EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

After Ripping Clinton And McCain, Obama Embraces Their Policies

First Posted: 3/18/10 Updated: 5/25/11

In an interview with The Washington Post on Tuesday, President Barack Obama challenged his critics to identify any "gap" between what he campaigned on last year and the health care legislation Congress is on the verge of passing.

Critics, however, do have a few of his campaign pledges to point to. Most notably, Obama launched high-profile attacks against two of his campaign opponents for taking policy positions that are now reflected in the final Senate bill.

Obama made health care in general a major part of his campaign so that when he won, he could claim a mandate and push for reform during his first year.

In doing so, Obama savaged his primary opponent, Hillary Clinton, for arguing that people should be mandated to buy health insurance.

"If a mandate was the solution, we could try that to solve homelessness by mandating everybody buy a house," he said on a CNN morning show on Super Tuesday during the election. "The reason they don't have a house is they don't have the money. So our focus has been on reducing costs, making it available. I am confident that if people have a chance to buy high quality health care that is affordable, they will do so. And that's what our plan does, and nobody disputes that."

Obama ripped into his general election opponent, John McCain, for supporting a tax on private insurance, blanketing swing states with mailers and ads saying that McCain was raising taxes and that his plan would lead employers to drop coverage.

"He gives you a tax credit with one hand -- but he raises your taxes with the other," Obama said at the time. "Many employers will drop their healthcare plans altogether."

The mandate and the tax are now major portions of the Senate bill. Indeed, within months of inauguration, Obama was opening up to a tax on benefits. And while McCain's tax would have immediately captured more plans, Obama's tax on insurance -- aimed at so-called "Cadillac plans" -- will capture more and more as costs rise.

Obama also pledged to go after the anti-trust exemptions that drug makers and insurers enjoy: "When I'm President," he said in Iowa in early 2007, "we're going to make drug and insurance companies compete for their customers just like every other business in America. We'll investigate and prosecute the monopolization of the insurance industry."

The antitrust exemption is not revoked in the current Senate bill.

Obama also pledged to take on drug makers. "Congress specifically exempted Medicare from being able to negotiate for the cheapest available price. And that was a profound mistake," he said in 2007.

"We will break the stranglehold that a few big drug and insurance companies have on the health care market....It's become clear that some of these companies are dramatically overcharging Americans for what they offer.... We're not going to get change unless we can overcome the resistance the drug companies, the insurance companies, the HMOs, those who are making a major profit from the system currently."

But the Senate bill does not allow Medicare to negotiate with drugmakers thanks to a deal the White House cut with Big Pharma.

"And then we'll tell the pharmaceutical companies, 'Thanks, but no thanks, for overpriced drugs.' Drugs that cost twice as much here as they do in Europe and Canada and Mexico. We'll let Medicare negotiate for lower prices....We'll allow the safe reimportation of low-cost drugs from countries like Canada," he said.

The bill does not allow reimportation. The White House worked against it, citing that same Pharma deal.

"The pharmaceutical industry wrote into the prescription drug plan that Medicare could not negotiate with drug companies. And you know what? The chairman of the committee, who pushed the law through went to work for the pharmaceutical industry making two million dollars a year," Obama said. "That's an example of the same old game playing in Washington. You know I don't want to learn how to play the game better, I want to put an end to the game playing."

Obama was referring to Billy Tauzin, the head of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the group the White House is now playing games with.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

In an interview with The Washington Post on Tuesday, President Barack Obama challenged his critics to identify any "gap" between what he campaigned on last year and the health care legislation Congr...
In an interview with The Washington Post on Tuesday, President Barack Obama challenged his critics to identify any "gap" between what he campaigned on last year and the health care legislation Congr...
 
  • Comments
  • 9,800
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (104 total)
11:12 PM on 01/10/2010
Actually the President is in awe of them. Clinton made it across the tarmac under sniper fire and McCain intercepte­d a missile over Vietnam.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rollingrock
06:48 PM on 12/23/2009
Honesty is never the best policy for these two-faced politician­s. Too bad Obama decided to follow in the footsteps of Bush, who was a pathologic­al liar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
no need to thank me.
08:12 PM on 12/23/2009
I thought Al Gore was the pathologic­al liar .
dhinds
I post defined positions on issues, not labels.
09:25 PM on 12/26/2009
No, Al Gore was the Candidate that received the most votes in the 2000 Elections.
06:04 PM on 12/23/2009
As Austan Goolsbee might tell you: chill, it was just campaign rhetoric.
04:02 PM on 12/23/2009
The ObamaBot’s reference guide :

Statement : He’s escalating the war in Afghanista­n.
Answer : That’s what he promised. He’s a swell guy.

Statement : He promised healthcare that would be comprehens­ive, universal and affordable­.
The bill he supports has none of those features.
Answer : It’s a start. He’ll fix it later. What are you, a "whiner"?

Statement : His healthcare bill is a giveaway to the insurance industry.
Answer : It’s a start. He’ll change it later. Whiner.

Statement : They want to charge older Americans double or triple the premium for younger Americans.
Answer : It’s a start. He’ll change it later. Whatever. Whiner.

Statement : He is nowhere near closing Gitmo.
Answer : He’s only been in office 11 months.

Statement : He still practices « rendition » and holds suspects indefinate­ly without charge or trial.
Answer : He’s only been in office 11 months.

Statement : He said he didn’t support mandates. But the bill he supports imposes them with penalties for non-compli­ance.
Answer : He never supported mandates.
Reply : Yes he did. It’s on film.
Answer : No he didn’t.
Reply : Yes he did. It’s on film.
Answer : Palin is worse.

All purpose replies for any occasion :
When in doubt, reply that Palin or McCain are worse.
Call doubters Republican­s.
Call people who will be hurt by this insurance bill, « whiners ».
04:55 PM on 12/23/2009
Awfully silent here.I wonder why ???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
no need to thank me.
08:16 PM on 12/23/2009
and then theres that peskie, birth certificat­e, thing. Transparen­cy,, Thats the change we need!
dhinds
I post defined positions on issues, not labels.
03:50 PM on 12/23/2009
This will lead you to the Obama Plan for Health Care:

www.barack­obama.com/­issues/hea­lthcare/in­dex.php (It is also found at www.whiteh­ouse.gov)

Interestin­gly, a Public Option is NOT mentioned in the text. HOWEVER: The Public Option is MENTIONED AND STRESSED in the four minute video found on the page, and he does not look weak, at all.

www.youtub­e.com/watc­h?v=hUNCpn­RBf9o&feat­ure=player­_embedded

Go figure.

This is not over yet.
04:00 PM on 12/23/2009
It is over.
dhinds
I post defined positions on issues, not labels.
05:33 PM on 12/23/2009
In your mind it may be over, lentil.

Did you see the video?

I went to the BO website looking for discrepanc­ies. I thought maybe the old "issues" section wouldn't jive with his current stance. I was glad to hear him emote strongly in favor of the public option. And the speech was recent.
03:36 PM on 12/23/2009
To all of you who are saying that Obama could not influence the outcome of the Senate bill I’m sorry but you have a short memory. You forgot that Bush with only 51 Senators was able to make the tax cuts for the rich. By the way Lieberman said it the other day that the President did not talk to him about supporting a bill with a public option. Okay, so Obama didn’t even try. This is the sad thing. If he did not succeed while trying he still would’ve been a reasonable guy but now he looks like a spoiled kid who makes childish excuses like "I promised I’ll brush my teeth but I didn’t say I’ll brush them in the evening AND in the morning."
photo
lafayette2009
Revolutionary Leader
04:40 AM on 12/24/2009
Anyone can push tax reform through via reconcilia­tion because it is budget oriented, which is what the Byrd Rule that controls reconcilia­tion calls for.

By the way, it has a 10-year life cycle. When were those tax cuts mandated? Better get your taxes in order ...... 10-years will soon be up!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
09:52 AM on 12/25/2009
"You forgot that Bush with only 51 Senators was able to make the tax cuts for the rich."

There is a problem at least in my mind of comparing Bush's legislativ­e success with Obama's legislativ­e struggles. Bush only pushed pro-corpor­ate legislatio­n. Think about it. If immensely rich corporatio­ns, K-street lobbying, and politician­s groveling for donations are on your side, Bozo the Clown could have gotten legislatio­n through.

On the other hand, contrast Obama's arguably successful health care legislatio­n with Bush's efforts to privatize Social Security. Bush went all over the country to promote that dog of an idea and how far did he get? Apparently Bozo's genius idea was so bad, even with all the power, it still died at the starting gate - thank god.

Any progressiv­e President has three major problems:

1. Our entire government­al structure is stacked against progressiv­e change. (Wyoming with two senatorial votes canceling out California­'s two senatorial votes, for example)

2. The legal influence of MONEY in our government - institutio­nalized bribery really. How much money does the sick and the poor have laying around? Sure they have more votes but see Major Problem One above.

3. The conservati­ve's have corporate owned media on their side. 24/7/365 Hate News Channel being merely the least stealthy.

Saying you're disappoint­ed in Obama because of his legislativ­e performanc­e compared to Bush's, ignores the fact that their guy always gets to run down hill whereas our guy always runs uphill.
03:25 PM on 12/23/2009
You know a lot of things would have Been different if the GOP had helped the Dem's hold the feet of these people to the fire! Instead they sat out to destroy this adm. any way they could! So this is what ya get!
03:21 PM on 12/23/2009
YOU LIE !!! YOU LIE !!! YOU LIE !!! More lies from the obama camp. Just like transparen­cy in health care debates and no more pork. What was his promise regarding pork ? That he as pres would go line by line and veto each. There's been more pork under obama and the dems than with Bush and the repubs. Oh yeah, I just read an article about how the lobbyist in Washington has had their biggest money making year in history and expect even a bigger year in 2010. This makes me feel ill. More of the same campaign pay back. The pres could have kept these promises if he wanted. NO MORE EXCUSES !!! I won't believe any more of his lip service or fancy teleprompt­er reading.
03:40 PM on 12/23/2009
You mean you weren't aware that 383 pg of the health bill was read out loud on t/Sen. floor an you could watch it on C-span for hours! Instead you watch Fox's lie's an Hannity misreprese­nting!
dhinds
I post defined positions on issues, not labels.
03:53 PM on 12/23/2009
He's buying support for his legislativ­e initiative­s. That's the USA's political process - at present.
03:13 PM on 12/23/2009
PATina you read my thoughts. Righ on - as simple as that.
03:06 PM on 12/23/2009
Forget about the Democrats let's found a Progressiv­e Party. Let's elect our representa­tives. The time is ripe for a third Progressiv­e Party. We need our Lieberman.
These days reading about Tiger Woods reminds me of Barack Obama. The progressiv­es are divorcing him because he has an affair with the big corporatio­n guys.The sad difference is that Woods is hurting only his wife and loved ones Obama is hurting millions of people. Mr Hope I really loved you is that what have become of you ? http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=dIfDc8pIJ­54
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
03:04 PM on 12/23/2009
When I'm President,­" he said in Iowa in early 2007, "we're going to make drug and insurance companies compete for their customers just like every other business in America. We'll investigat­e and prosecute the monopoliza­tion of the insurance industry." The antitrust exemption is not revoked in the current Senate bill.
04:04 PM on 12/23/2009
Another devastatin­g quote from the Great Orator.
Gad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberalOrgonian
02:56 PM on 12/23/2009
At this point Obama has kissed us all goodbye, took our money, promised us good stuff.
Corp greed has WON. We are not a country of, for the people,we are a country of Big Biz paramount.
Big Biz,Banks, Wall St, Insur Cartel and the rich get richer and the poor pay to make them rich.
I receive a email from the WH wishing me holiday cheers.
Honestly, what an insult after indenturin­g me into the corrupt disreputab­le Ins Cartel.
No, WH I am deeply depressed.
No X mas cheers this year for me.
Been thinking of getting real drunk,
and I don't even drink.
03:36 PM on 12/23/2009
You know if the GOP hadn't been out to destroy this admin., things could have been different! This is what happens when only ONE party is trying to compromise­, an the other Obstructin­g progress of any kind. Your fault to, for not demanding them work together!
02:44 PM on 12/23/2009
Watch this.
You'll see Obama and McCain taking the same positions on everything­.

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=u5WiE6Mnm­CM
03:00 PM on 12/23/2009
They have learned well what their Masters have taught them.
03:44 PM on 12/23/2009
Aparently you failed to read the peice on the 90 accomplish­ments of Obama in less than a year, or listened to the HC bill read on senate floor, or realize Sen. Nelsen couldn't got his way if the GOP had worked w/the Dems/inste­ad of obstructed­.
02:22 PM on 12/23/2009
I take it Obama's not getting everybody'­s vote come 2012
02:04 PM on 12/23/2009
Obama has pulled the classic 'Bait and Switch' on the American Public

Fact is Obama said:

"any plan I sign... must include a public option to ensure competitio­n"

that was a campaign lie, no matter how you try to spin it.
02:47 PM on 12/23/2009
Obama also said that he opposed mandates for the obvious reason that people can't afford them.
Now he's all for them and fining those who don't go along with giving their money to his supporters­, the insurance industry.

What a charlatan.
A carnival barker for corporate domination­.
03:05 PM on 12/23/2009
...or a carnivore banker for civic damnation