iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Swine Flu Vaccine Recall: 800,000 Doses Of Vaccine For Kids Recalled

MIKE STOBBE   12/15/09 06:54 PM ET   AP

Swine Flu Vaccine Recall

ATLANTA — Hundreds of thousands of swine flu shots for children have been recalled because tests indicate the vaccine doses lost some strength, government health officials said Tuesday.

The shots, made by Sanofi Pasteur, were distributed across the country last month and most have already been used, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The 800,000 pre-filled syringes that were recalled are for young children, ages 6 months to nearly 3 years.

Dr. Anne Schuchat, a CDC flu expert, stressed that parents don't need to do anything or to worry if their child got one – or even two – of the recalled shots. The vaccine is safe and effective, she said.

The issue is the vaccine's strength. Tests done before the shots were shipped showed that the vaccines were strong enough. But tests done weeks later indicated the strength had fallen slightly below required levels.

Why the potency dropped isn't clear. "That's the $64,000 question," said Len Lavenda, a Sanofi Pasteur spokesman.

Young children are supposed to get two doses, spaced about a month apart. Health officials don't think children need to get vaccinated again, even if they got two doses from the recalled lots, said Schuchat.

Swine flu vaccine has been available since early October, and since then manufacturers have released about 95 million doses for distribution in the United States.

The recalled shots were made by Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccines division of France-based Sanofi-Aventis Group. The vaccine all tested fine when it was shipped out earlier this fall. But last week, testing of one lot showed that the potency had fallen about 12 percent below the government standard, Lavenda said.

The company found three other lots with diminished strength. It notified government health officials and did a voluntary recall, asking doctors to return any unused doses. The vaccine has been in high demand and the company doesn't expect to see much come back, Lavenda added.

Officials with the Food and Drug Administration, the CDC and the company all said they believe the strength of the recalled doses is still high enough to protect children against the virus. No potency problem has been detected in the same vaccine packaged in other types of syringes or vials, Lavenda said.

Experts have a theory that the problem is specific to the children's pre-filled syringes. For some reason, the antigen – the key vaccine ingredient – may be sticking to the walls of those syringes, said Dr. Jesse Goodman, the FDA's deputy commissioner for science and public health.

Another manufacturer, Novartis, in February recalled five lots of seasonal flu vaccine packed in pre-filled syringes under similar circumstances.

Sanofi Pasteur bills itself as the No. 1 manufacturer of flu vaccines in the world. It makes flu vaccine at sites in France and in Pennsylvania.

Swine flu was first identified in April. During the first seven months of the pandemic, it has sickened about 50 million Americans and killed about 10,000, according to CDC estimates.

___

On the Net:

CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/H1N1FLU/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

ATLANTA — Hundreds of thousands of swine flu shots for children have been recalled because tests indicate the vaccine doses lost some strength, government health officials said Tuesday. The sho...
ATLANTA — Hundreds of thousands of swine flu shots for children have been recalled because tests indicate the vaccine doses lost some strength, government health officials said Tuesday. The sho...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 535
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
03:36 AM on 12/17/2009
According to this blog there is no reason to panic.
I am a mother of 2 and really am obsessed with the Swine flu. I believe we should all get vaccinated because the other alternative is getting the flu!
"According to Health officials there is a major increase in the vaccination production." (h1n1 news from http:www.isrameds.com) I advise you all to find out if the vaccine is available to you at your city.
hope
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sheldon101
sheldon101blog.blogspot.com Wakefield transcripts
06:13 AM on 12/19/2009
It will be back!
------------------

The number of people getting infected has dropped drastically since the beginning of December. That doesn't mean that the virus is finished with us. There are still too many people who haven't (1) been infected and are now immune or (2) haven't been infected for the virus to go away.

So it will be back in force in either a few weeks or at the latest in the fall of 2010.

And now that millions of millions of people have been guinea pigs for the safety of the vaccine there is no reason not to get vaccinated.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:48 AM on 12/16/2009
This story has "just plain wrong" stamped all over it. Either the vaccines are "not strong enough" - in which case the children of course have to be vaccinated - or there is something much more significant wrong with the vaccines.

I cannot think how authorities could know the vaccines are "not strong enough" anyway. Whereas I can imagine all too well how they could know the vaccines are defective in some other way.

I smell side effects.
10:47 AM on 12/16/2009
As I understand it, authorities can tell how potent a vaccine is by testing how many antigens are contained in a sample of it. The level the CDC mandates for it is not the minimum necessary, merely them erring on the side of caution, as underlined by the fact that health officials don't seem to feel the need to revaccinate children who have already received this vaccine.

And I doubt that side effects are a problem, since the company doesn't seem worried about the fact that most of the people that bought it are probably going to administer it. Not to mention that reduced potency would mean reduced side-effects, and that the most dire side effects I've ever heard reliably reported for the H1N1 vaccine are along the lines of muscle pain, malaise, nausea vomiting, and *maybe* a .001% chance of developing the very serious (but usually not permanent) Guillain-Barré Syndrome, though the studies on that are inconclusive and the disease (which has around a .001% of afflicting anyone in the community anyways) can also be caused by the flu, so it kinda gets you coming and going. Of course, that's not counting allergic reactions, but that's even more of a case by case situation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:25 PM on 12/16/2009
The incidence of side effects doesn't necessarily have any correlation to the strength of a substance. If the side effects you listed are the only ones you've heard of, you need to review what happened with the H1N1 vaccines in the 70s. But what I meant was that I suspect side effects have already occurred and that's why the vaccines are being recalled. I don't know of any drug recall in the history of the planet that was done purely because of a suspicion that the vaccine was weak. If, however, the vaccine really is that weak, then the children who were inoculated with it need to be revaccinated, which they are saying is not the case.

This has all the earmarks of our government lying to us, and lying to us like we're stupid. I think I mind the latter as much as I do the former.
03:06 AM on 12/16/2009
Why does anybody need the vaccine any how unless they have aids? I have had many health problems and stacks of pills... blue red green and i am only 23... I got the swine flu with bronchitis and I didn't die. A few bottles of cough syrup and some norco and I was fine.
04:51 AM on 12/16/2009
Because you're in fairly good health, even with the bronchitis. And hopefully, you weren't allowed anywhere near any children, old people, anyone else who might have died from a strong flu, or in any areas where you might have spread it to a large number of people who could then have spread it to vulnerable people all over the town, city, state, nation or world, depending on where they went before or even after their symptoms became apparent, since the main purpose of vaccination is to prevent the *spread* of diseases through preemptive immunization.

Not to mention that one of the most deadly pandemics in recorded history was the Spanish flu, which is of the same family as H1N1 (avian flus) and killed millions of people all over the world, as recently as 1918, and which they never really developed a treatment for since it killed people so quickly.
02:33 AM on 12/16/2009
Now be sure to trust your CORPORATELY RUN F.D.A.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sheldon101
sheldon101blog.blogspot.com Wakefield transcripts
10:34 PM on 12/16/2009
I agree completely. After all, it wasn't some investigative journalist, some whistle blower or some safety concern that made this public.

It was the company that made the stuff that says the potency has dropped when it shouldn't have.

I'm glad we are in agreement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sheldon101
sheldon101blog.blogspot.com Wakefield transcripts
11:53 PM on 12/15/2009
Safety versus Potency
-------------------------------
The vaccine is produced in lots. Each lot of bulk vaccine gets tested for safety and potency.

The filled product, whether vials or pre-filled syringes also gets tested for safety and potency.

And samples of the lot get tested, over time, for safety and potency. Because the potency of the packaged vaccine can go down.

So they found that the vaccine lost potency and recalled it. That has nothing to do with safety.
11:39 PM on 12/15/2009
another government run health care success story!
12:59 AM on 12/16/2009
Fun fact: the company that did this is a mega corporation that isn't government owned, and pretty much the same people that you'd get most vaccines through even if it wasn't though the government, so your point is kinda nonexistent.

Kudos to them for realizing the non-lethal problem that apparently doesn't even require taking another dose and doing a voluntary recall, though.
08:35 AM on 12/16/2009
so the fact that the order was late to begin with, it circumvented the traditional flu shot production, and now it must be recalled. cant wait for my mammogram at 50 even though my mom had cancer at 42 and my sister had it at 32 and my niece might get it at 22. hey but the bureaucrats know best.

also the seasonal flu kills on average 46,000 souls every year and will most likely surpass the swine flu in casualties, meaning that the government panic did nothing to hinder the onset of either disease. notice i did not blame the insurance companies or the pharma(friends of obama) because left to their own devices the profit would have driven them to their own schedule and the flu shots for those who desire such things would have been in place from the beginning.

in fact it is exactly as i stated another government run healthcare success story, tongue firmly in cheek.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timhere
02:52 AM on 12/16/2009
recalling drugs that do not work is a success and the proper role of government. Maybe you should blame pharma
08:40 AM on 12/16/2009
see above.
‱ “A government that is large enough to supply everything you need is large enough to take everything you have”. Thomas Jefferson
‱ "Personal independence is a virtue, but there can be no independence without a large share of self-dependence, and this virtue cannot be bestowed" [by government] Frederick Douglass
10:11 PM on 12/15/2009
Not surprising. Many organic molecules interact with plastic in a similar way as they interact with lipids and other non-polar substances.

If the swine flu antigen is lipophilic, then it would stick to the inside surfaces of a plastic syringe.

This is the same reason why you can't beat egg whites in a plastic bowl. The whites react with the plastic as if it's made of yolk, preventing them from forming bubbles.

Next time, they should ship the vaccine in glass vials. Preloaded plastic syringes should only be used for emergency drugs (e.g. epinephrine) whose extended storage in plastic has been validated.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrsmdressup
100% snark
10:17 PM on 12/15/2009
Interesting. In Canada they weren't to be put into a syringe until they were ready to use them. Once a vaccine had been put into a syringe, it had to be used within 24 hours or it was disposed of.

Looks like single-payer universal health care works just fine.
10:21 PM on 12/15/2009
Yes, that would be a very sensible policy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sheldon101
sheldon101blog.blogspot.com Wakefield transcripts
11:47 PM on 12/15/2009
Not exactly.

US vaccines also came in a 10 dose vial. Each time a dose in needed you stick a needle through the rubbery cover on the top of the vial, fill the needle and put the vial back into the fridge if it isn't needed immediately. The vials are good for a few weeks. The multi-use is why you need thimerosal to prevent any stray bacteria growing in the vaccine.

Some of the Canadian vaccine was the same as the US in 10 dose vials.

98% of the Canadian vaccine consisted of a mixture of vaccine plus the adjuvant. Load a needle with the contents of the vaccine vial and squirt it into the adjuvant vial and shake. Result 10 doses of vaccine ready to go. The 24 hour limit on the mix has to do with the studies on the stability of the adjuvant.

A similar adjuvant MF59 has been tested and is added to the vaccine before it leaves the factory. Once that vial is pierced, the vial can be used for 28?? days.
10:06 PM on 12/15/2009
How do you recall a vaccine that has been administered?
12:54 AM on 12/16/2009
Vampire Lawyers, if that's not somewhat redundant.
05:06 AM on 12/16/2009
EDIT: Of course, you don't really need to bother, as the loss of potency doesn't seem to be enough to be a loss of effectiveness, according to the information provided by this article. Its just below the CDC's standards for it, thus its being called back (like how milk can sometimes still be perfectly fine the day after its expiration date, but you really shouldn't tempt fate if you can avoid it).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
satanlite
Liberal blogger
09:04 PM on 12/15/2009
The only "mystery" here is how some HP are gonna believe Sanofi Pasteur co. didn't deliberately use Americans as a test bed for new equipment or procedures.

Mystery indeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dham4201
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sheldon101
sheldon101blog.blogspot.com Wakefield transcripts
01:23 AM on 12/17/2009
NO VIDEO VACCINE RULE

I've a no video vaccine rule. I don't watch them and I recommend that no one else watch them.

Vaccine videos are great for fear mongering vaccination opponents. You get tons and tons of misinfomation faster that you can handle it.

Instead, slow down and get your anti-vaccination nonsense in written form. That way you can easily stop, realize that the argument might have some problems with it, make up a couple of search queries and learn what the other side has to say.
07:48 PM on 12/15/2009
Lame ! this administration has had over a year to get this right. incompetence the new excellence.
11:00 PM on 12/15/2009
Obama now works in French Pharm labs! And anywhere else something goes wrong
05:17 AM on 12/16/2009
No no that;s Bush's job. That's why we wrote plays and did movies on how to assassinate Bush.....how soon we forget.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lislbc
if only closed minds came with closed mouths...
06:30 PM on 12/15/2009
I'm no doctor but my command of the English language is pretty good - if " tests done weeks later indicated the strength had fallen slightly below required levels", then how is it true that (according to Dr. Anne Schuchat) the recalled shots of "The vaccine is safe and effective, she said."? Safe maybe (in her opinion, I wouldn't stick that poison in my arm much less a childs'), but effective? How far below fail is actually fail? Is that like being a 'little bit' pregnant?
06:38 PM on 12/15/2009
Ah vaccines don't protect you forever they strengthen your immune system for a few years then for the nasty stuff if your job has the hazard of being exposed to it you have to take booster shots on a set scheledue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lislbc
if only closed minds came with closed mouths...
06:41 PM on 12/15/2009
..... huh??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
satanlite
Liberal blogger
09:14 PM on 12/15/2009
You're casting pearls ...
06:44 PM on 12/15/2009
According to the article she only says "The vaccine is still safe"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lislbc
if only closed minds came with closed mouths...
06:45 PM on 12/15/2009
reread good sir or madam. The quote was verbatim. The article reads 'safe and effective'
06:18 PM on 12/15/2009
Another hyperbolic and misleading headline, HuffPost. If the objective was to strike fear in your readers and prompt them/us to click the link, nicely done. For me, it's just another reason why I no longer visit this site on a daily basis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
satanlite
Liberal blogger
06:49 AM on 12/16/2009
Keep your promises.
06:16 PM on 12/15/2009
Hard to recall once they are in the child.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
fcsakes
06:05 PM on 12/15/2009
Much ado about nuttin.
06:46 PM on 12/15/2009
Yeah, the headline made me think some horrible disaster had happened, like people had died from the vaccine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:52 PM on 12/15/2009
?????...you didn't know?