iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mexico City Approves Gay Marriage

E. EDUARDO CASTILLO   12/21/09 07:41 PM ET   AP

Mexico Gay Pride

MEXICO CITY — Mexico City lawmakers on Monday made the city the first in Latin America to legalize same-sex marriage, a change that will give homosexual couples more rights, including allowing them to adopt children.

The bill passed the capital's local assembly 39-20 to the cheers of supporters who yelled: "Yes, we could! Yes, we could!"

Leftist Mayor Marcelo Ebrard of the Democratic Revolution Party was widely expected to sign the measure into law.

Mexico City's left-led assembly has made several decisions unpopular elsewhere in this deeply Roman Catholic country, including legalizing abortion in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. That decision sparked a backlash, with the majority of Mexico's other 32 states enacting legislation declaring life begins at conception.

The conservative Nation Action Party of President Felipe Calderon has vowed to challenge the gay marriage law in the courts. However, homosexuality is increasingly accepted in Mexico, with gay couples openly holding hands in parts of the capital and the annual gay pride parade drawing tens of thousands.

The bill calls for changing the definition of marriage in the city's civil code. Marriage is currently defined as the union of a man and a woman. The new definition will be "the free uniting of two people."

The change would allow same-sex couples to adopt children, apply for bank loans together, inherit wealth and be included in the insurance policies of their spouse, rights they were denied under civil unions allowed in the city.

"We are so happy," said Temistocles Villanueva, a 23-year-old film student who celebrated by passionately kissing his boyfriend outside the city's assembly.

Only seven countries allow gay marriages: Canada, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium. U.S. states that permit same-sex marriage are Iowa, Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticut and New Hampshire.

Argentina's capital became the first Latin American city to legalize same-sex civil unions in 2002 for gay and lesbian couples. Four other Argentine cities later did the same, and as did Mexico City in 2007 and some Mexican and Brazilian states. Uruguay alone has legalized civil unions nationwide.

Buenos Aires lawmakers introduced a bill for legalizing gay marriage in the national Congress in October but it has stalled without a vote, and officials in the South American city have blocked same-sex wedding because of conflicting judicial rulings.

Many people in Mexico and elsewhere in Latin America remain opposed to gay marriage, and the dominant Roman Catholic Church has announced its opposition.

"They have given Mexicans the most bitter Christmas," said Armando Martinez, the president of the College of Catholic Attorneys. "They are permitting adoption (by gay couples) and in one stroke of the pen have erased the term 'mother' and 'father.'"

City lawmaker Victor Romo, a member of the mayor's leftist party, called it a historic day.

"For centuries unjust laws banned marriage between blacks and whites or Indians and Europeans," he said. "Today all barriers have disappeared."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

MEXICO CITY — Mexico City lawmakers on Monday made the city the first in Latin America to legalize same-sex marriage, a change that will give homosexual couples more rights, including allowing t...
MEXICO CITY — Mexico City lawmakers on Monday made the city the first in Latin America to legalize same-sex marriage, a change that will give homosexual couples more rights, including allowing t...
Filed by Adam Taylor  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 626
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
01:29 AM on 01/03/2010
Yeah! Congrats Mexico City!
02:03 PM on 12/23/2009
I have volunteered in numerous orphanages in Mexico. I have seen children fighting eachother over basic necessities, food, clothing, water. I have seen the violence which is visited upon the more vulnerable children by the others who are stronger, bigger, etc, simply born out of the brutal environment they exist in. I've seen children who have languished for years without treatment for medical conditions. The vast, vast majority of children are never adopted. If the child has a medical condition, or is over the age of 6, the chances of them being adopted is close to 0%.

Most of these orphanages are run by the Catholic Church. Though they are vastly understaffed, overcrowded, and underfunded, the priests and nuns who run them are doing the best they can in that situation, themselves living in abject poverty so they can at least try and help these children in SOME way. Because as brutal as orphanage life can be, it's better than being a street urchin, being sold into prostitution or forced into drug running.

That the very people who run these orphanages, who dedicate their lives and give up any semblance of a comfortable life for these children, can then be so brainwashed by their religion that they honestly believe children being adopted by a gay couple is WORSE than them languishing in these orphanages (and then usually ending up on the street when they turn 18) is just unbelievable to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sprtakis69
Shouldn't all people be entitled to Equal rights?
02:07 AM on 12/25/2009
You said a mouth full sister! Very good post!

Fanned!
10:57 AM on 12/23/2009
Another group of lawmakers, like Washington D.C., have legalized same sex marriage, despite this not being an issue of equality, despite being on the wrong side of morality, and despite ignoring the rights of children. Same sex marriage laws have not passed due to the rightness of "a cause," but on the censorship of the citizenry by legislators who banned ballot initiatives and by judicial fiats that ignored precedents.

And what has surprised me for some time now is something that activists have apparently not considered in their rush to push for special rights and special benefits for homosexuals--that these special rights which have been arbitrarily given may someday also be arbitrarily taken away, unlike unalienable rights.
06:01 PM on 12/26/2009
What is your problem with the legislature doing its job? I'm not following you on the "wrong side of morality" jive. In order for something to not be moral, it has to based in rationality, not your personal likes and dislikes. Equality IS moral, and dispite your wicked insistance on gay people not being human...we ARE. Why do you right-wingers always get upset when the government does its functions? Courts are supposed to rule in favor of justice. Legislatures are supposed to be more reasonable and understanding of the principles of justice and equality than the general populace is. There is NOTHING wrong with the march of justice. If you don't like the future, check out.
10:38 AM on 12/27/2009
I am sorry but maybe I did not explain myself well enough, so I will try to clear some things up. I agree that equality is moral. No disagreement there. I do think gay people are human. Actually, I think we all have transcedental value and should all be treated with respect and kindness. I apologize if I have been lacking in showing this.

I believe courts are to interpret existing laws based on precedent and that all people should be treated equally under the law (though we have not reached this point.) However, I do not agree that the courts must recognize every citizen's desire as a right.

Concerning legislatures, these members are elected by the general populace so I am not sure why you feel that they are supposed to be more reasonable and understanding in principle than the general populace (though I wish they always were.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
che1111
12:25 AM on 12/23/2009
Yay! For Mexico!!!!! "erased the term 'mother' and 'father'" --- huh???? No, they have made father and father and mother and mother possible, not erased anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sprtakis69
Shouldn't all people be entitled to Equal rights?
01:03 AM on 12/23/2009
And hopefully the US, well the remaining holdouts, will follow in their footsteps sooner than later!!!
12:20 AM on 12/23/2009
Once upon a time, people came to the US to seek rights, liberty and freedom from religious persecution.

Will people soon be leaving the US to seek rights, liberty and freedom from religious persecution?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sprtakis69
Shouldn't all people be entitled to Equal rights?
01:05 AM on 12/23/2009
Isn't that the truth? We've come full circle - once again the religious are persecuting others!
photo
deepintheheartoftejas
Middle o/t Road = Yellow stripes & dead armadillos
12:01 AM on 12/23/2009
The capitol city of Mexico, and the capitol city of the US have approved equal rights. It's time for the rest of each nation to follow suit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sprtakis69
Shouldn't all people be entitled to Equal rights?
01:06 AM on 12/23/2009
Amen! I truly believe that will be the case. Things happen for a reason!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sprtakis69
Shouldn't all people be entitled to Equal rights?
09:26 PM on 12/22/2009
Yes! State by state, country by country, districts and cities, we're getting there, slowly, but surely!!!

Marriage equality is coming!

Congratulations to Mexico City!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBisceglia
03:46 PM on 12/22/2009
If only we could get back the 8 years of potential progress that were hijacked by the BUSH-CHENEY corporation; we could be WITH the rest of the world instead of trailing behind like the arrogant kid who refuses to listen and learn in class, then wonders why they are left behind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gaypower2
01:58 PM on 12/22/2009
Viva Mexico!
01:22 PM on 12/22/2009
Marriage is not a right. The government can deny marriage licenses to heterosexual couples who admit they are only marrying to gain citizenship and a host of other reasons. You have a 5th amendment right not to incriminate yourself. That is a right and it can't be denied by the government regardless of what you did. Marriage is not a right and unless homosexuals can prove they have to engage in homosexual acts and want to be described as the homosexual guy (for those that attempt to compare their sexual orientation to race) they are going to have a hard time getting the courts to change the laws without opening pandora's box.

God luck!
01:54 PM on 12/22/2009
You can quote any U.S. amendment and say they are rights while marriage is not. But at one point, women didn't have the right to vote. It was added. All the amendments were added. And with the way the tide is flowing in the States, equality for everyone regardless of sexual orientation will be passed into law. They already passed the Matthew Shephard Act in October this year.

And isn't this article about gay marriage in Mexico? Why are you citing the U.S. constitution?
09:28 PM on 12/22/2009
Don't mind him. He's still upset that gay people don't approve of him marrying his sister
photo
StevenWells
Objects in the avatar are larger than they appear
02:20 PM on 12/22/2009
"Marriage is not a right"

- Heard it before; far from definitive. The CA Supreme Court found it was, indeed, a right (one they subsequently allowed overruled at the whim of voters). But you wanna talk privilege? Seems to me it wasn't all that long ago that any attempts at gay rights legislation was decried by the opposition as "special privileges." If reserving "marriage" only to opposite-sex couples isn't a special privilege, there's no such thing.

"unless homosexuals can prove they have to engage in homosexual acts...they are going to have a hard time getting the courts to change the laws"

- Really can't imagine where you get this. Have heterosexual couples proved - and are they required to - that they have to engage in heterosexual acts?

"pandora's box"

- Trying to slip that slippery slope in again, huh?
10:44 PM on 12/22/2009
What is a heterosexual act? As long as you're with a person of a different sex, you're engaging in a heterosexual act. Do you guys know what hetero means?
10:56 AM on 12/22/2009
Mexico City has joined the civilized world! Unlike other countries!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DD1Prime
08:45 AM on 12/22/2009
Will Rio be next?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:26 AM on 12/22/2009
Has anyone else noticed how, as time passes, the pages at HP fill up with more meaningless crap. Twitter and twatter and crapper and bing and bong on and on and on...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DD1Prime
08:49 AM on 12/22/2009
Ever have your right to marry put to a vote? No? Why complain when others who suffer that indignity have a moment of respite?
photo
StevenWells
Objects in the avatar are larger than they appear
09:33 AM on 12/22/2009
Twitter? Sorry, I'm behind the technological curve.

Twatter? Not in my house.

Crapper? Hey, everyone needs a break from time to time.

Bing? Well, I currently live in the town where he grew up.

Bong? Not for many years now.

On and on...and upward and upward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipB
04:05 AM on 12/22/2009
Mi gran estima a México que ha honorado la dignidad y los derechos de todos sus ciudadanos
I have great esteem for Mexico who honors the dignity and rights of all their citizens.
This is a day of celebration. Thank you, Mexico!
02:26 AM on 12/22/2009
glad to be mexican..............once again