More

Executive Pay: SEC To Crack Down On How Companies Hide Compensation

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:55 PM ET

Sec

WASHINGTON (MARCY GORDON -- AP) -- Companies will have to reveal more information about how much they pay their top executives, under expanded requirements being imposed by federal regulators amid a public outcry over compensation.

The Securities and Exchange Commission also is changing a formula that critics say allowed companies to understate how much their senior executives are paid. At issue is how public companies report stock options and stock awards in regulatory filings. Such awards often make up most of top executives' pay.

Company policies that encouraged excessive risk-taking and rewarded executives for delivering short-term profits were blamed for fueling the financial crisis. The Obama administration imposed pay curbs on banks that received federal bailout money. Since then, eight of the largest such banks have repaid, or said they will repay, their federal money largely to escape caps on executive pay.

The Federal Reserve has given the 28 biggest U.S. banks -- including Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. -- a February deadline for submitting 2010 compensation plans. The Fed also will be encouraging, though not requiring, banks to revise this year's pay plans if they are out of step with principles the Fed has proposed to limit risk.

Anger over lavish Wall Street pay has led some U.S. banks to take pre-emptive action. Goldman Sachs, for example, has said it won't give cash bonuses to 30 top executives. Instead, they'll be paid in stock that can't be cashed in for five years.

The SEC is meeting Wednesday morning at 10 a.m. EST to adopt expanded disclosure rules for compensation at all public companies. The rules include information on how a company's pay policies might encourage too much risk-taking. SEC officials have said they want the new rules to be in place by spring, when companies send annual proxy disclosures to shareholders.

"It's going to force (companies) to think about these issues a decent amount," said Ray Russo, a corporate attorney at the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind Wharton & Garrison.

Companies will have to disclose how pay is determined in departments involved in the riskiest activities -- or departments that produce a big chunk of company profits.

The new requirements were proposed by the SEC and opened to public comment in July. They build on rules the agency adopted in 2006.

"The turmoil in the markets during the past 18 months has reinforced the importance of enhancing transparency, especially with regard to activities that materially contribute to a company's risk profile," the SEC said when it floated the proposal last summer.

Under current rules, companies don't have to reveal the full value of stock options they give an executive. Instead, they must disclose in their annual proxy statements only the portion of an options award that vests that year.

The new rule will require companies to show in a summary table the estimated value of all stock-based awards on the day they are granted. The SEC's 2006 rules had relegated those totals to a separate table that investors often overlook or find hard to decipher.

An example is the case of a company that decides its CEO deserves $10 million worth of stock options, to vest in equal installments over four years. Under current rules, the company would have to include only $2.5 million -- one-fourth of the total -- in the summary table.

Also at Wednesday's meeting, the SEC will require investment advisers to submit to annual surprise exams by outside auditors -- unless they entrust their clients' money to independent third parties. This move is aimed at plugging gaps that allowed Bernard Madoff to deceive investors.

The surprise audits for investment funds that have custody of clients' money would allow independent accountants to review a fund's books and verify that the money is there. The snap audits would apply to about 9,600 investment advisers that don't use third-party custodians, out of roughly 11,000 advisers registered with the SEC.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON (MARCY GORDON -- AP) -- Companies will have to reveal more information about how much they pay their top executives, under expanded requirements being imposed by federal regulators amid a p...
WASHINGTON (MARCY GORDON -- AP) -- Companies will have to reveal more information about how much they pay their top executives, under expanded requirements being imposed by federal regulators amid a p...
Filed by Grace Kiser  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
10:56 AM on 12/18/2009
I worked for a company once that pushed all the cost of Health Insurance for the front office on to the backs of the workers in the plant.
We enjoyed sick days and free health care at their expense mush like WalMart does it's employees now.
Most of us did not know the company did this and did not stay long after the CEO boasted about how he was screwing the workers with Health Care cost at a party . It was good to hear that company was taken over a few years later.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greihing
10:13 AM on 12/18/2009
This does not go far enough.

Remove the tax exemption that allows execs to defer their yearly wages into the next year or beyond. If they make a dollar this year, they pay taxes on it this year.
04:41 PM on 12/17/2009
Americans are more pessimistic now according to a recent study today about the economy then they were in jan 2009- even before all the greenshoots BS.
hat tip to; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

The working classes have seen declining real incomes for many years – something that was hidden due to excessive bank credit. We are running deficits equal to 15% of our GDP just to keep job losses from becoming worse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
02:00 PM on 12/17/2009
OOooooo, Im scared. An SEC crack down..... No there is a do nothing phrase.
09:43 AM on 12/17/2009
Jobless claims up again
so much for that V shaped recovery...
good articles; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

Time for a 2nd jobs stimulus
10:19 AM on 12/17/2009
Shut up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CAPTAINSKIPPY
10:56 PM on 12/16/2009
A typical argument given to shareholders on measures to approve the executive compensation packages is "other firms are paying similar amounts to their executives"; Good Luck!
10:22 AM on 12/17/2009
I hate that argument. It goes beyond stup/d. You guys screwed up the whole economy, and destroyed our banking system. You stole from people and got away with it. You have no conscience. We the American people are going to destroy you and your henchmen in Washington. We don't care about party systems. We are now in survival mode and you are going to pay.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
10:10 PM on 12/16/2009
I'll believe it when I see it. They're not going to stop until there are NO loopholes, and stiff federal penalties for even simple technical violations of the rules. (And still they won't play by the rules until a couple of guys are frog-marched from their cushy offices to jail, and forced to remain there for a while ...)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinxed
starting over at 60
07:37 PM on 12/16/2009
Time for more creative bookkeeping...
06:58 PM on 12/16/2009
The SEC is a toothless teddy bear!
06:13 PM on 12/16/2009
Tax all incomes over 500,000 at 50 % over 1,000,000 at 75% over 2,000,000 at 90%.
No loopholes, taxes must be audited at least every other year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinxed
starting over at 60
07:39 PM on 12/16/2009
And PAID every year ... no more deferred tax payments ... pay as you go like 98% of Americans!
10:23 AM on 12/17/2009
It used to be 90%.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gover
04:42 PM on 12/16/2009
Every time I see the words "SEC" and "crack" and "down" in the same headline I just whisper, "Bulls***" to myself.

The only headline with those three words in it I would probably not feel this way about would be, "SEC Down With Smoking Crack."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rallis
Virtue is Harmony
02:51 PM on 12/16/2009
announced 2 days ago by greek p.m. George Papandreou, 90% tax on bank bonuses!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinxed
starting over at 60
07:40 PM on 12/16/2009
Now there's some serious leaders!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DiogenesOfAlaska
Mitt Romney for president - of the Cayman islands!
02:33 PM on 12/16/2009
That should be easy. Didn't those clowns in the lobby arena and in the compensation consultancies claim that there's a marketplace for talent?

It's kinda like saying that there's a marketplace for the most productive use of the wealth of the ultrarich hidden in swiss bank accounts for tax evasion purposes.

Just in case you need an explanation of this joke: it's not just tax evasion, it is quite nonsensical to speak of 'capital chasing return' when nobody knows where the heck the capital is sitting. That's because return opportunities are just as private as $ figures on bank accounts.
01:53 PM on 12/16/2009
This will ratchet up the salary competition. Enough is never enough, it's all about getting more than the other guy.. No connection between pay and performance.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
01:32 PM on 12/16/2009
Didn’t CEO pay go thru the roof when the rates became public? Do we really think this will help anything?