored a deficit task force. He said he didn't "see how this process where everybody kind of lards on is going to actually ever come to an end unless we finally have the discipline to do a straight up-or-down vote across the board on revenues and spending cuts."

Proposals to put people back to work include tax breaks for new company hires, small business tax breaks, public works spending and federal aid to states.

Congress is also likely to extend measures, included in the $787 billion stimulus act last February, that provide jobless payments and health insurance subsidies for the unemployed.

___

On the Net:

Information on the bill, H.R. 3288, can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Sunday passed a $1.1 trillion spending bill with increased budgets for vast areas of the federal government, including health, education, law enforcement and veterans'...
WASHINGTON — The Senate on Sunday passed a $1.1 trillion spending bill with increased budgets for vast areas of the federal government, including health, education, law enforcement and veterans'...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 751
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
01:00 PM on 12/15/2009
Now there is some responsible behavioral mentality in congress HUH !!!
11:27 AM on 12/15/2009
I'm tired of all this empty populist rhetoric by the Obama administration while so little is actually being done in terms of actions & results. Everyone is afraid to attack the culprit of this problem; capitalism for fear of being labeled a commun1st, a democrat, a liberal or even worse. ...
hat tip to http://financeopinionss.blogpsot.com

So we're stuck chasing our tails. In a month come earnings season we'll hear of the new record Goldman bonuses and the usual 'we're not going to gonna take it anymore'
01:54 PM on 12/14/2009
Great country we live in... the only ones who benefit from economic % stock market growth are the top 1-3% of earners. Middle & lower class are stuck with stagnant wages, surging gas & food prices, no retirement, and no job security (if they are lucky enough to have jobs).

hat tip to http://fianceopinionss.blogspot.com
How long can this trend of inequality continue? Sadly, forever. Even with Obama nothing can be done.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
12:38 PM on 12/14/2009
I am so sick of hearing that the DEMS are spending like there is no tomorrow. Both parties are doing that, just look at the earmarks. What on earth do we need earmarks for. When you make a budget include what needs to be included and nothing else. All extras should go by the wayside. To insert earmarks if a fallacy of the highest order, that is why we make a budget in the first place.
Someone needs to cover the cost for the wars LOL but it is the people of the USA that are okay with it
for some 52% of the people want military intervention in Iraq and just as many voted for the surge in Afghanistan. War mongers, the uneducated majority. Like the new piece of paper found now about Iran's nukes, it just so happened to fly into the newspaper to get published. And you can't smell
Iraq all over again! We have the government we deserve!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WorkhelpWorkhelp
Control your money locally. Charter banks now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:42 AM on 12/14/2009
31 million for NIH.
626 million for defense budget?
Hmmmm--something's wrong with this picture..................................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
06:36 AM on 12/14/2009
Yes....Something is wrong with this picture.

Those figures are off by one letter. It's BILLION with a B.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
03:59 PM on 12/14/2009
We should cut our military spending by 50%, we still would be spending more than the next 20 militaries combined.
01:53 AM on 12/14/2009
hahaha! I really shouldn't laugh at this because my generations is being screwed over, but politics is so FUNNY! I really hope that when reelection happens, there will be less of a Democratic majority. And less earmarks. What a waste.

Rather than, as the Republicans stated "spend uncontrollably," there needs to be a direct policy over how money given from the government to support something is spent, rather than just giving make-believe money to people and telling them to spend it.

And to the person who said something about more money needs to be spend on education, let me tell you something. It wouldn't work. If you want to constantly throw money at a system, only to have it irresponsibly used on non-specific purposes intended to ''further'' students' education, then you're an idiot. education must remain how it is, because no matter the attempt made to change it, it is too far gone to be changed. Those who find education important will succeed, and those who don't, won't. There will be a class imbalance for a period of time, probably longer rather then shorter, and the imbalance would be the educated and the non-educated. I don't really want to say where I see America's future heading with the current economical, educational, political and military unbalances there are, but let's just say I may take a few years... vacation, after I graduate.
12:40 AM on 12/14/2009
Well, lord only knows more money has to be spent on education, for America is in danger of becoming a nation of illiterates. It's already happening and it's pretty darn scary. The only good thing about Failin' Palin, the High Priestess of Dummies, is that she exposed the high number of people who cannot read/write or make sound judgements about what's going on in America today. Supporting a ding-a-ling like Palin speaks volumes about their lack of intelligence.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
austin4
BANNED.... 4.. LIFE
11:31 PM on 12/13/2009
Anyone who works for a living and can't donate at least $100,000.00 to the Republican Party. Is not a Republican, and the Party could care less about you or your concerns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
insidious
Socialist Progressive Liberal Independent Feminist
12:12 AM on 12/14/2009
Plus, they need to pass the Purity Test...don't forget that one!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
04:00 PM on 12/14/2009
Even Reagan would not be pure enough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mtracy9
11:24 PM on 12/13/2009
"America has a strong economy and a surplus.... Now is the time to reform the tax code and share some of the surplus with the people who pay the bills."
--George W. Bush, nomination acceptance speech, 3 August 2000

After the election of 2000, Bush and a Republican-led Congress reduced income taxes, with the majority of the tax cuts going to America's wealthiest individuals. With the introduction of Bush's tax cuts, the budget surplus immediately disappeared and deficits resumed. By the end of Bush's eight-year term, the national debt stood at $10 trillion -- double its level when Bush assumed office. And, as for the strong economy Bush talked about when he assumed the Presidency­..........

"This is an impressive crowd -- the haves and the have-mores. Some people call you the elites; I call you my base."
--George W. Bush, at the annual Al Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, 19 October 2000
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
insidious
Socialist Progressive Liberal Independent Feminist
12:10 AM on 12/14/2009
It's amazing how US citizens don't even realize the amount of wealth that shifted under Bush/Republicans. It's a crying shame! My hard earned money that was taxed lined the pockets of corporations CEO and lobbyists: the very people who didn't need it at all. Then, when people really need help, the Republicans complain about the deficit! The nerve!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mtracy9
11:22 PM on 12/13/2009
Ronnie RayGun said that deficits do matter and criticized Carter for them. Of course, Ronnie would become infamous for tripling the National Debt. Cheney changed Republican orthodoxy by saying that deficits don't matter. Cheney/Bush then went on to double the National Debt. Now that we have a Democratic President, Republicans are returning to the old orthodoxy, saying that deficits do matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sathosiel
06:42 AM on 12/14/2009
Actually the debt and deficits don't matter as long as the federal reserve and the petroll dollar system is in place it's a big scam, the federal reserve is a for profit bank it's in there intrest to print all the money they can and charge us as much intrest as they can.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
04:01 PM on 12/14/2009
Reagan increased the National Debt directly by 189%. Republicans don't seem to have a problem with that.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jrutle
War is not working.
11:10 PM on 12/13/2009
A $1.1T budget isn't out of line for the times we are in. Anyone worried about the federal deficit given the state of our economy likes their depressions deep and wide.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
austin4
BANNED.... 4.. LIFE
11:10 PM on 12/13/2009
Amazing how Republicans/Conservatives develop an acute case of Selective Amnesia, when it comes to the excessive spending of the Bush Regime and the Republican led Congress. Talk about a Delusional group of people.
11:03 PM on 12/13/2009
What the republicans/right wing teabaggers fear is that the Obama economic plan will work, sending the repugs into permanent minority. Republicans want what is best for their party - not what is best for our beloved country
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
austin4
BANNED.... 4.. LIFE
11:07 PM on 12/13/2009
You are so right, or should I say correct. FANNED!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluejoni2525
and we've got to get ourselves back to the garden
12:01 AM on 12/14/2009
Yes there is no doubt about that !!! fanned
10:50 PM on 12/13/2009
If the republicans are so concerned about the budget all of a sudden (after cheering on huge deficits under Georgie-Boy), let's reign in the $1 trillion that we spend on "defense" (in quotes because our "defense" is actually "offense").
10:56 PM on 12/13/2009
"let's reign in the $1 trillion that we spend on "defense""

Ahh . . . they could have . . . ever since 2006 when the Ds took control of Congress.
11:04 PM on 12/13/2009
in case you haven't noticed, there are enough so-called dems that repeatedly vote with the repugs
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
austin4
BANNED.... 4.. LIFE
11:05 PM on 12/13/2009
Why didn't the R's reign in the Defense spending?