iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

New Restrictions Mean Airport Lines

DAVID KOENIG   12/28/09 06:19 PM ET   AP

Airport Lines

DALLAS — In-flight security rules have been eased after a two-day clampdown, airline officials familiar with the matter said Monday.

At the captain's discretion, passengers can once again have blankets and other items on their laps or move about the cabin during the tail end of flight. In-flight entertainment restrictions have also been lifted.

The airline officials spoke on condition of anonymity because federal safety officials had not publicly announced the changes.

Security rules were relaxed in the last 24 hours, one official said.

Tougher airline security measures were imposed Friday after a man flying from Nigeria to Amsterdam then to the U.S. on a Northwest Airlines flight tried to ignite an explosive as the plane prepared to land in Detroit. On Sunday, police met another Amsterdam-to-Detroit flight after the crew reported a "verbally disruptive passenger." A law enforcement official said the man posed no security risk to the plane.

Government officials have refused to discuss what restrictions had been put into place, but in many airports lines were longer and security personnel were extra diligent.

Travelers on incoming international flights said that during the final hour, attendants removed blankets, banned opening overhead bins, and told passengers to stay in their seats with their hands in plain sight.

In Philadelphia, sisters Leslie and Lilliam Bernal said security was much tighter as they returned from a wedding in the Dominican Republic than it had been in September, when they made the same trip.

Leslie, 26, of Keasby, N.J., said security screeners in Santo Domingo asked her to lift her long hair so they could look at her back.

"I don't mind at all," she said. "I'd rather them do what they have to do."

Authorities introduced a second layer of security at Pearson International Airport in Toronto. On Monday morning, every U.S.-bound passenger was subjected to a pat down and their luggage was inspected by hand. It took about three hours for travelers to get through the checks.

On one Air Canada flight from Toronto to New York's La Guardia Airport the crew told passengers before departure that in addition to remaining in their seats for the duration of one-hour flight, they were not allowed to use any electronic devices – even iPods – or their own headphones. The crew also told passengers that they would not be able to access their personal belongings because of the "enhanced security procedures."

At Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, television screens were tuned to the Atlanta Falcons football game, and some passengers were only faintly aware of Friday's incident in Detroit.

Jeff Fox, of Alpharetta, Ga., who was returning with his family from Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. after a weeklong cruise, said he will tolerate new restrictions if officials think they will keep passengers safer.

"I'm one of those who trusts that they're trying to do the right thing, even if it is a pain," he said.

The incident Friday, however, continued to raise questions about security, said Jack Riepe, a spokesman for the Association of Corporate Travel Executives.

Riepe said corporate travel managers want to know how Friday's suspect reached Detroit even though he was on a watch list maintained by counterterrorism experts. A government official said the suspect's father raised concerns about him to U.S. officials several weeks ago, but the father's information about his son's possible ties to fundamentalist Islamic groups was too vague to act upon.

U.S. airlines have been appealing to federal officials to make restrictions effective but palatable to passengers.

They remember that passengers accepted tough new security measures immediately after the 2001 terror attacks, which grounded all flights for several days, but that support for the restrictions waned.

___

AP writers Shannon McCaffrey in Atlanta, Karen Hawkins in Chicago, Kathy Matheson in Philadelphia, Matt Lee in Washington, Dan Strumpf in New York and John Heilprin in Toronto, contributed to this report. Koenig reported from Dallas.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

DALLAS — In-flight security rules have been eased after a two-day clampdown, airline officials familiar with the matter said Monday. At the captain's discretion, passengers can once again have ...
DALLAS — In-flight security rules have been eased after a two-day clampdown, airline officials familiar with the matter said Monday. At the captain's discretion, passengers can once again have ...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,287
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (28 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PetrBuben
controlled demolition, irrefutable evidence
02:42 AM on 12/29/2009
the immediate cause of the last Detroit airplane bombing was a UAV remote military airplane strike in Yemen.
these intensifying remote airplane bombings are a sure way to "ask for war, for terrorism"

the larger cause of terrorism are occupation, colonization aggression wars drive of Bush republican military complex, which started in 1991, resulted in genocide in Iraq during Iraq and Afghanistan occupation wars after 9/11 inside operation pretext for war.

With Obama, nothing has changed, the old forces of war are still in place. Danger continues.
08:09 PM on 12/28/2009
After the shoe bombing try, they made us take our shoes off so they could xray them. This guy tried to explode his underpants. Using government logic they tell us we can't pee the last hour of our flight.
08:07 PM on 12/28/2009
My own experience traveling within the US has been quite okay and well served, if not as merry as those VIP people might get. I personally think that the security inspections prior to and during the flight are pivotal in order to keep the peace of mind among the passenegers who, obviously, were tend to be rather sensitive. One couldn't afford to get disturbed by even the slightest incident that would cause damage or discomfort, never mind the life of all passengers!
With that in mind, I would always remind myself to be prepared for getting less than perfect treatments from security officers or flight attendants in the spirit of helping each other for enhancing our own security during our traveling. Truth be told, I am always in awe whenever I see the huge crowds in big airport terminals like in LA, NY, DC and others and feel tremendous grateful for those relentless efforts by the security to provide safe and comfortable journeys for me and others. If I have to sacrifice my own little privacy and physical comfort zone in exchange for my security during hours of flight, then I will gladly do it.
06:19 AM on 12/29/2009
Security inspections prior to and during the flight are designed to keep you frightened and pliable, not safe.
08:07 PM on 12/28/2009
For those who can,drive to Mexico or Canada; then, get on your International flight.
Give Rail a strong consideration for domestic travel.
The hassle and inconvenience of Air Travel in this country will only get worse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:53 PM on 12/28/2009
Let's just be rid of men who think like this: http://human-writes.net/images/bombpants.jpg
07:39 PM on 12/28/2009
Might I suggest a special security line for those inclined to wearing Fruit of The Boom underwear?

Just a thought.
07:37 PM on 12/28/2009
oh big deal. my parents went through a helluva lot worse during world war two. honestly, sometimes my generation acts like such an a bunch of entitled whingers. heaven forfend we should ever be asked to ration, or participate in neighborhood blackouts or collect scrap metal or make bandages or be drafted. my parents gave up their honeymoon for chrissakes.

so you wait long enough in a line to read an entire novel by george eliot. how horrible: you may have to read to entertain yourself. or talk to someone. an airport is time and space outside of any context. it's cool. get into how glamorous your life is. that will carry you through just about anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isee61
~Marine Mom~ and proud of it!
07:43 PM on 12/28/2009
I go to the airport to get from one place to another period. I don't go there to socialize, meet people or talk to them either. If I want to be social, I'll go to a bar or something.

When you get on a train, bus, cab, cruise ship you don't have to be violated like this.

Hey but if you want to, go for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jayann
07:51 PM on 12/28/2009
While I get your point about hardships worse than airport security lines, I think the issue is that these ridiculous "safety measures" don't keep us safe. The TSA chases its tail by implementing new measures that make no flight safer, no public more protected. They are simply an exercise in silliness that we pay billions for each year. This guy from Yemen should have tripped every security switch - he didn't despite OBVIOUS concerns. So, in over-reaction to their failure, they will now make double triple sure that my 80 year old father with a titanium knee will be subjected to sheer craziness in terms of x-rays, pat downs, body scans, etc. It makes no sense and there seems to be no end to it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pinhead71
09:30 PM on 12/28/2009
you just gave me an idea we could kill two birds with one stone (no pun intended) if they have x-rays and body scans etc. at the air port maybe they could keep a doctor on hand so they might screen for cases of cancer and notify the traveler so they could follow up with their doctor. Imagine how many lives that might save...WAIT!! i'm sorry that would be to much gov't intrusion in to our lives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:37 PM on 12/28/2009
They imposed a rule of no blankets? How in the world does this equal security?
07:29 PM on 12/28/2009
Summer before last I flew from Hong Kong to San Francisco then on to Denver. I assumed that because I had been in a muslum country my bags were opened and checked for explosives in San Francisco not in Hong Kong. By the time I was checked in SF it was too late. If I was a terrorist I'd have done something beefore then. This inspection was about thirteen hours too late to do any good. Whoever makes these policies aren't too swift, nor playing with a full deck but they must have clout for some reason.
07:40 PM on 12/28/2009
yeah. i don't get why the protocol isn't standard at all airports everywhere.

most rigid and thorough check i ever went through was in portland oregon, on a flight to san francisco. to this day i don't get it.
07:27 PM on 12/28/2009
Again, the "measures" that were implemented two days ago had next to nothing to do with real "security", and everything to do with a cynical effort at making the traveling public "feel" more "secure" (i.e the more uncomfortable you are, the more "safe" you must be). The measures (eg. being required to sit, and not use the lavatory for the last hour of a flight; not reading anything; keeping one's hands in plain view at all times; turning off the in-flight videos) were all arbitrary, made in haste, and bore no resemblance to rational security enhancement. Everybody (starting with the airlines) figured it out and objected, and the TSA quietly retreated. The TSA does not make you "safe"; it was created by government to make you "feel safe".
07:44 PM on 12/28/2009
Agree. We are being governed by a bunch of slick salespersons. Form always wins over substance. Instead of making 2 year old children sit without their books or toys for an hour, and plan their potty breaks, why don't we make some compromise to this extreme political correctness we are using?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
07:24 PM on 12/28/2009
I just saw a bit on the news about how flight attendants are going to have to take National Security Training. Once again, U.S. National Security rests not on Intel Analysts, FBI Agents or Homeland Security officials......But on U.S. Airline Flight Attendants!!! Who I might add, are still working under a 40% pay cut. Absolutely Shameful. Flight attendants jobs are now just as hazardous as any military soldier's job in a battlefield area. Where is the honouring? Where is the respect, the thank you's. Where is the hazardous duty pay or even a bonus?
07:29 PM on 12/28/2009
Never mind that chit, where's my pillow?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isee61
~Marine Mom~ and proud of it!
07:20 PM on 12/28/2009
Now that we have no choice but to have a stranger touch you, and call it safety check.

That still doesn't stop someone to put explosive down their underwear or in a body cavity and destroy themselves 1 hour and 10 minutes before a plane lands.

Some idiot gets on a plane out of the country and get into the airplane from another country and we americans get padded down and treated like potential terrorist. What a freaking joke.

This whole TSA is a joke. It does gives jobs to some american people, but make us safer by doing all this other crap, you all are kidding yourself.

If I don't have to get on a plane I won't, I don't want to be violated by strangers just to get to Kansas to see family.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jayann
03:32 PM on 12/29/2009
Absolutely totally agree. There has to be some kind of security measures that meshes common sense with respect. Right now these two concepts (esp. the common sense part) do not exist when we talk about airport security. It has been a complete mess since 9/11. Until the general traveling public protests loudly over these "measures" (that are nothing but smoke and mirrors to keep the lemmings in line and buying into the need for them) it will only get worse. Soon we'll have to get to the airport a day before the flight, have blood work done along with an MRI and CAT scan (to make sure that we're not carrying anything inside of ourselves) and the whole thing will not be covered by your health insurance, thus keeping the insurance exec's in their mansions with their private jets, but I digress.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
popart
retired school teacher
07:06 PM on 12/28/2009
why can't people who are obviously not terrorist have an ID that is impossible to fake that would allow them at least to board a plane without the hassle....speed up the process....a 92 year old american indian former school marm and grandmother from Oklahoma in sensible shoes and a walker with an ID confirming her background should not have to be treated as a possible terrorist.

I already have a top secret clearance from the Military from when i was in the service...how hard would it be to check me out and give me an ID that would allow me to board a planer with no hassle? millionsof americans could have background checks and receive ID to fly wihtout hassle....it might not be impossible for the bad guys to get an ID but it could be made pretty difficult...
libertyanne
Red-haired Freedom lover
11:18 AM on 12/29/2009
Why? Because I'm sure a lot of us are concerned about the Real ID card and what it has in
its magnetic strip. And if I can be tracked by the government without my knowledge several feet away others can duplicate the technology and do it as well.
Special traveler's ID's have been talked about and may be available. But "bad guys" get around every restriction foisted on us and only the law-abiding suffer.
07:04 PM on 12/28/2009
Conditions are right for growth of conservative-related illnesses.
yappnmutt
humping legs for liberty
07:00 PM on 12/28/2009
whew, that was close. i like to spend twenty minutes in the library doing crossword puzzles to relax my muscles enogh to relieve myself properly and fully.

how am i suppose to relax with a time limit imposed on my bodily functions.

i could be branded the tu. rd turrist with the methane bo. mb