iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Citigroup Stock Sale DELAYED By Treasury Department

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:00 PM ET

Citigroup Stock Scandal

The Treasury Department is backing off its plans to help Citigroup free itself from partial government ownership after the markets priced Citi's shares below Treasury's cost.

Treasury was planning to sell up to $5 billion of its Citi shares at the same time the firm moved to repay some $20 billion in bailout funds. The key was issuing $17 billion of common stock. The troubled financial conglomerate felt confident that it could easily raise the funds from investors to start repaying taxpayers.

But Citigroup raised that money by selling 5.4 billion shares at $3.15 apiece, according to Bloomberg News. That's below the $3.25 price at which the government purchased its 34 percent stake.

The below-cost offer spooked Treasury, according to published reports, leading the government to back off its planned sale.

The bank told Bloomberg that Treasury won't sell any of its shares for at least 90 days. Treasury had been planning on selling all of its stake in the next 6-12 months after its initial $5 billion sale.

A leading bank analyst issued a report Tuesday questioning the bank's move to begin repaying TARP funds.

Citigroup was in a position to begin repaying taxpayers only because of the Federal Reserve's extraordinary policies adopted in the wake of the bailout, Christopher Whalen of IRA Advisory Service wrote in a report to clients. It was those policies -- not "any meaningful change or improvement in the financial condition" of the bank -- that made it possible for the bank to begin raising new funds through the capital markets. Whalen said the same applied to Bank of America and Wells Fargo.

Whalen also said the repayment would not improve Citi's situation, as it is still facing steep losses thanks to a basket of troubled loans and higher credit losses that won't fully hit the company's books until next year.

Citigroup has experienced $23.6 billion in credit losses through Sept. 30, nearly double the losses it had at this point last year, according to federal regulatory filings.

It also has about $60 billion in delinquent loans on its books, about a 58 percent increase from the same period last year, regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve show. The percentage of assets so delinquent they're no longer accruing interest is rising, suggesting that writeoffs are not far behind, further increasing the firm's losses.

UBS analysts told clients in a research note Monday that one of the "issues" with Citi's move was the fact that, "Citi's still losing money."

But perhaps most problematic for the firm is its dependence on foreign sources for funding. Foreign deposits make up 27 percent of total assets, or $510.4 billion, according to regulatory filings. Citigroup also has some $273 billion in foreign loans.

Without the protective layer of explicit government guarantees, like TARP, "important foreign constituencies may accelerate their migration away from" large U.S. banks, like Citi, Whalen wrote.

Already, two important backers have distanced themselves from the firm.

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, one of the world's largest sovereign wealth funds, is trying to get out of a commitment to invest $7.5 billion in the firm at an inflated share price, according to published reports this week. It filed an arbitration claim and is seeking more than $4 billion in damages.

That news comes on the heels of the Kuwait Investment Authority selling its stake in Citigroup. The fund turned a profit on its sale, but it's now no longer invested in the firm.

Whalen views that as a negative sign for the bank. "The Kuwaitis know what they're doing," he said in a recent interview.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

The Treasury Department is backing off its plans to help Citigroup free itself from partial government ownership after the markets priced Citi's shares below Treasury's cost. Treasury was planning to...
The Treasury Department is backing off its plans to help Citigroup free itself from partial government ownership after the markets priced Citi's shares below Treasury's cost. Treasury was planning to...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:01 AM on 12/17/2009
When you can't hose the oil despots (who will pay too much for anything)..you're pretty much screwed.
http://yieldpig.blogspot.com/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:22 AM on 12/17/2009
Let
The
Zombie
Bank
Fail

Stop pouring money down the throat of this dead beast.
12:12 AM on 12/17/2009
Thanks for explaining this.
If there were no taxes due because of losses, why is it called a tax break?]

- + New sonofsamphm1c I'm a Fan of sonofsamphm1c I'm a fan of this user 37 fans permalink
photo

It's being extended to the new owners - after we sell our 34%.

If they make a profit in the future, they can use the losses to offset it and avoid paying taxes - up to 38 billion in profit, or about 14 billion in taxes.

This could take years and years for them to do.}]

What is the purpose then of giving the tax break to offset future losses? It does not make any sense..
01:16 AM on 12/17/2009
Past losses, 38 billion, can be used to offset future profits - unknown.

Say Citigroup makes 2 billion in 2011. Without the tax break, they would owe 700 million in income tax. They can take 2 billion of the 38 billion in past losses, and zero out their tax return. The 700 million would disappear.

Then they would have 36 billion left to use against profits earned after 2011.

To use the tax break, they have to make profits in the future. To use all of it, they would have to make 38 billion in the future. Based on past performance, that could take a long time.
09:12 AM on 12/17/2009
Funny how the rich gets the incentive to perform well!

The government could have just taken over the bank , put new people in charge and demand a profitable turnaround!

So like i said before, however you slice it, CITI getting a tax break is plain wrong.
11:58 PM on 12/16/2009
sonofsamphm1c I'm a Fan of sonofsamphm1c I'm a fan of this user 37 fans permalink
photo

Seriously, why don't you just forget this pointless anger at the banks and get behind figuring out how we can rebuild this country's jobs. It can;t be done with banks.

Pandit loses his job. Big damn deal. Pandit keeps his job. Big damn deal. I can't imagine why on earth this could possibly matter to anybody. One way or the other, it's a great big zero in terms of importance.

Their CEO from the summer of 2008 lost his job.}}

So you are saying we are at the mercy of banks and just accept the status quo?
Billions of dollars giveaways are a big deal!
No it is not a great big zero if they get our money and turn back and increase the interest rates to 30%!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:53 PM on 12/16/2009
Citigroup Stock Sale DELAYED By Treasury Department...until tomorrow! Give me an effing break.
11:06 PM on 12/16/2009
Hurry Citi create new common stock to sell so you can buy back the government held preferred Citi stock shares so you can screw you stockholders and hand out big Xmas bonuses to your vampires.

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com
10:28 PM on 12/16/2009
Major bank in Switzerland just got fined for laundering money from I.ran into the U.S.....strange chain of events on that.
09:54 PM on 12/16/2009
The picture is very clear. The government sits helplessly by as the banks loot the treasury and move their operations overseas!
10:26 PM on 12/16/2009
with Timmy`s blessing
11:48 PM on 12/16/2009
What do you mean sits helplessly by!!!! Bush and now Obama , the senate , house of representative are helping and aiding the enemy to destroy our manufacturing , jobs and economy...

Obama and the democrats pass a bill to give billions to these corporations , foreign country and to the military for what ever they wish for while he enforces his so called paygo policies on Americans to receive their OWN TAX MONEY to help them in the disaster caused by them..

They are no longer innocent , but are willing and helping them to do this..
11:52 PM on 12/16/2009
nonsense. The bailouts started under Bush.
09:26 PM on 12/16/2009
"But perhaps most problematic for the firm is its dependence on foreign sources for funding. Foreign deposits make up 27 percent of total assets, or $510.4 billion, according to regulatory filings. Citigroup also has some $273 billion in foreign loans."

So our taxpayer dollars are propping up foreign deposits. Where are their countries' tax dollars being put to use?

Oh wait, I know.....TBTF...yeah yeah, I got it.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Just another hostage of the poopy heads
09:34 PM on 12/16/2009
Yeah, and more than half of the amount of its foreign deposits are foreign loans. Most of them to Dubai.
09:36 PM on 12/16/2009
Was that Dubai that just claimed it was out of money?
09:49 PM on 12/16/2009
Not only they got the bailouts but there were not strings attached to them, thanks to Paulson and a stupid public.
09:23 PM on 12/16/2009
Now the institutional investors will be willing to take the gov't out of their position. The IRS deal was necessary because the institutional investors are the only group able to buy the volume of Citi shares we tax payers own. There is no way we would have gotten out alive or at a small profit if the IRS crushed out Citi with a tax debt. At this point, there might still be some problems with toxic debt and so on, but to the degree the economy recovers Citi's problems decrease proportionately. This is not as complex as many have tried to make it appear.
09:24 PM on 12/16/2009
Why can;t they pay delayed taxes with penalty like all of us do?
The fact is CITI is holding the treasury hostage by getting TARP.
10:01 PM on 12/16/2009
You miss the point, they are carryover tax LOSSES, there is no tax due, and you and any individual can take advantage of the same carry over loss laws on your investment or business losses. Whether Citi lost 38 billion or your local hardware store loses ten thousand makes no difference, same law, same rules. In this case, the Treasury and IRS made a good call, and I am not an apologist for the banks. Yes, there was a special exemption made to not disallow the losses, but it had nothing to do with Citi being a big bank, it had everything to do with the fact that the government itself was the buyer - with bailout funds provided by our tax dollars. This explanation is a slight oversimplification, but the bottom line is that what they did will, hopefully, help us taxpayers get their bailout money back.
09:30 PM on 12/16/2009
Even in the face of making sense as a financial tactic...it still irks a lot of us that Vikram Pandit remains at the helm and beneficiary of all this maneuvering.
09:52 PM on 12/16/2009
Even in the face of making sense as a financial tactic...it still irks a lot of us that Vikram Pandit remains at the helm and beneficiary of all this maneuvering.]]

very true. Even when the CITI is failing, Vikram gets billions! It is crazy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joyf1
Glad I live on an island.
08:49 PM on 12/16/2009
My husband and I owned Citigroup corporate bonds. After they declared bankruptcy, we sold them at a loss since they suspended dividends and we needed that money to pay our $1531 a month health insurance premium!!!!!!. The weird thing is our broker figured they wouldn't sell right away due to the financial problems of Citigroup. The bonds sold in minutes. He was in shock when he called us back. They also sold for a higher price than we expected. Our broker said, "Something is going on and they know it". And now they're going to repay the federal government et al? Yeah, something is going on all right.
09:28 PM on 12/16/2009
CITI is the hub of international money laundering with help from the Fed and Goldman Sachs.

Obama is paid to not pursue it because it would just be too calamitous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joyf1
Glad I live on an island.
09:31 PM on 12/16/2009
How is the president, "paid", not to pursue?
09:50 PM on 12/16/2009
Obama is not paid to, but coerced not to pursue it.
10:19 PM on 12/16/2009
I believe you're refering to CIT, not Citigroup. Citigroup never declared bankruptcy, but CIT did.
08:45 PM on 12/16/2009
This is amazing! The only reason Citi wanted to repay the TARP now, before the end of the year, is so that they can hand out BILLIONS of dollars in end of the year bonuses. If they don't pay it back by the end of the year the government can put a stop to their bonuses. Why else do you think Wells and these other banks wanted to pay this back before Dec. 31st?
boxman15
Obama 2012
08:30 PM on 12/16/2009
Good news? Bad news? Who knows anymore?
08:29 PM on 12/16/2009
Good that will show their CEO for not showing to a meeting with the president. Who got the power now? Losers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edwoodjr
08:24 PM on 12/16/2009
Between this and the health care stuff, I'm ready to throw in the towel. It's so obvious there is SO MUCH MORE going on than we realize. Not sure we should even give a $#!+ about this or the health care "debate" as it's is all confusing and so under the table it's ridiculous.